Still in nappies.

[The Colonel]

The latter part is rubbish - Admin went for the real trouble maker (and it was McMum).

You are talking a load of lying nonsense as usual. If admin got rid of anyone, it was Thread Monitor (and even that is speculation). McMum’s last post was on (or about) October 19th, when she stated that she would only post again if there was something specific to answer, and that she would not be replying to you again. Thread Monitor’s posts continued until October 30th and then ended abruptly. If you were so sure that admin had banned McMum, why did you continue to call all guests, who criticised you, McMum. It all goes to show that you are lying yet again, and that you are a pathological liar.

Yet again you claim that McMum was the real troublemaker, but you have still not come up with one iota of viable evidence to back up your assertion. Most posters on that thread (and this) believe that YOU were the real troublemaker, and there is a lot of evidence that they were correct about you, i.e. libelling, lying, making invented accusations without evidence, posting false McMum posts, trying to use false McMum posts as evidence when you knew that they were false, claiming that McMum was a proven MSbP sufferer who forced her son to wear nappies without any medical need, claiming that McMum had been jailed, claiming that McMum’s son had been taken into care, claiming that McMum didn’t have a son (thus contradicting yourself), shall I go on?

McMum is a troll.

Trolls are McMum.

McMum = Troll

Troll = McMum

You are a troll. So you are McMum.

So slow.

[Rebman]

True to form I see. When you can’t justify your claims, you resort to petty insults. This just about sums up your intellectual level, doesn’t it?

How about some real evidence instead of childish insults?

[The Colonel]

True to form I see. When you can’t justify your claims, you resort to petty insults. This just about sums up your intellectual level, doesn’t it?

How about some real evidence instead of childish insults?

Nappy wearing freak lover.

[Rebman]

Still no viable answers I notice.

Only the intellectually bankrupt resort to lies and puerile insults.

[The Colonel]

McMum

[Guest]

everyone is this thread is a deviant freak....

[sleepy2]

everyone is this thread is a deviant freak....

[The Colonel]

everyone is this thread is a deviant freak....

Not everyone - the anti-troll brigade aren't.

McMum/Rebman and others - so true.

[Rebman]

DEFINITION:-
An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial and usually irrelevant or off-topic messages in an _ community, such as an _ discussion forum or chat room, with the intention of baiting other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.

Was McMum a ‘troll’?
McMum’s contributions to this thread were entirely uncontroversial, relevant and on-topic before the arrival of the Colonel.
She did not bait any of the other posters to the thread, or disrupt normal on-topic discussion in any way before the arrival of the Colonel.
Conclusion: McMum was not a ‘troll’.

Is The Colonel a ‘troll’?
The Colonel’s opening posts in the thread accused regular posters of not seeking medical advice concerning their children’s wetting problems, without any evidence that this was the case, thus baiting other posters. Even when McMum stated that she had sought medical advice, the Colonel escalated his baiting by saying that she was not a good mother because she had sought advice from the NHS rather than from the private sector, again without bothering to find out if this was true or not.
The Colonel set out to disrupt normal on-topic discussion, even boasting about it:-

“I love the way I destroyed this thread, now I can move onto the one in the health section!”

and:-

As soon as I'm in control of this thread!
You didn't actually think I was sane did you?

The Colonel wasn’t satisfied until he had driven most of the genuine posters away and disrupted the thread to such an extent that normal on-topic discussion was impossible, resulting in admin moving it to the Stupid Posts.
This is not the only thread that the Colonel has set out to disrupt in this way.
Conclusion: The Colonel satisfies all the criteria for being a ‘troll’.

To put it in the childish terminology so loved by the Colonel:-

THE COLONEL = TROLL

[The Colonel]

DEFINITION:-
An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial and usually irrelevant or off-topic messages in an _ community, such as an _ discussion forum or chat room, with the intention of baiting other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.

Was McMum a ‘troll’?
McMum’s contributions to this thread were entirely uncontroversial, relevant and on-topic before the arrival of the Colonel.
She did not bait any of the other posters to the thread, or disrupt normal on-topic discussion in any way before the arrival of the Colonel.
Conclusion: McMum was not a ‘troll’.

Is The Colonel a ‘troll’?
The Colonel’s opening posts in the thread accused regular posters of not seeking medical advice concerning their children’s wetting problems, without any evidence that this was the case, thus baiting other posters. Even when McMum stated that she had sought medical advice, the Colonel escalated his baiting by saying that she was not a good mother because she had sought advice from the NHS rather than from the private sector, again without bothering to find out if this was true or not.
The Colonel set out to disrupt normal on-topic discussion, even boasting about it:-

“I love the way I destroyed this thread, now I can move onto the one in the health section!”

and:-

As soon as I'm in control of this thread!
You didn't actually think I was sane did you?

The Colonel wasn’t satisfied until he had driven most of the genuine posters away and disrupted the thread to such an extent that normal on-topic discussion was impossible, resulting in admin moving it to the Stupid Posts.
This is not the only thread that the Colonel has set out to disrupt in this way.
Conclusion: The Colonel satisfies all the criteria for being a ‘troll’.

To put it in the childish terminology so loved by the Colonel:-

THE COLONEL = TROLL

McMum speaks!

Do you get your nappies free on the NHS then McMum? Bless.



Rebman = McMum

[Guest]

DEFINITION:-
An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial and usually irrelevant or off-topic messages in an _ community, such as an _ discussion forum or chat room, with the intention of baiting other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.

Was McMum a ‘troll’?
McMum’s contributions to this thread were entirely uncontroversial, relevant and on-topic before the arrival of the Colonel.
She did not bait any of the other posters to the thread, or disrupt normal on-topic discussion in any way before the arrival of the Colonel.
Conclusion: McMum was not a ‘troll’.

Is The Colonel a ‘troll’?
The Colonel’s opening posts in the thread accused regular posters of not seeking medical advice concerning their children’s wetting problems, without any evidence that this was the case, thus baiting other posters. Even when McMum stated that she had sought medical advice, the Colonel escalated his baiting by saying that she was not a good mother because she had sought advice from the NHS rather than from the private sector, again without bothering to find out if this was true or not.
The Colonel set out to disrupt normal on-topic discussion, even boasting about it:-

“I love the way I destroyed this thread, now I can move onto the one in the health section!”

and:-

As soon as I'm in control of this thread!
You didn't actually think I was sane did you?

The Colonel wasn’t satisfied until he had driven most of the genuine posters away and disrupted the thread to such an extent that normal on-topic discussion was impossible, resulting in admin moving it to the Stupid Posts.
This is not the only thread that the Colonel has set out to disrupt in this way.
Conclusion: The Colonel satisfies all the criteria for being a ‘troll’.

To put it in the childish terminology so loved by the Colonel:-

THE COLONEL = TROLL

+1

[The Colonel]

DEFINITION:-
An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial and usually irrelevant or off-topic messages in an _ community, such as an _ discussion forum or chat room, with the intention of baiting other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.

Was McMum a ‘troll’?
McMum’s contributions to this thread were entirely uncontroversial, relevant and on-topic before the arrival of the Colonel.
She did not bait any of the other posters to the thread, or disrupt normal on-topic discussion in any way before the arrival of the Colonel.
Conclusion: McMum was not a ‘troll’.

Is The Colonel a ‘troll’?
The Colonel’s opening posts in the thread accused regular posters of not seeking medical advice concerning their children’s wetting problems, without any evidence that this was the case, thus baiting other posters. Even when McMum stated that she had sought medical advice, the Colonel escalated his baiting by saying that she was not a good mother because she had sought advice from the NHS rather than from the private sector, again without bothering to find out if this was true or not.
The Colonel set out to disrupt normal on-topic discussion, even boasting about it:-

“I love the way I destroyed this thread, now I can move onto the one in the health section!”

and:-

As soon as I'm in control of this thread!
You didn't actually think I was sane did you?

The Colonel wasn’t satisfied until he had driven most of the genuine posters away and disrupted the thread to such an extent that normal on-topic discussion was impossible, resulting in admin moving it to the Stupid Posts.
This is not the only thread that the Colonel has set out to disrupt in this way.
Conclusion: The Colonel satisfies all the criteria for being a ‘troll’.

To put it in the childish terminology so loved by the Colonel:-

THE COLONEL = TROLL

+1

Admins - McMum is back.

Banning request please.

[Rebman]

No answers as usual I note, only further insults. I have given a well researched analysis, before concluding that:-

THE COLONEL IS A TROLL

Where is the Colonel’s valid reason for concluding that McMum was a troll? He doesn’t have a reason apart from spite. He also doesn’t have any reason for concluding that McMum was an AB/DL. In fact there is more reason to suspect that the Colonel is an (in the closet) AB/DL because of his many hundreds of TROLL postings on various nappy threads.

[The Colonel]

No answers as usual I note, only further insults. I have given a well researched analysis, before concluding that:-

THE COLONEL IS A TROLL

Where is the Colonel’s valid reason for concluding that McMum was a troll? He doesn’t have a reason apart from spite. He also doesn’t have any reason for concluding that McMum was an AB/DL. In fact there is more reason to suspect that the Colonel is an (in the closet) AB/DL because of his many hundreds of TROLL postings on various nappy threads.

Are you Mohammed?

[Rebman]

My name is not Mohammed. I am not (and never have been) a Muslim, and I most certainly have never claimed to be a prophet of any kind. I am also not the fictitious son of your fake McMum, and nor am I the real McMum. I do not know McMum, and I do not know for certain whether what she posted was true or not. However, based on what she posted, I can see no evidence whatsoever that would indicate she was lying. The same cannot be said about you.

The real question is, are you a closet AB/DL? Why else were you posting hundreds of posts on a nappy thread, accusing others of being AB/DLs, without any tangible evidence, apart from those who openly admitted to being AB/DLs? McMum was certainly not one of them.

Unlike you, I do not lie in these forums, even to proven trolls such as yourself.