Still in nappies.

posts that are really a waste of time and effort

Moderator: Silent One

Postby Rebman » Sun Jun 29, 2008 5:30 pm

True to form I see. When you can’t justify your claims, you resort to petty insults. This just about sums up your intellectual level, doesn’t it?

How about some real evidence instead of childish insults?
Rebman
Mahatma
 
Posts: 1147
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 11:57 am

Postby The Colonel » Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:06 pm

Rebman wrote:True to form I see. When you can’t justify your claims, you resort to petty insults. This just about sums up your intellectual level, doesn’t it?

How about some real evidence instead of childish insults?


Nappy wearing freak lover. :roll:
The Colonel
 

Postby Rebman » Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:57 pm

Still no viable answers I notice.

Only the intellectually bankrupt resort to lies and puerile insults.
Rebman
Mahatma
 
Posts: 1147
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 11:57 am

Postby The Colonel » Tue Jul 01, 2008 5:52 pm

McMum :roll:
The Colonel
 

Postby Guest » Wed Jul 02, 2008 7:27 am

everyone is this thread is a deviant freak.... :evil:
Guest
 

Postby sleepy2 » Wed Jul 02, 2008 7:49 am

. wrote:everyone is this thread is a deviant freak.... :evil:



:eyebrows:
sleepy2
 

Postby The Colonel » Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:43 pm

. wrote:everyone is this thread is a deviant freak.... :evil:


Not everyone - the anti-troll brigade aren't.

McMum/Rebman and others - so true.
The Colonel
 

Postby Rebman » Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:04 am

DEFINITION:-
An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial and usually irrelevant or off-topic messages in an _ community, such as an _ discussion forum or chat room, with the intention of baiting other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.

Was McMum a ‘troll’?
McMum’s contributions to this thread were entirely uncontroversial, relevant and on-topic before the arrival of the Colonel.
She did not bait any of the other posters to the thread, or disrupt normal on-topic discussion in any way before the arrival of the Colonel.
Conclusion: McMum was not a ‘troll’.

Is The Colonel a ‘troll’?
The Colonel’s opening posts in the thread accused regular posters of not seeking medical advice concerning their children’s wetting problems, without any evidence that this was the case, thus baiting other posters. Even when McMum stated that she had sought medical advice, the Colonel escalated his baiting by saying that she was not a good mother because she had sought advice from the NHS rather than from the private sector, again without bothering to find out if this was true or not.
The Colonel set out to disrupt normal on-topic discussion, even boasting about it:-
“I love the way I destroyed this thread, now I can move onto the one in the health section!”

and:-
As soon as I'm in control of this thread!
You didn't actually think I was sane did you?

The Colonel wasn’t satisfied until he had driven most of the genuine posters away and disrupted the thread to such an extent that normal on-topic discussion was impossible, resulting in admin moving it to the Stupid Posts.
This is not the only thread that the Colonel has set out to disrupt in this way.
Conclusion: The Colonel satisfies all the criteria for being a ‘troll’.

To put it in the childish terminology so loved by the Colonel:-

THE COLONEL = TROLL
Rebman
Mahatma
 
Posts: 1147
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 11:57 am

Postby The Colonel » Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:51 am

Rebman wrote:DEFINITION:-
An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial and usually irrelevant or off-topic messages in an _ community, such as an _ discussion forum or chat room, with the intention of baiting other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.

Was McMum a ‘troll’?
McMum’s contributions to this thread were entirely uncontroversial, relevant and on-topic before the arrival of the Colonel.
She did not bait any of the other posters to the thread, or disrupt normal on-topic discussion in any way before the arrival of the Colonel.
Conclusion: McMum was not a ‘troll’.

Is The Colonel a ‘troll’?
The Colonel’s opening posts in the thread accused regular posters of not seeking medical advice concerning their children’s wetting problems, without any evidence that this was the case, thus baiting other posters. Even when McMum stated that she had sought medical advice, the Colonel escalated his baiting by saying that she was not a good mother because she had sought advice from the NHS rather than from the private sector, again without bothering to find out if this was true or not.
The Colonel set out to disrupt normal on-topic discussion, even boasting about it:-
“I love the way I destroyed this thread, now I can move onto the one in the health section!”

and:-
As soon as I'm in control of this thread!
You didn't actually think I was sane did you?

The Colonel wasn’t satisfied until he had driven most of the genuine posters away and disrupted the thread to such an extent that normal on-topic discussion was impossible, resulting in admin moving it to the Stupid Posts.
This is not the only thread that the Colonel has set out to disrupt in this way.
Conclusion: The Colonel satisfies all the criteria for being a ‘troll’.

To put it in the childish terminology so loved by the Colonel:-

THE COLONEL = TROLL


:lol:

McMum speaks!

Do you get your nappies free on the NHS then McMum? Bless.

:roll:

Rebman = McMum
The Colonel
 

Postby Guest » Mon Jul 07, 2008 3:54 am

Rebman wrote:DEFINITION:-
An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial and usually irrelevant or off-topic messages in an _ community, such as an _ discussion forum or chat room, with the intention of baiting other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.

Was McMum a ‘troll’?
McMum’s contributions to this thread were entirely uncontroversial, relevant and on-topic before the arrival of the Colonel.
She did not bait any of the other posters to the thread, or disrupt normal on-topic discussion in any way before the arrival of the Colonel.
Conclusion: McMum was not a ‘troll’.

Is The Colonel a ‘troll’?
The Colonel’s opening posts in the thread accused regular posters of not seeking medical advice concerning their children’s wetting problems, without any evidence that this was the case, thus baiting other posters. Even when McMum stated that she had sought medical advice, the Colonel escalated his baiting by saying that she was not a good mother because she had sought advice from the NHS rather than from the private sector, again without bothering to find out if this was true or not.
The Colonel set out to disrupt normal on-topic discussion, even boasting about it:-
“I love the way I destroyed this thread, now I can move onto the one in the health section!”

and:-
As soon as I'm in control of this thread!
You didn't actually think I was sane did you?

The Colonel wasn’t satisfied until he had driven most of the genuine posters away and disrupted the thread to such an extent that normal on-topic discussion was impossible, resulting in admin moving it to the Stupid Posts.
This is not the only thread that the Colonel has set out to disrupt in this way.
Conclusion: The Colonel satisfies all the criteria for being a ‘troll’.

To put it in the childish terminology so loved by the Colonel:-

THE COLONEL = TROLL

+1
Guest
 

Postby The Colonel » Mon Jul 07, 2008 6:51 pm

. wrote:
Rebman wrote:DEFINITION:-
An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial and usually irrelevant or off-topic messages in an _ community, such as an _ discussion forum or chat room, with the intention of baiting other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.

Was McMum a ‘troll’?
McMum’s contributions to this thread were entirely uncontroversial, relevant and on-topic before the arrival of the Colonel.
She did not bait any of the other posters to the thread, or disrupt normal on-topic discussion in any way before the arrival of the Colonel.
Conclusion: McMum was not a ‘troll’.

Is The Colonel a ‘troll’?
The Colonel’s opening posts in the thread accused regular posters of not seeking medical advice concerning their children’s wetting problems, without any evidence that this was the case, thus baiting other posters. Even when McMum stated that she had sought medical advice, the Colonel escalated his baiting by saying that she was not a good mother because she had sought advice from the NHS rather than from the private sector, again without bothering to find out if this was true or not.
The Colonel set out to disrupt normal on-topic discussion, even boasting about it:-
“I love the way I destroyed this thread, now I can move onto the one in the health section!”

and:-
As soon as I'm in control of this thread!
You didn't actually think I was sane did you?

The Colonel wasn’t satisfied until he had driven most of the genuine posters away and disrupted the thread to such an extent that normal on-topic discussion was impossible, resulting in admin moving it to the Stupid Posts.
This is not the only thread that the Colonel has set out to disrupt in this way.
Conclusion: The Colonel satisfies all the criteria for being a ‘troll’.

To put it in the childish terminology so loved by the Colonel:-

THE COLONEL = TROLL

+1


Admins - McMum is back.

Banning request please.
The Colonel
 

Postby Rebman » Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:22 pm

No answers as usual I note, only further insults. I have given a well researched analysis, before concluding that:-

THE COLONEL IS A TROLL

Where is the Colonel’s valid reason for concluding that McMum was a troll? He doesn’t have a reason apart from spite. He also doesn’t have any reason for concluding that McMum was an AB/DL. In fact there is more reason to suspect that the Colonel is an (in the closet) AB/DL because of his many hundreds of TROLL postings on various nappy threads.
Rebman
Mahatma
 
Posts: 1147
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 11:57 am

Postby The Colonel » Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:25 am

Rebman wrote:No answers as usual I note, only further insults. I have given a well researched analysis, before concluding that:-

THE COLONEL IS A TROLL

Where is the Colonel’s valid reason for concluding that McMum was a troll? He doesn’t have a reason apart from spite. He also doesn’t have any reason for concluding that McMum was an AB/DL. In fact there is more reason to suspect that the Colonel is an (in the closet) AB/DL because of his many hundreds of TROLL postings on various nappy threads.


Are you Mohammed?
The Colonel
 

Postby Rebman » Tue Jul 08, 2008 8:54 pm

My name is not Mohammed. I am not (and never have been) a Muslim, and I most certainly have never claimed to be a prophet of any kind. I am also not the fictitious son of your fake McMum, and nor am I the real McMum. I do not know McMum, and I do not know for certain whether what she posted was true or not. However, based on what she posted, I can see no evidence whatsoever that would indicate she was lying. The same cannot be said about you.

The real question is, are you a closet AB/DL? Why else were you posting hundreds of posts on a nappy thread, accusing others of being AB/DLs, without any tangible evidence, apart from those who openly admitted to being AB/DLs? McMum was certainly not one of them.

Unlike you, I do not lie in these forums, even to proven trolls such as yourself.
Rebman
Mahatma
 
Posts: 1147
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 11:57 am

Postby sleepy2 » Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:22 pm

if you two can't play nice ....we will have to take the ball off you ...

grow up you two .......... :dummy:


(common man with ,common word's ) :think:
sleepy2
 

PreviousNext

Return to Stupid Posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests