
Topic Of Gossip wrote:ZiaAries wrote:Bad analogy TopicOfGossip. I have the option to block Fred if I want and FF is for my entertainment, not for my spiritual guidance.
I stand by my previous statement. My vote for the President of my country will not be made because of the color of the candidates skin or gender. Humans (Zia included) have the right to vote as they see fit. It's a little more "complicated" than being implied.![]()
BTW, I haven't made up my mind yet who I will vote for. I have until November to gather all the info and weigh it.
I think my analogy is quite apt. I know many people who go to church for entertainment as well as spiritual guidance!
I'm not trying to get you to vote for anybody, as you said that's your decision, but to denigrate someone because they have an association with somebody else, be that spiritual, sexual, as a mentor or whatever, I think is wrong. That's because you can in no way measure exactly what influence that person has had on that individual's life.
You're putting the influence of spiritual guidance above everything else which isn't right. What about the influence of parents? Spouses? Academic teachers and lecturers? Peers? Friends?
What a person is and what they believe is built up from many, many sources over many years of one's life, not just from a single source.
I have been to churches where the pastor has been frothing at the mouth with tales of fire and brimstone and eternal damnation for those who do not follow his interpretations of the Bible. I'll quite happily listen to the sermon but it doesn't mean I have to agree with or believe what was said. Quite the contrary actually.
As I said... people are a little more complicated than you implied.
myron myron wrote:
But you're an atheist, not a believer and member of the congregation for more than 20 years who was married by that pastor and whose children were baptised by that pastor. Are you saying Obama is actually an atheist who is lying about his religious faith?
And Obama also has an association, nay a continuing friendship, with unrepentant former members of the terrorist Weather Underground. Should that not matter either?
Please . . .

Topic Of Gossip wrote:myron myron wrote:
But you're an atheist, not a believer and member of the congregation for more than 20 years who was married by that pastor and whose children were baptised by that pastor. Are you saying Obama is actually an atheist who is lying about his religious faith?
And Obama also has an association, nay a continuing friendship, with unrepentant former members of the terrorist Weather Underground. Should that not matter either?
Please . . .
Myron, you love trying to put words in my mouth don't you.
Where did I say or imply Obama is an atheist? Even if the Pastor delivered Obama's children and cleaned their bottoms, it still doesn't say what influence the Pastor had on Obama's life. And you cannot know this unless you are Obama himself.
There are a lot of other people who went to that church who I'm sure Obama must have talked to and been influenced by. What about them? You're going on like this pastor is the sole influence in the Obama's life and like a lemming he has to follow and believe every word the Pastor says, and I'm trying to say that like any normal person that cannot be the case.
I mean is there any one person in your life who has the kind of total influence that you're implying??
You cannot always judge a person by the company they keep. But this is exactly what you are doing.
Oh and I'm an aetheist?![]()
myron myron wrote:
In American Presidential politics, a candidate's past and present associations matter big time.
Topic Of Gossip wrote:myron myron wrote:
In American Presidential politics, a candidate's past and present associations matter big time.
As it does in UK politics, but that's more to keep the 24 hour news channels happy and to give the newspapers something to print.
I can assure you that every political leader throughout history has had associations with undesirable people at some time or other. As I'm sure you and everybody else on the planet has as well. That's just called... life.
But to then say that these undesirables must have had a negative influence on the person can only really be classed as guess work, unless of course, you are extremely proficient in the art of "mind reading".

myron myron wrote:In American Presidential politics, unsavory past or present associations cost real votes.
Topic Of Gossip wrote:myron myron wrote:In American Presidential politics, unsavory past or present associations cost real votes.
That's really touching Myron.![]()
That you are so concerned that Obama might lose. I'm sure he really appreciates your support.![]()
myron myron wrote:Topic Of Gossip wrote:myron myron wrote:In American Presidential politics, unsavory past or present associations cost real votes.
That's really touching Myron.![]()
That you are so concerned that Obama might lose. I'm sure he really appreciates your support.![]()
He ain't getting it: I have never voted Democrat and never will.
Big Ben wrote:You are confusing actions that you dislike with associations, lena. And no politician I know has a pattern of long, close associations with radicals as O'Bumma. And those associations speak to the core of who he really is. Those associations could turn into bad actions, unless Congress and Billary can keep him in check. He is a very dangerous man.
Return to Politics And Social Issues
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests