The New Marriage: female polygamy

Are women a mystery to you? Post your thoughts here.

Moderator: Silent One

Postby Guest » Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:32 pm

what guy wants sloppy seconds off a ho like that?
Guest
 

Postby mirko crocop » Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:25 am

TheMainDude wrote:It's obviously been written by someone with an agenda. I get turned on at the whole cuckold thing, but even I admit it's just a fantasy and not a basis for the reconstruction of society.

Not same thing to have fantasy fetish and in real life. No man will agree this 'cuckold marriage' for real. This is castrating the man. He is not man if wife has sex with other men and he must only beg wife for sex. Not marriage if no respect on both sides. This is no respect for husband. Author is not a good 'doctor' because biologically wrong. I find it sick.
mirko crocop
 

Postby Ronald Kornblow » Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:27 am

. wrote:How many of you guys would be willing to sleep with that kind of woman?

Even though her husband knows and accepts the situation, would the fact that she's married put you off?

the hubby doesn't accept the situation in the op. the wife gives hubby a take it or leave it ultimatum. if the wife paid me dearly, i would shag her.
Ronald Kornblow
 

Postby Oop's Did I do YOUR wife? » Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:31 pm

From 20 to 30 years old - I had a few of the above mentioned wives (other mens wives) & I think the O.P. has got it HALF right, from the fremale side.
They get bored with hubby & seek new excitement & new attention, but still want the stability of good old reliable Hubb's.

The rest of it, is a female dominance load of old bollocks.
Oop's Did I do YOUR wife?
 

Postby Gotta Say » Mon Jul 16, 2007 11:28 pm

This Susan Gower is mixing up ideas of natural drive and things made up by society. For example, there is this contradiction in her essay. She says women have a stronger sex drive then she says women get to say who is allowed to have sex with them. The first is a scientific idea and the second is a situation in society. In my opinion all this analyzing is pointless. Bottomline.. men and women want to have sex.. thats all.
Gotta Say
 

Postby Gotta Say » Mon Jul 16, 2007 11:39 pm

Ouch I failed to explain myself fully lol. I meant to say those two ideas dont reconcile well. You wont be picky when you want it desperately lol
Gotta Say
 

Postby Lena » Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:10 am

At one point this type of relationship wud have been perfect to me ...................

I guess I was a pioneer in this since I always cheated on whoever I was going with , even living with ............... :oops: :lol:

I don't have the patience for this anymore and wudn't recommend it since it leads to jealousy and breaking up .At 19 a gf left me for a guy we had a group thing going with and several years later at 23 my gf left me for another women who we were sleeping with .I've heard the same story from others.
Alive in spite of myself and looking at the world .........
User avatar
Lena
Goddess
 
Posts: 49427
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Kentucky , USA and Beijing China

Postby Guest » Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:08 am

Gimme Candy wrote:she doesn't say how many men accept a cuckold marriage....i wud bet it's very, very few....why wud a man stay married to a woman who sleeps around and denies her hubby sex and expects the hubby to stay faithful?

+1
Guest
 

Postby Guest » Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:52 pm

Sounds like the old excuse that women like to cheat and they need a self appointed relationships 'expert' to justify them doing it.

I'd include women that go to see male strippers too. Although, they are not having sex (or maybe some do, I hear stories) with the stripper the overtly engage in sexual contact with the stripper via hand or mouth to penis (which is often erect during a 'show').

Some women like to cheat, some men do. We have to deal with that so we don't need some quack telling us it is ok.
:roll:
Guest
 

Re: The New Marriage: female polygamy

Postby Guest » Tue Jul 24, 2007 3:36 am

lettie wrote:
The New Marriage: female polygamy by Dr Susan Gower

After studying human sexuality for many years it has become inarguable that more and more couples are choosing a relationship in which the wife engages in sexual activity with a variety of men while her husband remains faithful. I have witnessed this form of relationship helping to save– not ruin – many marriages.

Psychologically, women are hardwired differently than men. A woman has a dual sex drive. The first is centered on finding a mate for life to help support her and her offspring. This is why (and when) love is such an important part of a women's sexual desire. The second is a desire to obtain a variety of the best genetic material to produce the best children. This second desire begins to grow once a woman has found her life mate and grows stronger as time with him progresses. Eventually, this later and more powerful drive overpowers her sexual desire for her life mate. This is why a woman's sexual desire for her husband diminishes over time.

At the same time her sexual desire for other men is increasing. Often this desire for other men becomes so strong she cannot deny it. This does not make her immoral or mean that she no longer loves her husband. It is simply part of her genetic code.

As a result, a woman's increasing sexual appetite, due to her biologically age based sex drive, gives her greater sexual needs than her husband. She needs more sexual encounters, longer sexual encounters and more orgasms than her spouse isa able to provide. Her older or same-age husband, on the other hand, wants sex far less than his wife, oftentimes lasts only a few minutes before he reaches orgasm and is then no longer interested in sex. As a marriage continues this discrepancy in sexual needs increases dramatically, usually to the breaking point of a wife secretly finding a lover or lovers outside the marriage. This is usually the point when patients consult me.

Compounding these factors is that nature has not only given women a two prong and exponentially stronger sex drive than men, it has also given women the ability to experience a far greater quantity, intensity, and variety of sexual pleasure and orgasm than men. This is nature's way of motivating a woman to seek out sexual activity considering the risk she bears in doing so. (Even though today's contraceptives greatly reduce these risks, they do nothing to diminish the internal triggers that drive a woman's need for a variety of sex and sex partners. If anything, this reduction of risk intensifies her drive to seek pleasure.)

As a result, women can experience a wide range and intensity of sexual pleasure and diversity of orgasm. Besides the pleasure and orgasms derived from manual, oral and coital stimulation of a woman's clitoris, all three of which feel distinctly different, a woman can reach a completely different sensation of pleasure. This variety is obviously best accomplished by the use of multiple sexual partners.

Men, on the other hand, are far simpler sexually. Stimulate their glans (the little patch of skin at the front of the penis just below it's head) and they ejaculate. Furthermore, men can get nearly the same level of satisfaction from masturbating as the do completing a sex act with a woman. The male also has a much simpler sex drive than a woman. He simply wants to mate with any female he finds desirable. The longer he is denied sex, the stronger his desire grows and the criterion by which he finds a woman desirable lowers.

Since it is for the woman who decides if he will be allowed to have sex with her or not, his desire for her sexually is also linked to the desire for her approval. As he becomes more interested in her the desire to please her as a way to get sex can become overwhelming for him. That is why you will often see men acting foolishly in front of females they desire, even though they have no chance to have sex with them.

My experience with couples therapy has shown me that, although women are biologically designed for multiple partners, allowing men to have multiple partners is almost always bad idea. Interviews with couples in ‘open marriages’ have shown that these marriages almost always lead to a competition between the two spouses regarding who is having more sex with more partners. A wife will always win this competition because it is much easier for a woman to find sexual partners than it is for a man. The competition, however, can become nasty, ugly and often cruel. A wife will sometimes be drawn into the competition so deeply she will have sex with far more men than she wishes too, and her husband will have growing feelings of inadequacy, as he cannot keep up with his wife. This kind of competition almost always destroys a relationship.

The idea of open marriage also assumes the erroneous notion that men need a variety of sex partners. While all evidence indicates that a married woman both physiologically and psychologically does need a variety of sexual partners, a married man does not. The genetic code that drives a man is the thrill of pursuit, not the need for variety. Husbands in clinical studies who's desire for their wives have waned and who's interest have turned to other women have been completely turned around when their wives begin using arousal and sex-denial techniques on them. These techniques instill uncertainty in the husband as to whether he will be allowed to complete a sex act with her or not. Time after time, in study after study, these husband's desires have been focused back to their wives exclusively, losing all interest in other women. The wives in these studies were even able to vary their husband's level of interest through increasing or decreasing their application of arousal and sex-denial techniques.

Unsurprisingly, since human societal structures were originally matriarchal, societies that still live today in ways closer to our original female and male roles do not suffer from the damages of psychological and physiological stress. In these more basic societies, far from the modern world, are nearly always matriarchal and it is the women in these societies who control property, family affairs and sexual activity.

These women will usually have multiple husbands and lovers. One or two of these men provide them with food, shelter and security, while the others provide them with sex. In these societies there is no violence, crime, or sexual perversion. Men are focused on pleasing their wives instead of impressing other women in the group or competing with other men, except in the area of being good sex providers. Wives will keep this competition light and fun and ongoing. Men focused on this kind of competition do not compete with each other in other ways either, leading to much stronger male/male friendships and cooperation.

An unlikely place further confirmation of the appropriateness of cuckolding in human bonding relationships was discovered in the findings of primate studies. In one study, researchers found two anatomical influencers of fidelity in primates. One was the physical size difference between the sexes. The other was the male's ratio of penis size to body mass.

It was found that in those species of primates where the female was considerably larger than the male, the female would have many sexual partners and bond with none. As female/male size became closer, the female would bond with one male. This male would remain faithful to her, but she would continue to have sex with non-bonded males. It was found that this was not reversed until the male became extremely larger than the female.

The second influencer the researchers discovered was the ratio of penis size to body mass. In species where the difference in physical size between the sexes was slight, (as it is in humans) the penis to body size ratio increased female sexual behavior. The smaller the penis to body size, the more bonded males were restricted to activity with only their mate while females would engage in sexual activity with a variety of non-bonded males. Within these groups, females would generally bond with males with smaller penises and engage in sexual activity with better-endowed, non-bonded males. The most common activity between females and their mates was grooming and eating, with the far greater amount of sexual activity occurring between mated females and males other than their mates. Neither mated nor non-mated females would engage in sexual activity with bonded males who were not their own mates. The most frequent sexual activity of bonded males was masturbation.

This study particularly intrigued me because it's findings correlated so closely with my own experiences. Among my patients, husbands with smaller penises were not only more agreeable to being cuckolded, but would even sometimes suggest it. These very enlightened, lesser-endowed, husbands were keenly aware of their inability to satisfy their wives sexually. By accepting their wives engaging in sex with other men they were relieved of the pressure to perform.

Also interesting is that women, like other primate females, will rarely engage in sex with married men. A husband's wedding band makes for a fairly efficient chastity device.. A wife's wedding band, however, does little and sometimes even encourages pursuit by men. This further illustrates that the innate human proclivity for cuckold relationships goes genetically even deeper.

Just as our modern lives preventing us from responding to our need to express our flight or fight response leads to stress, and our turning from whole foods to processed foods give us all sorts of physical ailments, our denial of our natural sexual programming leads to untold emotional and behavioral problems.

It would startle the average person to learn how many divorces are caused by the inequity of a woman's unfulfilled sexual needs. In an effort to protect the man from humiliation it is rarely mentioned in polite society that the reason for a couple's divorce was because the wife was finding sexual satisfaction outside their marriage. If we could be open and honest about a women's needs, and that it is not the fault of their husbands that they need to fulfill those needs outside their marriages, then maybe we could begin to embrace cuckoldry as a healthy societal norm and save far more marriages.

I have seen many marriages saved by the acceptance of the practice of cuckoldry, rather than viewing it as a grounds for divorce. I have seen in my own female patients that once they start to engage in sex outside their marriage - with the acceptance of their husbands and the security that their husbands will remain faithful - they become more centered, calm and confident. Similarly, once their husbands get past their jealous feelings and fear of inadequacy they become calmer and more mature, no longer engaging in childish macho behavior like obsession with sports. They even loose their interest in pornography as their wives recounting of their extramarital exploits, or their participation in those exploits, becomes much more titillating to them than the artificial titillation of pornography.

When my female clients add the uncertainty principle of arousal and denial to their cuckold marriage a woman can bring her husband back to the days when they were first dating. Husbands become more focused on their wives and no longer suffer the frustrating feelings caused by a desire for unattainable women.


I always love when these dumb asses add the title of "Dr" in front of their name, in a doubtless attempt to add credibility to their rubbish, backward ideologies. *yawn*
Guest
 

Postby ZiaAries » Tue Jul 24, 2007 10:45 am

yucky doodle doo. this whole thread is sloppy seconds. not even worth trying to read.

polygamy? if I could have several husbands...Yes...duh? But appointments must be made in advance if more than one husband. I'd lock them all under one roof.....in separate quarters but...I've watch too much Bad Love on HBO about polygamy. Good Show.
User avatar
ZiaAries
Archangel
 
Posts: 28552
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:15 am
Location: United States of America

Postby Guest » Thu Jul 26, 2007 4:19 am

typical ignorant misandrist :roll:
Guest
 

Postby Guest » Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:07 am

. wrote:typical ignorant misandrist :roll:


+1
Guest
 

Postby I've done it » Sat Aug 11, 2007 5:03 pm

My Wife has had over 200 parters in our 12 years. I enjoy her comming home after a night out. I've never been with another
I've done it
 

Postby Guest » Sat Aug 11, 2007 11:27 pm

BUMP.
Guest
 

PreviousNext

Return to Just for Men

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests