ILWL wrote:myron myron wrote:ILWL wrote:Cambodia is right next to Vietnam, but no Communist dictatorship tolerated religion or religious people.
Religion is expressly antithetical to Communism, i.e. "the opiate of the people."
What was the point in telling me that Cambodia is next to Vietnam - I know it is a seperate political entity. Not everyone respected it as such did they Myron!
You are right that it is the antithesis but there is a difference between the words and the deeds. In some Communist countries there was a degree of pragmatism in the dealing with religon. Not sure if this was the situation in Asia but in Eastern Europe there was in periods an understanding.
I was in the Soviet Union and East Germany during the Cold War: there was no "degree of pragmatism in the dealing with religon"; quite the contrary.
And I was in Republique Populaire du Congo, a hardline Communist military dictatorship, in 1985: there was no "degree of pragmatism in the dealing with religon"; quite the contrary.
What of Poland though?
As for the differences between word and deed - did you ever see the Constitution of the Soviet Union?
It took the Pope to free Poland from the atheistic grip of Communism.
And I have seen the Constitution of the Soviet Union, but I don't recall its provisions. What I do recall is Soviet Customs in Moscow, where any religious book or religious writing was confiscated and its owner interrogated whilst the
real contraband I brought into and out of the country was never found.