This 'right' for gays is an injustice to children

Are the polititians doing a good job could you do better, debate your views with others
Guest
 

Postby Guest on Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:18 pm

Who is the above moron? :shock:

User avatar
Winky89
Regent Empress
 
Posts: 5286
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:24 am

Postby Winky89 on Sat Jun 02, 2007 11:43 pm

Casey55 wrote:
noodles wrote:

Yes il raise a child with my partner and i certainly wont be teaching my child that a father is 'just' a sperm doner. Whilst I believe that 'no father' works for many couples (just as no mother probably works for some) who said the father of my child wont be involved? You really shouldnt jump to conclusions.


No.. you wont "teach" the child that.
the child will LIVE THAT!

And your second part... wheres dad going to be?
Another house?
So now you teach your child that dad's are to be just VISITORS on the weekend?
What a fine lesson to teach your child especially if he's a son!

Your "conclusion" is that since some fathers and mothers don't work out to be good parents.... that that opens the door for you to do as you please!
Again.. your validating (arguing) your position based on bad scenarios(parents)!


Hey Steve :wave:

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Sun Jun 03, 2007 6:58 pm

Homosexuality is an abomination in the eyes of God.

Simple really.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Mon Jun 04, 2007 6:42 am

Really?

He contacted you and gave you this pesonal message himself did he? :roll:

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Mon Jun 04, 2007 9:16 am

No, it is written in the Bible. Ever hear of it? :roll:

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Mon Jun 04, 2007 9:56 am

You mean that book of bullshit that man wrote :roll:

User avatar
Winky89
Regent Empress
 
Posts: 5286
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:24 am

Postby Winky89 on Mon Jun 04, 2007 10:02 am

Ok, we've reached a standstill. There are two types of people on here.

Those who believe that gays should be allowed to adopt

Those who believe that gays should not be allowed to adopt because they are obviously going to r**** them, turn them into gays and generally cause trauma :roll:

Get over yourselves and agree to disagree fgs!

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Mon Jun 04, 2007 10:15 am

. wrote:You mean that book of bullshit that man wrote :roll:

The one that billions, that's right billions, of people believe in . . . religiously . . . Jews and Christians and Muslims.

An anti-religious bigot should not expect tolerance from anyone.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Mon Jun 04, 2007 10:16 am

Daniellef wrote:Ok, we've reached a standstill. There are two types of people on here.

Those who believe that gays should be allowed to adopt

Those who believe that gays should not be allowed to adopt because they are obviously going to r**** them, turn them into gays and generally cause trauma :roll:

Get over yourselves and agree to disagree fgs!

Wrong, simpleton. :roll:

User avatar
Winky89
Regent Empress
 
Posts: 5286
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:24 am

Postby Winky89 on Mon Jun 04, 2007 10:28 am

so far all I can see is a thread 9 pages of people disgreeing. You are obviously never going to come to any sort of conclusion are you?

noodles
Master Wizard
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:37 pm

Postby noodles on Mon Jun 04, 2007 10:41 am

No but its kinda fun. I suppose im feeding and enouraging the idiot but dealing with arseholes like that without wanting to permenently verbally abuse them can only be a good thing. He's doing me a favour in a wierd kind of way. Backhanded comments from/debates with people in pubs/street/parties will be an absolute breeze after that biggot :D

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Mon Jun 04, 2007 10:41 am

Daniellef wrote:so far all I can see is a thread 9 pages of people disgreeing. You are obviously never going to come to any sort of conclusion are you?

Don't make up bullshit as to why people are against gays adopting, mmkay? :wink:

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Mon Jun 04, 2007 10:43 am

noodles wrote:No but its kinda fun. I suppose im feeding and enouraging the idiot but dealing with arseholes like that without wanting to permenently verbally abuse them can only be a good thing. He's doing me a favour in a wierd kind of way. Backhanded comments from/debates with people in pubs/street/parties will be an absolute breeze after that biggot :D

Who is the bigot?

The one who shits on the religions of billions of people?

That would be you.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Mon Jun 04, 2007 11:54 am

The one that billions, that's right billions, of people believe in . . . religiously . . . Jews and Christians and Muslims.

An anti-religious bigot should not expect tolerance from anyone.


A load of sheep that have to believe in something because they cannot accept that there is nothing after death. :roll:


Baaaa Baaaaa Baaaaa

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Mon Jun 04, 2007 11:58 am

. wrote:
noodles wrote:No but its kinda fun. I suppose im feeding and enouraging the idiot but dealing with arseholes like that without wanting to permenently verbally abuse them can only be a good thing. He's doing me a favour in a wierd kind of way. Backhanded comments from/debates with people in pubs/street/parties will be an absolute breeze after that biggot :D

Who is the bigot?

The one who shits on the religions of billions of people?

That would be you.



:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

PreviousNext

Return to Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests