That's usual with him.
Happens with me too.
Custom Search
by Astral on Mon May 14, 2007 2:32 am
Guest wrote:
It would be better to have two gay loving parents than a pack of wolves!
It would be better to have two gay loving parents than convicted child molesters!
Sounds like two gay parents are just one notch up above scum!
I guess that makes it RIGHT!
haha!
NOT!
by Guest on Mon May 14, 2007 2:37 am
Astral wrote:Guest wrote:
It would be better to have two gay loving parents than a pack of wolves!
It would be better to have two gay loving parents than convicted child molesters!
Sounds like two gay parents are just one notch up above scum!
I guess that makes it RIGHT!
haha!
NOT!
I wasn't saying two gay parents were best you dips***. What I was saying is, go after what's worse first, then come back and b**** about homosexuals if you want.
Although I still think you won't have any real good argument then either. Sense you sound like one of those narrow minded twits that can only come up with "WRONG GROSS DISGUSTING, A SINFUL MANNER" crap. I won't bother arguing with you. If you present some good arguments I'll acknowledge you and respond accordingly.
by Guest on Mon May 14, 2007 3:56 am
Daniellef wrote:Ok, lets back up to your original question: are you saying that a mother is unnecessary in a childs upbringing?
No, I do not think a mother is necessary. I think a loving parent - ideally 2 loving parents are necessary.
by Guest on Mon May 14, 2007 4:14 am
Astral wrote:Guest wrote:
It would be better to have two gay loving parents than a pack of wolves!
It would be better to have two gay loving parents than convicted child molesters!
Sounds like two gay parents are just one notch up above scum!
I guess that makes it RIGHT!
haha!
NOT!
I wasn't saying two gay parents were best you dips***. What I was saying is, go after what's worse first, then come back and b**** about homosexuals if you want.
Although I still think you won't have any real good argument then either. Sense you sound like one of those narrow minded twits that can only come up with "WRONG GROSS DISGUSTING, A SINFUL MANNER" crap. I won't bother arguing with you. If you present some good arguments I'll acknowledge you and respond accordingly.
by Lao Tzu on Mon May 14, 2007 4:57 am
. wrote:Astral wrote:Guest wrote:
It would be better to have two gay loving parents than a pack of wolves!
It would be better to have two gay loving parents than convicted child molesters!
Sounds like two gay parents are just one notch up above scum!
I guess that makes it RIGHT!
haha!
NOT!
I wasn't saying two gay parents were best you dips***. What I was saying is, go after what's worse first, then come back and b**** about homosexuals if you want.
Although I still think you won't have any real good argument then either. Sense you sound like one of those narrow minded twits that can only come up with "WRONG GROSS DISGUSTING, A SINFUL MANNER" crap. I won't bother arguing with you. If you present some good arguments I'll acknowledge you and respond accordingly.
My point is you cannot give a scenario where two normal parents are the EQUAL to two gay ones!
All your justifications for gay parents are not based on normal, sound and reasonable factors!
just worst case scenarios!
For lack of a better description... to me... your making a case for two (but in this case ONE) wrongs make a right!
I'm sorry... that's just a S*** way to make decisions!
by Winky89 on Mon May 14, 2007 9:17 am
. wrote:Daniellef wrote:Ok, lets back up to your original question: are you saying that a mother is unnecessary in a childs upbringing?
No, I do not think a mother is necessary. I think a loving parent - ideally 2 loving parents are necessary.
The problem with your opinion is that it comes from a broken home where your mother drove your father into another womans arms!
Let's face it! Your point of view is pretty well poisoned!
You even think fathers leaving ther daughters makes for better daughters!
Your f*cked up!
by Guest on Mon May 14, 2007 12:44 pm
. wrote:Rights are not given freely but taken forcibly -- after a fight.
Gays are unwilling to fight for the rights they want.
Someone unwilling to fight for a right does not deserve that right.
by Guest on Mon May 14, 2007 12:48 pm
Daniellef wrote:. wrote:Daniellef wrote:Ok, lets back up to your original question: are you saying that a mother is unnecessary in a childs upbringing?
No, I do not think a mother is necessary. I think a loving parent - ideally 2 loving parents are necessary.
How much of a role model can two gay men be to a young girl?
Are two gay men a good role model for a young boy?
Are two gay men really just indoctrinating a young boy into their lifestyle instead of raisng him to be a man and husband to a wife?
by Guest on Mon May 14, 2007 12:50 pm
Lao Tzu wrote:. wrote:Astral wrote:Guest wrote:
It would be better to have two gay loving parents than a pack of wolves!
It would be better to have two gay loving parents than convicted child molesters!
Sounds like two gay parents are just one notch up above scum!
I guess that makes it RIGHT!
haha!
NOT!
I wasn't saying two gay parents were best you dips***. What I was saying is, go after what's worse first, then come back and b**** about homosexuals if you want.
Although I still think you won't have any real good argument then either. Sense you sound like one of those narrow minded twits that can only come up with "WRONG GROSS DISGUSTING, A SINFUL MANNER" crap. I won't bother arguing with you. If you present some good arguments I'll acknowledge you and respond accordingly.
My point is you cannot give a scenario where two normal parents are the EQUAL to two gay ones!
All your justifications for gay parents are not based on normal, sound and reasonable factors!
just worst case scenarios!
For lack of a better description... to me... your making a case for two (but in this case ONE) wrongs make a right!
I'm sorry... that's just a S*** way to make decisions!
Crass speculation grounded in illogic, resting on fiction.
by Winky89 on Mon May 14, 2007 1:25 pm
. wrote:Daniellef wrote:. wrote:Daniellef wrote:Ok, lets back up to your original question: are you saying that a mother is unnecessary in a childs upbringing?
No, I do not think a mother is necessary. I think a loving parent - ideally 2 loving parents are necessary.
How much of a role model can two gay men be to a young girl?
Are two gay men a good role model for a young boy?
Are two gay men really just indoctrinating a young boy into their lifestyle instead of raisng him to be a man and husband to a wife?
Well when a heterosexual couple bring up a child, most would "expect" that child to become a heterosexual adult even though it is unspoken so what is so different about a homosexual couple bringing up a child? Heterosexual parents dont exactly have sex in front of their children and neither do homosexual parents so the child still has as much opportunity to either live as a homo/heterosexual later in life.
You may be easily influenced by your parents sex lives but there are plenty gay adults who had heterosexual parents arent there?
by Guest on Mon May 14, 2007 2:14 pm
Daniellef wrote:
Well when a heterosexual couple bring up a child, most would "expect" that child to become a heterosexual adult even though it is unspoken so what is so different about a homosexual couple bringing up a child? Heterosexual parents dont exactly have sex in front of their children and neither do homosexual parents so the child still has as much opportunity to either live as a homo/heterosexual later in life.
You may be easily influenced by your parents sex lives but there are plenty gay adults who had heterosexual parents arent there?
Daniellef wrote:
Well when a heterosexual couple bring up a child, most would "expect" that child to become a heterosexual adult even though it is unspoken so what is so different about a homosexual couple bringing up a child?
The homosexual lifestyle is deviant by definition. It is a minority lifestyle that fails to serve the iterest of the child in how to live a NORMAL life with the opposite sex!
Heterosexual parents dont exactly have sex in front of their children and neither do homosexual parents so the child still has as much opportunity to either live as a homo/heterosexual later in life.
True. But there are a lot of stories here where parents were caught in the act! Is that a good thing for a young boy to see... Dad scewing dad in the arse?
Children grow up emulating their parents.
Should a straight boy experiment with other boy's?
Is that the path to making a man... having sex with other boys?
You may be easily influenced by your parents sex lives but there are plenty gay adults who had heterosexual parents arent there?
Again... homosexuals supposedly make up only 10% of the population.
Does 10% decide what's the norm for a child growing up?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests