This 'right' for gays is an injustice to children

Are the polititians doing a good job could you do better, debate your views with others
Astral
Private Dancer (can now PM!)
 
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:49 pm

Postby Astral on Tue May 15, 2007 12:43 am

Guest wrote:
Astral wrote:
Guest wrote:

It would be better to have two gay loving parents than a pack of wolves!
It would be better to have two gay loving parents than convicted child molesters!

Sounds like two gay parents are just one notch up above scum!

I guess that makes it RIGHT!
haha!
NOT!


I wasn't saying two gay parents were best you dips***. What I was saying is, go after what's worse first, then come back and b**** about homosexuals if you want.

Although I still think you won't have any real good argument then either. Sense you sound like one of those narrow minded twits that can only come up with "WRONG GROSS DISGUSTING, A SINFUL MANNER" crap. I won't bother arguing with you. If you present some good arguments I'll acknowledge you and respond accordingly.



My point is you cannot give a scenario where two normal parents are the EQUAL to two gay ones!

All your justifications for gay parents are not based on normal, sound and reasonable factors!
just worst case scenarios!

For lack of a better description... to me... your making a case for two (but in this case ONE) wrongs make a right!
I'm sorry... that's just a S*** way to make decisions!


Ehh, when did I say two homosexual parents were just as good? I didn't. I said quite clearly, there are far worse injustices to worry about. I firmly believe the best parents a child could have is two good heterosexual parents.

There isn't any real good reason for homosexual parents to be, but, homosexual parents can do better then heterosexual parents, the ones where the dad rapes the daughter, the ones where they are abused in some way or another. Although, heterosexual parents have far more potential to be the best.

So, until I see all these bad heterosexual parents clean up their act, I see no reason why homosexual parents can't be.

Get what I am saying right before you try replying.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue May 15, 2007 2:26 am

Astral wrote:
Guest wrote:


All your justifications for gay parents are NOT based on normal, sound and reasonable factors! just worst case scenarios!


There isn't any real good reason for homosexual parents to be, but, homosexual parents can do better then heterosexual parents, the ones where the dad rapes the daughter, the ones where they are abused in some way or another. Although, heterosexual parents have far more potential to be the best.


My bad.. Homosexuals NEVER r**** or abuse children in their care like heteros's do!

Astral
Private Dancer (can now PM!)
 
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:49 pm

Postby Astral on Tue May 15, 2007 3:00 am

Ugh, your clueless. I was just pointing out that in some cases children would be better off with homosexual parents, if it meant them treating them good.

Sky Low Low
 

Postby Sky Low Low on Tue May 15, 2007 4:02 am

Moral relativism may cause the downfall of humanity.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Tue May 15, 2007 12:47 pm

Astral wrote:Ugh, your clueless. I was just pointing out that in some cases children would be better off with homosexual parents, if it meant them treating them good.


My point is that your point is only valid when its based on a crap scenario!

As I have said before... Gay's would be better than a pack of wolves too!

But I don't go around saying that because it's a STUPID way to validate something!
Just as YOURS IS!

And, the problem with stupid validations is that some here are not wise enough to understand that and STILL use it to try to sway others!
Because then there is a consensous built on a foundation of S***!

Astral
Private Dancer (can now PM!)
 
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:49 pm

Postby Astral on Tue May 15, 2007 9:07 pm

Tell me, when did I validate it? I simply said it would be better for a child to have two good homosexual parents then two bad heterosexuals. I never said two homosexual parents were right or wrong.

Please, stop putting words in my mouth.

Personally, over all, I think if a person chooses to live as a homosexual, they choose to give up these rights. Oh well though, I also don't have a big problem with it either.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Wed May 16, 2007 12:37 am

^^^^^^^^^^

mealy-mouthed pablum

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Wed May 16, 2007 3:59 am

. wrote:
. wrote:Rights are not given freely but taken forcibly -- after a fight.

Gays are unwilling to fight for the rights they want.

Someone unwilling to fight for a right does not deserve that right.

Actually, they are!
They want to ban the Bible because it's hate.
They want to be classed as equals to hetero couples so they can adopt!

And the worst part about it is that all that teaches the child is that a mommy or daddy is not important for a child!

I meant "forcibly -- after a fight" in a literal sense.

noodles
Master Wizard
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:37 pm

Postby noodles on Wed May 16, 2007 11:35 am

Why dont you go to a gay parenting website or summat. Actually speak to some gay parents or kids of gay parents THEN come back with your opinions.

Im seriously thinking about having a child. Me and my partner WILL be the best parents our child could EVER have because we are his/her parents SIMPLE AS THAT!

My friends daughter wouldnt swap her gay parents for 'any' mum/dad parenting situation because she loves them and cant imagine her life without 'either' of them.

There are good and not so good parents everywhere - sexuality has nothing to do with it.

Quit the judgements about things you obviously know nothing about. When you 'know' some gay people/gay parents/kids of... then you can create 'informed' opinions.

To say something is better or worse than something else is daft.
Good loving parents are just that regardless.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Wed May 16, 2007 4:49 pm

You're boring and repetative kalel and know absolutely 'nothing' about real life and real people. Your life is small as is your mind. Nevermind eh.

noodles
Master Wizard
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:37 pm

Postby noodles on Fri May 18, 2007 1:59 pm

Yes kalel 'your' truth is extrememly short sighted and boring.

noodles
Master Wizard
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:37 pm

Postby noodles on Fri May 18, 2007 5:46 pm

Im sure you do. We all think our points are valid. Your views imo tho come from a place of ignorance and im never gonna respect your gay this gay that rantings. They are just that - rantings. With no real substance or thought.

noodles
Master Wizard
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:37 pm

Postby noodles on Fri May 18, 2007 7:28 pm

Ive actually lost count of the amount of times on this board Iv typed points about it. if you cant be arsed to read and digest the first, second, third............25th one, i really cant be arsed to type it again. Go back through my posts and find the info yourself. Id truly love to spend ALL my life repeating myself to you but, ya know, iv just painted my house and should really be watchin that dry.....

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Fri May 18, 2007 11:44 pm

You're gay and therefore biased. :roll:

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Sat May 19, 2007 1:40 am

. wrote:You're gay and therefore biased. :roll:

it's dishonest of noodles not to disclose he is gay in these threads

PreviousNext

Return to Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests