Trend Alert: Men's Skirts

Talk about the latest trends, Your fashion disasters, other peoples fashion disasters
User avatar
Alf Huckham
Demigod
 
Posts: 9217
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:45 pm

Postby Alf Huckham on Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:06 pm

Rich_L wrote:Ok Girls, I have a confession to make - - I joined in your skirt day tuesday, I hope you don't mind.
I wore an above knee 4" Black Denim Cargo with nude stockings and white girls high cut panties, 3 " clogs. Tuesday I had off. It would not matter anyway at work they don't want girls to wear skirts, only a few do, usually religious reasons.

I went with a friend shopping at Kohl's ( A department store in the USA) then she took me to lunch. This being a coffee house, having tables and chairs spread around, it required me to stay alert and sit properly.

Acording to her there was only 2 reactions to my wearing a skirt. One employee did a double take and an 8-10 year old boy could not take his eyes off me. I did get a compliment at the coffee house from the waitress, who was dressed in goth.

My point is there are about three dozen countries in the west were men still wear skirt or dress like clothing, ok some only for military ie: Greece Scotland What makes it right for them and wrong for us.

There was a period when men were not suppose to wear paints like the German barbarians did.
Ladies had to fight for the right to wear pants, ladies like Emma Snodgrass who in 1852 got thrown in jail for wearing pants. If it wasn't for the lgirls in the 50-60s wearing mens pants the manufacturers would never have started making pants to fit women. How many 50 shows do you see with woen in pants?

It was a fun Tuesday.
Rich


Good God! Not another weirdo!

User avatar
KiltyCol
Duchess
 
Posts: 2606
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:09 pm
Location: Worcestershire UK

Postby KiltyCol on Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:00 am

In the 50s nearly all women and girls wore skirts.
Best Regards from Colin - Have fun.

User avatar
Alf Huckham
Demigod
 
Posts: 9217
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:45 pm

Postby Alf Huckham on Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:28 am

rubbish

User avatar
KiltyCol
Duchess
 
Posts: 2606
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:09 pm
Location: Worcestershire UK

Postby KiltyCol on Sat Sep 06, 2008 9:10 pm

Some people were not even born then, so how do they think that they know what people wore.
Best Regards from Colin - Have fun.

User avatar
Usquanigo
Priestess
 
Posts: 845
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:40 pm
Location: The Sprawl

Postby Usquanigo on Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:12 am

KiltyCol wrote:Some people were not even born then, so how do they think that they know what people wore.


Pictures, video, TV. movies, etc.

Rich_L
Beginner! Talk to me!
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 3:39 am

Postby Rich_L on Sun Sep 07, 2008 2:47 am

I have to agree with KiltyCol.

KiltyCol wrote:In the 50s nearly all women and girls wore skirts.


And Again

KiltyCol wrote:Some people were not even born then, so how do they think that they know what people wore.


Maybe some of us were there in the 50's.
And I do know it was rare to see a girl in pants in the 60's, and even in '72 girls still did not were pants in school - not even in gym class. They wore an ugly romper! Like this http://tinyurl.com/5ulw5y
Rompers being one piece are not pants, tho they have 2 legs, pants would have been considered cross dressing.

User avatar
Usquanigo
Priestess
 
Posts: 845
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:40 pm
Location: The Sprawl

Postby Usquanigo on Sun Sep 07, 2008 5:36 am

Rich_L wrote:I have to agree with KiltyCol.

KiltyCol wrote:In the 50s nearly all women and girls wore skirts.


And Again

KiltyCol wrote:Some people were not even born then, so how do they think that they know what people wore.


Maybe some of us were there in the 50's.
And I do know it was rare to see a girl in pants in the 60's, and even in '72 girls still did not were pants in school - not even in gym class. They wore an ugly romper! Like this http://tinyurl.com/5ulw5y
Rompers being one piece are not pants, tho they have 2 legs, pants would have been considered cross dressing.


Wrong.

60s = hippies, girls were either "proper" or hippies. Proper girls had no need for pants, and hippies tended to prefer flowing skirts, however, LOTS of them DID wear pants. On and off stage. In fact, most images I can recall of Janis Joplin were in pants, but I have seen a lot of authentic footage in that History Channel special on hippies and about as many wore pants as not, so that busts your theory there.

Women have been wearing pants since the 40's. "Rosie the Riveter", have you heard of her maybe? - http://www.rosietheriveter.org/home/weldersa.jpg

Hollywood starlets were wearing pants too.

You can NOT equate the 2. If you even try, that illustrates a lot of ignorance.

User avatar
KiltyCol
Duchess
 
Posts: 2606
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:09 pm
Location: Worcestershire UK

Postby KiltyCol on Sat Sep 13, 2008 9:15 pm

Bushwalker wrote:8)
If you want to dress like a woman, wear blue jeans...
:lol:

Absolutely correct!
I don't like wearing jeans, although my wife bought me some, a few years ago.
Firstly I find them uncomfortable and
secondly, blue jeans are womens clothing.
Best Regards from Colin - Have fun.

User avatar
Usquanigo
Priestess
 
Posts: 845
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:40 pm
Location: The Sprawl

Postby Usquanigo on Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:51 am

KiltyCol wrote:
secondly, blue jeans are womens clothing.


No they aren't. They were invented in the 1800's, originally worn by cowboys and farmers because of their toughness.

Today, they come in BOTH women's AND men's variety, but if we look at the origin as a definition, then they, like pants on the whole, are men's clothing - but that's being ridiculous.

User avatar
Alf Huckham
Demigod
 
Posts: 9217
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:45 pm

Postby Alf Huckham on Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:14 pm

Usquanigo wrote:
KiltyCol wrote:
secondly, blue jeans are womens clothing.


No they aren't. They were invented in the 1800's, originally worn by cowboys and farmers because of their toughness.

Today, they come in BOTH women's AND men's variety, but if we look at the origin as a definition, then they, like pants on the whole, are men's clothing - but that's being ridiculous.


As ever.

johnie
Newbie
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 11:25 pm
Location: borders

men in skirts

Postby johnie on Tue Sep 16, 2008 3:20 pm

I only joined this forum yesterday 15.9.08, and have been following this topic of skirts for men. First, I am 75 yrs young, and lived thru the period of when women first started to wear pants. Except for the period 1939 to 1945 WW2, women did not start to wearing pants until late 60`s, not in the UK. In the war they did, since working on the land, they were given uniforms with pants, climbing up onto heaps of hay in skirts-not on-, and ambulance drivers women wore pants, so it was only for certain jobs when they wore pants. My wother was an ambulance driver. It would be the late 60s when my wife and her femail friends first started wearing. I was not in favour of this, but did not try to stop her. But it took a few years to really catch on. The makers thought at first it was a femail thing and would die out. But after a year or two, when it was not dying out, they saw extra money could be made selling ladies pants. So they started to design pants for women. However, when women started to wear pants in the UK, they were not allowed in some churches in pants, some restaruants would not let them in in pants. They were laughed at in the streets, made fools of, and in general did not have a happy time in pants. But they put up with it all, and look where they are now. However men in skirts. I wear kilts, both tartan and plain black ones, and love it. They are so cool in summer, and warm in winter. I have read on other forums, about women who wont let their husbands have a kilt. But the same women stands there wearing pants. That makes me see red. They do not believe in equality in clothing. So that is my 2 pence worth.
fashion kilt wearer

johnie
Newbie
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 11:25 pm
Location: borders

men in skirts

Postby johnie on Tue Sep 16, 2008 3:28 pm

I forgot to mention in my post a few minutes ago. When women first started in pants, they were not been made for women, so they bought pants from mens shops and altered them to fit. In my mind THEY WERE CROSS DRESSING. There is no other way to describe this action. to alter mens pants to fit and wearing them is cross dressing. So men should go and do the same, but wear skirts. However there are firms making skirts for men already, so they are not cross dressing.
Another 2 pennies worth.
fashion kilt wearer

User avatar
Alf Huckham
Demigod
 
Posts: 9217
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:45 pm

Postby Alf Huckham on Tue Sep 16, 2008 3:47 pm

shurrup you old C*** Cutter

User avatar
lisa star
Chat Merchant
 
Posts: 304
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 12:59 am
Location: west sussex

Postby lisa star on Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:03 pm

Wearing a skirt makes me feel free and is much better for a bloke not to have tight trousers on and feel the air on your leg's is great.
Hug's Lisa CD/TV xxxxxx

johnie
Newbie
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 11:25 pm
Location: borders

SKIRTS FOR MEN

Postby johnie on Tue Sep 16, 2008 7:41 pm

lisa
I could not agree more. The feel of the cool air around ones legs is great, but also for men, is the alternative choice of item to wear. When it is cool, many women change into pants, but when the air gets warmer, they put on a dress or skirt, to stay cool and fresh. Not so men, they stay in pants and get hot and bothered. But with skirts for men already been made, they dont have to.
fashion kilt wearer

PreviousNext

Return to Fashion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests