

none of the above wrote:I see little need for imposing such procedures on babies. Is there a real medical problem with letting a male child get to an age where he can objectively decide for himself if it's a needful process...
Meh, there's some that think hacking ears from puppies is still the done thing...
C.G. wrote:I think there may well be a cultural divide across the pond with our American friends here - you guys mainly are circumcised as a matter of routine, from what I can gather. In this country and many other European countries, it is less usual, and mainly done for religious reasons, or because there has been some health problem. To put it into context, I have only seen the results of it once in real life....

jinjin wrote:It will not work and the results prove it. To enforce it uniformly you must make all children property of the state, and they are many states that do not wish to have the responsibility of raising other people's children.
C.G. wrote:To put it into context, I have only seen the results of it once in real life....

Lucylastic wrote:C.G. wrote:To put it into context, I have only seen the results of it once in real life....
Really? It is not at all uncommon in London.
C.G. wrote: 20 pc of Brits. Of those 20 pc apparently the majoriy are done for religious reasons (explains why I haven't come across them!) . It is similar in most of Europe according to Wiki.

Lucylastic wrote:C.G. wrote: 20 pc of Brits. Of those 20 pc apparently the majoriy are done for religious reasons (explains why I haven't come across them!) . It is similar in most of Europe according to Wiki.
2.7 percent of the population are Muslim, 0.5 percent are Jewish. That leaves a significant proportion of chaps who've had a bit off the end for reasons other than religion, surely?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests