Female First Logo
  • Love & Sex
  • Find out more

    • Dating
    • Relationships
    • Weddings
    • Agony Aunts
  • Community
    • Discussion Board
    • Quick Chat
  • Celebrities
  • Find out more

    • Celebrity Gossip
    • Entertainment Gossip
    • Royal Family
    • Celebrity Interviews
    • Photo Gallery
    • Celebrity Directory
  • Lifestyle
  • Find out more

    • Parenting
    • Motoring
    • Travel
    • Food & Drink
    • Health
    • Home & Garden
    • Money
    • Business
    • Recruitment
    • Women's Issues
  • Entertainment
  • Find out more

    • Entertainment Gossip
    • Music
    • Movies
    • Sport
    • TV & Soaps
    • DVD and Blu-Ray
    • Games
    • Bollywood
    • Book Reviews
    • Bizarre
    • Competitions
    • Horoscopes
    • Big Brother
  • Fashion & Beauty
  • Find out more

    • Style News
    • Celebrity Style
    • Beauty Tips
    • Fashion Trends
    • Style Surgery
    • Shopping
  • Shopping
    • Fashion
    • Lingerie
    • Offers
    • Swimwear
    • DVDs
    • Gaming
    • Books
    • CDs
    • Gifts
  • Blog
    • Fashion Blog
    • Health Blog
    • Movies Blog
    • Music Blog
    • Sport Blog
  • Video
    • Latest Videos
    • Exclusive Videos
    • Celebrity Gossip Videos
    • Movie Trailers
    • Video Interviews
  • Follow us
  • femalefirst facebook
  • femalefirst twitter
  • Follow Me on Pinterest
FemaleFirst.co.uk Discussion Board Quick Chat  

Advanced search
  • Board index ‹ Films and Celebrity ‹ Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Section
  • Change font size
  • E-mail friend
  • Print view
  • FAQ
  • Register
  • Login

Jennifer Aniston Thread

All posts on Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston
Post a reply
35795 posts • Page 1416 of 2387 • 1 ... 1413, 1414, 1415, 1416, 1417, 1418, 1419 ... 2387
  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Fri Apr 27, 2012 11:16 pm

There is no left behined loon here.I am not a loon and Observer2 tasteless is horrbile Pr dude for brad at jj if he was smart or ( if Brad has smart pr people like say TC has, maniston won't be attached with him 7month let alone 7 years forget the usual "cheat" even her slapped her around and police report is there) she would be removed. The due suck i said something about Brad that he need to change a way the dude got me band. He want fans to blinedly to follow what those lame pr people want to run. No it can't happen because they are not doing the useful case. And the every star publicit ask kisser jared had to accept the request to banned me.But who cares! I have been band before for the similar reason befoer and I able to post again for some reason agin this is not the first time and I don't care much about and if I want to sign in in fans sites I would but I never tried that because I am not interested to sign in and comment.

about your allegations...Angie got only Brad and he hers and maniston like I said after 8 men 4 of them she admit for real came in her vag and acepting it was a relatipship,she should have been removed in all things from them but thanks to you interns support using her to attack jp , she is here to the day.
Have you seen her denying the 5 comment she gave in less than two weeks about the engagment? exactly . She won't deny any because all were given by her. For the person who doesn't care all those comments in little days tell something else about her. How desperate she is and how much she care. But when the tabloids sense that about her and put her in the usual victimhood stories she comeout and deny. You see the rythem. She has a freind like cuntia who talk about angie and remind everyone victimhood and then she comment about them 5 times in two weeks but she wants to be conderd as the same time a moved on person. How that can happen?????????????? why not the tabloids put a real story about it ?????? why they do it is becasue maniston give out vibes. She doesn't act like a person who doesn't care who truly moved on. etc.. but that they can not do because it measn loss of Money for them so it continues... and you contiuenss...

GEt the hell her out here she moved on isn't she?????????
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Fri Apr 27, 2012 11:31 pm

The interns can't accept they are using maniston to bash jp and that is why she is relevant tothe day because they support her not because they care but because they use her she is ameans to bash.
I am not loon. I don't want to sign infan sites because I don't like to sign and post and at jj obserer 2 got me banned because he think I say things about brad that he didn't approve. This stupid pr hos want the real fans to shut their mouth and do what this fools run. the problem is they are notdoing their job properly ( if Brad has people who are smart PR like forexample TC has or any other guy with a sucessful PR he wouldn't has been dealing about maniston case even if he slapped her around and their was a police case for 7 years as he did forget the allaged cheat story) So he /they don't do their job but they want people not to think also. I don't care If i am banned or not and this is not the first time they banned me before for some reason and let me post again for some reason of their own. Jared is an ass kisser for every stars publicit s so it is n't surprising.
about your stories about brad and angie being unfaithful... save your stories because NOONE is there. They are eachothers. There is noone comming out with that kind of story.. and as of manny admiting 4 of them get to come in her vag out 8-10 or so she has been with and admitting a relaitonship, she should have been all kind of remeoved but she doesn't want and she has the help of yours so it contiunes.
Her firend cuntia bashes angie reminds everyone victimhood and she comment 5 times in less than 2 weeks about the engament and didn't deny it if it wasn't from her like she does to other things. So then what the tabloids do assoicate her imagining she is still bitter and CARE very much. But when they do that she quickly come out and deny and say I don't know why they people do this :roll: who is she kidding it got to be her and her fools.
She wants to able to bash angie and assoicate relevancy with brad but she wants to be considered moved on. How that can happen?????????stupid old ho.
My problem is with the tablolids instead of talking about she pin for Brad, which she want them to do, why won't they say the real reason they put that kind of stories.
like in list what she does and what she then deny . Why not they tell her if you moved on act like one in all ways. But that means they will lose money so it contiues... and you contiuness...
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Fri Apr 27, 2012 11:32 pm

The interns can't accept they are using maniston to bash jp and that is why she is relevant tothe day because they support her not because they care but because they use her she is ameans to bash.
I am not loon. I don't want to sign infan sites because I don't like to sign and post and at jj obserer 2 got me banned because he think I say things about brad that he didn't approve. This stupid pr hos want the real fans to shut their mouth and do what this fools run. the problem is they are notdoing their job properly ( if Brad has people who are smart PR like forexample TC has or any other guy with a sucessful PR he wouldn't has been dealing about maniston case even if he slapped her around and their was a police case for 7 years as he did forget the allaged cheat story) So he /they don't do their job but they want people not to think also. I don't care If i am banned or not and this is not the first time they banned me before for some reason and let me post again for some reason of their own. Jared is an ass kisser for every stars publicit s so it is n't surprising.
about your stories about brad and angie being unfaithful... save your stories because NOONE is there. They are eachothers. There is noone comming out with that kind of story.. and as of manny admiting 4 of them get to come in her vag out 8-10 or so she has been with and admitting a relaitonship, she should have been all kind of remeoved but she doesn't want and she has the help of yours so it contiunes.
Her firend cuntia bashes angie reminds everyone victimhood and she comment 5 times in less than 2 weeks about the engament and didn't deny it if it wasn't from her like she does to other things. So then what the tabloids do assoicate her imagining she is still bitter and CARE very much. But when they do that she quickly come out and deny and say I don't know why they people do this :roll: who is she kidding it got to be her and her fools.
She wants to able to bash angie and assoicate relevancy with brad but she wants to be considered moved on. How that can happen?????????stupid old ho.
My problem is with the tablolids instead of talking about she pin for Brad, which she want them to do, why won't they say the real reason they put that kind of stories.
like in list what she does and what she then deny . Why not they tell her if you moved on act like one in all ways. But that means they will lose money so it contiues... and you contiuness...
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:02 am

The interns can't accept they are using maniston to bash jp and that is why she is relevant tothe day because they support her not because they care but because they use her she is ameans to bash.
I am not loon. I don't want to sign infan sites because I don't like to sign and post and at jj obserer 2 got me banned because he think I say things about brad that he didn't approve. This stupid pr hos want the real fans to shut their mouth and do what this fools run. the problem is they are notdoing their job properly ( if Brad has people who are smart PR like forexample TC has or any other guy with a sucessful PR he wouldn't has been dealing about maniston case even if he slapped her around and their was a police case for 7 years as he did forget the allaged cheat story) So he /they don't do their job but they want people not to think also. I don't care If i am banned or not and this is not the first time they banned me before for some reason and let me post again for some reason of their own. Jared is an a s s kisser for every stars publicit s so it is n't surprising.
about your stories about brad and angie being unfaithful... save your stories because NOONE is there. They are eachothers. There is noone comming out with that kind of story.. and as of manny admiting 4 of them get to come in her vag out 8-10 or so she has been with and admitting a relaitonship, she should have been all kind of remeoved but she doesn't want and she has the help of yours so it contiunes.
Her firend cuntia bashes angie reminds everyone victimhood and she comment 5 times in less than 2 weeks about the engament and didn't deny it if it wasn't from her like she does to other things. So then what the tabloids do assoicate her imagining she is still bitter and CARE very much. But when they do that she quickly come out and deny and say I don't know why they people do this :roll: who is she kidding it got to be her and her fools.
She wants to able to bash angie and assoicate relevancy with brad but she wants to be considered moved on. How that can happen?????????stupid old ho.
My problem is with the tablolids instead of talking about she pin for Brad, which she want them to do, why won't they say the real reason they put that kind of stories.
like in list what she does and what she then deny . Why not they tell her if you moved on act like one in all ways. But that means they will lose money so it contiues... and you contiuness...
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:06 am

It is beyond insanity to paint Aniston as the sleaze in this threesome. Have the loons ever looked at Jolie’s past antics, porn and drug use photos. Are they blind? Is it complete denial or a sheer lack of observational skills? How can anyone be this crazy? And how can this gruesome twosome Pitt and Jolie be considered a hot couple anymore. In whose world and in what planet?
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:06 am

^FF don't want to post my comment i tried two times so I will stop. After all you must run this site mannyis a mask.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:08 am

Sucks... I haven't been on the site for a couple of days and eagerly clicked on the last few pages of the Jen thread for the latest news and thoughts ... nothing but bitching about those creeps The Brand and comparisons to Jen and Justin.... sucks, nothing good here when its all negative BS and trying to make yourself feel better by trashing someone.... .even if it has to be a loon.

Sucks and maybe we can report and remove the annoying posts again?
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Just Wonderin' » Sat Apr 28, 2012 1:04 am

Ignore the latest loon invasion, they have nothing new to say. They are still going crazy over the lack of public interest in the brand and at being left behind when the long awaited engagement was announced by the jeweler.

The last Jennifer topic was whether she will attend the Comedy Awards being taped tomorrow and shown on May 5th. Horrible Bosses was nominated as a comedy film and she and Jason Bateman were both nominated as film comedy actress and actor for their roles in Horrible Bosses.
Just Wonderin'
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Maryt » Sat Apr 28, 2012 1:19 am

A few articles are popping up about the NBC Must See TV book by Warren Littlefield and describing the leap of faith they had to take on Jennifer given that she was already contracted first to CBS. Littlefield was on NBC's Today Show this morning and you can view his interview where he talks a bit very sweetly about Jennifer here:

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp/47203822#47203822

Jennifer Aniston almost missed out on ‘Friends’ role

Jennifer Aniston almost missed out on her breakthrough role in hit sitcom “Friends” because she was contracted to star on another TV show when she was offered the part as Rachel Green.

NBC network bosses immediately thought of Aniston as the perfect person to portray Green when they were presented with the comedy and they cast her alongside co-stars Courteney Cox, Matthew Perry, Lisa Kudrow, Matt LeBlanc and David Schwimmer.

But she had yet to sign a contract with NBC to officially join the show by the time it was ready to go into production in 1994, and TV executive Warren Littlefield admits they took a huge risk keeping Aniston on the project instead of simply recasting the role – because they weren’t completely sure if she’d be able to quit her other job.

In an interview on the “Today” show on Friday, he said, “We had a little difficulty. She had actually signed on to do a series at CBS and we had to take her in second position. We did the pilot that way, and she still wasn’t available.

“We had to go into series production throwing millions of dollars at risk and we still did not have the rights to go forward with Jennifer.”

Aniston was eventually able to commit to “Friends” and the program went on to become one of the most popular sitcoms of all time, winning multiple awards, including Emmy and Golden Globe honors – and launching her career.


http://blog.sfgate.com/dailydish/2012/04/27/jennifer-aniston-almost-missed-out-on-%E2%80%98friends%E2%80%99-role/
Maryt
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Maryt » Sat Apr 28, 2012 1:23 am

Apologies if this is a multiple post, but having trouble posting (yet somehow offensive, off-topic and incoherent posts manage to go through no problem!). A few articles are popping up about the NBC Must See TV book by Warren Littlefield and describing the leap of faith they had to take on Jennifer given that she was already contracted first to CBS. Littlefield was on NBC's Today Show this morning and you can view his interview where he talks a bit very sweetly about Jennifer here:

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp/47203822#47203822

Jennifer Aniston almost missed out on ‘Friends’ role

Jennifer Aniston almost missed out on her breakthrough role in hit sitcom “Friends” because she was contracted to star on another TV show when she was offered the part as Rachel Green.

NBC network bosses immediately thought of Aniston as the perfect person to portray Green when they were presented with the comedy and they cast her alongside co-stars Courteney Cox, Matthew Perry, Lisa Kudrow, Matt LeBlanc and David Schwimmer.

But she had yet to sign a contract with NBC to officially join the show by the time it was ready to go into production in 1994, and TV executive Warren Littlefield admits they took a huge risk keeping Aniston on the project instead of simply recasting the role – because they weren’t completely sure if she’d be able to quit her other job.

In an interview on the “Today” show on Friday, he said, “We had a little difficulty. She had actually signed on to do a series at CBS and we had to take her in second position. We did the pilot that way, and she still wasn’t available.

“We had to go into series production throwing millions of dollars at risk and we still did not have the rights to go forward with Jennifer.”

Aniston was eventually able to commit to “Friends” and the program went on to become one of the most popular sitcoms of all time, winning multiple awards, including Emmy and Golden Globe honors – and launching her career.
Maryt
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Maryt » Sat Apr 28, 2012 1:25 am

Glam Slam: The Friday Five: Get The Perfect Tan

Image

Ready to wear your cute new summer dresses and tank tops, but feeling too pale? (Story of my life.) Go bronze like Jennifer Aniston and add some color without sun damage thanks to these tips from InStyle magazine.

1. GO SLOWLY: Opt for a moisturizer that gradually builds a subtle tan with DHA, a chemical that produces a darker color in the upper layers of skin. Apply it every day and, within a week, you’ll see a slightly deeper hue emerge.

2. PREP YOUR BODY: Shower and shave a few hours before the self-tanning, then smooth the skin’s surface with an exfoliator so the color goes on evenly.

3. MOISTURIZE DRY SPOTS: Don’t forget to rub a little lotion on your elbows, knees, and feet. Since those areas tend to be super-dry, they grab more color and can wind up darker than the rest of your body.

4. CREATE CONTOURS: Though self-tanner can give you a nice, healthy glow, it often erases the natural shadows that give your face definition. Add dimension with a powder brush that’s one shade darker than your tan. Using a fan brush, dust it along the cheekbones, sides of the nose, hairline, and jawline.

5. PICK THE RIGHT OUTFIT: If you’re bronzing at a salon, wear loose, long-sleeve loungewear. Besides the delayed glow from DHA, most formulas also deliver a temporary tint that can rub off. So the more covered up you are, the less likely it is to smudge anything else.


http://www.accesshollywood.com/glam-slam-the-friday-five-get-the-perfect-tan_article_63938
Maryt
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sat Apr 28, 2012 1:26 am

If Jen was slated to be Rachael all along why is the rumor that she was originally going to be the role Courtney Cox had.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Just Wonderin' » Sat Apr 28, 2012 1:37 am

Courtney has said she decided after being cast for Rachel that she really wanted to play Monica instead. That's when they looked for a new Rachel. That search was the one in which they wanted Jennifer.
Just Wonderin'
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Maryt » Sat Apr 28, 2012 2:14 am

If Jen was slated to be Rachael all along why is the rumor that she was originally going to be the role Courtney Cox had.


Courtney has said she decided after being cast for Rachel that she really wanted to play Monica instead. That's when they looked for a new Rachel. That search was the one in which they wanted Jennifer.


That's not exactly true.

Both stories - that Jennifer and Courteney were originally wanted for the other's part, and that Jennifer got Rachel and was already signed with CBS are not new - they've been talked about for years. Courteney was asked by those casting the show to come and read for Rachel, and likewise, Jennifer was asked to come and read for Monica. They both actually wanted to read for the role they eventually got - they both felt more of a connection to the roles they later played - they expressed this and that's who they then were allowed to read for. So Courteney read and was offered Monica - as per the new book, it came down to her and Nancy McKeon, but the creators wanted Courteney. She was never offered the role of Rachel, just asked to come and audition for it initially. Similarly, Jennifer read for and was offered the role of Rachel only a couple of hours after the audition, after initially being asked to read for Monica. When she auditioned she was already signed with CBS for Muddling Through, which ended up canceled. But before it was, NBC was taking a huge financial gamble on hiring and proceeding to shoot with her.
Maryt
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Just Wondein' » Sat Apr 28, 2012 2:19 am

Any word on the Comedy Awards appearance?
Just Wondein'
 
Top

PreviousNext

Post a reply
35795 posts • Page 1416 of 2387 • 1 ... 1413, 1414, 1415, 1416, 1417, 1418, 1419 ... 2387

Return to Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Section

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Sign up stay updated
Tweets by @FemaleFirst_UK

Like Us On facebook

Save up to 75% in the Lovehoney Sale
web2 - 0.01s