Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Guest wrote:"Homophobia" implies "irrationality". I am COLDLY RATIONAL. Unlike the bulk of the straights, I KNOW what goes on in the homo community, so you don't fool ME; you need not bother with all that fag propaganda about how my prejudice is based on 'ignorance"; my attitude is based on FACTUAL KNOWLEDGE about the homos: their rampant promiscuity,(untroubled by condoms, for the most part; I recall reading a serious article in a GAY magazine (X-tra!) on the escalating rates of "barebacking" among the younger homos back in 1999, and you can be SURE it hasn't gotten any better since then!)
-Their sexually-transmitted disease rates (OFF THE SCALE, and many of them incurable or antibiotic-resistant!), their tendencies towards DRUG ABUSE (they also have the HIGHEST rates of prescription drug abuse, for starters, and it was GAY "club culture" that introduced drugs like "special k" and "GHB" to the general public back in the 80s and 90s, as I'm sure you KNOW)
-And, less well realized, their not-particularly-covert MEDIA push to make their particular practices 'acceptable" to the general public. I am also well-armed with the STATISTICS, (garnered directly from the archives of Health Canada, and not the sanitized versions, either) that show the appalling truth about GAY DISEASE RATES.
The fact is, is that this "push" to make "sexual deviancy" acceptable is going to have some very unexpected negative side effects, one of which will be to expose WOMEN to MORE STDs than ever before...now that homo sex is crawling out of the seedy "suck bars" and into everyone's lives, women should be made aware that given the horrifyingly HIGH disease rates among homos, to say nothing of their extremely common, filthy, E-coli -laden sexual practice of "<A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/catalog/default.php/cPath/23_64_255' target='_blank'><A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/catalog/default.php/cPath/23_64_255' target='_blank'><A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/catalog/default.php/cPath/23_64_255' target='_blank'>Anal</A></A></A> sex" , they can expect that THEY will ALSO be exposed to them through the media of a male population that sees no problem with "exploring its homosexual radicle".
It is already estimated that among the male population, that THREE out of FOUR young men under the age of 30 are already carrying around an STD of some kind; that's a pretty APPALLING statistic, and one that if it isn't true NOW, soon WILL BE.
Given that men as a rule tend to be 'careless' about their health (never mind their SEXUAL health) and their personal hygiene, and young men, especially, will jump at ANY opportunity to 'get lucky", and that NOW, with gayness becoming acceptable, they will have MANY MORE opportunities to "get lucky" (if you could call it that!) and thus MANY MORE OPPORTUNITIES to contract a nasty, INCURABLE, sexually-transmitted disease through such contact! And, all the young women who "hook up" with these young men, will , by extension, ALSO have the opportunity to contract those diseases AS WELL.
As a woman, I surely have the RIGHT to warn my younger female contemporaries of this danger, one which, plastered over with BS media hype and falsehoods about the "harmlessness" of homosexuality, tends to get LOST in the shuffle! It is no surprise that the homos would NOT wish to make these "facts" PUBLIC; in our disease-phobic society, their campaign would have a much lesser chance of succeeding, if the FACTS about their DISEASE RATES were better known! The homos HATE women anyway; the fact that women will now be exposed to their awful diseases through the intermediary of their "bi-curious" boyfriends no doubt gives the homos a good giggle, right?
Oh and here's ANOTHER little factual gossip tidbit to add to the one about "gerbiling": A while ago the gay pride event committee was in danger of losing its funding; this was because Health Canada finally put two and two together and realized about the HUGE ENORMOUS SPIKE in Toronto's STD rates in July and August was due to the influx of homos into Toronto for the GP event; it of course serves an unparallelled opportunity for all the disease-carrying-homos all over North America to get laid and leave the consequences BEHIND them for OUR health care system to bear the brunt of!
VAJ
Fellow Canadian here. LOL at Xtra as a "serious" magazine, gimme a break. Oh? So there are "serious" gay magazines?>snicker< (How does one talk seriously about "packing fudge",I wonder?) The fact is, it is a GAY magazine, and when the GAYS THEMSELVES express concern over the fact that younger homos are opting out of "safe sex" then I would say there's CAUSE FOR CONCERN.
In some regions MSM (men who have sex with men) do have the highest infection rates. However, rates are also increasing among teenagers, women, and people over 50. Because there is a whole HELL of a LOT MORE disease out there among :young men (who are being sanctioned to "explore their homosexual radicle" women (more women are being brainwashed into thinking bisexual and homosexual men are 'sexy", without realizing that this means that THEY are exposing themselves to ENORMOUS amounts of INCURABLE STDs) Speaking of women in many regions of the world infection rates are highest among women and the great majority of them are infected by hetero men. How do YOU KNOW they are "hetero"? Lotsa nominally "straight" men sneak off for a little homo sex on the side! What, are you STUPID?
Funny how everybody acts like they know so much about the homos, and they DON'T know THIS little fact! I also know for a FACT that in INDIA, men ROUTINELY have sex with other men , just like in Muslim countries, where men are segregated by societal laws from women, pederasty and homosexuality is VERY COMMON. But, it is, of course, kept on the 'down-low', so ,of course nobody talks about it!
Also, there is a crucial cultural distinction in play here that few knows about:in the countries you mention, only men who actually "take it up the butt" are considered "homosexual"!!! Men who "take the active role" are NOT considered "homos" at all, since that "role" is proper to "a man"! So, again, all these men in those countries claiming to be 'hetero" are NOTHING OF THE SORT by OUR standards, but they ARE 'hetero", by THEIR cultural standards! Hence the common perception that they caught AIDS from "female prostitutes".
So to focus on the gay community with such vitriolic hatred is both ridiculous and short sighted. The TRUTH HURTS, doesn't it?
Nothing "ridiculous" about it AT ALL, and it is not I who is being "shortsighted", as you will all find to your sorrow in a few more years, after the homos have had more time to "give us their gifts"!!! (Just look up the term "gift-giver" and for fun, "bug-chaser". Two terms for sinister activities common to the gay community!)
Funny, how covert HATRED directed at WOMEN is disregarded, but the mention of a few cold hard facts about the homos is dismissed as "vitriol"!
The HIV/AIDS problem goes far beyond the gay community blaming them for such a complex epidemic is simplistic and frankly, dishonest. It is YOU who are being dishonest and/or deliberastely OBTUSE. AIDS came to North America via ONE fag, and started from THERE. Of course, when you have a population of people that routinely has 10 or more sex partners a WEEK, its hardly surprising that AIDS would have spread like WILDFIRE, right? And now that there's "a cure", it's back to the old "unprotected" grind! And, OUR health care system is BEARING THE BRUNT of it!
I don't care what anyone says, this is one of the most interesting things I've read about homosexuality. Especially the part about homosexuals in Muslim countries.




