Jennifer Aniston Thread

[Guest]

Good grief. I see the blogs are latching onto Chelsea's comments. I don't know why people can't get over the fact that Chelsea's a comedienne and she's been railing against Jolie for literally years.

[Guest]

NE has been making up stories about Jen that are simply bs. Honestly I don't understand why anyone could believe any stories about a celeb written in those mags. Not even for celebs you hate.

As for the Chelsea comment Guest I find it annoying that Jen gets blamed for what she says. I personally wish she would shut up about Jolie, but she has been doing it for years before Jen. It is what it is though. In pro-Angelina blogs or mags Jen would be blamed for the tsunami...lol

Lola:-)

[Guest]

I wish JA and her desperate barrens neither talk about neiher stays under their name thread neither the meida mention them for any reason. But all of the threes stille exists because the disease continue to do what she does. GEt out here and then what you do or your barrens say won't matter. No wonder they are a towel where every guy wife and leave.
Why not she talk about how maniston take stummy it wouold be more intersesting that trying to meniton angie's or anything hers. Bitter towels, They get thier atteniton only when they attach or mention.

[Monie]

They do not name Justin Theroux anywhere in the article. He's outta there and they [NE] know it. It's gonna be announced later on this summer, maybe after Jolieho's wedding, but they're already split.

So, NE "knows" they're broken up, but instead of scooping everyone on it, try write a story about Jennifer hitting a statue at Jason Barenan's house? I mean, come on. Again, if NE knew anything, they wouldn't have had to resort to the over the top nonsense of Jen "collapsing".

I also wish Chelsea would stop talking about Angelina. She has the right to say whatever she wants, but she has to know it's not helping her friend. If this interview is in print now, she must've done the interview more than a month ago, but most people won't realize that, and now it'll feed into this engagement feud nonsense.

[Guest]

I am asking the tabloid interns and anyone who reads this please you be the leader and stop posting anything that has mansiton and JP name together. Pls make Mansiton and co them live thier own life and have their own means of publicty instead of getting using JP. Pls refuse to associate them and stop posting these people with JP. Thankyou in advance.

[Just Wonderin]

Jennifer sells magazines. Until she doesn't, the mags print and _ will make up stories about her when there are no real ones available. As byproduct of this process is that it gives the Loons something to gripe about.

[Guest]

They do not name Justin Theroux anywhere in the article. He's outta there and they [NE] know it. It's gonna be announced later on this summer, maybe after Jolieho's wedding, but they're already split.

So, NE "knows" they're broken up, but instead of scooping everyone on it, try write a story about Jennifer hitting a statue at Jason Barenan's house? I mean, come on. Again, if NE knew anything, they wouldn't have had to resort to the over the top nonsense of Jen "collapsing".

I also wish Chelsea would stop talking about Angelina. She has the right to say whatever she wants, but she has to know it's not helping her friend. If this interview is in print now, she must've done the interview more than a month ago, but most people won't realize that, and now it'll feed into this engagement feud nonsense.

Chelsea has been using Jolie as material for her standup routine for nearly a decade -- since long before she and Aniston became close friends. Expecting her to censor what she says simply because she is now friends with Aniston is an outrageous suggestion. I believe Aniston herself would be appalled if she knew her fans expected Chelsea Handler to censor her remarks for Jen's sake.

In fact, If Chelsea's comments about Jolie bothered Jen that much, she and Chelsea would never have become as close of friends as they are, since Chelsea used to be much more vocal and much nastier about Jolie. In fact, if anything, Chelsea seems to have dialed the Jolie-ridicule back a notch since becoming friends with Aniston.

I consider myself a fan of both women, and I have a hard time reading these kinds of comments. Really, people, the whole world does not revolve around Jen, and I doubt she'd want it to.

[Guest]

Jennifer sells magazines. Until she doesn't, the mags print and _ will make up stories about her when there are no real ones available. As byproduct of this process is that it gives the Loons something to gripe about.

I don't care they write about her I am asking you people jsut stop mentioning jp with her with her friends with her anything no matter is the attempt no matter they try pls.

[Guest]

Jennifer sells magazines. Until she doesn't, the mags print and _ will make up stories about her when there are no real ones available. As byproduct of this process is that it gives the Loons something to gripe about.

I don't care they write about her I am asking you people jsut stop mentioning jp with her with her friends with her anything no matter is the attempt no matter they try pls.

You people means as in blog wirters, tabloid interns/magazines and everyone in the media per say . thankyou in advance.

[Maryt]

I also wish Chelsea would stop talking about Angelina. She has the right to say whatever she wants, but she has to know it's not helping her friend. If this interview is in print now, she must've done the interview more than a month ago, but most people won't realize that, and now it'll feed into this engagement feud nonsense.

Agree with you. I mean it's ridiculous that the blogs and tabloids jump on anything Handler says about Jolie and link Jennifer to it - as if Jennifer controls what her friends do in their professional capacities! It's also unfair that Handler can't comment or make jokes about Jolie like other comediennes without it being blown out of proportion simply because of her friendship with Jennifer - I also find this to be a bit misogynistic too for a couple of reasons: 1) Jennifer is good friends with Fallon and Conan, both of whom have made jokes at Jolie's expense (even some recently), yet no one in the media connected Jennifer to their comments, and no one in the media jumped on those male comediennes for their comments (because you know, women only confide and Bleet to other females who then always stick up for them by bitching out other women ), and 2) male comediennes are always allowed to be sarcastic, bold, critical, etc., but a female comedienne is called down to the dirt - ironically mostly by females! - for doing the same thing. And then there is the other element to this recent story that you bring up too - that this latest comment of Handler's was probably made a couple of months ago if it is just now coming out in a magazine, yet the blogs will jump on this given the recent engagement news and try to connect the two as well. It's all ridiculous.

However, unfair as it may be, I do wish Handler would think more before speaking sometimes. I don't think there is anything wrong with her making jokes about Jolie - that's part of her job as a comedienne. She actually hadn't done that for quite some time on her show before Jolie's Oscar leg incident. And her roundtable didn't even talk about the engagement last week, so I do think she made that call out of respect for Jennifer and knowing how anything she said about it might get tied back to her. But the comments in question in this latest magazine interview aren't her making a joke but responding to a question about how to know and who she thought isn't a "girl's girl." In this case, she ought to have known that naming Jolie would get brought back negatively on Jennifer, and she really could have answered the general question without naming Jolie (or anyone) as a specific example.

[Cheater Ho brad pitt]

I am asking the tabloid interns and anyone who reads this please you be the leader and stop posting anything that has mansiton and JP name together. Pls make Mansiton and co them live thier own life and have their own means of publicty instead of getting using JP. Pls refuse to associate them and stop posting these people with JP. Thankyou in advance.

You are an insecure b.i.t.ch, why waste your time on this thread when you clearly is a hater, what makes you keep coming here
oh because you are obsessed with our jen, gtfo here and let go son

[Guest]

I also wish Chelsea would stop talking about Angelina. She has the right to say whatever she wants, but she has to know it's not helping her friend. If this interview is in print now, she must've done the interview more than a month ago, but most people won't realize that, and now it'll feed into this engagement feud nonsense.

Agree with you. I mean it's ridiculous that the blogs and tabloids jump on anything Handler says about Jolie and link Jennifer to it - as if Jennifer controls what her friends do in their professional capacities! It's also unfair that Handler can't comment or make jokes about Jolie like other comediennes without it being blown out of proportion simply because of her friendship with Jennifer - I also find this to be a bit misogynistic too for a couple of reasons: 1) Jennifer is good friends with Fallon and Conan, both of whom have made jokes at Jolie's expense (even some recently), yet no one in the media connected Jennifer to their comments, and no one in the media jumped on those male comediennes for their comments (because you know, women only confide and Bleet to other females who then always stick up for them by bitching out other women ), and 2) male comediennes are always allowed to be sarcastic, bold, critical, etc., but a female comedienne is called down to the dirt - ironically mostly by females! - for doing the same thing. And then there is the other element to this recent story that you bring up too - that this latest comment of Handler's was probably made a couple of months ago if it is just now coming out in a magazine, yet the blogs will jump on this given the recent engagement news and try to connect the two as well. It's all ridiculous.

However, unfair as it may be, I do wish Handler would think more before speaking sometimes. I don't think there is anything wrong with her making jokes about Jolie - that's part of her job as a comedienne. She actually hadn't done that for quite some time on her show before Jolie's Oscar leg incident. And her roundtable didn't even talk about the engagement last week, so I do think she made that call out of respect for Jennifer and knowing how anything she said about it might get tied back to her. But the comments in question in this latest magazine interview aren't her making a joke but responding to a question about how to know and who she thought isn't a "girl's girl." In this case, she ought to have known that naming Jolie would get brought back negatively on Jennifer, and she really could have answered the general question without naming Jolie (or anyone) as a specific example.

You bring up a number of great points, but I respectfully, but vehemently, disagree with your last paragraph. What you are saying is that anyone who is or becomes a friend of Aniston's must never ever say anything about either Pitt or Jolie in case there is fallout for Jen. That is just wrong on so many levels. Chelsea Handler is known both for speaking very frankly and for her dislike of Jolie. She has been known for these things for years -- long before she became friends with Jen. If Jen had a problem with that, she would never have cultivated the friendship with Handler as she has.

The bottom line, as I see it, is that Jen has moved on. She doesn't care what Handler says about Jolie because it has nothing to do with her (Jen). If Aniston gets that, I'm not sure why her fans don't.

[Guest]

[Just Wonderin']

Yeah, those sure are their mega fake smiles. This photo could be used as part of the training process for people to learn to determine fake from real smiles. Loons have a lot of trouble with this.

[Guest]

I also wish Chelsea would stop talking about Angelina. She has the right to say whatever she wants, but she has to know it's not helping her friend. If this interview is in print now, she must've done the interview more than a month ago, but most people won't realize that, and now it'll feed into this engagement feud nonsense.

Agree with you. I mean it's ridiculous that the blogs and tabloids jump on anything Handler says about Jolie and link Jennifer to it - as if Jennifer controls what her friends do in their professional capacities! It's also unfair that Handler can't comment or make jokes about Jolie like other comediennes without it being blown out of proportion simply because of her friendship with Jennifer - I also find this to be a bit misogynistic too for a couple of reasons: 1) Jennifer is good friends with Fallon and Conan, both of whom have made jokes at Jolie's expense (even some recently), yet no one in the media connected Jennifer to their comments, and no one in the media jumped on those male comediennes for their comments (because you know, women only confide and Bleet to other females who then always stick up for them by bitching out other women ), and 2) male comediennes are always allowed to be sarcastic, bold, critical, etc., but a female comedienne is called down to the dirt - ironically mostly by females! - for doing the same thing. And then there is the other element to this recent story that you bring up too - that this latest comment of Handler's was probably made a couple of months ago if it is just now coming out in a magazine, yet the blogs will jump on this given the recent engagement news and try to connect the two as well. It's all ridiculous.

However, unfair as it may be, I do wish Handler would think more before speaking sometimes. I don't think there is anything wrong with her making jokes about Jolie - that's part of her job as a comedienne. She actually hadn't done that for quite some time on her show before Jolie's Oscar leg incident. And her roundtable didn't even talk about the engagement last week, so I do think she made that call out of respect for Jennifer and knowing how anything she said about it might get tied back to her. But the comments in question in this latest magazine interview aren't her making a joke but responding to a question about how to know and who she thought isn't a "girl's girl." In this case, she ought to have known that naming Jolie would get brought back negatively on Jennifer, and she really could have answered the general question without naming Jolie (or anyone) as a specific example.

You bring up a number of great points, but I respectfully, but vehemently, disagree with your last paragraph. What you are saying is that anyone who is or becomes a friend of Aniston's must never ever say anything about either Pitt or Jolie in case there is fallout for Jen. That is just wrong on so many levels. Chelsea Handler is known both for speaking very frankly and for her dislike of Jolie. She has been known for these things for years -- long before she became friends with Jen. If Jen had a problem with that, she would never have cultivated the friendship with Handler as she has.

The bottom line, as I see it, is that Jen has moved on. She doesn't care what Handler says about Jolie because it has nothing to do with her (Jen). If Aniston gets that, I'm not sure why her fans don't.

For me it's not that I don't get that. It's that the media doesn't get that. I am sure Jen is a big girl and can handle anything thrown at her as proved many times. I am just annoyed for her that she has to be connected to the Jolie Pitts and even dragging anything her friends say into the mix.

Lola:-)