Female First Logo
  • Love & Sex
  • Find out more

    • Dating
    • Relationships
    • Weddings
    • Agony Aunts
  • Community
    • Discussion Board
    • Quick Chat
  • Celebrities
  • Find out more

    • Celebrity Gossip
    • Entertainment Gossip
    • Royal Family
    • Celebrity Interviews
    • Photo Gallery
    • Celebrity Directory
  • Lifestyle
  • Find out more

    • Parenting
    • Motoring
    • Travel
    • Food & Drink
    • Health
    • Home & Garden
    • Money
    • Business
    • Recruitment
    • Women's Issues
  • Entertainment
  • Find out more

    • Entertainment Gossip
    • Music
    • Movies
    • Sport
    • TV & Soaps
    • DVD and Blu-Ray
    • Games
    • Bollywood
    • Book Reviews
    • Bizarre
    • Competitions
    • Horoscopes
    • Big Brother
  • Fashion & Beauty
  • Find out more

    • Style News
    • Celebrity Style
    • Beauty Tips
    • Fashion Trends
    • Style Surgery
    • Shopping
  • Shopping
    • Fashion
    • Lingerie
    • Offers
    • Swimwear
    • DVDs
    • Gaming
    • Books
    • CDs
    • Gifts
  • Blog
    • Fashion Blog
    • Health Blog
    • Movies Blog
    • Music Blog
    • Sport Blog
  • Video
    • Latest Videos
    • Exclusive Videos
    • Celebrity Gossip Videos
    • Movie Trailers
    • Video Interviews
  • Follow us
  • femalefirst facebook
  • femalefirst twitter
  • Follow Me on Pinterest
FemaleFirst.co.uk Discussion Board Quick Chat  

Advanced search
  • Board index ‹ Films and Celebrity ‹ Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Section
  • Change font size
  • E-mail friend
  • Print view
  • FAQ
  • Register
  • Login

The hagwitch wants to distract from the PLAGIARISM SUIT

All posts on Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston
Post a reply
85 posts • Page 4 of 6 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: The hagwitch wants to distract from the PLAGIARISM SUIT

Postby friends » Fri Apr 20, 2012 12:38 pm

VVVVV wrote:It's absolutely TELLING about the TRUE state of affairs that we are hearing about how the ring has been in production for "a year"-yet there is no sign that wedding plans are being or have been made AT ALL! Zip. Nada.

That fact, in and of itself, is the CLUE that demonstrates that the whole thing is a big PR song-and-dance, probably meant to distract from the PLAGIARISM SUIT...Yahoo, f'r instance, can't seem to pump the "Brangelina engagement"articles about out FAST ENOUGH...you'd almost think they were being PAID to do so! :twisted:

And, what could the ho be wanting to 'distract' from? It's GOT to be the plagiarism suit...didn't somebody SAY it was being put off until late April? And gee, here it is: LATE APRIL. It's gotta be THAT. Keep your eyes open, everyone; these two NEVER do anything like this without a REASON (and, believe me, it's NOT about any damn "engagement"; the most cursory scrutiny of the details shows that clearly!) Don't fall for the hype; it's being put out there to keep you from seeing SOMETHING ELSE she DOESN'T want seen!

VAJ
friends
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: The hagwitch wants to distract from the PLAGIARISM SUIT

Postby MYGUEST » Fri Apr 20, 2012 2:51 pm

friends wrote:
VVVVV wrote:It's absolutely TELLING about the TRUE state of affairs that we are hearing about how the ring has been in production for "a year"-yet there is no sign that wedding plans are being or have been made AT ALL! Zip. Nada.

That fact, in and of itself, is the CLUE that demonstrates that the whole thing is a big PR song-and-dance, probably meant to distract from the PLAGIARISM SUIT...Yahoo, f'r instance, can't seem to pump the "Brangelina engagement"articles about out FAST ENOUGH...you'd almost think they were being PAID to do so! :twisted:

And, what could the ho be wanting to 'distract' from? It's GOT to be the plagiarism suit...didn't somebody SAY it was being put off until late April? And gee, here it is: LATE APRIL. It's gotta be THAT. Keep your eyes open, everyone; these two NEVER do anything like this without a REASON (and, believe me, it's NOT about any damn "engagement"; the most cursory scrutiny of the details shows that clearly!) Don't fall for the hype; it's being put out there to keep you from seeing SOMETHING ELSE she DOESN'T want seen!

VAJ


He is a fool if he marries her before this case if finalized. If Mr. Braddock is successful in his claim, than any judgement rendered, Pitt's assets can also be obtained through a financial disclosure, and be assessed in any payout. I don't think EITHER of them want the FEDS poking into their finances........
MYGUEST
Duchess
 
Posts: 2513
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 3:48 am
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: The hagwitch wants to distract from the PLAGIARISM SUIT

Postby Just Wonderin' » Fri Apr 20, 2012 3:04 pm

Even if they marry before any resolution to the suit Pitt's separate assets will not be at risk. They will remain separate under California law since CA is considered their "residence" state.
Just Wonderin'
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: The hagwitch wants to distract from the PLAGIARISM SUIT

Postby MYGUEST » Fri Apr 20, 2012 3:14 pm

Just Wonderin' wrote:Even if they marry before any resolution to the suit Pitt's separate assets will not be at risk. They will remain separate under California law since CA is considered their "residence" state.


Wanna bet? Under the FEDERAL Law, you are married you become ONE entiety. His assets will and can be considered in any judgement. This is NOT the state court, but a FEDERAL court.
MYGUEST
Duchess
 
Posts: 2513
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 3:48 am
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: The hagwitch wants to distract from the PLAGIARISM SUIT

Postby friends » Fri Apr 20, 2012 4:13 pm

MYGUEST wrote:
Just Wonderin' wrote:Even if they marry before any resolution to the suit Pitt's separate assets will not be at risk. They will remain separate under California law since CA is considered their "residence" state.


Wanna bet? Under the FEDERAL Law, you are married you become ONE entiety. His assets will and can be considered in any judgement. This is NOT the state court, but a FEDERAL court.



He was responsible as she did, because he knew that it was not her script and that Braddock was robbed! The Federal Court will call him as witness.
friends
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: The hagwitch wants to distract from the PLAGIARISM SUIT

Postby Guest » Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:30 pm

What else will Jolie do to distract from the plagiarism suit?
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: The hagwitch wants to distract from the PLAGIARISM SUIT

Postby Just Wonderin » Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:41 pm

MYGUEST wrote:
Just Wonderin' wrote:Even if they marry before any resolution to the suit Pitt's separate assets will not be at risk. They will remain separate under California law since CA is considered their "residence" state.


Wanna bet? Under the FEDERAL Law, you are married you become ONE entiety. His assets will and can be considered in any judgement. This is NOT the state court, but a FEDERAL court.


Yeah, I'll take that bet and raise you. Why make this stuff up when people are out there who know what the law is? Premarital assets are not considered community property under state law. Federal law does not convert them into community property upon marriage unless the parties do that themselves by agreement or practice. A federal judgment does not supercede property laws of the state in which it is being collected. BTW where did you get your law degree?
Just Wonderin
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: The hagwitch wants to distract from the PLAGIARISM SUIT

Postby Just Wonderin' » Fri Apr 20, 2012 8:29 pm

He was responsible as she did, because he knew that it was not her script and that Braddock was robbed! The Federal Court will call him as witness.[/quote]

He may be called as a witness to testify about what he knew and when he knew it, but he has no responsibility under the law for her actions and the actions of GK Films andthe other defendants unless he was in on the whole thing somehow. He was always extremely careful about what he said when asked about the movie and her "writing" it, so he may have known something that caused that exercise of caution.
Just Wonderin'
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: The hagwitch wants to distract from the PLAGIARISM SUIT

Postby friends » Fri Apr 20, 2012 8:51 pm

Just Wonderin' wrote:He was responsible as she did, because he knew that it was not her script and that Braddock was robbed! The Federal Court will call him as witness.


He may be called as a witness to testify about what he knew and when he knew it, but he has no responsibility under the law for her actions and the actions of GK Films andthe other defendants unless he was in on the whole thing somehow. He was always extremely careful about what he said when asked about the movie and her "writing" it, so he may have known something that caused that exercise of caution.[/quote]


As a witness he knows not to write, because it takes a lot of time and not two days during the flu. Examine them in detail about writing and everything else, and there will be witnesses of their stupidity, when shame to end up in court. He must think carefully about it, Angelina is already stupid enough to pull it into ruin.
friends
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: The hagwitch wants to distract from the PLAGIARISM SUIT

Postby Just Wonderin' » Fri Apr 20, 2012 11:21 pm

Hey, IMO she did steal the story and then dressed it up with her own fetishes. She called it an untitled love story for heaven's sake. IMO stealing a script is totally consistent with her personality. She is a short cut taker par exellence. I wonder if evidence of her personality traits and predispositions to fabricate will be well developed in the suit. Certainly the drafts of this script she claims to have written, other things she has written herself [not had ghost written like her newspaper pieces] and her knowledge of the war in Bosnia are relevant to the suit. So far she has not demonstrated any real understanding of the war and the various interests involved. Her personality would be an interesting development in this suit. At any rate her credibility is always an issue and let's face it, it will be easy to prove all the lies she has told. These threads alone should be a gold mine for Braddock's legal counsel. Anyone who has anything to do with JoLie ends up in deep sh*ite.
Just Wonderin'
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: The hagwitch wants to distract from the PLAGIARISM SUIT

Postby Guest » Sat Apr 21, 2012 1:04 pm

KrazyDiamond wrote:
Guest wrote:Hi everybody. Been lurking here for years. I just wanted to say that my impression is that LegGate wasn't an accident. The way she flashed the leg over and over, it was almost mechanical, why keep doing it? And there was a story about the dress, something last minute about the way it was chosen, alledgedly.
And from looking at one of the videos that was posted on here, it looks like she's saying, when she walks in front of BP "I didn't even want this F****** dress". (I don't know how to post links from other threads yet) Maybe she was being made fun of by the photographers, anyways, she seemed pissed.
My point is: I think it was a signal. No way that was going unnoticed, it was W o r l d N e w s ! Methinks it was a subtle signal, a "go ahead" or something of the sort to one of the state leaders she has been "meeting with" perhaps? In other words, programming.

Cheers for listening


I'm very intrigued by your theory and it seems plausible, too. Can you elaborate as to who you think is programmed? You think it's Jolie?


If you look at it from this point of view, yeah, absolutely. Folowing the line of thought, the diamond, with all its connotations, public and other, could well be the reward / uprising for getting the job done.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: The hagwitch wants to distract from the PLAGIARISM SUIT

Postby Guest » Sat Apr 21, 2012 1:16 pm

Altough Im not disagreeing with the thread title. Just putting thoughts out, at last :) This seemed like a good place to start. Cheers again.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: The hagwitch wants to distract from the PLAGIARISM SUIT

Postby Guest » Sat Apr 21, 2012 1:22 pm

Guest wrote:
KrazyDiamond wrote:
Guest wrote:Hi everybody. Been lurking here for years. I just wanted to say that my impression is that LegGate wasn't an accident. The way she flashed the leg over and over, it was almost mechanical, why keep doing it? And there was a story about the dress, something last minute about the way it was chosen, alledgedly.
And from looking at one of the videos that was posted on here, it looks like she's saying, when she walks in front of BP "I didn't even want this F****** dress". (I don't know how to post links from other threads yet) Maybe she was being made fun of by the photographers, anyways, she seemed pissed.
My point is: I think it was a signal. No way that was going unnoticed, it was W o r l d N e w s ! Methinks it was a subtle signal, a "go ahead" or something of the sort to one of the state leaders she has been "meeting with" perhaps? In other words, programming.

Cheers for listening


I'm very intrigued by your theory and it seems plausible, too. Can you elaborate as to who you think is programmed? You think it's Jolie?


If you look at it from this point of view, yeah, absolutely. Folowing the line of thought, the diamond, with all its connotations, public and other, could well be the reward / uprising for getting the job done.



How about this: A highly criminal leader from a small (B alkan) country, a perfect match for evil Bleet Jolie, dared her to flash her leg at the Oscar's in return of a favour. We will know what the favour is when we hear it. Maybe. Just an idea.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: The hagwitch wants to distract from the PLAGIARISM SUIT

Postby Guest » Sat Apr 21, 2012 1:25 pm

Guest wrote:
KrazyDiamond wrote:
Guest wrote:Hi everybody. Been lurking here for years. I just wanted to say that my impression is that LegGate wasn't an accident. The way she flashed the leg over and over, it was almost mechanical, why keep doing it? And there was a story about the dress, something last minute about the way it was chosen, alledgedly.
And from looking at one of the videos that was posted on here, it looks like she's saying, when she walks in front of BP "I didn't even want this F****** dress". (I don't know how to post links from other threads yet) Maybe she was being made fun of by the photographers, anyways, she seemed pissed.
My point is: I think it was a signal. No way that was going unnoticed, it was W o r l d N e w s ! Methinks it was a subtle signal, a "go ahead" or something of the sort to one of the state leaders she has been "meeting with" perhaps? In other words, programming.

Cheers for listening


I'm very intrigued by your theory and it seems plausible, too. Can you elaborate as to who you think is programmed? You think it's Jolie?


If you look at it from this point of view, yeah, absolutely. Folowing the line of thought, the diamond, with all its connotations, public and other, could well be the reward / uprising for getting the job done.



Are you alluding to MKUltra? With all her tattoos, Jolie represents a perfect slave, and she often acts like a robot.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: The hagwitch wants to distract from the PLAGIARISM SUIT

Postby Guest » Sat Apr 21, 2012 2:00 pm

Quote:
The United Nations refugee agency has elevated the Hollywood star from being a goodwill ambassador to a special envoy, a role that will see her represent the organization to governments and diplomats.

It is the first time the U.N. refugee agency has named a special envoy, said its spokesman Adrian Edwards. Elsewhere in the global body such posts are usually reserved for career diplomats or retired politicians.

"Her work does go substantially beyond what we would typically see as being the normal role of a goodwill ambassador," Edwards told reporters in Geneva. "I don't think you need a rocket scientist to see the benefits that she is bringing in terms of the attention that she is getting for the plight of the world's displaced."

Jolie has jetted the world on behalf of the organization over the past ten years, making high-profile visits to refugee camps in Iraq, Haiti and Pakistan, among other places.

Apart from her time, Jolie has also given large personal donations to the organization, which relies entirely on voluntary contributions from governments, companies and individuals.

"She has donated substantially to refugees," said Edwards, noting that the actress/director won't receive any money for her role. "There is to my knowledge absolutely no connection between any donation of money and this role."

Jolie's new position will focus on the complex crises that result in the mass displacement of people, such as in Afghanistan and Somalia. In addition, on special occasions she will represent the U.N.'s High Commissioner for Refugees, Antonio Guterres.

"That can mean conveying messages to governments. It can mean conveying messages to other people and partners that we work with," said Edwards.

UNHCR works to help almost 35 million refugees and internally displaced people around the world. It was established to aid millions of Europeans displaced by World War II and has since become one of the world's most prominent humanitarian organizations.[/quote]

Just throwing this into the mix as well. It was in a different thread. I dont mean to be off topic bringing this up, I guess my connection is deflection. It would be great to bring this sort of angle up more, its very interessting, though I understand its a bit out of fashion perhaps? And also, as Im aware, its been properly covered on ff before, no need to repeat it. But yeah, mk, all that.
Guest
 
Top

PreviousNext

Post a reply
85 posts • Page 4 of 6 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Return to Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Section

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 31 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Sign up stay updated
Tweets by @FemaleFirst_UK

Like Us On facebook

Save up to 75% in the Lovehoney Sale
web2 - 0.01s