Anti's & Loons Getting Along Thread

[Guest]

OP here .... anyone getting along yet???

There were a few so-called 'loons' here who although I didn't get their love of brangelina, they seemed reasonable and were able to engage in covos about things here with 'antis'.

I thought Mad Hatter was one of the better "loons." And if I recall correctly, he even readily admitted to a mistake. Several other antis got along with him/her. Vaj didn't, of course. But she's a polarizing figure herself.

[Guest]

[quote="JuJuBee"]1. Here's an example of your tolerance. If anything thinks they own the board, it's you. It's haters/antis who think they own this section of FF and prefer those who disagree with them not to post here. Let's look at your response on another thread to this question asked by the OP. Okay! Your tolerance chip is missing. [You're entitled to your opinion![/b]

OP: How long will the marriage last, if it takes place? She asked!
You: That's their business! Everybody else, mind your own marriage/relationship. That's my answer!

Wow...so that's you getting along with everyone? Does getting along mean you are not allowed an opposite opinion?
I stand by my answer. That's you, the champion of free speech? She asked a question. I answered.

2. It's understood what a person posts is their opinion. Of course, but posting an opinion as fact is wrong! I know that some people who come to read here for the first time, out of curiosity, are flabbergasted, to put it mildly. Others want to puke. Do you have any idea what FFers are called? Female Freaks is a mild one. It would be redundant to constantly type such qualifiers. You should make sure that people who read your post, maybe for the first time, know that you're not posting a fact when you're posting an opinion.

By the way, you don't follow your own rule. You should have stated "In my opinion those who can't stand the Jolie Pitts write their opinions as if they're facts." I think you're nitpicking! I must have said it ten times already! Maybe more. Get with your own program before you impose it on others. Only the site owner can impose rules.
3. Exactly. You contradict yourself. You're against free speech. Rubbish!
4. Exactly. Intolerant people like you put limits on it. Do you read the posts here, JuJuBee? I've said it many times that we're all entitled to our OPINIONS, but should not make up stories. I'm just amazed that many people don't know the limit. Even tabloids, I think, know how far they can go. They have to, or they can be slapped with a lawsuit.

5. Leave everyone's conscience to their own management. I think some people don't seem to have a conscience, or maybe they just haven't matured yet! Your very peculiar definition of free speech bans words, expressions, and opinions that you find personally offensive. Do you enjoy namecalling? Are ugly, vulgar made-up facts okay?

It's clear (some) haters/antis don't like the fact that Jolie has fans, are against opposing opinions, and are intolerant! The other day a poster called me I-forgot-what for being a fan! I don't know how many times I've been told to get the h@ll out of here (as if the posters who said that own FF or this section of FF), or to go back to where I came from.

So tell us what nasty, negative, in-the-gutter sentiments is the OP expressing? This is a thread about getting along which, I think, is actually very positive. The OP who asked how long the JP marriage will last, started her thread because, I guess, she loves talking about Jolie. I know haters/antis LOVE to talk about the JPs all the time! Did your response add to the discussion? Did you present the opposing viewpoint? I present MY viewpoints!
If you're an Angie fan, you could have written the marriage will last forever. You didn't do that. I don't know the future. Do you? I AM an Angie fan, yes! Your response was an insufferably superior, It happens to by my opinion! finger-wagging lecture.Your opinion.

All of your posts are like this. I'm the same on all sites I'm posting in. I give my opinions, don't make up stories and don't namecall. And you're surprised you have a hard time here, What makes you think I'm having a hard time here? Your Majesty? Try acting in good faith and joining the discussion instead of belittling it. When it comes to the JPs, or it's JP related, it's my opinion that most of the time, when an opposing view is presented, haters/antis often slam the messenger, instead of addressing/disputing the points in the post. When it's a slam-Jolie post, I often see others shrieking approval and joining in happily. It makes me smh and I'm reminded again that I'm in the AJ/BP section of FF./quote]

[Guest]

1. Here's an example of your tolerance. If anything thinks they own the board, it's you. No, it's haters/antis who think they own the board and don't want people who disagree with them to post here. I've been told many times to get the h@ll out of here, or to go back where I came from. Let's look at your response on another thread to this question asked by the OP.Okay. Your tolerance chip is missing. YOUR opinion.

OP: How long will the marriage last, if it takes place? Her question.
Loon: That's their business! Everybody else, mind your own marriage/relationship. My answer.

Wow...so that's you getting along with everyone? Does getting along with everyone mean you can't express your opinion, or have an opposing opinion? That's you, the champion of free speech? She asked. I answered. I stand by my answer!

2. It's understood what a person posts is their opinion. Of course, but posting an opinion as fact is wrong. It would be redundant to constantly type such qualifiers. It is right to make sure that when you're posting an opinion, that people who read your post, know that they're reading an opinion. By the way, you don't follow your own rule. You should have stated "In my opinion those who can't stand the Jolie Pitts write their opinions as if they're facts." Get with your own program before you impose it on others. [b]You are nitpicking! I have posted it I don't know how many times. You're not new and you know my posts. If a newbie questions me about it, it would explain it.

[Guest]

1. Here's an example of your tolerance. If anything thinks they own the board, it's you. No, it's haters/antis who think they own the board and don't want people who disagree with them to post here. I've been told many times to get the h@ll out of here, or to go back where I came from. Let's look at your response on another thread to this question asked by the OP.Okay. Your tolerance chip is missing. YOUR opinion.

OP: How long will the marriage last, if it takes place? Her question.
Loon: That's their business! Everybody else, mind your own marriage/relationship. My answer.

Wow...so that's you getting along with everyone? Does getting along with everyone mean you can't express your opinion, or have an opposing opinion? That's you, the champion of free speech? She asked. I answered. I stand by my answer!

2. It's understood what a person posts is their opinion. Of course, but posting an opinion as fact is wrong. It would be redundant to constantly type such qualifiers. It is right to make sure that when you're posting an opinion, that people who read your post, know that they're reading an opinion. By the way, you don't follow your own rule. You should have stated "In my opinion those who can't stand the Jolie Pitts write their opinions as if they're facts." Get with your own program before you impose it on others. You are nitpicking! I have posted it I don't know how many times. You're not new and you know my posts. If a newbie questions me about it, it would explain it.

[Guest]

You contradict yourself. Where? You're against free speech. Rubbish!

Intolerant people like you put limits on it. I'm against presenting opinions as facts, aren't you?

Leave everyone's conscience to their own management. Some people don't seem to have a conscience, or maybe they just haven't matured yet. Your very peculiar Peculiar in your opinion. definition of free speech bans words, expressions, and opinions that you find personally offensive. Are you for namecalling and making up stories, and vulgarity?

[Guest]

So tell us what nasty, negative, in-the-gutter sentiments is the OP expressing? This thread is about getting along, so this is a positive thread. I think the OP in the other thread who asked how long the JP marriage will last, just wants to talk about them. I know haters/antis LOVE to talk about the JP family.
Did your response add to the discussion? I think so. I hope so. Did you present the opposing viewpoint? She didn't post an opinion that one could oppose. She asked a question. If you're an Angie fan, you could have written the marriage will last forever. You didn't do that. Nobody knows the future. Maybe you have a crystal ball? Your response was an insufferably superior, finger-wagging lecture. I stand by it. Any reasonable person would agree with me.

All of your posts are like this. And you're surprised you have a hard time here, What makes you think I'm having a hard time here? Your Majesty? Try acting in good faith and joining the discussion instead of belittling it. [b]There aren't many real discussions here, imo; As soon as anyone disagrees with anything a hater/anti posts about the JPs, many attack the messenger. Many don't address the points made in the post. Haters/antis should learn to tolerate different opinions!

[Guest]

So tell us what nasty, negative, in-the-gutter sentiments is the OP expressing? This thread is about getting along, so this is a positive thread. I think the OP in the other thread who asked how long the JP marriage will last, just wants to talk about them. I know haters/antis LOVE to talk about the JP family.
Did your response add to the discussion? I think so. I hope so. Did you present the opposing viewpoint? She didn't post an opinion that one could oppose. She asked a question. If you're an Angie fan, you could have written the marriage will last forever. You didn't do that. Nobody knows the future. Maybe you have a crystal ball? Your response was an insufferably superior, finger-wagging lecture. I stand by it. Any reasonable person would agree with me.

All of your posts are like this. And you're surprised you have a hard time here, What makes you think I'm having a hard time here? Your Majesty? Try acting in good faith and joining the discussion instead of belittling it. There aren't many real discussions here, imo; As soon as anyone disagrees with anything a hater/anti posts about the JPs, many attack the messenger. Many don't address the points made in the post. Haters/antis should learn to tolerate different opinions!

[Guest]

And why on earth would I want to get along with the loons? To learn to be tolerant of people who have different opinions(?) For starters, try not to namecall. If you want you CAN have civilized discussions with people who have different/opposite opinions. just because we have been posting on the same subject for many years?? So maybe I also should get along with the nazis that post on another board I visit. People who disagree with haters/antis here in FF about the JPs just have different opinions. They are not at all like nazis. After all we ARE posting on the same board even though we disagree. Your choice.

This is nonsense. I chose my friends carefully IRL and on..lin.e. And the loons are certainly NOT the kind of people I would want to socialize with. To people you call 'loons,' YOU are the loon. Do you have any idea what haters/antis are called?
'Female Freaks' is a mild one! I don't want to fight or argue with them either, I just ignore them, Maybe that's the right choice, for you. I would be happy if the just left this board and never came back. They are most definitely NOT the reason I'm here.

And I don't say this only because the are foolish fans of a celeb that I don't like. You sound like an intolerant person. I say it because it is obvious that they are stupid, vicious, rude and meanspritited simple beings. There are stupid, vicious, rude, mean-spirited or simpletons in every group, including right here among the haters/antis! And I don't want anything to do with that kind of people.

[JuJuBee]

OP: How long will the marriage last, if it takes place? She asked!
You: That's their business! Everybody else, mind your own marriage/relationship. That's my answer! She asked a question. I answered.

But that's the point I was making-- you didn't answer the OP's question. You rebuked her for asking the question in the first place. Two entirely different things. And that, my dear loon, is why you are a card-carrying member of the thought police. In effect, you told everyone on that discussion thread to shut up because you did not approve of the topic, as innocuous as it was. That's a rather strange way of joining in and contributing, isn't it? Especially from someone as tolerant as you, who gets along with everybody.

[Guest]

OP: How long will the marriage last, if it takes place? She asked!
You: That's their business! Everybody else, mind your own marriage/relationship. That's my answer! She asked a question. I answered.

But that's the point I was making-- you didn't answer the OP's question. You rebuked her for asking the question in the first place. Two entirely different things. And that, my dear loon, is why you are a card-carrying member of the thought police. In effect, you told everyone on that discussion thread to shut up because you did not approve of the topic, as innocuous as it was. That's a rather strange way of joining in and contributing, isn't it? Especially from someone as tolerant as you, who gets along with everybody.

I was trying to not say what I really thought of that question. You're forcing me to say it. I'll put it this way: It wasn't a smart question. How can anyone answer that? Nobody knows it, not even the two people involved.

[Guest]

Nobody knows it, not even the two people involved.

Not JuJuBee and I'm reluctant to jump into this spider web. But if you had answered with that comment, it would have been "good faith" (JJB's description) contribution to the thread than merely a disruptive force solely intent to shut down the thread and speech.

[Guest]

ITA! Smart question to who? Let the board decide. If posters what to converse..let them. But, this is all in vain...how many times do we have to say this before posters realize that poster doesn't want to converse in a tolerant way at all. This includes all of his/her alters that have just returned but probably have been here all along.

[JuJuBee]

OP: How long will the marriage last, if it takes place? She asked!
You: That's their business! Everybody else, mind your own marriage/relationship. That's my answer! She asked a question. I answered.

But that's the point I was making-- you didn't answer the OP's question. You rebuked her for asking the question in the first place. Two entirely different things. And that, my dear loon, is why you are a card-carrying member of the thought police. In effect, you told everyone on that discussion thread to shut up because you did not approve of the topic, as innocuous as it was. That's a rather strange way of joining in and contributing, isn't it? Especially from someone as tolerant as you, who gets along with everybody.

I was trying to not say what I really thought of that question. You're forcing me to say it. I'll put it this way: It wasn't a smart question. How can anyone answer that? Nobody knows it, not even the two people involved.

Are you serious? The OP was asking people for their opinions. Everyone who participates understands that. Except loons. This is a gossip forum. Don't like the topic? Think it's stupid? Don't see the point in speculating? Feel free to move on, minus the nastygrams.

[Guest]

A loon is an obsessive compulsive. You can’t fight its mental illness, try to rationalize or make friends with it. Setting the record straight on some of its delusions represented as “facts” for the general public is fine but a loon is wed to its illusions for life. A loon also likes to play chameleon under different guises to baffle and bamboozle its repulsed audience. It screams like a chicken with its head about to be cut off when it is ignored. A loon must also ALWAYS have the last word, which is part of the compulsion.

[Guest]

A loon must also give a serious dig and very nasty insult to the BP’s former wife and anyone who comes near her. It transfers its deep frustration that the utopian “rainbow family” it dreams about is not getting the respect it thinks they deserve onto Jennifer Aniston. A loon has a transference disease that stems from a personal self-loathing and unfulfilled lifestyle. This fills it with irrational hatred as well as love for celebs it doesn't even know but works night and day to defend. Even its hero BP indicated loons have something seriously missing in their lives. And he meant more than a sensitivity chip. Lots of other chips are missing, too. Loons think they are helping when all along they have been hurting their idols.