Female First Logo
  • Love & Sex
  • Find out more

    • Dating
    • Relationships
    • Weddings
    • Agony Aunts
  • Community
    • Discussion Board
    • Quick Chat
  • Celebrities
  • Find out more

    • Celebrity Gossip
    • Entertainment Gossip
    • Royal Family
    • Celebrity Interviews
    • Photo Gallery
    • Celebrity Directory
  • Lifestyle
  • Find out more

    • Parenting
    • Motoring
    • Travel
    • Food & Drink
    • Health
    • Home & Garden
    • Money
    • Business
    • Recruitment
    • Women's Issues
  • Entertainment
  • Find out more

    • Entertainment Gossip
    • Music
    • Movies
    • Sport
    • TV & Soaps
    • DVD and Blu-Ray
    • Games
    • Bollywood
    • Book Reviews
    • Bizarre
    • Competitions
    • Horoscopes
    • Big Brother
  • Fashion & Beauty
  • Find out more

    • Style News
    • Celebrity Style
    • Beauty Tips
    • Fashion Trends
    • Style Surgery
    • Shopping
  • Shopping
    • Fashion
    • Lingerie
    • Offers
    • Swimwear
    • DVDs
    • Gaming
    • Books
    • CDs
    • Gifts
  • Blog
    • Fashion Blog
    • Health Blog
    • Movies Blog
    • Music Blog
    • Sport Blog
  • Video
    • Latest Videos
    • Exclusive Videos
    • Celebrity Gossip Videos
    • Movie Trailers
    • Video Interviews
  • Follow us
  • femalefirst facebook
  • femalefirst twitter
  • Follow Me on Pinterest
FemaleFirst.co.uk Discussion Board Quick Chat  

Advanced search
  • Board index ‹ Films and Celebrity ‹ Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Section
  • Change font size
  • E-mail friend
  • Print view
  • FAQ
  • Register
  • Login

If Brad married can't testify against his wife--

All posts on Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston
Post a reply
44 posts • Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

If Brad married can't testify against his wife--

Postby Guest » Sat Apr 21, 2012 8:28 pm

Just sayin'

He can't testify against her at the trial.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: If Brad married can't testify against his wife--

Postby Guest » Sat Apr 21, 2012 8:42 pm

Do you mean if Braddock case goes to court? Wow! Never thought of that. =O :shock:
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: If Brad married can't testify against his wife--

Postby Guest » Sat Apr 21, 2012 11:28 pm

Good point... and he can get the kids if something should just happen to her. The nasties goes both ways in that family!
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: If Brad married can't testify against his wife--

Postby Guest » Sat Apr 21, 2012 11:42 pm

That law only applies to what happens after the wedding. If they get married it will be for the publicity only, there is no legal benefit to either one of them.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: If Brad married can't testify against his wife--

Postby ShowerCryJolie » Sun Apr 22, 2012 12:32 am

I'm pretty sure that it only counts if there isn't a third party present too.
~`~`~The Sister Loons prey for the praying mantis Angle Angie.~`~`~
User avatar
ShowerCryJolie
Advocate
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 8:33 am
Location: The Headquarters of the-
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: If Brad married can't testify against his wife--

Postby Guest » Sun Apr 22, 2012 12:58 am

Federal civil cases are different than criminal cases. Even if he marries her, he can still be questioned. Spousal privilege is only for criminal cases. Her freedom is not at risk. (I actually cited an article here, but the message won't post with the link. Basically, it is a recent case where a woman tried to claim spousal privilege in a civil case and was told it only applies in criminal cases. This is for U.S. Federal Court.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: If Brad married can't testify against his wife--

Postby Yarahmadi » Sun Apr 22, 2012 12:59 am

:arrow:
Yarahmadi
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: If Brad married can't testify against his wife--

Postby Bucephalus » Sun Apr 22, 2012 6:07 am

Guest wrote:Just sayin'

He can't testify against her at the trial.



Eureka!
Bucephalus
Duchess
 
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:16 pm
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: If Brad married can't testify against his wife--

Postby JuJuBee » Sun Apr 22, 2012 6:18 am

KC Films is named in the suit with the Ho. Two execs were let go in early April. The company is in turmoil over the recent string of box-office duds they put out, not all of which were Ho and StuPitt related, but still. A plagiarism suit is the icing on the cake to the disaster that was In The Land Of Made No Money.
JuJuBee
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: If Brad married can't testify against his wife--

Postby Guest » Fri Apr 27, 2012 6:23 pm

What if a more criminal case is coming down the pike? Didn't someone allude to criminal practices she has commited that someday would be exposed? What if that's becoming more of a possibility, and Pitt wants to make sure they can't incriminate each other?
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: If Brad married can't testify against his wife--

Postby Just Wonderin' » Fri Apr 27, 2012 7:50 pm

JuJuBee wrote:KC Films is named in the suit with the Ho. Two execs were let go in early April. The company is in turmoil over the recent string of box-office duds they put out, not all of which were Ho and StuPitt related, but still. A plagiarism suit is the icing on the cake to the disaster that was In The Land Of Made No Money.


I think you meant to say GK Films [Graham King]. This company has two of the brand's biggest supporters: King and TX oil billionaire Tim Headington. Yes, there was a shake up involving at least 3 top people. According to Nikki Finke who put as nice a spin on it as possible [she knows who it pays to flatter]:

SVP Grey Rembert was let go for the stated reason “she’s a books person and brought in great books, but having a books person is a luxury for anyone and especially for an indie company”. [The company recently hired Abby Ex as VP Production & Development from The Weinstein Co and she’s seen as Rembert’s replacement.] It is rumored GK Films will be hiring more physical producers soon and that the company. Rembert had been with Graham a long time: the former DreamWorks production executive was a lit specialist who joined King’s Initial Entertainment Group as VP of Development back in 2006. She was put in charge after GK Films acquired the feature film rights to the Lara Croft adventure Tomb Raider aiming for a 2013 release. She’s also the exec who brought Brian Selznick’s novel The Invention of Hugo Cabret into GK Films which lost a heartbreaking mint on Martin Scorsese’s 2011 big-budget 3D family fare Hugo.

COO Bahman Naraghi joined Graham King’s GK Films in 2008 in the newly created role of COO with the job of leading the Santa Monica-based company’s financial and operational development and to plan and implement the distribution structure. Naraghi reported directly to King and arrived from Netflix, where he had spearheaded that company’s push into acquiring and developing original content and played an integral role in establishing the now-defunct Red Envelope. The COO is supposed to be replaced.

So, Grey Rembert was let go.

COO Bahman Naraghi “mutually decided” to part ways, albeit reluctantly and only because Naraghi wanted to change careers and become a film producer.

The third is PR head Mic Kramer who just got a new job at Paramount so that’s the stated reason why he’s leaving.





GK Films also laid off 3 assistants: one is owner Graham King’s (“He has two assistants and decided he only needs one”), one was Rembert’s, and the third was Kramer’s.

There is a difference of opinion on whether there are more layoffs to come. Some sources are saying GK Films will be as active as ever under Graham King and his business partner, Dallas oilman Tim Headington. And that the company’s fortunes look brighter with these two biopics ahead: John Logan writing the Four Seasons musical Jersey Boys, and Sacha Baron Cohen starring in the Freddie Mercury biopic. That sounds like the usual spin.

GK Films has been inolved with the brand in some way for at least 6 films in the last 6 years: The Departed, The Tourist, ITLOB&H, World War Z, and a projected Lara CroftTomb Raider Reboot scheduled for a 2013 release although no filming has begun as yet. They also produced The Rum Diary, widely considered to have been part of the deal to induce Depp to do the Tourist.
Just Wonderin'
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: If Brad married can't testify against his wife--

Postby Guest » Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:04 pm

Guest wrote:What if a more criminal case is coming down the pike? Didn't someone allude to criminal practices she has commited that someday would be exposed? What if that's becoming more of a possibility, and Pitt wants to make sure they can't incriminate each other?


I do remember something like that - wasn't it KITD or someone like that who said she'd done some awful things, criminal things that would someday come to light?
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: If Brad married can't testify against his wife--

Postby Just Wonderin' » Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:08 pm

Spousal privilege is limited to criminal matters. Unless there are criminal matters related to the issue of the script being taken from Braddock's work this is a non issue. Also, since they were not married at the time of the events, the privilege does not apply even if they marry some time before a trial.
Just Wonderin'
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: If Brad married can't testify against his wife--

Postby Guest » Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:09 pm

then why did they not just go away and get married then? Brad only cares about Brad. He will happily let Jolie take the fall. I wish he would marry her though, he deserves a lifetime misery. If only those six innocent children were not caught up in this mess. :evil:
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: If Brad married can't testify against his wife--

Postby Guest » Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:24 pm

Any legal eagles? This might be a stupid question and I hope that you can follow it ... If they got married and it developed that Ho did plagiarize and Pitt knew and did nothing to stop production of BloodNR@pe, would his assets be compromised in any monies awarded to the actual author, despite any prenups, if some of the money put up for production of that movie came from his assets in addition to what King and company put in? After all whozat the author, is said to have contacted the MIR foundation about his book and the movie idea long before Ho wrote her screenplay, and MIR is Pitt's baby.
Guest
 
Top

Next

Post a reply
44 posts • Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3

Return to Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Section

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], MYGUEST, Olio, Yahoo [Bot] and 45 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Sign up stay updated
Tweets by @FemaleFirst_UK

Like Us On facebook

Save up to 75% in the Lovehoney Sale
web2 - 0.02s