
UK/AU TABLOIDS



Guest wrote:So lol@ star it is angie time to sad right ???????????????
the garbage telling can't have them in something postive on the cover that is the problem. They are in their best relationship why won't you idiots get it?LOL
_Skankalina wrote:Guest wrote:So lol@ star it is angie time to sad right ???????????????
the garbage telling can't have them in something postive on the cover that is the problem. They are in their best relationship why won't you idiots get it?LOL
I don't know them personally, so I can tell only by pictures and video. And based on those alone I can't say that they are happy. They seem very dedicated to their image as a couple though. Like I said, I only see pictures and video. You sound very sure though and talk like you know them and have interacted with them behind the cameras. Based on your interaction with them how's the feeling you have around them?
Skeletrout wrote:Wow I'm sure they thought they would dominate the covers for the next year with tabs photoshopping imaginary wedding dresses on Jolie asking people to vote on what looks best and not stop fantasizing about the wedding..... blah blah. And they are getting nothing. Total snooze fest. No one cares. Why would they? Hearing a 50 year old man and nearly 40 year old woman with 6 kids together call themselves "newly engaged" is eye roll worthy to the extreme.
Guest wrote:_Skankalina wrote:Guest wrote:So lol@ star it is angie time to sad right ???????????????
the garbage telling can't have them in something postive on the cover that is the problem. They are in their best relationship why won't you idiots get it?LOL
I don't know them personally, so I can tell only by pictures and video. And based on those alone I can't say that they are happy. They seem very dedicated to their image as a couple though. Like I said, I only see pictures and video. You sound very sure though and talk like you know them and have interacted with them behind the cameras. Based on your interaction with them how's the feeling you have around them?
After seven years he made her to have two births and adopting 3 of her kids( meaning she adopted all first and then he) and fianlly when the all hoppola dies and giving her a ring to make it legal, I don't see why this kind of stories need to be written as this time and day. The problem with this magazines no one will them when they do that because it is getting old.
MYGUEST wrote:Skeletrout wrote:Wow I'm sure they thought they would dominate the covers for the next year with tabs photoshopping imaginary wedding dresses on Jolie asking people to vote on what looks best and not stop fantasizing about the wedding..... blah blah. And they are getting nothing. Total snooze fest. No one cares. Why would they? Hearing a 50 year old man and nearly 40 year old woman with 6 kids together call themselves "newly engaged" is eye roll worthy to the extreme.
Both have been married before.........her twice, him once, with 2 other engagements in his past that didn't make it to the altar.....Who have 6 kids, and been together 7 yrs...who cares is right! The thing is, this "act" could of been more beneficial ($$ wise) to them both had they did this years ago. Today? No one cares........lol.......they can't even beat out the Kardashians for the tabloid covers!! ha ha ha ha ha...yea that's the King and Queen of Hollywood for ya!
Skeletrout wrote:MYGUEST wrote:Skeletrout wrote:Wow I'm sure they thought they would dominate the covers for the next year with tabs photoshopping imaginary wedding dresses on Jolie asking people to vote on what looks best and not stop fantasizing about the wedding..... blah blah. And they are getting nothing. Total snooze fest. No one cares. Why would they? Hearing a 50 year old man and nearly 40 year old woman with 6 kids together call themselves "newly engaged" is eye roll worthy to the extreme.
Both have been married before.........her twice, him once, with 2 other engagements in his past that didn't make it to the altar.....Who have 6 kids, and been together 7 yrs...who cares is right! The thing is, this "act" could of been more beneficial ($$ wise) to them both had they did this years ago. Today? No one cares........lol.......they can't even beat out the Kardashians for the tabloid covers!! ha ha ha ha ha...yea that's the King and Queen of Hollywood for ya!
IKR! Once you reach your in late 30s and definitely if you've been married before and have kids, having a big wedding like your some young couple and blushing bride and groom is a joke. They look like idiots. You're supposed to just get married and get it done.
I saw someone else comment on site saying there was nothing more pathetic than a middle aged woman with kids in a white wedding dress. I agree.
Return to Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Section
Users browsing this forum: KrazyDiamond and 42 guests