Loons have glamor shots taken

[Guest]

Och Leven, knock it off - now you're being the bully.

I say good on Levan to call out a stupid thread. Can your picture stand up to scrutiny? If so, let's see it.

You first.

By the way, I'm the Anti you were 'speaking' with before, saying the article is despicable; the one who was never told she was pretty. Are you trying to bully me as well as JW now? Be careful when you point that finger of hypocrisy Levan, for there are three fingers pointing back at you.

[Guest]

Och Leven, knock it off - now you're being the bully.

I say good on Levan to call out a stupid thread. Can your picture stand up to scrutiny? If so, let's see it.

You first.

By the way, I'm the Anti you were 'speaking' with before, saying the article is despicable; the one who was never told she was pretty. Are you trying to bully me as well as JW now? Be careful when you point that finger of hypocrisy Levan, for there are three fingers pointing back at you.

Not Levan and I'm not following you. Are you this poster?

:shock: Christ, the DM will be taking the piss out of mentally ill people next. That article will clearly encourage people to comment on how ugly all those innocent people are. Unbelievably shallow.

That is the poster Levan spoke about the article was despicable. Seemed like Levan was agreeing with that poster.

[Guest]

Och Leven, knock it off - now you're being the bully.

I say good on Levan to call out a stupid thread. Can your picture stand up to scrutiny? If so, let's see it.

You first.

By the way, I'm the Anti you were 'speaking' with before, saying the article is despicable; the one who was never told she was pretty. Are you trying to bully me as well as JW now? Be careful when you point that finger of hypocrisy Levan, for there are three fingers pointing back at you.

Not Levan and I'm not following you. Are you this poster?

:shock: Christ, the DM will be taking the piss out of mentally ill people next. That article will clearly encourage people to comment on how ugly all those innocent people are. Unbelievably shallow.

That is the poster Levan spoke about the article was despicable. Seemed like Levan was agreeing with that poster.

Yes, sorry - I thought you were Levan replying to me. This thread has melted

[Guest]

Yes, sorry - I thought you were Levan replying to me. This thread has melted

It tends to get that way with Levan and her detractors.

Anyway, I thought you two were on the same page. Bizarre to fight over an agreement.

[Guest]

Yes, sorry - I thought you were Levan replying to me. This thread has melted

It tends to get that way with Levan and her detractors.

Anyway, I thought you two were on the same page. Bizarre to fight over an agreement.

I told Levan to knock off bullying JW (although privately agreed with some of the points she made in her synopsis of JW response), so I thought that was her reply.

I see they have a pic and info up about someone called Nisha. I think that should be taken down too. Why can't either side 'play fair', we only clash on our opinion's about two celebrities.

[Guest]

Yes, sorry - I thought you were Levan replying to me. This thread has melted

It tends to get that way with Levan and her detractors.

Anyway, I thought you two were on the same page. Bizarre to fight over an agreement.

I told Levan to knock off bullying JW (although privately agreed with some of the points she made in her synopsis of JW response), so I thought that was her reply.

I see they have a pic and info up about someone called Nisha. I think that should be taken down too. Why can't either side 'play fair', we only clash on our opinion's about two celebrities.

Yes, Levan can come on strong but I agreed with her points too.

That picture is from the person stalking Nishag and she thinks Levan is her (never has shown any actual proof but shouldn't be part of the discussion anyway).

[she the lurker....]

these pictures are funny


imo no need to take this so seriously and feel victitimized for these people. the pictures were taken 20-30 years ago, those people are also older and i am sure, most of these people are laughing about them now, because most of the 80ies pictures are embarassing and terrible, no matter what "beauty" or nobody/celebrity you were.


but to get on topic there are many that just scream for being used and enlarge our photoshop gallery. any photoshoppers?

[Guest]

They forgot Bradders' glamour shot...

[Guest]

Yes, sorry - I thought you were Levan replying to me. This thread has melted

It tends to get that way with Levan and her detractors.

Anyway, I thought you two were on the same page. Bizarre to fight over an agreement.

I told Levan to knock off bullying JW (although privately agreed with some of the points she made in her synopsis of JW response), so I thought that was her reply.

I see they have a pic and info up about someone called Nisha. I think that should be taken down too. Why can't either side 'play fair', we only clash on our opinion's about two celebrities.

Yes, Levan can come on strong but I agreed with her points too.

That picture is from the person stalking Nishag and she thinks Levan is her (never has shown any actual proof but shouldn't be part of the discussion anyway).

First of all, I think everyone has missed the poster's point below. Her point makes sense to me, since I have also seen some of these pics used elsewhere. The problem is that the information was buried in the middle of a rant to Levan, which a lot of people skip. It would have been better had the poster made a standalone post on this issue, I think:

And BTW? Those pix have been photoshopped to hell and back. They don't represent actual people. Stupid Bleet. Do you really think a newspaper would publish pix of real people without having prior written approval? I've seen the one of the redneck family on about twenty different sites under twenty different contexts. So, get off your soapbox and fcck right off with your bullshitt lectures to just wonderin.

And I'm a little curious about those who are so horrified about personal information purporting to be Levan being posted here. Don't get me wrong. I think it is atrocious to post identifying information about any poster on public boards, and I report it whenever I see it. Thanks to FF'ers, it has almost always already been reported by the time I see it, but I remain very disturbed by the practice. It is one reason that a lot of anti's are afraid to come to FF, which is a shame. We could use more of that type of poster on this board.

I'm also puzzled though that nobody seems upset that, for a while, the board was spammed (yes, spammed, loon -- you can call me anything you want, speculate endlessly that I am every other a.nonymous poster on this board, but that is the only word that applies in this case) with pictures and personal information about someone the loons think is Jusstly. The board had to ban the word "S.imy" because these loons were posting it in every thread multiple times. Think, for just a minute, about how often it had to be posted for the board to have to resort to banning that word.

Where is the outrage about that? Where is the outrage about the loons' posting a half dozen threads containing the real names and pictures of people that we don't even know post here? Where was Levan's outrage then? Reading through all these threads last night, it became very clear to me that someone -- several posters it seems -- have a vested interest in tamping down any speculation about Levan by stalking and assaulting posters who make claims that Levan has posted here before under other names. As Vag would say, "cui bono?" Who benefits from shutting down all criticism of Levan?

[Guest]

Why oh why did he wear brown shoes with pale pink. Why oh why did he wear pink, full stop?

[Jus Wonderin']

Pitt in pink,. At least the pant legs aren't as long and baggy as he usually wears. Notice how he daintily remembers to take a stance that minimizes his bowed left leg. He is so self conscious about his height, his legs, and his feet. Of course they are an issue with filmings. In Troy they did all sorts of things to make him look taller and then used a leg double because his legs even bulked up didn't look manly enough for a warrior.

[JuJuBee]

They forgot Bradders' glamour shot...

Finnochio, she is so pretty in pink, no?

[WhoAmINow]

I hate people

For once, the head loon tells the truth.

[Levan1]

Where is the outrage about that? Where is the outrage about the loons' posting a half dozen threads containing the real names and pictures of people that we don't even know post here? Where was Levan's outrage then? Reading through all these threads last night, it became very clear to me that someone -- several posters it seems -- have a vested interest in tamping down any speculation about Levan by stalking and assaulting posters who make claims that Levan has posted here before under other names. As Vag would say, "cui bono?" Who benefits from shutting down all criticism of Levan?

1. From the minute I got here, I got yelled at for being a "fat virgin", then Nishag, then Iceman etcetera...I tried to defend myself (and those people) but obviously it's a "battle you can never win. No matter what you write, some people cannot and will not believe that I'm not Nishag or whomever they feel annoyed by. So I ignored that topic for a awhile whenever somebody tried to derail the thread or attack me with vicious comments about Nishag and it worked for me perfectly (no time to waste on replying to those comments). Then there was the long thread "All about Nishag" full of very sensitive info, I posted a long ass comment in defense of Nishag and S. Alanes (or the perceived S. Alanes) and for myself too because if somebody would really post info about me, I would sue. Very few antis did what I did which in my eyes is silently agreeing with the crazy stalker habit of that one anti I guess. The thread got deleted (thankfully) but the stalker posted her original post on other unrelated threads just to annoy me or other people I guess (which I ignored). So don't try and judge me because I defended Nishag and others many times but when I do, they think I'm "too" invested so I must be Nishag and when I ignore it, I don't care about crazy posters doing this or don't care about NIshag or I AM Nishag thus I'm too scared to comment (you know what, I shouldn't even care, I got nothing to do with those people ). Why don't you judge the people who actually POST that S***? Why should I held accountable for actions of crazy people?

2. Why are loons the supposed culprits of this posting of information? That stalker of Nishag is attacking me so commen sense would dictate that if I am a loon than fellow loons wouldn't go off on me right? So we can assume that it's anti (you can recognize her hateful nonsensical writing style when writing about JP, lots of and "hore", very twisted person).

3. That's the point, nobody benefits. Just the crazy stalker because she gets a kick out of it, she wants me "Nishag" be taken down and thinks she is right and successful. You too seem to think I'm Nishag too which would be another success of crazy stalker, drag everybody into her delusions. I can't convince people I'm not Nishag so I just let it be with replying to every accusation. It's always the same anyway.

[Levan1]

I hate people

For once, the head loon tells the truth.

^^ Selective quoting, no context. Some gutter tabloids would love to have you on your team Bet your brains were working hard to find an angle to discredit my comment. Congrats...Oh and try and avoid the "head loon" term, it gives away who you are since you do it too when signed in