Loons have glamor shots taken

[Levan1]

The woman's first name evidently is "Nisha" and not "Nishag." "Nishag" is that stalker's oh-so-clever-in-her-sick-and-twisted-mind insulting term for her obsessive hate for that woman. She has this love for the word, "hag" as well. It used to be more of a term that loons called "antis" but she has taken it on as her own. That, in itself, tells you it's just one SICKO stalker though she will protest as loudly as anyone can stand that her alters are others who share her same obsessive sickness over ONE specific woman. How many distinct stalkers does any random person on the net has????

I didn't realize others referred to the woman as "Nisha" that was her actual name (never really bothered to read that SICKO's dossier notes on her prey).

Huh, never knew that. I guess it makes sense. People like this whole puns on names thing.

I don't know anything about the Nishag stuff, so I'll stay out of that, but I do think the last three paragraphs of this post bring up some excellent points. I haven't followed Levan very much at all, but I do remember him/her being exposed for fabricating a claim about a quotation in a Newsweek article. She was anything BUT respectful, even after she'd been clearly busted for lying. If it was an honest mistake on her part, she certainly didn't apologize for, nor make any mention of, this error after the fact. Sorry, but I was indifferent to her up until that thread, but her behavior spoke volumes. And if endorsing the above Guest's comments gets me flamed, so be it. Here's the Newsweek thread I was referring to, if anyone's interested.

Oh my, you know, if you don't follow me that much than I wonder how you dug up that article so quick? And remember it so well? I wasn't lying by the way and I wasn't disrespectful. If other people start with the namethrowing (in capitals if I remember correctly and the word "Bleet" was thrown around very fast too) I don't know why I shouldn't be snarky at the very least. And I'm not going to apologize to somebody who insults me during her rebuttals, I'm not going to grovel for somebody so vile (even though she was right) and I DID acknowledge my mistake in a comment a week ago. I did make a mistake and I though the info I gave was correct but that other person certainly wasn't respectful towards me. And since when do antis apologize when they get it wrong (wasn't JP splitting up in 2005 to 2012 and whatnot?). Everything a tabloid churns out is believed, no apology whatsoever for antis' mistakes, seems to me you apply a double standard. I should be nice at ALL TIMES even when offended greatly and apologize but antis can do whatever they please? Ain't going to fly.


And you know what, I was making a valid point in this thread and guess who is derailing the thread? I don't comment for almost a day and yet here we are discussing the same things again totally off-topic. But sure, loons are the crazy stalker ones who derail every thread

[Guest]

You're not setting the rules here, you won't chase me away and this tiny part of Female First does not belong to antis or you so you have no business in telling me what I can or cannot do.

But she is trying her damnedest to be the moderator. She begged the administrators to delete a thread. She's working overtime flagging posts. She even pulled the posting rules from a dating site.

[Guest]

The woman's first name evidently is "Nisha" and not "Nishag." "Nishag" is that stalker's oh-so-clever-in-her-sick-and-twisted-mind insulting term for her obsessive hate for that woman. She has this love for the word, "hag" as well. It used to be more of a term that loons called "antis" but she has taken it on as her own. That, in itself, tells you it's just one SICKO stalker though she will protest as loudly as anyone can stand that her alters are others who share her same obsessive sickness over ONE specific woman. How many distinct stalkers does any random person on the net has????

I didn't realize others referred to the woman as "Nisha" that was her actual name (never really bothered to read that SICKO's dossier notes on her prey).

Huh, never knew that. I guess it makes sense. People like this whole puns on names thing.

I'll give you and others a clue now which will have her change her tune. Search for her favorite spelling of "fcck." She's one of a few, if not just herself who has that favorite preference to write that word that way. Then you will see her dirty fingerprints on all the Nisha post and the bitchy mouthy ones, too.

Now wait for her futile denials and lies to obfuscate and deflect.

[Guest]

I don't know anything about the Nishag stuff, so I'll stay out of that, but I do think the last three paragraphs of this post bring up some excellent points. I haven't followed Levan very much at all, but I do remember him/her being exposed for fabricating a claim about a quotation in a Newsweek article. She was anything BUT respectful, even after she'd been clearly busted for lying. If it was an honest mistake on her part, she certainly didn't apologize for, nor make any mention of, this error after the fact. Sorry, but I was indifferent to her up until that thread, but her behavior spoke volumes. And if endorsing the above Guest's comments gets me flamed, so be it. Here's the Newsweek thread I was referring to, if anyone's interested.

Oh my, you know, if you don't follow me that much than I wonder how you dug up that article so quick? And remember it so well? I wasn't lying by the way and I wasn't disrespectful. If other people start with the namethrowing (in capitals if I remember correctly and the word "Bleet" was thrown around very fast too) I don't know why I shouldn't be snarky at the very least. And I'm not going to apologize to somebody who insults me during her rebuttals, I'm not going to grovel for somebody so vile (even though she was right) and I DID acknowledge my mistake in a comment a week ago. I did make a mistake and I though the info I gave was correct but that other person certainly wasn't respectful towards me. And since when do antis apologize when they get it wrong (wasn't JP splitting up in 2005 to 2012 and whatnot?). Everything a tabloid churns out is believed, no apology whatsoever for antis' mistakes, seems to me you apply a double standard. I should be nice at ALL TIMES even when offended greatly and apologize but antis can do whatever they please? Ain't going to fly.


And you know what, I was making a valid point in this thread and guess who is derailing the thread? I don't comment for almost a day and yet here we are discussing the same things again totally off-topic. But sure, loons are the crazy stalker ones who derail every thread

Makes you wonder why she put in her 2 cents over that trivial point.

[Guest]

I am the poster you are responding to and I also read the thread in question, and several others accusing you of being Nishag. And I am sorry to tell you that if you were outraged by anyone other than Nishag's "outing," your "outrage" was desultory at best. You're not telling me, you are giving your opinion, which is not a fact. Before that thread I defended Nishag many times and I wonder why I'm held accountable for other people's actions? I'm not but either way, if I feel like it, I'll throw in my two cents but regardless of what other people might think, it comes from an honest place. Not to please others or deflect if that's what you think. IIRC, you only brought it up because another poster asked where your anger was about all the "outings' done by loons. Antis are the ones posting the info. If I'm presumed to be a "loon" than Nishag must have been one too. Therefore, anti(s) who had a problem with Nishag take it out on me. It's anti vs. loon. Saying that loons out people would be ridiculous since I'd wager most loons stick up for each other just like most antis. Many antis won't acknowledge for some reason, even on the Facebook thread started by an anti, people can't handle it and start blaming loons (in general) for the stalking even though it's clear it's an anti. With me, they just have a name (and they think a face) to vent their issues directly.

You've been accused numerous times of deflection. I think that is one reason that so many posters seem to be calling you out as Nishag. And you are doing it here again with your point number two, which makes no sense. It does make sense because anti like to place the blame on the all "evil" loons all the time. It's easy for them but that doesn't make it true. This whole "loon" and "anti" thing is childish and antis bring up loons facebook accounts or blame loons when threads get hijacked even though they're not above it either. So why can't I turn the tables? Even in my response it makes sense because it said that loons are doing the outings and I responded to that. No one is claiming the loons are outing you, and you know that. So why pretend that you don't? I know that antis out loons, that was my reasoning. Not pretending anything. To what purpose?

In point number three, you reveal your outrage at the Nishag "stalker" yet again. Yet, unless I've missed something, and I don't think I have, the Nishag information appeared to be posted here ONE TIME. Let me repeat that: ONE TIME. The couple of other instances where it appears, it is simply being reposted from threads elsewhere on the board, as far as I can see. And you are still sticking with the ONE TIME then If it appears on other threads, that would count as MORE or MANY TIMES, probably by that same person who can't handle the original thread being deleted. I'm, sure you'll let me know if I am wrong about that. Because you are. Not only that information was posted but before that thread, snippets of Nishag's life were posted too, I knew long before that thread about that woman's fertility issues for instance. And how she looked like. And that she had weight issues. Links to other sites that she joined where posted. But sure, let's act as if that info was never posted right? On that "All About Nishag" thread she even posted that I was WARNED so there were other posts about Nishag and you should know that since you read that thread.

Yet the supposed "outing" of Jusstly continues nearly unabated with continuous NEW posts and threads containing pictures and other identifying information about her. Even after the board banned the very use of her name, loons and trolls continued their efforts to circumvent the board's rules in order to post ongoing personal information about her. In fact, trolls started an entire new thread about her last night, which the mods appear to have deleted. It never stops. So, you'll excuse me if I find your faux outrage a little bit disingenuous, Levan. I also noticed the pattern where accusations against you, nearly invariably lead to these same loons and troll going off on Jusstly or whomever they think is the "jenloon" at any given moment. Odd coincidence, at the very least, wouldn't you agree? See, I don't even know what you're trying to do here? Faux outrage? Really? What am I supposed to do, be here 24/7 and prove I care about other people's lives all the time? Even when I'm not writing here for days, people post about me (lurkmode), it seems more like antis are invested in that info, not me or loons. Even other antis are saying that personal information does not belong here yet others constantly bring this up?
I would also add that, IMO, you are not credible. You've been caught in a number of lies (you are not an American, false citations, etc). Do you really think I'm going to be baited in giving away my real identity. I could give you my Facebook account in 2 seconds with proof of my nationality (not American dearie) but that would mean the antis won. Furthermore, it will be used constantly to mock me. I won't allow you that victory so keep telling yourself I'm American and whatever. The further you and others are from the truth, the better and I learnt that hard way. Fact is, you don't need to know my real identity, it should not matter to you, you shouldn't be so invested in it. Even your "critiques" of the Brand sound phony. Yet they're real but hey that's your opinion. And then you give yourself away when you post lies about Aniston that have been debunked to you (as Levan) on this thread already. As another poster said, you just wait awhile and disseminate the same information that has already been proved to you, with appropriate citations, as untrue. And you do this all with a palpable air of condescension and arrogance that, I am sorry to tell you, is very off-putting. What's with all the sorry? I'm not offended or hurt by any of your remarks. Faux-concern...And I just post from what I know or read, I'm not a gossip professor, just trying to give my opinion and trying to underline it by what I think are facts.

So, my question to you is this? Why are you so invested in this board? Why do you insist on coming here to lecture us? You are a loon and, apparently, a well known loon. This is an anti site. Why don't you go to one of the numerous anti sites to post? Why do you feel such a compelling need to convert us? If you weren't here stirring up trouble as you did on this thread, I'm pretty damn sure there would be no "Nishag" threads. So many questions you feel entitled to be answered. As long as I'm not banned, I do what I damn well please. You're not setting the rules here, you won't chase me away and this tiny part of Female First does not belong to antis or you so you have no business in telling me what I can or cannot do.There will always be a "Nishag", if not to give the antis something to talk about when news is slow. Or they dig up Facebook accounts of "loons". Or if they're really bored just start fighting amongst each other. And you are pretty damn cocky to state facts about a person you don't know.

So, if it bothers you that much, why not leave? This isn't a rhetorical question. It is something I ask frequently that I have never gotten an answer to. Actually, I answered that question. Maybe not directly to you but in some of my comments, I state my reasons for coming here. And I ain't going to dig it up for you. Why do you and other loons crave our approval so badly? I don't want or need your or other antis approval. We don't go over to your sites what sites? to tell you how wrong you are for loving the brand and/or disliking Aniston. I know I don't care about your opinions on the subject, and I'm pretty sure that real FF'ers (not the trolls) what are REAL FF'ers? A clique within a clique agree with me. So, why do you insist on coming here? Again a rhetorical question followed by a real question followed by a sense of entitlement?

Since you now seem to love green so much (why am I not surprised? ), I'll respond to you in that same color with one comment, and one comment only:

[b]I don't give a shite what you call yourself these days since your alters change by the hour and the day and the site -- whoever you are and whatever your purpose:

STFU!![/b]

[Guest]

Since you now seem to love green so much (why am I not surprised? ), I'll respond to you in that same color with one comment, and one comment only:

[b]I don't give a shite what you call yourself these days since your alters change by the hour and the day and the site -- whoever you are and whatever your purpose:

STFU!![/b]

Like clockwork. BOOM!

[Guest]

The woman's first name evidently is "Nisha" and not "Nishag." "Nishag" is that stalker's oh-so-clever-in-her-sick-and-twisted-mind insulting term for her obsessive hate for that woman. She has this love for the word, "hag" as well. It used to be more of a term that loons called "antis" but she has taken it on as her own. That, in itself, tells you it's just one SICKO stalker though she will protest as loudly as anyone can stand that her alters are others who share her same obsessive sickness over ONE specific woman. How many distinct stalkers does any random person on the net has????

I didn't realize others referred to the woman as "Nisha" that was her actual name (never really bothered to read that SICKO's dossier notes on her prey).

Huh, never knew that. I guess it makes sense. People like this whole puns on names thing.

I don't know anything about the Nishag stuff, so I'll stay out of that, but I do think the last three paragraphs of this post bring up some excellent points. I haven't followed Levan very much at all, but I do remember him/her being exposed for fabricating a claim about a quotation in a Newsweek article. She was anything BUT respectful, even after she'd been clearly busted for lying. If it was an honest mistake on her part, she certainly didn't apologize for, nor make any mention of, this error after the fact. Sorry, but I was indifferent to her up until that thread, but her behavior spoke volumes. And if endorsing the above Guest's comments gets me flamed, so be it. Here's the Newsweek thread I was referring to, if anyone's interested.

Oh my, you know, if you don't follow me that much than I wonder how you dug up that article so quick? And remember it so well? I wasn't lying by the way and I wasn't disrespectful. If other people start with the namethrowing (in capitals if I remember correctly and the word "Bleet" was thrown around very fast too) I don't know why I shouldn't be snarky at the very least. And I'm not going to apologize to somebody who insults me during her rebuttals, I'm not going to grovel for somebody so vile (even though she was right) and I DID acknowledge my mistake in a comment a week ago. I did make a mistake and I though the info I gave was correct but that other person certainly wasn't respectful towards me. And since when do antis apologize when they get it wrong (wasn't JP splitting up in 2005 to 2012 and whatnot?). Everything a tabloid churns out is believed, no apology whatsoever for antis' mistakes, seems to me you apply a double standard. I should be nice at ALL TIMES even when offended greatly and apologize but antis can do whatever they please? Ain't going to fly.


And you know what, I was making a valid point in this thread and guess who is derailing the thread? I don't comment for almost a day and yet here we are discussing the same things again totally off-topic. But sure, loons are the crazy stalker ones who derail every thread

Since you now seem to love green so much (why am I not surprised? ), I'll respond to you in that same color with one comment, and one comment only:

I don't give a shite what you call yourself these days since your alters change by the hour and the day and the site -- whoever you are and whatever your purpose:

STFU!!

[Guest]

In response:

You're not telling me, you are giving your opinion, which is not a fact.

I beg to differ. When someone writes paragraph after paragraph devoted to the outrage of outing Nishag vs. a couple of sentences about the outrage of outing Jusstly, any reasonable person is going to assume some bias exists. That's much more than just an opinion.

It does make sense because anti like to place the blame on the all "evil" loons all the time. It's easy for them but that doesn't make it true.

You're doing it again. Deflecting. Why can't you just admit that's what you're doing? The bottom line is that you strongly implied that "loons" were outing you. That is ridiculous and we both know it. Your argument doesn't even make sense.

And you are still sticking with the ONE TIME then If it appears on other threads, that would count as MORE or MANY TIMES, probably by that same person who can't handle the original thread being deleted.

Again, you are deflecting from my point. To the best of my knowledge, there was only one "outing" on Nishag. All the other posts have been reposts of the original. On the other hand, there have been constant ongoing attempts to post personal, identifying information about Jusstly. One such thread that attempted to circumvent the ban on her name was deleted just last night. I have to take your point that there were other "snippets of Nishag's life" posted here. I am not aware of them. Which means they were apparently directed toward people who would "get" that inside information.

There were not continuous posts and threads on her that were unavoidable even if you trying to avoid them. So, let me state my point very clearly here. The Nishag "outing" was a blip on the screen compared to the overload of unavoidable information on Jusstly that has overwhelmed this board. So, if you are indeed just concerned about the outing of personal information and not invested in the specific outing of one person, you would have been decrying Jusstly's outing just as vociferously as you have Nishag's. And you're not. Obviously.

See, I don't even know what you're trying to do here? Faux outrage? Really? What am I supposed to do, be here 24/7 and prove I care about other people's lives all the time? Even when I'm not writing here for days, people post about me (lurkmode), it seems more like antis are invested in that info, not me or loons. Even other antis are saying that personal information does not belong here yet others constantly bring this up?

I think I just answered this above. Everytime somone challenges you, the troll comes out to play. So, you don't know anything about that. Fine.

Do you really think I'm going to be baited in giving away my real identity. I could give you my Facebook account in 2 seconds with proof of my nationality (not American dearie)

I don't care about your identity. I'm saying that you are not truthful and I stand by that statement.

And you are pretty damn cocky to state facts about a person you don't know.

What? I asked why you frequent this site when you know, as a Brand fan, that you are going to be bothered by it. What is cocky about that? Are you saying you are not a Brand fan?

Actually, I answered that question. Maybe not directly to you but in some of my comments, I state my reasons for coming here. And I ain't going to dig it up for you.

Regrettably, you do not have any credibility with me, so I will just assume that you can't answer this question either.

what are REAL FF'ers? A clique within a clique

Again with the deflection. I stated very clearly that I was talking about FF'ers and not about trolls, who seek out boards for no reason other than to sow dissention.

Again a rhetorical question followed by a real question followed by a sense of entitlement?

It wasn't a rhetorical question, and I'm not sure why asking it makes you believe I have a sense of entitlement. You've already indicated that you're not going to answer it, so that's that.

[Guest]

Levan, looks like you set off your stalker in her freakout yet again and again...

[Levan1]

In response:

You're not telling me, you are giving your opinion, which is not a fact.

I beg to differ. When someone writes paragraph after paragraph devoted to the outrage of outing Nishag vs. a couple of sentences about the outrage of outing Jusstly, any reasonable person is going to assume some bias exists. That's much more than just an opinion.

Fact is, the Nishag debacle was there from the start, that's the first connection people made. By my knowledge the perceived Justlly debacle came later and wasn't linked to me as much as the Nishag thing so while I did find it as stupid as the Nishag thing, I didn't pay as much attention either (I don't want to be part of every discussion in outings because as soon as I do then people definitely will drag me into it). I think very few people think I'm actually outing people and I think you just want to start S***. And for what it's worth (nothing actually) I don't think Justlly is Jenloon or S. Alanes, I don't believe anybody knows the real identities of others, it's just mindless entertainment for some. And again, it's not my job here to defend EVERYBODY who is beig outed. You want to make that link but I have nothing to do with it, what more can I say? I don't own Nishag or anybody anything, I CHOOSE to speak up but you can't force me to be the advocate of the "outed" and blame me for not speaking up enough or for everybody. You are going overboard with your accusations.

It does make sense because anti like to place the blame on the all "evil" loons all the time. It's easy for them but that doesn't make it true.

You're doing it again. Deflecting. Why can't you just admit that's what you're doing? The bottom line is that you strongly implied that "loons" were outing you. That is ridiculous and we both know it. Your argument doesn't even make sense.

Uhm, no, I said antis were outing loons, I made that perfectly clear in my other paragraph you of course didn't quote . Antis vs loons, antis do the outings (or people who just hate other people and pretend to be antis because they think they can get away with it on a forum like this), antis look for "loons" on the internet to make threads about them. Talk about deflection, learn how to read

And you are still sticking with the ONE TIME then If it appears on other threads, that would count as MORE or MANY TIMES, probably by that same person who can't handle the original thread being deleted.

Again, you are deflecting from my point. To the best of my knowledge, there was only one "outing" on Nishag. All the other posts have been reposts of the original. On the other hand, there have been constant ongoing attempts to post personal, identifying information about Jusstly. One such thread that attempted to circumvent the ban on her name was deleted just last night. I have to take your point that there were other "snippets of Nishag's life" posted here. I am not aware of them. Which means they were apparently directed toward people who would "get" that inside information.

So you think that posting snippets of her, her pictures, personal info (sad info!) doesn't count as "outing" people? Alright, good to know your standard. I think you are heavily invested in the Justlly case and trying to put the blame on me. Justlly came after Nishag and I only saw two pictures of her and barely saw any info that was provided in the way Nisha's info was provided. Again, good to know you're standard, you try to diminish the Nishag issue but try and make the Justlly thing bigger than it is (Nisha's is brought up more to my knowledge than Justlly). I wonder why you are so upset and invested about the possible serious outing of Justlly and what I maybe have to do with it? Nisha is being made fun of constantly but Justlly is being avidly protected (I don't know anything about yesterday's thread). Seems to me that people take quicker action against it than for Nishag and I wonder if it's something personal for you. Or maybe it's because Justlly is an Aniston-fan and so a JP-hater? Protects antis but throw "loons" under the bus? You like to try and shift the blame on me but it won't work. You are deflecting yourself by making a connection with Justlly and me.

There were not continuous posts and threads on her that were unavoidable even if you trying to avoid them. So, let me state my point very clearly here. The Nishag "outing" was a blip on the screen compared to the overload of unavoidable information on Jusstly that has overwhelmed this board. So, if you are indeed just concerned about the outing of personal information and not invested in the specific outing of one person, you would have been decrying Jusstly's outing just as vociferously as you have Nishag's. And you're not. Obviously. I think you need to take five and consider what you're doing now. I think that under your respectful way of writing, there is something serious going on and I expect me being linked to Justlly all the time from now on. Need a scapegoat? Let me state my point very clearly: I do not own you, S. Alanes/Justlly/whomever whatever, Nishag...any explanation or defense. When I WISH to defend somebody, I will do it because I want to. You are in no position to judge me for defending Nishag more than Justlly. I already stated why and you feel way too entitled for answers that don't concern you and you are personally too invested to look for somebody to blame and I think that's suspicious.

See, I don't even know what you're trying to do here? Faux outrage? Really? What am I supposed to do, be here 24/7 and prove I care about other people's lives all the time? Even when I'm not writing here for days, people post about me (lurkmode), it seems more like antis are invested in that info, not me or loons. Even other antis are saying that personal information does not belong here yet others constantly bring this up?

I think I just answered this above. Everytime somone challenges you, the troll comes out to play. So, you don't know anything about that. Fine. You are really reaching are you? What do you think you can achieve with this? This has been discussed so many times before.

Do you really think I'm going to be baited in giving away my real identity. I could give you my Facebook account in 2 seconds with proof of my nationality (not American dearie)

I don't care about your identity. I'm saying that you are not truthful and I stand by that statement. You don't care?! What is all THIS then? You do care and you are fishing for something that doesn't concern you. Why do you even begin about my identity when this thread isn't about me or Nishag. You are making this personal.

And you are pretty damn cocky to state facts about a person you don't know.

What? I asked why you frequent this site when you know, as a Brand fan, that you are going to be bothered by it. What is cocky about that? Are you saying you are not a Brand fan? Maybe post that quote in its whole and you will understand. You are being very cocky and fishy.

Actually, I answered that question. Maybe not directly to you but in some of my comments, I state my reasons for coming here. And I ain't going to dig it up for you.

Regrettably, you do not have any credibility with me, so I will just assume that you can't answer this question either. So you demand an answer from me but can't look it up yourself so you just assume that I lie anyway (even if I would bother to look it up for you) and at the same time suggest that I can't answer the question? WHY do you ask it then in the first place?! Why even reply to me and ask me questions when I'm not truthful, credible...? You are losing grip...

what are REAL FF'ers? A clique within a clique

Again with the deflection. I stated very clearly that I was talking about FF'ers and not about trolls, who seek out boards for no reason other than to sow dissention. Word of the day: deflection.

Again a rhetorical question followed by a real question followed by a sense of entitlement?

It wasn't a rhetorical question, and I'm not sure why asking it makes you believe I have a sense of entitlement. You've already indicated that you're not going to answer it, so that's that. Sense of entitlement meet person who keeps replying to me but not expecting answers and even if I do answer doesn't believe me anyway

[Guest]

There's only one person outing Justlly as **** Alanes. I doubt she truly believes it and does it just to annoy Justlly and the Nisha STALKER.

Fact of the matter, Justly is a running joke on this board who annoys both loons and antis. Quite an accomplishment in bringing together antis and loons. Only that equal nutjob in the Nisha STALKER actually defends Justlly as this "valuable member." What a laugh.

[Guest]

So you think that posting snippets of her, her pictures, personal info (sad info!) doesn't count as "outing" people? Alright, good to know your standard. I think you are heavily invested in the Justlly case and trying to put the blame on me. Justlly came after Nishag and I only saw two pictures of her and barely saw any info that was provided in the way Nisha's info was provided. Again, good to know you're standard, you try to diminish the Nishag issue but try and make the Justlly thing bigger than it is (Nisha's is brought up more to my knowledge than Justlly). I wonder why you are so upset and invested about the possible serious outing of Justlly and what I maybe have to do with it? Nisha is being made fun of constantly but Justlly is being avidly protected (I don't know anything about yesterday's thread). Seems to me that people take quicker action against it than for Nishag and I wonder if it's something personal for you. Or maybe it's because Justlly is an Aniston-fan and so a JP-hater? Protects antis but throw "loons" under the bus? You like to try and shift the blame on me but it won't work. You are deflecting yourself by making a connection with Justlly and me.

Of course she is. It's part of her obfuscation from her antics. I'll show you another post where she puts on this act of false indignation.

[Guest]

In response:

You're not telling me, you are giving your opinion, which is not a fact.

I beg to differ. When someone writes paragraph after paragraph devoted to the outrage of outing Nishag vs. a couple of sentences about the outrage of outing Jusstly, any reasonable person is going to assume some bias exists. That's much more than just an opinion.

Fact is, the Nishag debacle was there from the start, that's the first connection people made. By my knowledge the perceived Justlly debacle came later and wasn't linked to me as much as the Nishag thing so while I did find it as stupid as the Nishag thing, I didn't pay as much attention either (I don't want to be part of every discussion in outings because as soon as I do then people definitely will drag me into it). I think very few people think I'm actually outing people and I think you just want to start S***. And for what it's worth (nothing actually) I don't think Justlly is Jenloon or S. Alanes, I don't believe anybody knows the real identities of others, it's just mindless entertainment for some. And again, it's not my job here to defend EVERYBODY who is beig outed. You want to make that link but I have nothing to do with it, what more can I say? I don't own Nishag or anybody anything, I CHOOSE to speak up but you can't force me to be the advocate of the "outed" and blame me for not speaking up enough or for everybody. You are going overboard with your accusations.

It does make sense because anti like to place the blame on the all "evil" loons all the time. It's easy for them but that doesn't make it true.

You're doing it again. Deflecting. Why can't you just admit that's what you're doing? The bottom line is that you strongly implied that "loons" were outing you. That is ridiculous and we both know it. Your argument doesn't even make sense.

Uhm, no, I said antis were outing loons, I made that perfectly clear in my other paragraph you of course didn't quote . Antis vs loons, antis do the outings (or people who just hate other people and pretend to be antis because they think they can get away with it on a forum like this), antis look for "loons" on the internet to make threads about them. Talk about deflection, learn how to read

And you are still sticking with the ONE TIME then If it appears on other threads, that would count as MORE or MANY TIMES, probably by that same person who can't handle the original thread being deleted.

Again, you are deflecting from my point. To the best of my knowledge, there was only one "outing" on Nishag. All the other posts have been reposts of the original. On the other hand, there have been constant ongoing attempts to post personal, identifying information about Jusstly. One such thread that attempted to circumvent the ban on her name was deleted just last night. I have to take your point that there were other "snippets of Nishag's life" posted here. I am not aware of them. Which means they were apparently directed toward people who would "get" that inside information.

So you think that posting snippets of her, her pictures, personal info (sad info!) doesn't count as "outing" people? Alright, good to know your standard. I think you are heavily invested in the Justlly case and trying to put the blame on me. Justlly came after Nishag and I only saw two pictures of her and barely saw any info that was provided in the way Nisha's info was provided. Again, good to know you're standard, you try to diminish the Nishag issue but try and make the Justlly thing bigger than it is (Nisha's is brought up more to my knowledge than Justlly). I wonder why you are so upset and invested about the possible serious outing of Justlly and what I maybe have to do with it? Nisha is being made fun of constantly but Justlly is being avidly protected (I don't know anything about yesterday's thread). Seems to me that people take quicker action against it than for Nishag and I wonder if it's something personal for you. Or maybe it's because Justlly is an Aniston-fan and so a JP-hater? Protects antis but throw "loons" under the bus? You like to try and shift the blame on me but it won't work. You are deflecting yourself by making a connection with Justlly and me.

There were not continuous posts and threads on her that were unavoidable even if you trying to avoid them. So, let me state my point very clearly here. The Nishag "outing" was a blip on the screen compared to the overload of unavoidable information on Jusstly that has overwhelmed this board. So, if you are indeed just concerned about the outing of personal information and not invested in the specific outing of one person, you would have been decrying Jusstly's outing just as vociferously as you have Nishag's. And you're not. Obviously. I think you need to take five and consider what you're doing now. I think that under your respectful way of writing, there is something serious going on and I expect me being linked to Justlly all the time from now on. Need a scapegoat? Let me state my point very clearly: I do not own you, S. Alanes/Justlly/whomever whatever, Nishag...any explanation or defense. When I WISH to defend somebody, I will do it because I want to. You are in no position to judge me for defending Nishag more than Justlly. I already stated why and you feel way too entitled for answers that don't concern you and you are personally too invested to look for somebody to blame and I think that's suspicious.

See, I don't even know what you're trying to do here? Faux outrage? Really? What am I supposed to do, be here 24/7 and prove I care about other people's lives all the time? Even when I'm not writing here for days, people post about me (lurkmode), it seems more like antis are invested in that info, not me or loons. Even other antis are saying that personal information does not belong here yet others constantly bring this up?

I think I just answered this above. Everytime somone challenges you, the troll comes out to play. So, you don't know anything about that. Fine. You are really reaching are you? What do you think you can achieve with this? This has been discussed so many times before.

Do you really think I'm going to be baited in giving away my real identity. I could give you my Facebook account in 2 seconds with proof of my nationality (not American dearie)

I don't care about your identity. I'm saying that you are not truthful and I stand by that statement. You don't care?! What is all THIS then? You do care and you are fishing for something that doesn't concern you. Why do you even begin about my identity when this thread isn't about me or Nishag. You are making this personal.

And you are pretty damn cocky to state facts about a person you don't know.

What? I asked why you frequent this site when you know, as a Brand fan, that you are going to be bothered by it. What is cocky about that? Are you saying you are not a Brand fan? Maybe post that quote in its whole and you will understand. You are being very cocky and fishy.

Actually, I answered that question. Maybe not directly to you but in some of my comments, I state my reasons for coming here. And I ain't going to dig it up for you.

Regrettably, you do not have any credibility with me, so I will just assume that you can't answer this question either. So you demand an answer from me but can't look it up yourself so you just assume that I lie anyway (even if I would bother to look it up for you) and at the same time suggest that I can't answer the question? WHY do you ask it then in the first place?! Why even reply to me and ask me questions when I'm not truthful, credible...? You are losing grip...

what are REAL FF'ers? A clique within a clique

Again with the deflection. I stated very clearly that I was talking about FF'ers and not about trolls, who seek out boards for no reason other than to sow dissention. Word of the day: deflection.

Again a rhetorical question followed by a real question followed by a sense of entitlement?

It wasn't a rhetorical question, and I'm not sure why asking it makes you believe I have a sense of entitlement. You've already indicated that you're not going to answer it, so that's that. Sense of entitlement meet person who keeps replying to me but not expecting answers and even if I do answer doesn't believe me anyway

The only remotely relevant thing you've said here is that "deflection" is the word of the day, as it always is for you. I'm not following you down this stupid garden path. I've already said that I report all posting of personal information. I've also said that it has almost always been reported before I click on the button. This tells me that there are very few posters here who want to be a part of that kind of board.

To the best of my knowledge, the Nishag and the Jusstly information all started being outed at the same time. I understand that, for some reason, you insist on making a distinction between the two. What I'm saying is that there is none. And if you're horrified abolut the Nishag information being posted, then you should be equally horrified at the Jusstly information being posted. I know I am. I am saying that you are not.

Draw your own conclusion.

[Guest]

The only remotely relevant thing you've said here is that "deflection" is the word of the day, as it always is for you. I'm not following you down this stupid garden path. I've already said that I report all posting of personal information. I've also said that it has almost always been reported before I click on the button. This tells me that there are very few posters here who want to be a part of that kind of board.

To the best of my knowledge, the Nishag and the Jusstly information all started being outed at the same time. I understand that, for some reason, you insist on making a distinction between the two. What I'm saying is that there is none. And if you're horrified abolut the Nishag information being posted, then you should be equally horrified at the Jusstly information being posted. I know I am. I am saying that you are not.

Draw your own conclusion.

Thanks for your umpteenth play of innocence. It's only been predicted multiple times. It's in the docket.

[Guest]

The only remotely relevant thing you've said here is that "deflection" is the word of the day, as it always is for you. I'm not following you down this stupid garden path. I've already said that I report all posting of personal information. I've also said that it has almost always been reported before I click on the button. This tells me that there are very few posters here who want to be a part of that kind of board.

To the best of my knowledge, the Nishag and the Jusstly information all started being outed at the same time. I understand that, for some reason, you insist on making a distinction between the two. What I'm saying is that there is none. And if you're horrified abolut the Nishag information being posted, then you should be equally horrified at the Jusstly information being posted. I know I am. I am saying that you are not.

Draw your own conclusion.

Thanks for your umpteenth play of innocence. It's only been predicted multiple times. It's in the docket.

umpteenth? Is that anything like galore, granny?