The woman's first name evidently is "Nisha" and not "Nishag." "Nishag" is that stalker's oh-so-clever-in-her-sick-and-twisted-mind insulting term for her obsessive hate for that woman. She has this love for the word, "hag" as well. It used to be more of a term that loons called "antis" but she has taken it on as her own. That, in itself, tells you it's just one SICKO stalker though she will protest as loudly as anyone can stand that her alters are others who share her same obsessive sickness over ONE specific woman. How many distinct stalkers does any random person on the net has????
I didn't realize others referred to the woman as "Nisha" that was her actual name (never really bothered to read that SICKO's dossier notes on her prey).
Huh, never knew that. I guess it makes sense. People like this whole puns on names thing.
I don't know anything about the Nishag stuff, so I'll stay out of that, but I do think the last three paragraphs of this post bring up some excellent points. I haven't followed Levan very much at all, but I do remember him/her being exposed for fabricating a claim about a quotation in a Newsweek article. She was anything BUT respectful, even after she'd been clearly busted for lying. If it was an honest mistake on her part, she certainly didn't apologize for, nor make any mention of, this error after the fact. Sorry, but I was indifferent to her up until that thread, but her behavior spoke volumes. And if endorsing the above Guest's comments gets me flamed, so be it. Here's the Newsweek thread I was referring to, if anyone's interested.
Oh my, you know, if you don't follow me that much than I wonder how you dug up that article so quick? And remember it so well? I wasn't lying by the way and I wasn't disrespectful. If other people start with the namethrowing (in capitals if I remember correctly and the word "Bleet" was thrown around very fast too) I don't know why I shouldn't be snarky at the very least. And I'm not going to apologize to somebody who insults me during her rebuttals, I'm not going to grovel for somebody so vile (even though she was right) and I DID acknowledge my mistake in a comment a week ago. I did make a mistake and I though the info I gave was correct but that other person certainly wasn't respectful towards me. And since when do antis apologize when they get it wrong (wasn't JP splitting up in 2005 to 2012 and whatnot?). Everything a tabloid churns out is believed, no apology whatsoever for antis' mistakes, seems to me you apply a double standard. I should be nice at ALL TIMES even when offended greatly and apologize but antis can do whatever they please? Ain't going to fly.
And you know what, I was making a valid point in this thread and guess who is derailing the thread? I don't comment for almost a day and yet here we are discussing the same things again totally off-topic. But sure, loons are the crazy stalker ones who derail every thread