Guest wrote: Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:I don't know why you insist on living in the past. The ex-wife now has a partner who also left a relationship. Don't you feel like you're meddling in other people's private business? If you think Jolie is engaged in drug smuggling, you should report it. Make sure you can prove it, and get yourself a lawyer.
Can you please stop with the fake twin pregnancy and See Eye Eh?
Nope. Last I checked it was a FREE COUNTRY and I can write about whatever the @#!*% I CHOOSE to write about, and YOU can choose to take your eyes ELSEWHERE; that's what a SCROLL BUTTON is for! At least I am ON TOPIC and NOT blathering on endlessly about the LOONS.
Oh: and about the "past"? The fact is: the FUTURE is based on THE PAST. So if you want to know where the future will go, just look to the PAST. Also, people FORGET about things, so I talk about 'the past" in order to REMIND them. But, since YOU are obviously intellectually LIMITED, you can just pass over anything I say; it would probably be like "pearls before swine" ANYWAY.
And I also agree; to talk about "privacy" in conjunction with the two miscreants is LUDICROUS; these two hypocrites constantly share their so-called "private" life with the WORLD- and then have the NERVE to "complain" that "we have no privacy wah wah wah!" That was THEIR choice, wasn't it? So if they insist on making their private business "public" then they have NO room to complain when people take them up on it, nor do they get to dictate TERMS.VAJ
I think it's you who are intellectually limited! You? Think?
To go on about the twin pregnancy being fake is just brainless and ridiculous, To voluntarily IGNORE the overwhelming MOUNTAIN of evidence that the "twin pregnancy" was in fact a PAID MEDIA FRAUD would be truly be the "brainless' course of action
and if you're certain that Jolie smuggles drugs, then report it, take her to court. Instead you're yammering on a gossip board. >big eyeroll< What, you think the "authorities" are going to listen to me, based on mere deductive THEORIES of what Angelina is getting up to based on the news reports? Without "hard" proof of any there is nothing to be done....nothing, that is, except to come to a celeb gossip board and POINT IT OUT on an ONGOING BASIS.
There is more to a private life than they have shared with the public, and if you're not intellectually limited you'd know it! It's haters/antis who have tried to make up vulgar stories about their private life that they have not shared with the public. If you've been reading here, you'd know that too.
Plenty of celebrities have complained about not having privacy. Do you have a link about Pitt and Jolie complaining that "we have no privacy wah wah wah?" Lots of them, just GOOGLE "Pitt/Jolie complains about lack of privacy"!
Pitt's complaint is that the paparazzi come too close to the children with their bright flashes, and he would like them to take pictures from the distance with their zoom lenses. Not that they listen to him, and that is what bothers him. I remember reading that he himself doesn't mind the intrusion/interest, because there's the trade-off that he enjoys. Right. Whatever you say
The future is based on the past,' so I guess you are saying you're not learning and will be intellectually limited in the future too! Do you know who dictates terms? People do! People with a sense of decorum do not make up intrusive and vulgar stories about anyone! I have not yet had to "make up" anything; everything I say is based on the facts and PHOTO PROOF available to me!