Female First Logo
  • Love & Sex
  • Find out more

    • Dating
    • Relationships
    • Weddings
    • Agony Aunts
  • Community
    • Discussion Board
    • Quick Chat
  • Celebrities
  • Find out more

    • Celebrity Gossip
    • Entertainment Gossip
    • Royal Family
    • Celebrity Interviews
    • Photo Gallery
    • Celebrity Directory
  • Lifestyle
  • Find out more

    • Parenting
    • Motoring
    • Travel
    • Food & Drink
    • Health
    • Home & Garden
    • Money
    • Business
    • Recruitment
    • Women's Issues
  • Entertainment
  • Find out more

    • Entertainment Gossip
    • Music
    • Movies
    • Sport
    • TV & Soaps
    • DVD and Blu-Ray
    • Games
    • Bollywood
    • Book Reviews
    • Bizarre
    • Competitions
    • Horoscopes
    • Big Brother
  • Fashion & Beauty
  • Find out more

    • Style News
    • Celebrity Style
    • Beauty Tips
    • Fashion Trends
    • Style Surgery
    • Shopping
  • Shopping
    • Fashion
    • Lingerie
    • Offers
    • Swimwear
    • DVDs
    • Gaming
    • Books
    • CDs
    • Gifts
  • Blog
    • Fashion Blog
    • Health Blog
    • Movies Blog
    • Music Blog
    • Sport Blog
  • Video
    • Latest Videos
    • Exclusive Videos
    • Celebrity Gossip Videos
    • Movie Trailers
    • Video Interviews
  • Follow us
  • femalefirst facebook
  • femalefirst twitter
  • Follow Me on Pinterest
FemaleFirst.co.uk Discussion Board Quick Chat  

Advanced search
  • Board index ‹ Films and Celebrity ‹ Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Section
  • Change font size
  • E-mail friend
  • Print view
  • FAQ
  • Register
  • Login

In London and not a peep. Not even in The Daily B'stard

All posts on Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston
Post a reply
95 posts • Page 7 of 7 • 1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: In London and not a peep. Not even in The Daily B'stard

Postby Guest » Mon May 21, 2012 8:26 pm

But you are here talking about them among all the people inhollywood.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: In London and not a peep. Not even in The Daily B'stard

Postby Guest » Mon May 21, 2012 8:39 pm

Guest wrote:
mademoiselle wrote:
Guest wrote:
Sy-nic wrote:I think Pitt did an admirable job of destroying his marriage by responding to his e*e*t*o* on more than one occasion. :roll:


Wow, if you know that for a fact, he must be the only one in the world, and how is that any of your business?


I'm sorry - but did you miss something?

Didn't HIS DICK lead him to JoLIAR? The fact he was getting his balls and C*** hummed (along with the photos on the beeeach) caused his ex wife to kick his skanky filthy arse OUT. :clap:

Pitt seems to have a problem controlling his balls and C*** ... because he hasn't got a MIND, much less a brain - look at the list of ladies (and probably not to mention men) that he cheeses up with his appendage.


Millions of men were led by their other brain to other women. What I find strange is that you're obsessed with this particular couple. They are under your skin. In your blood. Maybe you need professional help to get rid of this obsession, so you can go on living your own life without this unhealthy hatred for a couple you don like, don't know and will probably never meet.


People have always been fascinated with evil. Brangelina is a pair of evil. Very greedy hypocrites who would do anything for fame and money. No surprise more and more people are looking through them despite their media propaganda machine. The amount of propaganda to promote them exceeds a dictator's propaganda by far. All in vaim....
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: In London and not a peep. Not even in The Daily B'stard

Postby Guest » Tue May 22, 2012 10:10 am

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:You don't hear or read about other people lives so much because they don't sell their lives as much as Brangelina does. They are a a reality show come to life. They can live off camera when they want to which only shows they pre-arrange all those pap shoots. Anyone who can deny they have sold their children's privacy for a buck is living in loon world. And again, they are entertaining - [b]they are too shallow and superficial to be interesting

yet you people cant get ENOUGH of them and have their names in your mouth all the time even when they aren't seen in public.


Again, it's called E-N-T-E-R-T-A-I-N-M-E-N-T


How is being angry and then slamming people you don't know entertainment? You must be a very weird person!
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: In London and not a peep. Not even in The Daily B'stard

Postby Guest » Tue May 22, 2012 10:47 am

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:You don't hear or read about other people lives so much because they don't sell their lives as much as Brangelina does. They are a a reality show come to life. They can live off camera when they want to which only shows they pre-arrange all those pap shoots. Anyone who can deny they have sold their children's privacy for a buck is living in loon world. And again, they are entertaining - [b]they are too shallow and superficial to be interesting

yet you people cant get ENOUGH of them and have their names in your mouth all the time even when they aren't seen in public.


Again, it's called E-N-T-E-R-T-A-I-N-M-E-N-T


How is being angry and then slamming people you don't know entertainment? You must be a very weird person!


How is adoring shallow fake people you don't know NOT weird? You must be one of those infamous loons.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: In London and not a peep. Not even in The Daily B'stard

Postby Guest » Tue May 22, 2012 8:42 pm

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:I don't know why you insist on living in the past. The ex-wife now has a partner who also left a relationship. Don't you feel like you're meddling in other people's private business? If you think Jolie is engaged in drug smuggling, you should report it. Make sure you can prove it, and get yourself a lawyer.

Can you please stop with the fake twin pregnancy and See Eye Eh?


Nope. Last I checked it was a FREE COUNTRY and I can write about whatever the @#!*% I CHOOSE to write about, and YOU can choose to take your eyes ELSEWHERE; that's what a SCROLL BUTTON is for! At least I am ON TOPIC and NOT blathering on endlessly about the LOONS.

Oh: and about the "past"? The fact is: the FUTURE is based on THE PAST. So if you want to know where the future will go, just look to the PAST. Also, people FORGET about things, so I talk about 'the past" in order to REMIND them. But, since YOU are obviously intellectually LIMITED, you can just pass over anything I say; it would probably be like "pearls before swine" ANYWAY.

And I also agree; to talk about "privacy" in conjunction with the two miscreants is LUDICROUS; these two hypocrites constantly share their so-called "private" life with the WORLD- and then have the NERVE to "complain" that "we have no privacy wah wah wah!" That was THEIR choice, wasn't it? So if they insist on making their private business "public" then they have NO room to complain when people take them up on it, nor do they get to dictate TERMS.VAJ


I think it's you who are intellectually limited! You? Think? :laff: :laff: :laff: To go on about the twin pregnancy being fake is just brainless and ridiculous, To voluntarily IGNORE the overwhelming MOUNTAIN of evidence that the "twin pregnancy" was in fact a PAID MEDIA FRAUD would be truly be the "brainless' course of action and if you're certain that Jolie smuggles drugs, then report it, take her to court. Instead you're yammering on a gossip board. >big eyeroll< What, you think the "authorities" are going to listen to me, based on mere deductive THEORIES of what Angelina is getting up to based on the news reports? Without "hard" proof of any there is nothing to be done....nothing, that is, except to come to a celeb gossip board and POINT IT OUT on an ONGOING BASIS.There is more to a private life than they have shared with the public, and if you're not intellectually limited you'd know it! It's haters/antis who have tried to make up vulgar stories about their private life that they have not shared with the public. If you've been reading here, you'd know that too.

Plenty of celebrities have complained about not having privacy. Do you have a link about Pitt and Jolie complaining that "we have no privacy wah wah wah?" Lots of them, just GOOGLE "Pitt/Jolie complains about lack of privacy"! Pitt's complaint is that the paparazzi come too close to the children with their bright flashes, and he would like them to take pictures from the distance with their zoom lenses. Not that they listen to him, and that is what bothers him. I remember reading that he himself doesn't mind the intrusion/interest, because there's the trade-off that he enjoys. Right. Whatever you say'

The future is based on the past,' so I guess you are saying you're not learning and will be intellectually limited in the future too! Do you know who dictates terms? People do! People with a sense of decorum do not make up intrusive and vulgar stories about anyone! I have not yet had to "make up" anything; everything I say is based on the facts and PHOTO PROOF available to me!

VAJ
Guest
 
Top

Previous

Post a reply
95 posts • Page 7 of 7 • 1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Return to Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Section

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], icedj, Olio, romancer and 35 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Sign up stay updated
Tweets by @FemaleFirst_UK

Like Us On facebook

Save up to 75% in the Lovehoney Sale
web2 - 0.01s