AJ next role: Live Courtroom Drama

[Guest]

So you're suggesting that bradDICK had a "contract" with Graham King and Angelina....uh. I don't think so...LOL...LOL..LOL..all bradDICK has is a big mouth spewing out ridiculous accusations left and right and a book (not even in English at the time) that he was having problems finding a publisher for (obviously, NOT a best seller), and a need for MONEY.....

I know reading comprehension or even common sense isn't a strong suit for you, especially when loon mentality rules. But keep burying the existence of Sarkic like Jolie has for your only real defense.

You had better work some black magic on Braddock when the case proceeds. It's gonna get ugly...more ugly than Jolie's cosmetic surgery and anorexia have taken a toll...LOL...LOL...LOL...

Years from now, when and IF the case ever goes to court. bradDICK will STILL just be a "brokeAS$" wannabe trying to bilk money from the talented people....LOL...LOL...LOL...

[Guest]

Years from now, when and IF the case ever goes to court. bradDICK will STILL just be a "brokeAS$" wannabe trying to bilk money from the talented people....LOL...LOL...LOL...

But he will still be a much better human being than your broken ass Jolie with her melting face and lies spinning to a dizzying circle of ill repute with only you loons polishing her flat ass....LOL...LOL...LOL

[Guest]

Years from now, when and IF the case ever goes to court. bradDICK will STILL just be a "brokeAS$" wannabe trying to bilk money from the talented people....LOL...LOL...LOL...

But he will still be a much better human being than your broken ass Jolie with her melting face and lies spinning to a dizzying circle of ill repute with only you loons polishing her flat ass....LOL...LOL...LOL

.......http://www.vulture.com/2012/07/most-val ... stars.html
100 Most Valuable Stars
#5 Brad Pitt
#8 Angelina Jolie
Most Valuable drama Stars
#1 Brad Pitt
#4 Angelina Jolie
Most Valuable action Stars
#6 Angelina Jolie

[Guest]

Years from now, when and IF the case ever goes to court. bradDICK will STILL just be a "brokeAS$" wannabe trying to bilk money from the talented people....LOL...LOL...LOL...

But he will still be a much better human being than your broken ass Jolie with her melting face and lies spinning to a dizzying circle of ill repute with only you loons polishing her flat ass....LOL...LOL...LOL

.......http://www.vulture.com/2012/07/most-val ... stars.html
100 Most Valuable Stars
#5 Brad Pitt
#8 Angelina Jolie
Most Valuable drama Stars
#1 Brad Pitt
#4 Angelina Jolie
Most Valuable action Stars
#6 Angelina Jolie

You base her worth on a vapid poll? Truly out of the mind of a loon.

[mm7]

So you're suggesting that bradDICK had a "contract" with Graham King and Angelina....uh. I don't think so...LOL...LOL..LOL..all bradDICK has is a big mouth spewing out ridiculous accusations left and right and a book (not even in English at the time) that he was having problems finding a publisher for (obviously, NOT a best seller), and a need for MONEY.....

I know reading comprehension or even common sense isn't a strong suit for you, especially when loon mentality rules. But keep burying the existence of Sarkic like Jolie has for your only real defense.

You had better work some black magic on Braddock when the case proceeds. It's gonna get ugly...more ugly than Jolie's cosmetic surgery and anorexia have taken a toll...LOL...LOL...LOL...

Years from now, when and IF the case ever goes to court. bradDICK will STILL just be a "brokeAS$" wannabe trying to bilk money from the talented people....LOL...LOL...LOL...

James J Braddock v. Angelina Jolie et al

Plaintiff: James J Braddock
Defendants: FilmDistrict, GK Films, Angelina Jolie, Edin Sarkic and Scout Film

Case Number: 2:2012cv05883
Filed: July 9, 2012

Court: California Central District Court
Presiding Judge: Dolly M. Gee
Referring Judge: Victor B. Kenton

Nature of Suit: Intellectual Property - Copyrights

For the debut like you, which obviously is not clear that writing screenplays and books, is not the same, nor can ever be the same? Also for idiots like you, which must be clear, this is the cause of which will not escape, and especially of the evidence, and that you can attack Braddock, but he was just bull that will destroy Jolie, just because he stole a piece of literature! Read, if you're literate, but I doubt it, because your way of expression is exactly the level of your little angel Jolie ... ummmm ... you know ... ummmm ... I think ... ummmm ... hmmm

[Guest]

So you're suggesting that bradDICK had a "contract" with Graham King and Angelina....uh. I don't think so...LOL...LOL..LOL..all bradDICK has is a big mouth spewing out ridiculous accusations left and right and a book (not even in English at the time) that he was having problems finding a publisher for (obviously, NOT a best seller), and a need for MONEY.....

I know reading comprehension or even common sense isn't a strong suit for you, especially when loon mentality rules. But keep burying the existence of Sarkic like Jolie has for your only real defense.

You had better work some black magic on Braddock when the case proceeds. It's gonna get ugly...more ugly than Jolie's cosmetic surgery and anorexia have taken a toll...LOL...LOL...LOL...

Years from now, when and IF the case ever goes to court. bradDICK will STILL just be a "brokeAS$" wannabe trying to bilk money from the talented people....LOL...LOL...LOL...

James J Braddock v. Angelina Jolie et al

Plaintiff: James J Braddock
Defendants: FilmDistrict, GK Films, Angelina Jolie, Edin Sarkic and Scout Film

Case Number: 2:2012cv05883
Filed: July 9, 2012

Court: California Central District Court
Presiding Judge: Dolly M. Gee
Referring Judge: Victor B. Kenton

Nature of Suit: Intellectual Property - Copyrights

For the debut like you, which obviously is not clear that writing screenplays and books, is not the same, nor can ever be the same? Also for idiots like you, which must be clear, this is the cause of which will not escape, and especially of the evidence, and that you can attack Braddock, but he was just bull that will destroy Jolie, just because he stole a piece of literature! Read, if you're literate, but I doubt it, because your way of expression is exactly the level of your little angel Jolie ... ummmm ... you know ... ummmm ... I think ... ummmm ... hmmm

" just because he stole a piece of literature! " So now you are saying that Braddock stole a piece of literature. So Jolie stole something Braddock stole himself?

[mm7]

So you're suggesting that bradDICK had a "contract" with Graham King and Angelina....uh. I don't think so...LOL...LOL..LOL..all bradDICK has is a big mouth spewing out ridiculous accusations left and right and a book (not even in English at the time) that he was having problems finding a publisher for (obviously, NOT a best seller), and a need for MONEY.....

I know reading comprehension or even common sense isn't a strong suit for you, especially when loon mentality rules. But keep burying the existence of Sarkic like Jolie has for your only real defense.

You had better work some black magic on Braddock when the case proceeds. It's gonna get ugly...more ugly than Jolie's cosmetic surgery and anorexia have taken a toll...LOL...LOL...LOL...

Years from now, when and IF the case ever goes to court. bradDICK will STILL just be a "brokeAS$" wannabe trying to bilk money from the talented people....LOL...LOL...LOL...

James J Braddock v. Angelina Jolie et al

Plaintiff: James J Braddock
Defendants: FilmDistrict, GK Films, Angelina Jolie, Edin Sarkic and Scout Film

Case Number: 2:2012cv05883
Filed: July 9, 2012

Court: California Central District Court
Presiding Judge: Dolly M. Gee
Referring Judge: Victor B. Kenton

Nature of Suit: Intellectual Property - Copyrights

For the debut like you, which obviously is not clear that writing screenplays and books, is not the same, nor can ever be the same? Also for idiots like you, which must be clear, this is the cause of which will not escape, and especially of the evidence, and that you can attack Braddock, but he was just bull that will destroy Jolie, just because [b]SHE stole a piece of literature! Read, if you're literate, but I doubt it, because your way of expression is exactly the level of your little angel Jolie ... ummmm ... you know ... ummmm ... I think ... ummmm ... hmmm[/b]

" just because he stole a piece of literature! " So now you are saying that Braddock stole a piece of literature. So Jolie stole something Braddock stole himself?

Teasing you and all this is irrelevant, the case is legitimate and it will have to answer for theft and for everything else. Letter written in error, but it is clear that "she".! Now these three days to discuss the nonsense that is not relevant to the case? What cretinism?