AJ next role: Live Courtroom Drama

[Guest]

The alleged similarities are all true anecdotes from the war that hundreds of people experienced - maybe thousands of people. They in turn told others. Similarities in retelling historically accurate events is not evidence of plagiarism. There is actually no way around the fact of similarities of the events really happened. You cannot copyright history or true events. All the events you mention such as being raped in front of others, separating women and children - those things didn't just happen one time and in one place but at many times and in many places and to many women. So the idea that only Braddock could know or tell about those events is something I am just not seeing. Thousands of people knew all these things.

This is what seems odd to me. Braddock has insisted his story is a true story. Jolie has said that she was told the germ of her story by a woman refugee. Jolie also said that a number of events in her movie were retellings of other events during the war and how they unfolded told her by some of the actors in her film.

If it makes you feel all warm and fuzzy then keep believing Angie's story---but please do everyone else a big favor and stop posting your same old story over and over and over and over and over again. Tired of reading your same comments on other sites also. You are a one note LOON.

If it makes you feel all smug and superior to be impressed with this idiot Braddock and his igorant arrogance then enjoy yourself. The same old tired attacks on Jolie without even using one brain cell became old many years ago. Nothing changes here. The stupid just multiplies.

Care to explain the points I mentioned? How do you plagiarize true stories experienced by thousands of people, witnessd by untold thousands more and retold to thousands of people. How does Braddock have a copyright claim on these true events and stories that thousands of people were aware of and discussing? You can't explain it can you?

Nothing has been shown yet except both these authors were writing about the same historical events. The plaintiff hasn't even delivered up to the court yet the subject writing.

At this point the parties have to enter into court mandated mediation before anything happens. Even if no one wants to settle, all the parties have to certify to the court that they made a good faith effort to do so before the case can proceed.

I can see this is going to be a field day for those eager to twist the realities of the on-going case into more nonsensical fodder against Jolie.

You're a stupid multiplied! Incredibly stupid, idiot, you could say something like that. Idiot, understand! The book was written, such as a whole, have not one book, the film was not made ​​with the same story, identical? And it appears Jolie stupid, just like you and talk about the thousands of stories? Here is a specific, protected, to authoritative story, with the code, ISDN bar cod, from 2007? Hello! Idiot, I feel sorry. and those next to them are you! An amazing amount of nonsense is yours, just like Jolie? Braddock has a copyright, like any writer of his literary work, thus it is a book published many years ago, and even more so because he was born in Sarajevo, lived, worked, was during the war, while Jolie's drug use? Your stupidity tires, literally, that such happiness as you do not reproduce, because the world would be horrible. moron

Do not lie! Books in Croatian and English was delivered in court. Literally, you're disgusting in his lies! How do you claim that it was not delivered up, even when delivered in December last year, you idiot! Rotten garbage. Such people should be forbidden to go out, it would not be passed on the infection of their stupidity!

Oh, really? Then please tell me what exhibit number these 2 books are on the case docket. They were not submitted as exhibits or as evidence in any form to the court. They are nowhere to be found even now.

Keep up your trash talk. That will go a long way in helping your case. I wonder what Judge Dow thought, and now what Judge Gee and M.J. Kentor thought, when they read the trash talking idiotic emails and other communications sent to Angelina Jolie, attorneys, her manager, and others before this suit was filed. The defendant's attorneys quite properly and smartly made these communications part of the court record. I'll bet the defendants are keeping the best for trial. This is going to be hilarious.

So where are those exhibits you claim were "delivered in court"? Got any proof of that? Like, oh I don't know - in the effing court record? Maybe Braddock wrapped them up and sent them as Christmas presents to the judge.

You want trash talking emails!? Oh boy, the loons have littered the airwaves for 7 solid years... if you want to compare that kinda S***, I think you'll find you have a losing battle. It's all garbage and that can't be blamed on a journalist!

Other than that, stop trying to tease more details from Braddock through this website. they are not going to provide you with advance notice of their evidence so you can buy off witnesses to deny everything.... I am sure they know your game and are not stupid enough to fall for what you thought was a clever subterfuge to find out strategy, points and everything you'll need to provide a contradictory reality for the judge. there are plenty facts not blasted on these blogs, that will have its day in court and which time you can shuffle papers up your asss trying to come up with a quick defense, a liar you paid off or whatever other unsavory, unethical and illegal activities planned behind scenes to win Jolie's case.

[friends]

The alleged similarities are all true anecdotes from the war that hundreds of people experienced - maybe thousands of people. They in turn told others. Similarities in retelling historically accurate events is not evidence of plagiarism. There is actually no way around the fact of similarities of the events really happened. You cannot copyright history or true events. All the events you mention such as being raped in front of others, separating women and children - those things didn't just happen one time and in one place but at many times and in many places and to many women. So the idea that only Braddock could know or tell about those events is something I am just not seeing. Thousands of people knew all these things.

This is what seems odd to me. Braddock has insisted his story is a true story. Jolie has said that she was told the germ of her story by a woman refugee. Jolie also said that a number of events in her movie were retellings of other events during the war and how they unfolded told her by some of the actors in her film.

If it makes you feel all warm and fuzzy then keep believing Angie's story---but please do everyone else a big favor and stop posting your same old story over and over and over and over and over again. Tired of reading your same comments on other sites also. You are a one note LOON.

If it makes you feel all smug and superior to be impressed with this idiot Braddock and his igorant arrogance then enjoy yourself. The same old tired attacks on Jolie without even using one brain cell became old many years ago. Nothing changes here. The stupid just multiplies.

Care to explain the points I mentioned? How do you plagiarize true stories experienced by thousands of people, witnessd by untold thousands more and retold to thousands of people. How does Braddock have a copyright claim on these true events and stories that thousands of people were aware of and discussing? You can't explain it can you?

Nothing has been shown yet except both these authors were writing about the same historical events. The plaintiff hasn't even delivered up to the court yet the subject writing.

At this point the parties have to enter into court mandated mediation before anything happens. Even if no one wants to settle, all the parties have to certify to the court that they made a good faith effort to do so before the case can proceed.

I can see this is going to be a field day for those eager to twist the realities of the on-going case into more nonsensical fodder against Jolie.

You're a stupid multiplied! Incredibly stupid, idiot, you could say something like that. Idiot, understand! The book was written, such as a whole, have not one book, the film was not made ​​with the same story, identical? And it appears Jolie stupid, just like you and talk about the thousands of stories? Here is a specific, protected, to authoritative story, with the code, ISDN bar cod, from 2007? Hello! Idiot, I feel sorry. and those next to them are you! An amazing amount of nonsense is yours, just like Jolie? Braddock has a copyright, like any writer of his literary work, thus it is a book published many years ago, and even more so because he was born in Sarajevo, lived, worked, was during the war, while Jolie's drug use? Your stupidity tires, literally, that such happiness as you do not reproduce, because the world would be horrible. moron

Do not lie! Books in Croatian and English was delivered in court. Literally, you're disgusting in his lies! How do you claim that it was not delivered up, even when delivered in December last year, you idiot! Rotten garbage. Such people should be forbidden to go out, it would not be passed on the infection of their stupidity!

Oh, really? Then please tell me what exhibit number these 2 books are on the case docket. They were not submitted as exhibits or as evidence in any form to the court. They are nowhere to be found even now.

Keep up your trash talk. That will go a long way in helping your case. I wonder what Judge Dow thought, and now what Judge Gee and M.J. Kentor thought, when they read the trash talking idiotic emails and other communications sent to Angelina Jolie, attorneys, her manager, and others before this suit was filed. The defendant's attorneys quite properly and smartly made these communications part of the court record. I'll bet the defendants are keeping the best for trial. This is going to be hilarious.

So where are those exhibits you claim were "delivered in court"? Got any proof of that? Like, oh I don't know - in the effing court record? Maybe Braddock wrapped them up and sent them as Christmas presents to the judge.

-Firstly, to see all the documents of the case you have to pay, so you can not know whether there or not included? You talk without proof, and all the blind, the craze with Jolie!

-I do not know what kind of email saying, but on his website the official letters sent by mail to the addresses of producers and their agents?

-Secondly, threatening email from GKFilms only harms them, not to Braddock, and proof that he forbade contact, you had no right!

-They thought that it will scare the mafia? All his contacts, proof that they were warned at the time of plagiarism, even before filming, and they ignored that fact!

-Therefore, through you, like you, who are delegated to her party, you will not make anything on the forums, because there is evidence that Braddock will bury Jolie in court.

-It's not just email, but photographs, witnesses, and more, and most importantly the book. When the jury to be shown movie, with the exact parts of the book, phrases, actions, and these together and it can kill. Braddock is a personal friend, with one of the actors from the film, and that her biggest mistake!
Shut mouth, I've had it!

[Guest]

Levan's in attorney mode, I see.

[Guest]

Jolie is going to be the key witness. She will be cross-examined on her knowledge and that is when she will make a baboon of herself on the stand. NO KNOWLEDGE can be exhibited because she is a dumb monkey regarding the background of this story. Recall her thanking the citizens of Yugoslavia in Bosnia. Not much better than her 'country of Africa' flub. She really ought to lose her protection with Humaney organizations and her ambassadorship for political fronts after this.

Jolie will prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that she has no ability sufficient to even comprehend how to go about writing a script on this volatile and complex topic. Even today, after her so-called directorship of the film and shilling it on every street corner, she remains a clueless baboon, thanking the people of Yugoslavia?!

That's what I have great anticipation for: to watch her dig herself in that lying hole of hers. She hardly can keep all her litany of lies straight. She should thank the media for never following up on her inconsistencies and never reading up on her previous interviews and comments to see where she has slipped up. Lawyers are paid to find holes in the witnesses' testimonies and statements.

Unscripted and even rehearsed, she's a hot mess.

[Guest]

Did that sh*tshow really get a golden globe? I didn't remember that.

Anyway, the loons told us that this case wasn't going to be taken seriously in any US court, so how can this be?

It's NOT being taken seriously, the judge in Illionois ruled FOR the DEFENDANT,( NOT BradDICK). BradDICK wanted the case in Illionois, he LOST the first round already, the judge said the case had NO business being in Illinois, therefore it was moved to Califronia, just what FilmDictrict wanted.

Then why didn't the judge just END it there, and stated the case had absolutely NO merit and dismissed it as so?? He could of just ended it all in Chicago...........the case was transferred to The California Federal Court per Judge Dow's instructions. You may wish it all away, it isn't going away. James Braddock will have his day in court.....count on it.

Because that wasn't the issue before Judge Dow to decide at that time. Judges decide the issues before them at that particular stage of the case. Judge Dow was only asked to decide 2 issues. The first was the request by Braddock for anTemporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction based on a Ex Parte Motion. The judge decided both whether to llow the plaintiff, Braddock, to make such a request even though Braddock had not even served the defendants yet with notice of the motion and that was met with a resounding WTF are you talking about fool? Judge Dow denied that.

The other issue which is related to the above paragraph was the issue of whether Braddock could get a TRO or restraining order to stop the movie even if he did properly serve the defendants with notice of this request for a TRO so they could properly respond in opposition. Again, Judge Dow denied this request by Braddock. The court quite pointedly noticed that Braddock had been aware of the movie and its intended release date for a very long time and yet Braddock elected to filed his lawsuit at the last minute right before the film's release.

The only other remaining issue that was ever before Judge Dow was the issue of whether is court had personal jurisdiction over any of the defedants. Judger Dow ruled that his court di dnot and therefore dismissed the case in his court and transferred it to the Central District of California.

Judge Dow was not in a position to dismiss on the merit of the case. That comes at a loater time. Federal Judges do not just rule willy nilly. They rule on what is properly before them at the time. The case on the merits was not before Judge Dow.

Whether Braddock has his day in court remain to be seen.

So you are saying this article is wrong in saying Jolie's lawyers petitioned the court to dismiss the case?

Or you are saying Jolie did not petition to dismiss the case?

Or she petitioned but the judge did not dismiss?

[Guest]

Pretty clear post for anyone who can read. Funny how reading comprehension always trips up the loons. For the reading impaired large font loon: Jolie and the other defendants asked the court to dismiss the suit on the basis of personal jurisdiction, the court denied their motion and transferred the case to another venue - in CA.

[Guest]

edit: on the basis of lack of personal jurisdiction

[Guest]

Asking for dismissal as an alternative action is what you normally do in a motion. E.g., move this case out of this jurisdiction or, in the alternative, dismiss it. That's how it works. If the first option is allowed (i.e., moving the case) then the judge doesn't act on the alternative request of dismissal. Actually the court docket entry does say the case was in fact dismissed in the Northern District of Illinois and transferred to the Central District of California.

[Guest]

-Firstly, to see all the documents of the case you have to pay, so you can not know whether there or not included? You talk without proof, and all the blind, the craze with Jolie!

Again, your arrogance despite your ignorance on this matter is a huge weakness. Some people have access to the federal court system which provides access to the entire case including all motions, court orders, case documents, exhibits filed with the court, all other filings, the case docket and all docket entries. I am one of those people. The fees involved are very small. So, in fact, I have seen the entire case and know for a fact that Braddock has never filed with the court or with the opposing parties a copy of either the original Subject Work (his book) or its subsequent translations.

From Braddock's motions it is clear that a later translation was being worked on even as the case was being filed. It appears that it had not been published by the time of the original case filing. He better have the original translation available for the defendants and court to examine as well because he will be subject to accusations that he changed the translation to make it match up with the movie/script.

Braddock also better have the book as originally published for the parties and court to examine and proof that it IS the book as originally published.

-I do not know what kind of email saying, but on his website the official letters sent by mail to the addresses of producers and their agents?

In the court filings there are a number of emails attached as exhibits. They include a number of emails from Braddock himself to GK Films as well as copies of emails from Felix Korpar ("purportedly 'an authorized representative' of Braddock's") to Geyer Kosinski and to Graham King and Tim Headington. The emails sent by Korpar can be found Braddock's website. The emails personally sent by Braddock are not on his website.

-Secondly, threatening email from GKFilms only harms them, not to Braddock, and proof that he forbade contact, you had no right!

The email sent by GKFilms is the standard Cease and Desist communication. The threats contained in Braddock's emails are hilarious and disturbing at the same time. Braddock says the case can go away if Angelina Jolie would personally meet with him and talk to him or he will go to the press and tell the world that she is on the side of the Serbs and "tell all the world that Angelina loves war criminals like Mladic, Karadzic and others who destroyers [sic] my Sarajevo . . ."

-They thought that it will scare the mafia? All his contacts, proof that they were warned at the time of plagiarism, even before filming, and they ignored that fact!

-Therefore, through you, like you, who are delegated to her party, you will not make anything on the forums, because there is evidence that Braddock will bury Jolie in court.

Well, he hasn't shown any evidence helpful to himself yet.

-It's not just email, but photographs, witnesses, and more, and most importantly the book. When the jury to be shown movie, with the exact parts of the book, phrases, actions, and these together and it can kill. Braddock is a personal friend, with one of the actors from the film, and that her biggest mistake!
Shut mouth, I've had it!

It's hard to face the truth about the case isn't it? Though you are so pig headed, ignorant of the facts and smug that I am sure you are totally clueless of the reality of this matter. I hope someone is paying you for your services as a shill for Braddock. Is this why Braddock linked to FF from his website?

[Guest]

Loon, if the above synopsis is true, that means that in the first 19 minutes alone, there were 13 parallels between the book and the movie. Some similarities are to be expected given that they are based on history, but 13/19 is pushing things, and since they were more or less in sequential order...what are the odds of that? That's not even counting the overall similarities listed in the original suit, which were substantial.

It's not looking good for Jolie. At all. She clearly stole it, and I think you know it. Come on, you didn't really think that Jolie could write, did you?

[Guest]

By virtue the case hasn't been dismissed, she's lost. Watch her S*** in her pants as she tries to keep her lies straight.

[Guest]

-Firstly, to see all the documents of the case you have to pay, so you can not know whether there or not included? You talk without proof, and all the blind, the craze with Jolie!

Again, your arrogance despite your ignorance on this matter is a huge weakness. Some people have access to the federal court system which provides access to the entire case including all motions, court orders, case documents, exhibits filed with the court, all other filings, the case docket and all docket entries. I am one of those people. The fees involved are very small. So, in fact, I have seen the entire case and know for a fact that Braddock has never filed with the court or with the opposing parties a copy of either the original Subject Work (his book) or its subsequent translations.

From Braddock's motions it is clear that a later translation was being worked on even as the case was being filed. It appears that it had not been published by the time of the original case filing. He better have the original translation available for the defendants and court to examine as well because he will be subject to accusations that he changed the translation to make it match up with the movie/script.

Braddock also better have the book as originally published for the parties and court to examine and proof that it IS the book as originally published.

-I do not know what kind of email saying, but on his website the official letters sent by mail to the addresses of producers and their agents?

In the court filings there are a number of emails attached as exhibits. They include a number of emails from Braddock himself to GK Films as well as copies of emails from Felix Korpar ("purportedly 'an authorized representative' of Braddock's") to Geyer Kosinski and to Graham King and Tim Headington. The emails sent by Korpar can be found Braddock's website. The emails personally sent by Braddock are not on his website.

-Secondly, threatening email from GKFilms only harms them, not to Braddock, and proof that he forbade contact, you had no right!

The email sent by GKFilms is the standard Cease and Desist communication. The threats contained in Braddock's emails are hilarious and disturbing at the same time. Braddock says the case can go away if Angelina Jolie would personally meet with him and talk to him or he will go to the press and tell the world that she is on the side of the Serbs and "tell all the world that Angelina loves war criminals like Mladic, Karadzic and others who destroyers [sic] my Sarajevo . . ."

-They thought that it will scare the mafia? All his contacts, proof that they were warned at the time of plagiarism, even before filming, and they ignored that fact!

-Therefore, through you, like you, who are delegated to her party, you will not make anything on the forums, because there is evidence that Braddock will bury Jolie in court.

Well, he hasn't shown any evidence helpful to himself yet.

-It's not just email, but photographs, witnesses, and more, and most importantly the book. When the jury to be shown movie, with the exact parts of the book, phrases, actions, and these together and it can kill. Braddock is a personal friend, with one of the actors from the film, and that her biggest mistake!
Shut mouth, I've had it!

It's hard to face the truth about the case isn't it? Though you are so pig headed, ignorant of the facts and smug that I am sure you are totally clueless of the reality of this matter. I hope someone is paying you for your services as a shill for Braddock. Is this why Braddock linked to FF from his website?

No English translation had to be published before the case was filed. All that needs to be shown is overwhelming similarity between his original work and her movie. We all know there were Serbo-Croatian speakers in Camp Jolie who were in contact with Braddock for years anyway.

It really is a lousy thing that Jolie has done. Lousy, dirty, dishonorable.

[Guest]

OK, big font and colors means you are a shouting loon. [quote="Guest"][quote="friends"]

Some people have access to the federal court system which provides access to the entire case including all motions, court orders, case documents, exhibits filed with the court, all other filings, the case docket and all docket entries. I am one of those people. You and nearly every member of the federal bar and all their employees, including clerks, secretaries, and paralegals. You sound like one of those employees who think you know more than you do. No credible attorney would make such ignorant comments.

SoHe has had no need to do file anything but his suit, motions, and response to the defendants' motions. These dealt with the tro and jurisdiction issues, not the underlying claims. As yet there has been no Rule 26 exchange of documents, etc. [/b]


-I Well, he hasn't shown any evidence helpful to himself yet. Discovery will be ordered and overseen by the CA court. This will be where the documents will appear.

[friends]

-Firstly, to see all the documents of the case you have to pay, so you can not know whether there or not included? You talk without proof, and all the blind, the craze with Jolie!

Again, your arrogance despite your ignorance on this matter is a huge weakness. Some people have access to the federal court system which provides access to the entire case including all motions, court orders, case documents, exhibits filed with the court, all other filings, the case docket and all docket entries. I am one of those people. The fees involved are very small. So, in fact, I have seen the entire case and know for a fact that Braddock has never filed with the court or with the opposing parties a copy of either the original Subject Work (his book) or its subsequent translations.

From Braddock's motions it is clear that a later translation was being worked on even as the case was being filed. It appears that it had not been published by the time of the original case filing. He better have the original translation available for the defendants and court to examine as well because he will be subject to accusations that he changed the translation to make it match up with the movie/script.

Braddock also better have the book as originally published for the parties and court to examine and proof that it IS the book as originally published.

-I do not know what kind of email saying, but on his website the official letters sent by mail to the addresses of producers and their agents?

In the court filings there are a number of emails attached as exhibits. They include a number of emails from Braddock himself to GK Films as well as copies of emails from Felix Korpar ("purportedly 'an authorized representative' of Braddock's") to Geyer Kosinski and to Graham King and Tim Headington. The emails sent by Korpar can be found Braddock's website. The emails personally sent by Braddock are not on his website.

-Secondly, threatening email from GKFilms only harms them, not to Braddock, and proof that he forbade contact, you had no right!

The email sent by GKFilms is the standard Cease and Desist communication. The threats contained in Braddock's emails are hilarious and disturbing at the same time. Braddock says the case can go away if Angelina Jolie would personally meet with him and talk to him or he will go to the press and tell the world that she is on the side of the Serbs and "tell all the world that Angelina loves war criminals like Mladic, Karadzic and others who destroyers [sic] my Sarajevo . . ."

-They thought that it will scare the mafia? All his contacts, proof that they were warned at the time of plagiarism, even before filming, and they ignored that fact!

-Therefore, through you, like you, who are delegated to her party, you will not make anything on the forums, because there is evidence that Braddock will bury Jolie in court.

Well, he hasn't shown any evidence helpful to himself yet.

-It's not just email, but photographs, witnesses, and more, and most importantly the book. When the jury to be shown movie, with the exact parts of the book, phrases, actions, and these together and it can kill. Braddock is a personal friend, with one of the actors from the film, and that her biggest mistake!
Shut mouth, I've had it!

It's hard to face the truth about the case isn't it? Though you are so pig headed, ignorant of the facts and smug that I am sure you are totally clueless of the reality of this matter. I hope someone is paying you for your services as a shill for Braddock. Is this why Braddock linked to FF from his website?

This evidence for you, and all others fool's like you:

Braddock publish a book 2007 in december 19

http://knjiga.hr/04.asp?param=s&ID=2890 ... ovjera=nav

http://www.superknjizara.hr/index.php?p ... =100034757

http://arhiv.slobodnadalmacija.hr/20080215/mozaik02.asp

etc...

[mm7]

-Firstly, to see all the documents of the case you have to pay, so you can not know whether there or not included? You talk without proof, and all the blind, the craze with Jolie!

Again, your arrogance despite your ignorance on this matter is a huge weakness. Some people have access to the federal court system which provides access to the entire case including all motions, court orders, case documents, exhibits filed with the court, all other filings, the case docket and all docket entries. I am one of those people. The fees involved are very small. So, in fact, I have seen the entire case and know for a fact that Braddock has never filed with the court or with the opposing parties a copy of either the original Subject Work (his book) or its subsequent translations.

From Braddock's motions it is clear that a later translation was being worked on even as the case was being filed. It appears that it had not been published by the time of the original case filing. He better have the original translation available for the defendants and court to examine as well because he will be subject to accusations that he changed the translation to make it match up with the movie/script.

Braddock also better have the book as originally published for the parties and court to examine and proof that it IS the book as originally published.

-I do not know what kind of email saying, but on his website the official letters sent by mail to the addresses of producers and their agents?

In the court filings there are a number of emails attached as exhibits. They include a number of emails from Braddock himself to GK Films as well as copies of emails from Felix Korpar ("purportedly 'an authorized representative' of Braddock's") to Geyer Kosinski and to Graham King and Tim Headington. The emails sent by Korpar can be found Braddock's website. The emails personally sent by Braddock are not on his website.

-Secondly, threatening email from GKFilms only harms them, not to Braddock, and proof that he forbade contact, you had no right!

The email sent by GKFilms is the standard Cease and Desist communication. The threats contained in Braddock's emails are hilarious and disturbing at the same time. Braddock says the case can go away if Angelina Jolie would personally meet with him and talk to him or he will go to the press and tell the world that she is on the side of the Serbs and "tell all the world that Angelina loves war criminals like Mladic, Karadzic and others who destroyers [sic] my Sarajevo . . ."

-They thought that it will scare the mafia? All his contacts, proof that they were warned at the time of plagiarism, even before filming, and they ignored that fact!

-Therefore, through you, like you, who are delegated to her party, you will not make anything on the forums, because there is evidence that Braddock will bury Jolie in court.

Well, he hasn't shown any evidence helpful to himself yet.

-It's not just email, but photographs, witnesses, and more, and most importantly the book. When the jury to be shown movie, with the exact parts of the book, phrases, actions, and these together and it can kill. Braddock is a personal friend, with one of the actors from the film, and that her biggest mistake!
Shut mouth, I've had it!

It's hard to face the truth about the case isn't it? Though you are so pig headed, ignorant of the facts and smug that I am sure you are totally clueless of the reality of this matter. I hope someone is paying you for your services as a shill for Braddock. Is this why Braddock linked to FF from his website?

This evidence for you, and all others fool's like you:

Braddock publish a book 2007 in december 19

http://knjiga.hr/04.asp?param=s&ID=2890 ... ovjera=nav

http://www.superknjizara.hr/index.php?p ... =100034757

http://arhiv.slobodnadalmacija.hr/20080215/mozaik02.asp

etc...