Female First Logo
  • Love & Sex
  • Find out more

    • Dating
    • Relationships
    • Weddings
    • Agony Aunts
  • Community
    • Discussion Board
    • Quick Chat
  • Celebrities
  • Find out more

    • Celebrity Gossip
    • Entertainment Gossip
    • Royal Family
    • Celebrity Interviews
    • Photo Gallery
    • Celebrity Directory
  • Lifestyle
  • Find out more

    • Parenting
    • Motoring
    • Travel
    • Food & Drink
    • Health
    • Home & Garden
    • Money
    • Business
    • Recruitment
    • Women's Issues
  • Entertainment
  • Find out more

    • Entertainment Gossip
    • Music
    • Movies
    • Sport
    • TV & Soaps
    • DVD and Blu-Ray
    • Games
    • Bollywood
    • Book Reviews
    • Bizarre
    • Competitions
    • Horoscopes
    • Big Brother
  • Fashion & Beauty
  • Find out more

    • Style News
    • Celebrity Style
    • Beauty Tips
    • Fashion Trends
    • Style Surgery
    • Shopping
  • Shopping
    • Fashion
    • Lingerie
    • Offers
    • Swimwear
    • DVDs
    • Gaming
    • Books
    • CDs
    • Gifts
  • Blog
    • Fashion Blog
    • Health Blog
    • Movies Blog
    • Music Blog
    • Sport Blog
  • Video
    • Latest Videos
    • Exclusive Videos
    • Celebrity Gossip Videos
    • Movie Trailers
    • Video Interviews
  • Follow us
  • femalefirst facebook
  • femalefirst twitter
  • Follow Me on Pinterest
FemaleFirst.co.uk Discussion Board Quick Chat  

Advanced search
  • Board index ‹ Films and Celebrity ‹ Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Section
  • Change font size
  • E-mail friend
  • Print view
  • FAQ
  • Register
  • Login

From Pitt's rep

All posts on Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston
Post a reply
189 posts • Page 12 of 13 • 1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: From Pitt's rep

Postby Guest » Thu Aug 16, 2012 2:00 am

BILLY BOB THORNTON (47) AND HIS NEW GIRL DANIELLE DOTZENROD (23) LEAVE BY THE BACK DOOR OF "BILLY MARTIN'S," AN EXPENSIVE COWBOY SHOP ON SUNSET PLAZA IN BEVERLY HILLS, CA.DANIELLE HAS ALREADY MOVED INTO THE HOUSE IN BEVERLY HILLS THAT BILLY-BOB BOUGHT WITH ANGELINA JOLIE.
(August 31, 2002 - Source: Bauer Griffin)

Image

August 05, 2002
Marriage, Interrupted
Looking back now, Sherry Hollingsworth says she did notice something unusual in Billy Bob Thornton's behavior when the two longtime friends had dinner in Little Rock in May. "Billy's always the happy-go-lucky type," says Hollingsworth, 47, an elementary school principal. "That little spark wasn't there. I kept thinking he's tired or doesn't feel well."Still, Thornton, 47, put on a good show, trotting out photos of wife Angelina Jolie and their infant son Maddox, whose adoption they had announced just two months earlier. One showed the happy trio lounging on a bed. It was, says Hollingsworth, "just, you know, a simple family moment."

Things have just gotten a lot more complicated. On July 17, just two months past their second wedding anniversary, Jolie, 27, filed for divorce, citing irreconcilable differences. "My daughter is very sad," says her mother, former actress Marcheline Bertrand, 52. "It's a really tough time for her." Thornton sounded a similar note in his brief public statement: "It is a sad thing." For Jolie, this is a second divorce, for Thornton his fifth; three of his prior marriages, like this one, lasted just two years.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: From Pitt's rep

Postby Guest » Thu Aug 16, 2012 2:02 am

Guest wrote:No comment from Jolie's people? Ouch, that is cold, a gentleman he is not. He could not make it any clearer he has no intention of marrying her. He doesn't appear to even want to be near her anymore.


Just a reminder, folks, of why the loons keep taking this thread off-topic. Although, it was hilarious reading through the whole thread. The loons would successfully derail the conversation, but then anti's would start talking about whatever it was the loons derailed (like how Pitt might have to give up the adoptive kid like Billy Bob had to give up Maddox), and the loons would all be running back, waving their arms to derail that conversation too. By my count, that has happened about four times in this thread. Hilarious! Get over it loons! Anti's don't have to rely on talking points to defend our positions, we can talk about tangential issues just as easily as the main topic. Don't you just hate it when that happens?
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: From Pitt's rep

Postby Guest » Thu Aug 16, 2012 2:48 am

Guest wrote:BILLY BOB THORNTON (47) AND HIS NEW GIRL DANIELLE DOTZENROD (23) LEAVE BY THE BACK DOOR OF "BILLY MARTIN'S," AN EXPENSIVE COWBOY SHOP ON SUNSET PLAZA IN BEVERLY HILLS, CA.DANIELLE HAS ALREADY MOVED INTO THE HOUSE IN BEVERLY HILLS THAT BILLY-BOB BOUGHT WITH ANGELINA JOLIE.
(August 31, 2002 - Source: Bauer Griffin)

Image

August 05, 2002
Marriage, Interrupted
Looking back now, Sherry Hollingsworth says she did notice something unusual in Billy Bob Thornton's behavior when the two longtime friends had dinner in Little Rock in May. "Billy's always the happy-go-lucky type," says Hollingsworth, 47, an elementary school principal. "That little spark wasn't there. I kept thinking he's tired or doesn't feel well."Still, Thornton, 47, put on a good show, trotting out photos of wife Angelina Jolie and their infant son Maddox, whose adoption they had announced just two months earlier. One showed the happy trio lounging on a bed. It was, says Hollingsworth, "just, you know, a simple family moment."

Things have just gotten a lot more complicated. On July 17, just two months past their second wedding anniversary, Jolie, 27, filed for divorce, citing irreconcilable differences. "My daughter is very sad," says her mother, former actress Marcheline Bertrand, 52. "It's a really tough time for her." Thornton sounded a similar note in his brief public statement: "It is a sad thing." For Jolie, this is a second divorce, for Thornton his fifth; three of his prior marriages, like this one, lasted just two years.


BBT moved a younger woman into the house he and the HoLie shared a month after she filed for his serial cheating and not wanting to be a parent with her. Now that is karma.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: From Pitt's rep

Postby OHNOSHEDIDN'T! » Thu Aug 16, 2012 3:28 am

Skeletrout wrote:It's always always Pitt issuing the wedding denials. It's never once come from her. Humiliating. :oops:



No she's to busy telling "Bob The Jeweler", to send out wedding speculations to the media. In fact with every speculation, she was getting press and HE was getting FREE publicity for himself....., with his name attached as a "source" like he was already holed up at the Chateau in France, working on the wedding bands in a haste for the weekend nuptials.................the thing is....the media is going to get sick to death of it, and when it is time for the wedding, no on is going to give a flying fig....
OHNOSHEDIDN'T!
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: From Pitt's rep

Postby Guest » Thu Aug 16, 2012 3:33 am

OHNOSHEDIDN'T! wrote:
Skeletrout wrote:It's always always Pitt issuing the wedding denials. It's never once come from her. Humiliating. :oops:



No she's to busy telling "Bob The Jeweler", to send out wedding speculations to the media. In fact with every speculation, she was getting press and HE was getting FREE publicity for himself....., with his name attached as a "source" like he was already holed up at the Chateau in France, working on the wedding bands in a haste for the weekend nuptials.................the thing is....the media is going to get sick to death of it, and when it is time for the wedding, no on is going to give a flying fig....



People are sick to death of it already - most of the public didn't even know there were rumors of a wedding last weekend. We only knew because the loons were doing happy dances all over the place. Seven long years of this dance is 6 years too damn long!! Nobody cares except the loons and the antis who get to laugh at the loons once again when no wedding happens!!
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: From Pitt's rep

Postby Mac and P » Thu Aug 16, 2012 4:56 am

I find it funny that there is the fax stating the jeweler is staying at their home making the wedding bands. Has he set up shop there? If so, I really need to get the battery in my watch changed.


Two other points:

Jolie was indeed self admitted to the UCLA Neuropsychiatric Unit. She reported that she wanted to be admitted before she "hurt my self or someone else." I do believe the presumptive diagnosis was Borderline Personality disorder. Jolie has spoken of this many times, proudly in fact. How did her true fans miss that? Oh, yeah, it was before Brad so that is all wiped out like a reverse Total Recall.

The issue for many Antis IS NOT THAT Angelina may or may not have bedded Pitt when he was married, no one likes that but that is NOT what caused the backlash. It was the manufactured spin she pimped to make Aniston look bad and make herself look like a superior human being. Fortunately (aside from The Loons whose brains are dead from eating way too much potted meat) something about screwing someone over and then planting BS about them so you don't look bad makes many of us sick. Jolie was not even content with do that; she had to make herself appear like the most evolved human on the planet. Then there was the W Magazine spread that said "Brad and Angelina". Nice humanitarian work there. I also did not see Laura Dern trying to spin in order to make herself look good at the expense of someone else. That, in a nutshell, is the difference for me. Jolie gives a whole new meaning to the phase "by any means necessary."




'
Last edited by Mac and P on Thu Aug 16, 2012 4:30 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Mac and P
Queen
 
Posts: 4169
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 12:58 am
Location: Some where out there
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: From Pitt's rep

Postby Guest » Thu Aug 16, 2012 5:06 am

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:That's very interesting that Jolie and Thornton were represented by the same agency. She was also trying to shed the lesbian image and being with an older not very attractive man made it seem like she was converted.


I thought so too - that's why I posted it. Funny how loons are not admitting they were wrong about Angie NOT committing herself to a psych ward and they have not responded to this post either. Do they just ignore it - stick their heads in the sand like ostriches. They must - there would be no other way to continue to defend this bittch otherwise!!



I'm convinced the loons are all a bunch of unintelligent, women hating, narcissists just like Jolie. They can't debate. They can only use name calling. And they lie and deny (just like Jolie does) when they know they did wrong but have no defense.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: From Pitt's rep

Postby Guest » Thu Aug 16, 2012 8:32 am

Guest wrote:
Levan1 wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:is this the same Laura Dern who got pregnant while Ben Harper's wife was pregnant as well and whos child with Ben and the child that Ben had with his ex-wife are the SAME age


yup! i love how the people on this site who always say "poor" dern forget that she homewrecked a marriage with kids, i heard she even wrecked Billy Bobs relationship with his wife Pietra


Yup, she wrecked two homes with children yet is still better than Jolie. Mind boggles.
Somebody from TMZ stated it perfectly (when Harper left her ass):

Don't shed any tears for Laura Dern. She's a serial homewrecker and she's getting exactly what she deserves. She deliberately went after Harper when his wife was 5 months pregnant and by the time Harper left his wife for Dern she was 3 months pregnant herself. It's the same crap she pulled with Billy Bob Thorton when he was married to Pietra Cherniak. She was also "the other woman" in her relationships with Jeff Goldblum and Renny Harlin. She's left a long trail of heartbroken girlfriends and wives as a result of almost every major relationship with a man she's had in her adult life. The fact that Harper dumped her as unceremoniously as he dumped his first wife for her? That's just icing on the cake. What goes around comes around. Dern didn't shed any tears for Harper's pregnant wife when he left her, so why should anyone feel sorry for Dern? You reap what you sow. She should have thought about that while she was sleeping with the married Harper in 2000.


An inconventient truth for people who rag all over Jolie and put women like Dern on a pedestal just because it suits their agenda. Even Aniston gets a pass despite it being obvious she was the other woman with Bivens and Theroux. Mind boggles. But don't start about that because then look for other bad things Jolie did :roll:


Wow, Levanhag. You haven't changed a bit. What does whether or not Laura Dern cheated in the past (which may or may not be true) have ANYTHING to do with what BBT did to her? Deflect, deflect, deflect! Another loon teaching. You've got that down. Of course, I imagine you're head instructor by now. You should put that on your resume. It'll help fill in the gap since SCIF, and it sounds so impressive too! Chair, Department of Strategic Defection, Brangelunatic (Loon) University.

And I see they've promoted you to the Department of Creating False Viral Narratives with your tired old lie about Bivens. Run to your other sites and try this strategy there, Professor Shitt4Brains. Here, we deal in facts. I'll stop here to give you a moment to trill your fake laughter; you're a liar and your fake incredulity about FF credibility is a sham. Everyone knows that. You and your various minions would not be here without rest, literally 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 52 weeks a year, if you weren't aware of the damage we are doing to your idols.

You loons said it enough -- "go to FF." Well, you insulted enough people and sent them to FF that we now a lot of very well informed, very articulate posters. And piece by piece, we are dismantling the platform of lies that the myth of Brangelina stands on. Ha! I believe that's called "hoist by your own petard." You loons created a monster for yourselves by sending so many people here; people, for the most part, who didn't even follow the brand, people who had ventured a mild criticism of the brand and been called a jeluz, fat hater, and sent here. I notice you're not sending them here anymore. That practice ended, best as I can tell, about six months ago? Would that be about right?

So, just to clarify: the three people in the relationshiop (Bivens, Theroux, and Aniston) have all indicated that Aniston and Theroux did not get together while Bivens and Theroux were still dating. Get it Levanhag? No one endorses the loon version of this story, yet I've already noticed it's become on of those loon talking items, where no matter how many times you link to Biven's or anyone else's denial, you loons continue spouting the same lie without even acknowledging proof otherwise. Oh, and that reminds me, Levanhag. You should take this back to Brange U. This tactic has gotten so old that people have just stopped providing you loons links at all. That's not a good thing for you, although I'm sure you think it is.

But you are not quite sane on this subject, so I will explain it to you: loons' have lost so much credibility with the gereral public that the average person doesn't even care what you think. The complete lack of enthusiasm that greeted the brand's engagement announcement compared with the public/media excitement over Aniston's has been a long time in the works. And you loons, have helped bring it to this stage.


Oh, SNAP! Love it, love it, love it!
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: From Pitt's rep

Postby kittypurry » Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:42 am

Guest wrote:
People are sick to death of it already - most of the public didn't even know there were rumors of a wedding last weekend. We only knew because the loons were doing happy dances all over the place. :lol: Seven long years of this dance is 6 years too damn long!! Nobody cares except the loons and the antis who get to laugh at the loons once again when no wedding happens!!


dance dance
happy dance :dance:

:clap:
User avatar
kittypurry
Wizard
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:11 pm
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: From Pitt's rep

Postby Mac and P » Fri Aug 17, 2012 3:12 am

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:That's very interesting that Jolie and Thornton were represented by the same agency. She was also trying to shed the lesbian image and being with an older not very attractive man made it seem like she was converted.


I thought so too - that's why I posted it. Funny how loons are not admitting they were wrong about Angie NOT committing herself to a psych ward and they have not responded to this post either. Do they just ignore it - stick their heads in the sand like ostriches. They must - there would be no other way to continue to defend this bittch otherwise!!



I'm convinced the loons are all a bunch of unintelligent, women hating, narcissists just like Jolie. They can't debate. They can only use name calling. And they lie and deny (just like Jolie does) when they know they did wrong but have no defense.




I think you are right- amazing bunch.
User avatar
Mac and P
Queen
 
Posts: 4169
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 12:58 am
Location: Some where out there
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: From Pitt's rep

Postby congusto » Fri Aug 17, 2012 3:36 am

Mac and P wrote:I find it funny that there is the fax stating the jeweler is staying at their home making the wedding bands. Has he set up shop there? If so, I really need to get the battery in my watch changed.


Two other points:

Jolie was indeed self admitted to the UCLA Neuropsychiatric Unit. She reported that she wanted to be admitted before she "hurt my self or someone else." I do believe the presumptive diagnosis was Borderline Personality disorder. Jolie has spoken of this many times, proudly in fact. How did her true fans miss that? Oh, yeah, it was before Brad so that is all wiped out like a reverse Total Recall.

The issue for many Antis IS NOT THAT Angelina may or may not have bedded Pitt when he was married, no one likes that but that is NOT what caused the backlash. It was the manufactured spin she pimped to make Aniston look bad and make herself look like a superior human being. Fortunately (aside from The Loons whose brains are dead from eating way too much potted meat) something about screwing someone over and then planting BS about them so you don't look bad makes many of us sick. Jolie was not even content with do that; she had to make herself appear like the most evolved human on the planet. Then there was the W Magazine spread that said "Brad and Angelina". Nice humanitarian work there. I also did not see Laura Dern trying to spin in order to make herself look good at the expense of someone else. That, in a nutshell, is the difference for me. Jolie gives a whole new meaning to the phase "by any means necessary."




'

This is why I'm glad to see you posting again M&P!
Guest » Wed Nov 28, 2012 5:25 pm
Congusto ....I am simply astounded by your pomposity and ill will.
User avatar
congusto
Teacher
 
Posts: 577
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:29 pm
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: From Pitt's rep

Postby Guest » Fri Aug 17, 2012 3:55 am

I bet the loons will ignore it the next time Ms. Angelina Jolie Voight is committed again. They will call it a spa if anything.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: From Pitt's rep

Postby madame » Fri Aug 17, 2012 12:17 pm

anyone ever see any pics of her with friends relaxed at home hosting a dinner party ?
i bet not ..
one foto in all the years they've been pimping ...
madame
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: From Pitt's rep

Postby Mac and P » Fri Aug 17, 2012 3:57 pm

congusto wrote:
Mac and P wrote:I find it funny that there is the fax stating the jeweler is staying at their home making the wedding bands. Has he set up shop there? If so, I really need to get the battery in my watch changed.


Two other points:

Jolie was indeed self admitted to the UCLA Neuropsychiatric Unit. She reported that she wanted to be admitted before she "hurt my self or someone else." I do believe the presumptive diagnosis was Borderline Personality disorder. Jolie has spoken of this many times, proudly in fact. How did her true fans miss that? Oh, yeah, it was before Brad so that is all wiped out like a reverse Total Recall.

The issue for many Antis IS NOT THAT Angelina may or may not have bedded Pitt when he was married, no one likes that but that is NOT what caused the backlash. It was the manufactured spin she pimped to make Aniston look bad and make herself look like a superior human being. Fortunately (aside from The Loons whose brains are dead from eating way too much potted meat) something about screwing someone over and then planting BS about them so you don't look bad makes many of us sick. Jolie was not even content with do that; she had to make herself appear like the most evolved human on the planet. Then there was the W Magazine spread that said "Brad and Angelina". Nice humanitarian work there. I also did not see Laura Dern trying to spin in order to make herself look good at the expense of someone else. That, in a nutshell, is the difference for me. Jolie gives a whole new meaning to the phase "by any means necessary."




'

This is why I'm glad to see you posting again M&P!



Hey there!!! And thank you it is good to be posting again!!
User avatar
Mac and P
Queen
 
Posts: 4169
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 12:58 am
Location: Some where out there
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: From Pitt's rep

Postby kittypurry » Fri Aug 17, 2012 4:09 pm

congusto wrote:
Mac and P wrote:I find it funny that there is the fax stating the jeweler is staying at their home making the wedding bands. Has he set up shop there? If so, I really need to get the battery in my watch changed.


Two other points:

Jolie was indeed self admitted to the UCLA Neuropsychiatric Unit. She reported that she wanted to be admitted before she "hurt my self or someone else." I do believe the presumptive diagnosis was Borderline Personality disorder. Jolie has spoken of this many times, proudly in fact. How did her true fans miss that? Oh, yeah, it was before Brad so that is all wiped out like a reverse Total Recall.

The issue for many Antis IS NOT THAT Angelina may or may not have bedded Pitt when he was married, no one likes that but that is NOT what caused the backlash. It was the manufactured spin she pimped to make Aniston look bad and make herself look like a superior human being. Fortunately (aside from The Loons whose brains are dead from eating way too much potted meat) something about screwing someone over and then planting BS about them so you don't look bad makes many of us sick. Jolie was not even content with do that; she had to make herself appear like the most evolved human on the planet. Then there was the W Magazine spread that said "Brad and Angelina". Nice humanitarian work there. I also did not see Laura Dern trying to spin in order to make herself look good at the expense of someone else. That, in a nutshell, is the difference for me. Jolie gives a whole new meaning to the phase "by any means necessary."






'

This is why I'm glad to see you posting again M&P!


M&P always manages to nail it - well said both of you :clap: :clap:
User avatar
kittypurry
Wizard
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:11 pm
Top

PreviousNext

Post a reply
189 posts • Page 12 of 13 • 1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13

Return to Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Section

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Skeletrout and 56 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Sign up stay updated
Tweets by @FemaleFirst_UK

Like Us On facebook

Save up to 75% in the Lovehoney Sale
web2 - 0.01s