Finally Jolie and others go to court 9/4/2012

[mm7]

Case 2:12-cv-05883-DMG-VBK Document 74 Filed 08/17/12

Dariush Adli
Rasheed McWilliams
ADLI LAW GROUP P.C.
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 6900
Los Angeles, California 90071

Attorneys for Plaintiff James J Braddock

Harrison J. Dossick
Christine M. Neuharth
Reed Smith LLP
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 700
Los Angeles, CA 90067-6078

Attorneys for Defendants
Angelina Jolie, GK Films, LLC (sued
erroneously as GK Films), and
FilmDistrict Pictures, LLC (sued
erroneously as Film District)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES J. BRADDOCK,
Plaintiff,
vs.
ANGELINA JOLIE, an individual;
GK FILMS, a California corporation;
FILMDISTRICT, an Illinois corporation;
SCOUT FILM, a foreign corporation; and
EDIN SARKIC, an individual,
Defendants.
Case No. 2:12-CV-05883-DMG (VBK)

ORDER RE STIPULATION TO
ALLOW DEFENDANTS ANGELINA
JOLIE, GK FILMS, LLC, AND
FILMDISTRICT PICTURES, LLC

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT ON OR BY
SEPTEMBER 4, 2012
Case 2:12-cv-05883-DMG-VBK Document 74 Filed 08/17/12

The Court has read and considered the Stipulation to Allow Defendants to
Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or by September 4, 2012 (the “Stipulation”) filed
by Plaintiff James J. Braddock and Defendants Angelina Jolie, GK Films, LLC and
FilmDistrict Pictures, LLC. For the reasons stated in the Stipulation and for good
cause shown, the Court hereby APPROVES the Stipulation.
Defendants shall have until September 4, 2012 to respond to the Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 17, 2012

DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:12-cv-05883-DMG-VBK Document 74 Filed 08/17/12

Now the problems start for Jolie! Will remember this very well, who is Braddock, when he rudely ignored by all!

[Guest]

Case 2:12-cv-05883-DMG-VBK Document 74 Filed 08/17/12

Dariush Adli
Rasheed McWilliams
ADLI LAW GROUP P.C.
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 6900
Los Angeles, California 90071

Attorneys for Plaintiff James J Braddock

Harrison J. Dossick
Christine M. Neuharth
Reed Smith LLP
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 700
Los Angeles, CA 90067-6078

Attorneys for Defendants
Angelina Jolie, GK Films, LLC (sued
erroneously as GK Films), and
FilmDistrict Pictures, LLC (sued
erroneously as Film District)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES J. BRADDOCK,
Plaintiff,
vs.
ANGELINA JOLIE, an individual;
GK FILMS, a California corporation;
FILMDISTRICT, an Illinois corporation;
SCOUT FILM, a foreign corporation; and
EDIN SARKIC, an individual,
Defendants.
Case No. 2:12-CV-05883-DMG (VBK)

ORDER RE STIPULATION TO
ALLOW DEFENDANTS ANGELINA
JOLIE, GK FILMS, LLC, AND
FILMDISTRICT PICTURES, LLC

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT ON OR BY
SEPTEMBER 4, 2012
Case 2:12-cv-05883-DMG-VBK Document 74 Filed 08/17/12

The Court has read and considered the Stipulation to Allow Defendants to
Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or by September 4, 2012 (the “Stipulation”) filed
by Plaintiff James J. Braddock and Defendants Angelina Jolie, GK Films, LLC and
FilmDistrict Pictures, LLC. For the reasons stated in the Stipulation and for good
cause shown, the Court hereby APPROVES the Stipulation.
Defendants shall have until September 4, 2012 to respond to the Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 17, 2012

DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:12-cv-05883-DMG-VBK Document 74 Filed 08/17/12

Now the problems start for Jolie! Will remember this very well, who is Braddock, when he rudely ignored by all!

Are you out of your frigging mind, "go to court", it means "respond", NOT LITERALLY go to court....IDIOT.....

[Guest]

Oh goody, a female judge!!!!!!!!!

[KrazyDiamond]

Whoa! No need to fall off your rocker and start name-calling. No one is insulting YOU unless you're Jolie.

Yep, that just means they have to file a response in court. That's usually taken care of by paralegals. They just go to the window, get their forms stamped, and then it will go to the judge's desk. It's a standard procedure, but I AM amazed they were given such a small window of time to respond. These things take time. They could very well begin discussin settlement at this point.

[mm7]

Case 2:12-cv-05883-DMG-VBK Document 74 Filed 08/17/12

Dariush Adli
Rasheed McWilliams
ADLI LAW GROUP P.C.
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 6900
Los Angeles, California 90071

Attorneys for Plaintiff James J Braddock

Harrison J. Dossick
Christine M. Neuharth
Reed Smith LLP
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 700
Los Angeles, CA 90067-6078

Attorneys for Defendants
Angelina Jolie, GK Films, LLC (sued
erroneously as GK Films), and
FilmDistrict Pictures, LLC (sued
erroneously as Film District)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES J. BRADDOCK,
Plaintiff,
vs.
ANGELINA JOLIE, an individual;
GK FILMS, a California corporation;
FILMDISTRICT, an Illinois corporation;
SCOUT FILM, a foreign corporation; and
EDIN SARKIC, an individual,
Defendants.
Case No. 2:12-CV-05883-DMG (VBK)

ORDER RE STIPULATION TO
ALLOW DEFENDANTS ANGELINA
JOLIE, GK FILMS, LLC, AND
FILMDISTRICT PICTURES, LLC

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT ON OR BY
SEPTEMBER 4, 2012
Case 2:12-cv-05883-DMG-VBK Document 74 Filed 08/17/12

The Court has read and considered the Stipulation to Allow Defendants to
Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or by September 4, 2012 (the “Stipulation”) filed
by Plaintiff James J. Braddock and Defendants Angelina Jolie, GK Films, LLC and
FilmDistrict Pictures, LLC. For the reasons stated in the Stipulation and for good
cause shown, the Court hereby APPROVES the Stipulation.
Defendants shall have until September 4, 2012 to respond to the Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 17, 2012

DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:12-cv-05883-DMG-VBK Document 74 Filed 08/17/12

Now the problems start for Jolie! Will remember this very well, who is Braddock, when he rudely ignored by all!

Are you out of your frigging mind, "go to court", it means "respond", NOT LITERALLY go to court....IDIOT.....

Response, meaning that they have to respond, but also to begin the process, go to court, and finally an old woman must be physically present and to respond to their lies! What are you nervous? Enough of your lies and its here! You were saying that there was nothing from the court? Where are now all those idiots? If it bothers her fall and you do not read!
Small dick and hair bothered!

[Guest]

Whoa! No need to fall off your rocker and start name-calling. No one is insulting YOU unless you're Jolie.

Yep, that just means they have to file a response in court. That's usually taken care of by paralegals. They just go to the window, get their forms stamped, and then it will go to the judge's desk. It's a standard procedure, but I AM amazed they were given such a small window of time to respond. These things take time. They could very well begin discussin settlement at this point.

This case started in December 2011 and was ordered to be transferred to the Central District of California from Illinois Northern. The Defendants have had lots of time to prepare a response. That said, the suit is still a long way away from trial of the issue in court.

http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/copy ... l/summary/

[mm7]

Whoa! No need to fall off your rocker and start name-calling. No one is insulting YOU unless you're Jolie.

Yep, that just means they have to file a response in court. That's usually taken care of by paralegals. They just go to the window, get their forms stamped, and then it will go to the judge's desk. It's a standard procedure, but I AM amazed they were given such a small window of time to respond. These things take time. They could very well begin discussin settlement at this point.

This case started in December 2011 and was ordered to be transferred to the Central District of California from Illinois Northern. The Defendants have had lots of time to prepare a response. That said, the suit is still a long way away from trial of the issue in court.

http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/copy ... l/summary/

Dig it or not, but every day longer it will be increasing problems, especially because of evidence that they can not refute! That there are a hundred of its lawyers will not help her, that it would be a shame for her! Publicity, cameras, reporters will spread Jolie because of her lies! Bradock it anyway! Will enjoy the material for a new book which will definitely ruin Jolie! Just let it prolongs the court, her problem!

[Guest]

Whoa! No need to fall off your rocker and start name-calling. No one is insulting YOU unless you're Jolie.

Yep, that just means they have to file a response in court. That's usually taken care of by paralegals. They just go to the window, get their forms stamped, and then it will go to the judge's desk. It's a standard procedure, but I AM amazed they were given such a small window of time to respond. These things take time. They could very well begin discussin settlement at this point.

This case started in December 2011 and was ordered to be transferred to the Central District of California from Illinois Northern. The Defendants have had lots of time to prepare a response. That said, the suit is still a long way away from trial of the issue in court.

http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/copy ... l/summary/

Dig it or not, but every day longer it will be increasing problems, especially because of evidence that they can not refute! That there are a hundred of its lawyers will not help her, that it would be a shame for her! Publicity, cameras, reporters will spread Jolie because of her lies! Bradock it anyway! Will enjoy the material for a new book which will definitely ruin Jolie! Just let it prolongs the court, her problem!

Lawyers are not cheap and they will drag this out. She will be eating up her savings. She will owe GK, so I expect to see some cheap and really bad movies to try to pay them back. Maybe even television. I think GK produces Grimm, she can be her evil self in disguise until the ugly monster comes out.

[OHNOSHEDIDN'T!]

Whoa! No need to fall off your rocker and start name-calling. No one is insulting YOU unless you're Jolie.

Yep, that just means they have to file a response in court. That's usually taken care of by paralegals. They just go to the window, get their forms stamped, and then it will go to the judge's desk. It's a standard procedure, but I AM amazed they were given such a small window of time to respond. These things take time. They could very well begin discussin settlement at this point.

This case started in December 2011 and was ordered to be transferred to the Central District of California from Illinois Northern. The Defendants have had lots of time to prepare a response. That said, the suit is still a long way away from trial of the issue in court.

http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/copy ... l/summary/

Dig it or not, but every day longer it will be increasing problems, especially because of evidence that they can not refute! That there are a hundred of its lawyers will not help her, that it would be a shame for her! Publicity, cameras, reporters will spread Jolie because of her lies! Bradock it anyway! Will enjoy the material for a new book which will definitely ruin Jolie! Just let it prolongs the court, her problem!

Lawyers are not cheap and they will drag this out. She will be eating up her savings. She will owe GK, so I expect to see some cheap and really bad movies to try to pay them back. Maybe even television. I think GK produces Grimm, she can be her evil self in disguise until the ugly monster comes out.

Exactly. Mr. Braddock's attorneys probably took this case on a contingency basis, meaning IF there is a judgement award, that is how they will get paid. They can even ask the court request the defendants pay out a separate judgement just to the attorneys and their legal fees. Where Jolie, GK, etc, will have to pay out of pocket a huge retainer, for those various defense attorneys. The longer this case drags on the more those attorneys rack up billable hours!!! This can cause Ms. Bonkers a huge financial hit. GK also...who's Film District is already floundering after financial movie flops they have helped produce. I don't know if Sardic (sp?) is cash flush either.....apparently he's gone underground and unable to get served with court papers. That right there tells me something is really fishy with him......and he knows what HE did and Ms. Bonkers did!

[aguest]

I just hope the hollywood papers keep this in the news so pitt and jolie will be too embarassed to come back. Would be nice if the hollywood people are talking about this and snickering about jolie.

[KrazyDiamond]

You can't "hide" from a court summons. If Sardic does hide and never files his response, that just strengthens Braddock's case. It could be a slam dunk if he refuses to be deposed. My guess is that they will settle the matter. I can't believe Jolie would be stupid enough to let it go to trial where she WOULD be require to appear in court.

[mm7]

You can't "hide" from a court summons. If Sardic does hide and never files his response, that just strengthens Braddock's case. It could be a slam dunk if he refuses to be deposed. My guess is that they will settle the matter. I can't believe Jolie would be stupid enough to let it go to trial where she WOULD be require to appear in court.

Šarkić not answer to anyone, much less a court in Chicago and CA! He believes that it does not concern him? It is not only stupid but also a primitive! But it also proves that Braddock was right! Obviously they do not understand the weight of everything, and they think that they will draw on some of the "Only Fools and Horses"? Sarkic's problem, but Jolie too!

[Guest]

I just hope the hollywood papers keep this in the news so pitt and jolie will be too embarassed to come back. Would be nice if the hollywood people are talking about this and snickering about jolie.

There are plenty of people in hollywood snickering about Angelina Jolie. Plenty.

[Guest]

Case 2:12-cv-05883-DMG-VBK Document 74 Filed 08/17/12

Dariush Adli
Rasheed McWilliams
ADLI LAW GROUP P.C.
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 6900
Los Angeles, California 90071

Attorneys for Plaintiff James J Braddock

Harrison J. Dossick
Christine M. Neuharth
Reed Smith LLP
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 700
Los Angeles, CA 90067-6078

Attorneys for Defendants
Angelina Jolie, GK Films, LLC (sued
erroneously as GK Films), and
FilmDistrict Pictures, LLC (sued
erroneously as Film District)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES J. BRADDOCK,
Plaintiff,
vs.
ANGELINA JOLIE, an individual;
GK FILMS, a California corporation;
FILMDISTRICT, an Illinois corporation;
SCOUT FILM, a foreign corporation; and
EDIN SARKIC, an individual,
Defendants.
Case No. 2:12-CV-05883-DMG (VBK)

ORDER RE STIPULATION TO
ALLOW DEFENDANTS ANGELINA
JOLIE, GK FILMS, LLC, AND
FILMDISTRICT PICTURES, LLC

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT ON OR BY
SEPTEMBER 4, 2012
Case 2:12-cv-05883-DMG-VBK Document 74 Filed 08/17/12

The Court has read and considered the Stipulation to Allow Defendants to
Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or by September 4, 2012 (the “Stipulation”) filed
by Plaintiff James J. Braddock and Defendants Angelina Jolie, GK Films, LLC and
FilmDistrict Pictures, LLC. For the reasons stated in the Stipulation and for good
cause shown, the Court hereby APPROVES the Stipulation.
Defendants shall have until September 4, 2012 to respond to the Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 17, 2012

DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:12-cv-05883-DMG-VBK Document 74 Filed 08/17/12

Now the problems start for Jolie! Will remember this very well, who is Braddock, when he rudely ignored by all!

Are you out of your frigging mind, "go to court", it means "respond", NOT LITERALLY go to court....IDIOT.....

Response, meaning that they have to respond, but also to begin the process, go to court, and finally an old woman must be physically present and to respond to their lies! What are you nervous? Enough of your lies and its here! You were saying that there was nothing from the court? Where are now all those idiots? If it bothers her fall and you do not read!
Small dick and hair bothered!

Did you see anything that said that Angie had to be IN court, of course she doesn't have to be in court.

[Guest]

Angelina will never go to court. Everything will be handled by her lawyers.