Edin Sarkic-removed from ITLOBAH . page

[Guest]

Edin Sarkic was a producer in Jolie's directorial debut. Mentioned numerous times in THR as being the Bosnian producer.Also mentioned in Braddock's lawsuit against Jolie. Now it appears that his name has been removed from the I.M.d.b. page for the movie.Why would that happen?

[Guest]

he withdrew his name due to the lawsuit controversy so as to not further taint the movie until the allegations can be disproven/proven in a court of law.

[Guest]

he withdrew his name due to the lawsuit controversy so as to not further taint the movie until the allegations can be disproven/proven in a court of law.

Why didn't Jolie remove her name? She's listed too! I think his named was removed.

[Guest]

His name was removed because Braddock can prove he met him, he can't prove he met Jolie. And a producer isn't as obvious as a director/"writer" for removing from a movie list.

[Guest]

Too bad they haven't remved all of the news stories that cite him as a producer for the film.

[Guest]

The more they pull shiit like this, the more guilty they look. Keep digging yourself in a hole. HAHA

[Guest]

They're stupid if they think the previous version of the page can't be dug up. If I were Braddock's team, I would hit them hard for destruction of evidence while litigation is pending. And hire some electronic forensics experts as soon as possible. People would be amazed at what these guys can find when you think you've deleted all the evidence.

[MYGUEST]

he withdrew his name due to the lawsuit controversy so as to not further taint the movie until the allegations can be disproven/proven in a court of law.

Isn't that a little late for that? How removing his name from the credits, will stop the movie from being further tainted? The lawsuit has already done that job. Graham King's name is still there as producer, he is listed in the lawsuit. That makes absolutely no sense. Especially when there are numerous articles out there naming him as ITLOBAH "Bosnian producer." Unless they are going to cleanse the internet with the news articles. Still doesn't matter in the long run, Braddock has proof that he met/communicated with Sarkic and he has further proof that he was one of the producers of this movie. Will Sarkic LIE under oath for Angelina Jolie, that he wasn't one of the producers? Has he been hand-picked as the "fall guy" here, and that is why he removed his name? Has he seen the "writing" (pun intended) on the wall?

[Guest]

I'm not buying some of the excuses here (especially without links)! If you have nothing to hide then present your case in court. Why hide? or Remove anything? Seems to me Jolie is trying to erase any trace of them knowing each other. Probably because the lawsuit is already hurting her this award season. The AFI is honoring Brad but not Jolie. They are also honoring The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo. The funny thing is this film's release date is 12,21, 2011 and ITOBH's release date is 12,23,2011. So, why was Jolie's film left out?

[Guest]

Problem is that Sarkin is on record speaking on Jolie's behalf when she had her filming permit in Bosnia removed:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/11/17/us-bosnia-jolie-idUSTRE6AG2T320101117

Simply removing him from that list won't do and it just makes Jolie look even more guilty.

[Guest]

he withdrew his name due to the lawsuit controversy so as to not further taint the movie until the allegations can be disproven/proven in a court of law.

Isn't that a little late for that? How removing his name from the credits, will stop the movie from being further tainted? The lawsuit has already done that job. Graham King's name is still there as producer, he is listed in the lawsuit. That makes absolutely no sense. Especially when there are numerous articles out there naming him as ITLOBAH "Bosnian producer." Unless they are going to cleanse the internet with the news articles. Still doesn't matter in the long run, Braddock has proof that he met/communicated with Sarkic and he has further proof that he was one of the producers of this movie. Will Sarkic LIE under oath for Angelina Jolie, that he wasn't one of the producers? Has he been hand-picked as the "fall guy" here, and that is why he removed his name? Has he seen the "writing" (pun intended) on the wall?

Kind of like how thiefs, murderers and other criminals tamper with evidence. They think it will help their case in appearing innocent when, in fact, it has the opposite effect.

[Guest]

How removing his name from the credits, will stop the movie from being further tainted?

By removing his name from the credits and make sure that he isn't listed anywhere associated with the film, they will fake ignorance, i.e. "we don't know who this Sarkin person Braddock met with is, since he is not someone associated with ITLOBAH". And if anyone were to check that, they wouldn't find his name listed anywhere and assume that Braddock is lying.

Kind of like the FAKE representative Jolie paid to praise her film.

[Guest]

The movie has not been released to theaters yet. Removing his name Now, removes those who have not been following the brand misdeeds, from making any connection from Sarkic to the movie when it is released and from any future articles and advertising. Holie is not worried about looking guilty to those who watch her for further misdeeds, she is worried about those who haven't yet made any connection between those two, Sarkic and Braddock, to Angelina's plagiarism lawsuit.

[Guest]

He removed his own name. He's way down the list of producers, having only to do with Bosnia where there was to be filming, but it didn't happen. All filming happened elsewhere. Sarkic has no substantive contact with Jolie at all

[Guest]

He removed his own name. He's way down the list of producers, having only to do with Bosnia where there was to be filming, but it didn't happen. All filming happened elsewhere. Sarkic has no substantive contact with Jolie at all

poor loon!!!