Lena wrote:Wonder if he too vacuums the rocks in the garden by the back door ?
tidho wrote:If by 'the Obama people' you mean the 'main steam media', and by 'fighting back' you mean 'twisting context' then I agree. It was fine politics.
In the original remarks he specifically stated he wadn't using the term in the biblical sense. On the off chance there was confusion that should have created enough doubt in any impartial journallist to ask a follow up question about what he meant. Instead the media runs with an attach on religion.
I do like the phony theology line though, and think it applies in the biblical sense too. At the 2012 National Prayer Breakfast Obama basically said Jesus would approve of his proposed tax policy.
I spent some time in Sunday school but don't recall Jesus being pro big governement. Seemed like he was more of the personal responsibility type.
Jesus would vote for Santorum.
Santorum has issues and is simply not going to attract moderate females...unless they like to be employed. I think its fair to attack him on those, not nonsense like his theology comment - unless people have issue with what he was actually saying.
Lena wrote:There's separation of state & religion here and anyone who like Sanatarium who starts talking the way he's been worrys many .
Do we want government by Pat Robertson or American Protestant or Catholic versions of the ayatollahs that run Iran ?
Lena wrote:The Obama people did a good job of fighting back when Sanatarium attacked the President's religion .
Disgusting , a founding principal of America was religious freedom & respect for all religions .
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests