Female First Logo
  • Love & Sex
  • Find out more

    • Dating
    • Relationships
    • Weddings
    • Agony Aunts
  • Community
    • Discussion Board
    • Quick Chat
  • Celebrities
  • Find out more

    • Celebrity Gossip
    • Entertainment Gossip
    • Royal Family
    • Celebrity Interviews
    • Photo Gallery
    • Celebrity Directory
  • Lifestyle
  • Find out more

    • Parenting
    • Motoring
    • Travel
    • Food & Drink
    • Health
    • Home & Garden
    • Money
    • Business
    • Recruitment
    • Women's Issues
  • Entertainment
  • Find out more

    • Entertainment Gossip
    • Music
    • Movies
    • Sport
    • TV & Soaps
    • DVD and Blu-Ray
    • Games
    • Bollywood
    • Book Reviews
    • Bizarre
    • Competitions
    • Horoscopes
    • Big Brother
  • Fashion & Beauty
  • Find out more

    • Style News
    • Celebrity Style
    • Beauty Tips
    • Fashion Trends
    • Style Surgery
    • Shopping
  • Shopping
    • Fashion
    • Lingerie
    • Offers
    • Swimwear
    • DVDs
    • Gaming
    • Books
    • CDs
    • Gifts
  • Blog
    • Fashion Blog
    • Health Blog
    • Movies Blog
    • Music Blog
    • Sport Blog
  • Video
    • Latest Videos
    • Exclusive Videos
    • Celebrity Gossip Videos
    • Movie Trailers
    • Video Interviews
  • Follow us
  • femalefirst facebook
  • femalefirst twitter
  • Follow Me on Pinterest
FemaleFirst.co.uk Discussion Board Quick Chat  

Advanced search
  • Board index ‹ Films and Celebrity ‹ Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Section
  • Change font size
  • E-mail friend
  • Print view
  • FAQ
  • Register
  • Login

Jennifer Aniston Thread

All posts on Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston
Post a reply
34776 posts • Page 1361 of 2319 • 1 ... 1358, 1359, 1360, 1361, 1362, 1363, 1364 ... 2319
  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby ThisMadScientist » Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:50 pm

Guest wrote:I think it is a shocking invasion of privacy and the tabs should be fined for giving out names of doctors of celebs or anyone for that matter. Sounds like stalking. :evil:


Im also positive that there is some kind of law that ensures confidentiality between doctors and patients. Regardless of if Jennifer is this doctors patient or not, someone needs to sue. That way they know that some things are completely off limits. They shouldn't be allowed to get away with stuff like this. Its illegal to obtain patient information without consent.
User avatar
ThisMadScientist
Swami
 
Posts: 1035
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 12:14 am
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Maryt » Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:55 pm

I agree with everything you have said MaryT. If it truly was for them and their children, then just go and get married. There is no reason for an announcement. The only purpose that serves is to create speculation surrounding not only them and their family but also Jennifer as well.

As for the pregnancy story from life and style. Its hard to know when they are making this stuff up, but if Jen did not drink and only ate vegetarian sushi then its definitely a possibility. If you look back at the pics and video we had through out Feb (especially the WOF ceremony), Jen had a small bump, but it was there in the priemere photos, it was reall noticeable during some of the press interviews (especially the MTV interview when Paul and Jen are walking to their seats and access hollywood interview). Even at a point during the prank on the Ellen show you could see it. So it was not due to clothes or a certain angle, however it just be weight gain, although it did not look like that to me.

She has signed on for projects but some dont have a definitive start date and the swtich movie she has not been confirmed for. I am not sure what's going on with MYA. The director had said he would announce the co star soon but he has not. And he tweeted back to someone asking about working with an "actress" that was inferred to be jen that he "hoped so" but he likes her. This made m think that something has postponed the start of this movie or thrown soemthing up in the air.

Again, I think their is evidence to go both ways. Sightings and pics have been few and far between so I guess we will just have to wait for something more definitive.


Guest I personally am more inclined to think she isn't pregnant now for many reasons (new home renos, film projects, etc.). However, I can acknowledge that what you're saying about some of the picture angles during Wanderlust promotion giving a "hint" of a bump. Besides the ones you mentioned, there was also her Conan appearance and Leno where this was also noticeable too. However, this is why I've always said I find "bump watch" to be so unreliable (for Jennifer or anyone else). Jennifer has always had this slight curve to her lower abdomen and I think this is often what gets misconstrued as a "bump" by people. Depending on the outfit, angle, her stance, etc., it's easy for someone to think she's "bumpy." Until she's very obviously visibly pregnant (large undeniable bump) or announces it, I don't put much stock in "bump watch" where she's concerned. I mean there have been pics of her that have really given that impression before and it's not turned out to be the case, so I think it would have to be a rather large distinct bump for it to get me to believe at this point!

As for the L&S report on her food choice and not drinking - well, they could just as easily be inventing that whole report! Plus we've heard before that she's abstained from drinking - there were a bunch of reports of that last August-November, so as someone mentioned then, it might be that she's given up drinking to help with kicking cigarettes. On the other hand, maybe L&S is right, but that still doesn't have to mean she's pregnant: she could simply like the food options they've reported, and she could be opting for non-alcoholic drinks based on preference or because they are trying. Who knows?!

I did have the same question as you mention about the MYA director's tweet about "hoping" to work with her (assuming he was talking about Jennifer) since this came well after he mentioned she was involved and he had met/talked with her (I thought it an odd remark). And you are right that until one of these projects goes into production, anything is possible. I'm still thinking that the films are a big reason that she wouldn't be pregnant right now, but it's certainly possible that she signed on and then became pregnant or was very early stages pregnant and didn't know when she signed on. The only ones that have (unconfirmed) start dates that have floated around (UELP/Switch=May, and MYA=June), were the ones announced back in early February (meaning she signed on for MYA and was in talks for Switch/UELP earlier than that for the info to get out). She's never confirmed her involvement in Switch/UELP (she actually said it was a possibility during the February MTV interview, that they were "talking about it" but not that it was a fact), but the director recently said she is part of the cast (but without knowing when he gave the interview, it's also possible - though not likely - that he was jumping the gun on including her without it being definite). Either way, signing up to a film doesn't preclude a pregnancy: look at Beyonce whose pregnancy postponed the A Star is Born remake, or Reese Witherspoon whose pregnancy has meant she's had to drop out of a previous project commitment. Plus with MYA, one of the characters is meant to be pregnant, so assuming that's Jennifer role and she is or were to become pregnant in real life, it could possibly still work. Besides, lots of films write-in pregnancies too (or film around them): Catherine Zeta-Jones in Traffic is one example.

In terms of WTM, it's been said that she's had the script and an offer for a few weeks (with everything hinging on her) and hasn't yet signed on - so I won't count that as a definite project of hers until something more concrete comes out. And even if she does sign on, there's no start date yet for production (plus if everything really hinges on her then it sounds like they would postpone shooting it to accommodate her if she is or were to become pregnant). The other recent project announcement is the UJTCP written/directed by Justin. Besides there being no start date, this also sounds like it's still in the earlier stages of pre-production and script development, etc. - not close to going into production. Plus, as producer/star and with her partner as writer/director/producer, obviously this can and would be changed or delayed to accommodate her if a pregnancy was an issue.

Like I said, I tend to think her supposedly soon upcoming filming commitments and news are proof she isn't pregnant, but on the other hand, having those put out in the press does offer a good cover if she were pregnant. Recall when the press was reporting she was taking time off from acting that this was used to indicate a pregnancy. So to is the opposite used as proof against one (despite as I've noted above, that not being a good reason since it happens all the time that women become pregnant and projects have to be altered or delayed). We'll just have to wait and see - new pics or info on the projects might offer an answer!
Maryt
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:20 pm

I hope she is not pregnant with Justin. I saw a picture of him looking just like Charles Manson. Jen wouldn't want a baby with a mass murderer. A crazy one. Justin looks weird.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby ThisMadScientist » Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:34 pm

Guest wrote:I hope she is not pregnant with Justin. I saw a picture of him looking just like Charles Manson. Jen wouldn't want a baby with a mass murderer. A crazy one. Justin looks weird.


Umm you just called Justin a mass murderer. You do know that is slanderous, right?
User avatar
ThisMadScientist
Swami
 
Posts: 1035
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 12:14 am
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Maryt » Sun Apr 15, 2012 9:18 pm

And just as we are talking about Miss You Already and casting and what's on the go with this project, comes these tweets:

Sapphire ‏ @SAPPHIRED_
@SteelMillPaul what really? Oh my gosh, that's terrible. I hope you're okay. I just wanted to ask about Miss You Already casting :)
5h

Paul Andrew Williams ‏ @SteelMillPaul
@SAPPHIRED_ all I'll say right now is no casting news as yet but there will be a ton of announcements. x
4h


Don't know what all that means, but hopefully something concrete will come out on this soon.
Maryt
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sun Apr 15, 2012 9:24 pm

If, and that's a big IF, it turns out that Jen really is pregnant, then the sudden Brangelina engagement (which technicall isn't even an engagement yet) will make more sense.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:11 pm

Didn't she just deny she is not getting married or pregnat? regardless, He talked about getting married last summer if you forgot also said the ring take long to creat. This is the usual dragging her to their thing because he can't make sense in her own to her own fans. too sad.
PS. When they adress Brad and Angie they will call them his fiance and her fiance trust me. Weather you like it or not. Admit it or not
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:19 pm

Guest wrote:to blind and incoherent LOON

Image


:shh:

go be happy for brad and angie and leave us alone



nononon... that is OLD times when she is still without SHAME when using the victimhood relevancy...

NOW the thread name above as you can see or when you google it, it doesn't have her name. That was in the victimhood era she was cosniderd and wanted . She never even then have a thread the thread is created later because they figured she can use the hate support

Now she has A MAN the triangle is no more look above if you blind use google, yahoo, msn or any other search engine and you will see it has name brad and Angie name.

JA shouldn't use the victimhood triangle relevancy of any thing. remember she is moved on. So she need to set a fourm using her name and her man name and gather all her fans , hos there. she is using the triangle vicmtimhood attachment hate thread that is under their name.

The protect is a nobody dickless user. NO man no one will let his girl to be attached for her relevancy in her ex name and having his hos posting his everything here. He must know he is no one and he need the attachment of her. And must no she has no value that she brings for him for him with out her attachment. I feel sorry for him. It must suck to be a man like that. She never have a man who is clean never. all of them users who wants to use her victimhood, triangle attachment fame. huvane is dumb but then again he could be fearing she has no fan base to set up a fourm for her. :oops:
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Just Wonderin' » Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:22 pm

So in the midst of your celebrating the "engagement" you still find Jennifer such a threat.
Just Wonderin'
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:29 pm

I'm loving the fact that most of the HO's and DUH's fans are illiterate, non English speaking losers. Thank God.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Just Wonderin' » Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:33 pm

You don't get it. We don't care what you want us to do. We do what we want to do. The mention of Jennifer bothers you people so much some the FFs think it is fun to bring it up and see you guys go bonkers. This couple began in adultery. I seem to recall that is one of the big 10 no-nos that God has laid down. I can see how it is problematic to your attempt to connect two satanists with God, but deal with it.
Just Wonderin'
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Cheater Ho brad pitt » Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:38 pm

I believe if jen is indeed pregnant she wouldnt mind dropping all her movies in production. either they wait for her or not
honestly i hope she is pregnant though but there is still time for her to carry justin's child, nothing is too late for God

Btw the guest who is talking nonsense is just one hell of a fart fool and thinks she is on heroine again, i bet she doesnt know
who justin even is and based her opinion on just that one picture she saw, what is wrong if justin looks like manson, manson
is a human being too you little Bleet. please do us a favor and go tell jen not to carry justin's baby and am sure she gonna give
you one hell of a slap that you wouldnt be able to wake up from your shock again, LMAO

Also i dont get why they want jen's thread to be deleted for what reason, oh just because all mangie and stupitt hoe's haters are
jen's lovers, hahaha
Cheater Ho brad pitt
Just warming up
 
Posts: 193
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:26 am
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:45 pm

Just Wonderin' wrote:So in the midst of your celebrating the "engagement" you still find Jennifer such a threat.

I know! You would think these crazy people would WANT Jen to have a good relationship with Justin. They should be singing his praises not putting him down. What a bunch of hypocrites. They just want to keep bashing the ex wife and everyone around her. This is why I can't stand the Pitts, they spawned this bunch of meanies.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Justllly » Sun Apr 15, 2012 11:28 pm

Guest wrote:why not she interested in her by herslef with her own thing in her own fan site. It is sad peopple only knwo how to be her fan when they get reminded vicmtimhood stories. :cry: :oops:
And the guy he must feel no power since his no name until 40 years old and take on her victimhood fame. Poor guy his man hood all must taken from him since she is the one who has way much money than him but then again this is the only time he is famous. so he can not decide not to use this with her.


We love Jen and Justin that why we are. If you can'nt deal fans of J &J ,it your problem
Justllly
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Maryt » Sun Apr 15, 2012 11:38 pm

Good grief. I don't get this nonstop arguing about Jennifer being on this site. She is in the thread description as has been pointed out with photographic proof. It's also been pointed out that none of us posters here have the ability to move her from that description and put her somewhere else. You're preaching to the choir here since I could care less where she is - I'll be following. You might try contacting the board moderators/heads instead of fruitlessly repeating yourself to those who can't change things.

As for the triangle, the only part of that keeping it going is Pitt who is the last one to bring up Jennifer and the whole mess. She hasn't spoken of it in years aside from saying there is no feud, there is no triangle. So if you want to blame someone for connecting these three, blame Pitt.

Didn't she just deny she is not getting married or pregnat?


Not that I think she is pregnant at the moment, but actually her rep has denied the Greek wedding, but hasn't directly denied the pregnancy gossip. In fact, IF (a huge if!) she were currently pregnant, his comments have been perfectly worded.

Huvane's response to Gossip Cop on this week's Star cover story:

A rep for the actress tells Gossip Cop, “She is not getting married in Greece and we are not even sure who that person is who claims to be her cousin.”


And to Wonderwall he said the following:

"I lost count how many times Star has had her pregnant," Aniston's spokesman tells Wonderwall. "This new story is false just like the rest. There is no wedding in Greece, and we are not even sure who that person is who claims to be her cousin."


Again, I'm not saying I think she's pregnant. Personally, I think since January that Huvane has taken a different approach to pregnancy reports in particular. He hasn't really denied any directly if I'm recalling correctly (prior to then he used to be pretty consistent and quick to shoot down those rumors emphatically). Some of us on here said back in January that perhaps Huvane was taking and establishing a different approach (since the old one sure wasn't stopping the tabloids anyway) so that if/when they did get pregnant he wouldn't be seen as giving a different response and therefore the news wouldn't be outed. Essentially we thought he might be backing off responding to such rumors quickly and directly so that if/when she is pregnant him not denying it won't be seen as a clue to a pregnancy. I still think that's the case, and that's why he hasn't jumped to deny the Life&Style article or the pregnancy portion of the Star article. He was pretty direct in shooting down the wedding since there is actually a guy out there who gave interviews and is quoted as saying he is her cousin and that they are getting married in Greece this summer, so it makes sense that Huvane would have to deny that story more directly.
Maryt
 
Top

PreviousNext

Post a reply
34776 posts • Page 1361 of 2319 • 1 ... 1358, 1359, 1360, 1361, 1362, 1363, 1364 ... 2319

Return to Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Section

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MYGUEST and 45 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Sign up stay updated
Tweets by @FemaleFirst_UK

Like Us On facebook

Save up to 75% in the Lovehoney Sale
web2 - 0.01s