Guest wrote:So Vaj, here's the engagement, what do you think?
Guest wrote:It's a DEFLECTION. From "Leg-Gate, from the PLAGIARISM LAWSUIT... doesn't matter: whatever it may seem like, an "engagement announcement" it ISN'T.
Come now: the ring (with Brad 'designing it') is supposedly been "a year' in the making: Well I myself have MADE jewelry, and I can tell you: a ring like she's got would take a WEEK at the most! What, did she dig the ORE out of the ground and smelt it herself ,or what? And cut the stones herself? That's the only way I could see that ring taking 'a year" to produce!
And, STILL NO WEDDING DATE! You mean they have been "unofficially engaged" for a year, and STILL don't have a "wedding date"? PUH-leazzze! One more thing to indicate that the whole thing is merely DEFLECTION. And, the jeweler annouced it? Where was BRAD? HE is the one who's supposed to be all 'pumped' about this...but he's showing about as much enthusiasm for "marrying' the ho as he did over becoming "a father of twins"! And I am 100% sure this "engagement", so-called, is just as 'genuine" as that "twin pregnancy" was!
VAJ
Guest wrote:It's a DEFLECTION. From "Leg-Gate, from the PLAGIARISM LAWSUIT... doesn't matter: whatever it may seem like, an "engagement announcement" it ISN'T.
Come now: the ring (with Brad 'designing it') is supposedly been "a year' in the making: Well I myself have MADE jewelry, and I can tell you: a ring like she's got would take a WEEK at the most! What, did she dig the ORE out of the ground and smelt it herself ,or what? And cut the stones herself? That's the only way I could see that ring taking 'a year" to produce!
And, STILL NO WEDDING DATE! You mean they have been "unofficially engaged" for a year, and STILL don't have a "wedding date"? PUH-leazzze! One more thing to indicate that the whole thing is merely DEFLECTION. And, the jeweler annouced it? Where was BRAD? HE is the one who's supposed to be all 'pumped' about this...but he's showing about as much enthusiasm for "marrying' the ho as he did over becoming "a father of twins"! And I am 100% sure this "engagement", so-called, is just as 'genuine" as that "twin pregnancy" was!
VAJ
Guest wrote:So Vaj, here's the engagement, what do you think?
alecto Magaera wrote:Guest wrote:It's a DEFLECTION. From "Leg-Gate, from the PLAGIARISM LAWSUIT... doesn't matter: whatever it may seem like, an "engagement announcement" it ISN'T.
Come now: the ring (with Brad 'designing it') is supposedly been "a year' in the making: Well I myself have MADE jewelry, and I can tell you: a ring like she's got would take a WEEK at the most! What, did she dig the ORE out of the ground and smelt it herself ,or what? And cut the stones herself? That's the only way I could see that ring taking 'a year" to produce!
And, STILL NO WEDDING DATE! You mean they have been "unofficially engaged" for a year, and STILL don't have a "wedding date"? PUH-leazzze! One more thing to indicate that the whole thing is merely DEFLECTION. And, the jeweler annouced it? Where was BRAD? HE is the one who's supposed to be all 'pumped' about this...but he's showing about as much enthusiasm for "marrying' the ho as he did over becoming "a father of twins"! And I am 100% sure this "engagement", so-called, is just as 'genuine" as that "twin pregnancy" was!
VAJ
Vaj - he will marry her. You know he will and not for 'imaginary media love'.
I wish you would believe me; he is the controller. You are an amazingly insightful person, but what I don't understand is how you didn't see Pitt for who he truly is.
Return to Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Section
Users browsing this forum: emiline, Google [Bot], MYGUEST and 77 guests