Female First Logo
  • Love & Sex
  • Find out more

    • Dating
    • Relationships
    • Weddings
    • Agony Aunts
  • Community
    • Discussion Board
    • Quick Chat
  • Celebrities
  • Find out more

    • Celebrity Gossip
    • Entertainment Gossip
    • Royal Family
    • Celebrity Interviews
    • Photo Gallery
    • Celebrity Directory
  • Lifestyle
  • Find out more

    • Parenting
    • Motoring
    • Travel
    • Food & Drink
    • Health
    • Home & Garden
    • Money
    • Business
    • Recruitment
    • Women's Issues
  • Entertainment
  • Find out more

    • Entertainment Gossip
    • Music
    • Movies
    • Sport
    • TV & Soaps
    • DVD and Blu-Ray
    • Games
    • Bollywood
    • Book Reviews
    • Bizarre
    • Competitions
    • Horoscopes
    • Big Brother
  • Fashion & Beauty
  • Find out more

    • Style News
    • Celebrity Style
    • Beauty Tips
    • Fashion Trends
    • Style Surgery
    • Shopping
  • Shopping
    • Fashion
    • Lingerie
    • Offers
    • Swimwear
    • DVDs
    • Gaming
    • Books
    • CDs
    • Gifts
  • Blog
    • Fashion Blog
    • Health Blog
    • Movies Blog
    • Music Blog
    • Sport Blog
  • Video
    • Latest Videos
    • Exclusive Videos
    • Celebrity Gossip Videos
    • Movie Trailers
    • Video Interviews
  • Follow us
  • femalefirst facebook
  • femalefirst twitter
  • Follow Me on Pinterest
FemaleFirst.co.uk Discussion Board Quick Chat  

Advanced search
  • Board index ‹ Films and Celebrity ‹ Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Section
  • Change font size
  • E-mail friend
  • Print view
  • FAQ
  • Register
  • Login

Jennifer Aniston Thread

All posts on Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston
Post a reply
35580 posts • Page 1364 of 2372 • 1 ... 1361, 1362, 1363, 1364, 1365, 1366, 1367 ... 2372
  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Justllly » Sun Apr 15, 2012 5:31 am

Guest wrote:That is why I dislike this old ho. She want the assoication because it is for her benifite she fucken moved on then get out from their name huvan illitrate ho, sele and his 100 names and maryr why can't they set her place and really truly serously for real cut the last attachment and get the f*** away. She is a nobody disgusting ho and that midgit he must not have a dick. That is why he is here to use too. Protector by ass if you are a man protect your dignity and take the ho out of Brad and Angie forum.


Long live Jen and Justin

Jobless Branglina talk about irrelvancy.


Wedding specialy reality Tv or tabloid in the near future in all tabloid mag at your neighbrhood store. :lol:
Justllly
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Justllly » Sun Apr 15, 2012 5:44 am

Guest wrote:It will be more like she still use the assoication because dickless user and her can't give up the assoication fame special . She got to be here to be cared about.
Don't you feel ashamed to support her while she does this and pretend moving on even if huvesy pays your illitrate ass money. What a gut less woman . Is she really a human?? is he really a man user.


Long live Jen and Justin

Jobless branglina talk about irrelvancy

Weeding speciall realty tv coming in the near futur. You got to do what you got to do to measure up with the real stars of hollywood.
Justllly
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:35 am

IMO this was a business meeting that didn't go well.

Guest wrote:Image
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sun Apr 15, 2012 11:00 am

Guest wrote:Image

Very very cute pic. TY Loons for bringing it. JA looks fantastic, her hair - PERFECTION!

Sweet! I was at the grocery store yesterday and the only magazine that was practically all sold out was the one of Jennifer on the cover.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby ThisMadScientist » Sun Apr 15, 2012 5:50 pm

I see PR loon is back with her annoying way of quoting others. :roll:
User avatar
ThisMadScientist
Swami
 
Posts: 1035
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 12:14 am
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Maryt » Sun Apr 15, 2012 6:24 pm

Off topic: At the moment, Jennifer is part of this forum - she is in the description. So all those asking posters to move her should direct their comments to the forum moderators (posters have nothing to do with where discussion on her should be). Unless/until Jennifer gets moved out of the description, posts on her are supposed to go here. If you want to avoid her it's pretty easy to do by not coming into the one thread devoted solely to her.

And as for Pitt and Jolie and the "frenzy" over their engagement - there is only a "frenzy" because they wanted there to be one and the media is hoping to create one so that they can garner interest from the public. If this was truly just about them getting married ("for the kids") then they would have just gone and done it. The way this rolled out with the sanctioned picture, then the press release to THR from the jeweler after no one cared about the ring in the picture, then the confirmation about the "promise for the future" - it's laughable. They've been together 7 years, have 6 kids and almost as many homes together, have stated repeatedly there is no greater commitment then the kids and yet now she needs a ring to guarantee a "promise for the future?" Please. Besides, on neutral websites (those not pro or anti Pitt/Jolie) the general consensus from commenters seems to be "who cares" or "engaged? seems anti-climatic." People magazine can change their cover story for this week if they want, but they might want to remember that one of their worst selling issues last year was a cover story devoted to Pitt/Jolie and family - a fact posted here earlier this year when such numbers were released. From what I can see, Jennifer has had to be dragged into this news by the media in order to create stories and garner any public interest - there are a ton of stories floating around about comparing the two engagement rings, discussing the timeline of their relationship (and remarking on the crossover period with Jennifer and Pitt's marriage), as well as articles about Jennifer's made-up reaction to the news (courtesy of Hollywood Life who invented the original article).

On topic: From an interview with personal trainer Christina Howells:

The aesthetic ideal has shifted in the past few years, moving away from the athletic bodies of the 1980s and super-skinny look of the 1990s and early Noughties to one that is more feminine and toned. Jennifer Aniston, if you like. ('Yes, she’s my favourite,’ agrees Howells. 'Not too skinny and with curves. She also looks happy in her body.’)


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/women_shealth/9197566/The-shape-shifter-interview-with-personal-trainer-Christina-Howells.html

And here's more on this week's Life & Style story about Jennifer and Justin and her supposed pregnancy:

Did Jennifer Aniston Announced Her Pregnancy To Tom Hanks And Rita Wilson

The word is that Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux announced her pregnancy to Tom Hanks and his wife Rita Wilson at dinner several days ago. Tom and Rita are old friends of Jennifer’s – going all the way back to her days with Brad Pitt. Furthermore, Tom and Rita are not people anyone would be ashamed to be seen dining with.

So why did Jen sneak in through the back door of Katsuya for her dinner date on April 4th in Los Angeles… and why does an eyewitness report that Jen was covering up her stomach?

Further evidence in favor of believing that Jennifer is pregnant is that she has given up her favorite drink – vodka – in favor of water with lemon. But even more compelling is that she has finally stopped smoking!

“Jen was covered up in black and was hiding her stomach,” notes a restaurant insider. “She wanted as much privacy as possible.” And Justin was apparently super snuggly as he protected his pregnant woman.

All of this is revealed in Life & Style Print Edition, April 23rd:

After weeks of speculation that America’s sweetheart is expecting, a glowing Jen, 43, nibbled on pregnancy-friendly veggie-sushi rolls, seaweed salad, and rice and vegetables while her ecstatic boyfriend doted on her with her long-time friends toasting with Sake.” Justin was very affectionate with Jennifer. He had his arm around her, and held her hand and kissed her,” shares a fellow diner.” They looked like newlyweds!”

Justin has been a constant source of support as Jens paid regular visits to OB/GYN Dr. Robert Katz to see how fertile she is, according to an insider, and to get blood work done to check her hormone levels. After not getting the results they wanted, she’s now switched to OB/GYN Dr. Edward Liu at Cedars-Sinai Hospital in LA.

“I’ve always wanted to have children,” Jen said.” I want to have it all.”


http://www.celebdirtylaundry.com/2012/did-jennifer-aniston-announced-her-pregnancy-to-tom-hanks-and-rita-wilson-0415/
Maryt
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Maryt » Sun Apr 15, 2012 6:27 pm

At the moment, Jennifer is part of this forum - she is in the description. So all those asking posters to move her should direct their comments to the forum moderators (posters have nothing to do with where discussion on her should be). Unless/until Jennifer gets moved out of the description, posts on her are supposed to go here. If you want to avoid her it's pretty easy to do by not coming into the one thread devoted solely to her.

And as for Pitt and Jolie and the "frenzy" over their engagement - there is only a "frenzy" because they wanted there to be one and the media is hoping to create one so that they can garner interest from the public. If this was truly just about them getting married ("for the kids") then they would have just gone and done it. The way this rolled out with the sanctioned picture, then the press release to THR from the jeweler after no one cared about the ring in the picture, then the confirmation about the "promise for the future" - it's laughable. They've been together 7 years, have 6 kids and almost as many homes together, have stated repeatedly there is no greater commitment then the kids and yet now she needs a ring to guarantee a "promise for the future?" Please. Besides, on neutral websites (those not pro or anti Pitt/Jolie) the general consensus from commenters seems to be "who cares" or "engaged? seems anti-climatic." People magazine can change their cover story for this week if they want, but they might want to remember that one of their worst selling issues last year was a cover story devoted to Pitt/Jolie and family - a fact posted here earlier this year when such numbers were released. From what I can see, Jennifer has had to be dragged into this news by the media in order to create stories and garner any public interest - there are a ton of stories floating around about comparing the two engagement rings, discussing the timeline of their relationship (and remarking on the crossover period with Jennifer and Pitt's marriage), as well as articles about Jennifer's made-up reaction to the news (courtesy of Hollywood Life who invented the original article).

On topic: From an interview with personal trainer Christina Howells:

The aesthetic ideal has shifted in the past few years, moving away from the athletic bodies of the 1980s and super-skinny look of the 1990s and early Noughties to one that is more feminine and toned. Jennifer Aniston, if you like. ('Yes, she’s my favourite,’ agrees Howells. 'Not too skinny and with curves. She also looks happy in her body.’)


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/women_shealth/9197566/The-shape-shifter-interview-with-personal-trainer-Christina-Howells.html
Maryt
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Maryt » Sun Apr 15, 2012 6:27 pm

And here's more on this week's Life & Style story about Jennifer and Justin and her supposed pregnancy:

Did Jennifer Aniston Announced Her Pregnancy To Tom Hanks And Rita Wilson

The word is that Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux announced her pregnancy to Tom Hanks and his wife Rita Wilson at dinner several days ago. Tom and Rita are old friends of Jennifer’s – going all the way back to her days with Brad Pitt. Furthermore, Tom and Rita are not people anyone would be ashamed to be seen dining with.

So why did Jen sneak in through the back door of Katsuya for her dinner date on April 4th in Los Angeles… and why does an eyewitness report that Jen was covering up her stomach?

Further evidence in favor of believing that Jennifer is pregnant is that she has given up her favorite drink – vodka – in favor of water with lemon. But even more compelling is that she has finally stopped smoking!

“Jen was covered up in black and was hiding her stomach,” notes a restaurant insider. “She wanted as much privacy as possible.” And Justin was apparently super snuggly as he protected his pregnant woman.

All of this is revealed in Life & Style Print Edition, April 23rd:

After weeks of speculation that America’s sweetheart is expecting, a glowing Jen, 43, nibbled on pregnancy-friendly veggie-sushi rolls, seaweed salad, and rice and vegetables while her ecstatic boyfriend doted on her with her long-time friends toasting with Sake.” Justin was very affectionate with Jennifer. He had his arm around her, and held her hand and kissed her,” shares a fellow diner.” They looked like newlyweds!”

Justin has been a constant source of support as Jens paid regular visits to OB/GYN Dr. Robert Katz to see how fertile she is, according to an insider, and to get blood work done to check her hormone levels. After not getting the results they wanted, she’s now switched to OB/GYN Dr. Edward Liu at Cedars-Sinai Hospital in LA.

“I’ve always wanted to have children,” Jen said.” I want to have it all.”


http://www.celebdirtylaundry.com/2012/did-jennifer-aniston-announced-her-pregnancy-to-tom-hanks-and-rita-wilson-0415/
Maryt
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Maryt » Sun Apr 15, 2012 6:29 pm

Here's more on this week's Life & Style story about Jennifer and Justin and her supposed pregnancy:

Did Jennifer Aniston Announced Her Pregnancy To Tom Hanks And Rita Wilson

The word is that Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux announced her pregnancy to Tom Hanks and his wife Rita Wilson at dinner several days ago. Tom and Rita are old friends of Jennifer’s – going all the way back to her days with Brad Pitt. Furthermore, Tom and Rita are not people anyone would be ashamed to be seen dining with.

So why did Jen sneak in through the back door of Katsuya for her dinner date on April 4th in Los Angeles… and why does an eyewitness report that Jen was covering up her stomach?

Further evidence in favor of believing that Jennifer is pregnant is that she has given up her favorite drink – vodka – in favor of water with lemon. But even more compelling is that she has finally stopped smoking!

“Jen was covered up in black and was hiding her stomach,” notes a restaurant insider. “She wanted as much privacy as possible.” And Justin was apparently super snuggly as he protected his pregnant woman.

All of this is revealed in Life & Style Print Edition, April 23rd:

After weeks of speculation that America’s sweetheart is expecting, a glowing Jen, 43, nibbled on pregnancy-friendly veggie-sushi rolls, seaweed salad, and rice and vegetables while her ecstatic boyfriend doted on her with her long-time friends toasting with Sake.” Justin was very affectionate with Jennifer. He had his arm around her, and held her hand and kissed her,” shares a fellow diner.” They looked like newlyweds!”

Justin has been a constant source of support as Jens paid regular visits to OB/GYN Dr. Robert Katz to see how fertile she is, according to an insider, and to get blood work done to check her hormone levels. After not getting the results they wanted, she’s now switched to OB/GYN Dr. Edward Liu at Cedars-Sinai Hospital in LA.

“I’ve always wanted to have children,” Jen said.” I want to have it all.”
Maryt
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sun Apr 15, 2012 6:32 pm

Maryt wrote:At the moment, Jennifer is part of this forum - she is in the description. So all those asking posters to move her should direct their comments to the forum moderators (posters have nothing to do with where discussion on her should be). Unless/until Jennifer gets moved out of the description, posts on her are supposed to go here. If you want to avoid her it's pretty easy to do by not coming into the one thread devoted solely to her.

And as for Pitt and Jolie and the "frenzy" over their engagement - there is only a "frenzy" because they wanted there to be one and the media is hoping to create one so that they can garner interest from the public. If this was truly just about them getting married ("for the kids") then they would have just gone and done it. The way this rolled out with the sanctioned picture, then the press release to THR from the jeweler after no one cared about the ring in the picture, then the confirmation about the "promise for the future" - it's laughable. They've been together 7 years, have 6 kids and almost as many homes together, have stated repeatedly there is no greater commitment then the kids and yet now she needs a ring to guarantee a "promise for the future?" Please. Besides, on neutral websites (those not pro or anti Pitt/Jolie) the general consensus from commenters seems to be "who cares" or "engaged? seems anti-climatic." People magazine can change their cover story for this week if they want, but they might want to remember that one of their worst selling issues last year was a cover story devoted to Pitt/Jolie and family - a fact posted here earlier this year when such numbers were released. From what I can see, Jennifer has had to be dragged into this news by the media in order to create stories and garner any public interest - there are a ton of stories floating around about comparing the two engagement rings, discussing the timeline of their relationship (and remarking on the crossover period with Jennifer and Pitt's marriage), as well as articles about Jennifer's made-up reaction to the news (courtesy of Hollywood Life who invented the original article).

On topic: From an interview with personal trainer Christina Howells:

The aesthetic ideal has shifted in the past few years, moving away from the athletic bodies of the 1980s and super-skinny look of the 1990s and early Noughties to one that is more feminine and toned. <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=Jennifer Aniston' target='_blank'>Jennifer Aniston</A>, if you like. ('Yes, she’s my favourite,’ agrees Howells. 'Not too skinny and with curves. She also looks happy in her body.’)


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/women_shealth/9197566/The-shape-shifter-interview-with-personal-trainer-Christina-Howells.html



The thing is, there really is no media frenzy. This isn't nearly as big of an attention getter that it would have been 3 years ago. Really nobody cares. They are old news. Nothing they do matters now and they are still saying it's for the kids, not each other. No date set either. This is an attempt at attention, but for the most part it's been met with a yawn. Not even the loons are that excited.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby ThisMadScientist » Sun Apr 15, 2012 6:35 pm

Not believing anything until I see it. For all we know, its another BS. Nothing different from the other 234640 "Aniston is Pregnant" covers.
User avatar
ThisMadScientist
Swami
 
Posts: 1035
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 12:14 am
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sun Apr 15, 2012 6:45 pm

I am no fan of Brangelina and rarely comment on them, but it is hard for me to say congrats. Why? They have been together for so long why not just get married in an intimate ceremony and be done with it? IMO it looks like a PR move where they get to milk the thing twice. The engagement and then the wedding. Oh well. Happy for their fans, but can they please leave Jen out of it. Why do they think that an engagement for them would matter to her? They have been together for 7 years and have 6 kids...lol

Lola:-)
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sun Apr 15, 2012 6:47 pm

Maryt wrote:Here's more on this week's Life & Style story about Jennifer and Justin and her supposed pregnancy:

Did <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=Jennifer Aniston' target='_blank'>Jennifer Aniston</A> Announced Her Pregnancy To Tom Hanks And Rita Wilson

The word is that <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=Jennifer Aniston' target='_blank'>Jennifer Aniston</A> and Justin Theroux announced her pregnancy to Tom Hanks and his wife Rita Wilson at dinner several days ago. Tom and Rita are old friends of Jennifer’s – going all the way back to her days with Brad Pitt. Furthermore, Tom and Rita are not people anyone would be ashamed to be seen dining with.

So why did Jen sneak in through the back door of Katsuya for her dinner date on April 4th in Los Angeles… and why does an eyewitness report that Jen was covering up her stomach?

Further evidence in favor of believing that Jennifer is pregnant is that she has given up her favorite drink – vodka – in favor of water with lemon. But even more compelling is that she has finally stopped smoking!

“Jen was covered up in black and was hiding her stomach,” notes a restaurant insider. “She wanted as much privacy as possible.” And Justin was apparently super snuggly as he protected his pregnant woman.

All of this is revealed in Life & Style Print Edition, April 23rd:

After weeks of speculation that America’s sweetheart is expecting, a glowing Jen, 43, nibbled on pregnancy-friendly veggie-sushi rolls, seaweed salad, and rice and vegetables while her ecstatic boyfriend doted on her with her long-time friends toasting with Sake.” Justin was very affectionate with Jennifer. He had his arm around her, and held her hand and kissed her,” shares a fellow diner.” They looked like newlyweds!”

Justin has been a constant source of support as Jens paid regular visits to OB/GYN Dr. Robert Katz to see how fertile she is, according to an insider, and to get blood work done to check her hormone levels. After not getting the results they wanted, she’s now switched to OB/GYN Dr. Edward Liu at Cedars-Sinai Hospital in LA.

“I’ve always wanted to have children,” Jen said.” I want to have it all.”

this article is contracdicting itself, the last paragraph make it sound like they are still trying
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sun Apr 15, 2012 6:55 pm

I agree with everything you have said MaryT. If it truly was for them and their children, then just go and get married. There is no reason for an announcement. The only purpose that serves is to create speculation surrounding not only them and their family but also Jennifer as well.

As for the pregnancy story from life and style. Its hard to know when they are making this stuff up, but if Jen did not drink and only ate vegetarian sushi then its definitely a possibility. If you look back at the pics and video we had through out Feb (especially the WOF ceremony), Jen had a small bump, but it was there in the priemere photos, it was reall noticeable during some of the press interviews (especially the MTV interview when Paul and Jen are walking to their seats and access hollywood interview). Even at a point during the prank on the Ellen show you could see it. So it was not due to clothes or a certain angle, however it just be weight gain, although it did not look like that to me.

She has signed on for projects but some dont have a definitive start date and the swtich movie she has not been confirmed for. I am not sure what's going on with MYA. The director had said he would announce the co star soon but he has not. And he tweeted back to someone asking about working with an "actress" that was inferred to be jen that he "hoped so" but he likes her. This made m think that something has postponed the start of this movie or thrown soemthing up in the air.

Again, I think their is evidence to go both ways. Sightings and pics have been few and far between so I guess we will just have to wait for something more definitive.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Maryt » Sun Apr 15, 2012 6:59 pm

Not believing anything until I see it. For all we know, its another BS. Nothing different from the other 234640 "Aniston is Pregnant" covers.


Agreed ThisMadScientist! If anything I believe it's actually an entirely false story. Just bringing it over to give an idea of what the tabloid is saying and because there is no new Jennifer pics/news. I'm actually surprised that they can get away with putting in actual doctor's names and claiming that she's a patient. Regardless of whether this info is true or not, the doctors are real and IMHO should not be used in a story. If Jennifer is a patient of theirs, then that shouldn't be printable (it should be private and off limits), and if she's not, then they shouldn't be allowed to invent that lie and put a real doctor's name in their story. There really needs to be some sort of regulation of these tabloids since it is beyond ridiculous what they are allowed to get away with.

I am no fan of Brangelina and rarely comment on them, but it is hard for me to say congrats. Why? They have been together for so long why not just get married in an intimate ceremony and be done with it? IMO it looks like a PR move where they get to milk the thing twice. The engagement and then the wedding. Oh well. Happy for their fans, but can they please leave Jen out of it. Why do they think that an engagement for them would matter to her? They have been together for 7 years and have 6 kids...lol


Agree Lola. There is no other way to view it other than a PR stunt based on the way they rolled this out. These same people who claim to want privacy have just invited the press to speculate ad nauseum about their wedding. If they had just kept quiet and done it, this wouldn't have been the case. I can't wait for them to be married as I hope this might finally put another nail in the coffin of the "triangle." I also think it's ridiculous to think Jennifer gave this more than a passing thought - it's nothing more than a formality at this point, so why would she remotely care?
Maryt
 
Top

PreviousNext

Post a reply
35580 posts • Page 1364 of 2372 • 1 ... 1361, 1362, 1363, 1364, 1365, 1366, 1367 ... 2372

Return to Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Section

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Feedfetcher, icedj and 45 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Sign up stay updated
Tweets by @FemaleFirst_UK

Like Us On facebook

Save up to 75% in the Lovehoney Sale
web2 - 0.01s