Female First Logo
  • Love & Sex
  • Find out more

    • Dating
    • Relationships
    • Weddings
    • Agony Aunts
  • Community
    • Discussion Board
    • Quick Chat
  • Celebrities
  • Find out more

    • Celebrity Gossip
    • Entertainment Gossip
    • Royal Family
    • Celebrity Interviews
    • Photo Gallery
    • Celebrity Directory
  • Lifestyle
  • Find out more

    • Parenting
    • Motoring
    • Travel
    • Food & Drink
    • Health
    • Home & Garden
    • Money
    • Business
    • Recruitment
    • Women's Issues
  • Entertainment
  • Find out more

    • Entertainment Gossip
    • Music
    • Movies
    • Sport
    • TV & Soaps
    • DVD and Blu-Ray
    • Games
    • Bollywood
    • Book Reviews
    • Bizarre
    • Competitions
    • Horoscopes
    • Big Brother
  • Fashion & Beauty
  • Find out more

    • Style News
    • Celebrity Style
    • Beauty Tips
    • Fashion Trends
    • Style Surgery
    • Shopping
  • Shopping
    • Fashion
    • Lingerie
    • Offers
    • Swimwear
    • DVDs
    • Gaming
    • Books
    • CDs
    • Gifts
  • Blog
    • Fashion Blog
    • Health Blog
    • Movies Blog
    • Music Blog
    • Sport Blog
  • Video
    • Latest Videos
    • Exclusive Videos
    • Celebrity Gossip Videos
    • Movie Trailers
    • Video Interviews
  • Follow us
  • femalefirst facebook
  • femalefirst twitter
  • Follow Me on Pinterest
FemaleFirst.co.uk Discussion Board Quick Chat  

Advanced search
  • Board index ‹ Films and Celebrity ‹ Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Section
  • Change font size
  • E-mail friend
  • Print view
  • FAQ
  • Register
  • Login

Jennifer Aniston Thread

All posts on Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston
Post a reply
36960 posts • Page 1365 of 2464 • 1 ... 1362, 1363, 1364, 1365, 1366, 1367, 1368 ... 2464
  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:14 pm

Here are the videos where a I think a bump is pretty obvious

MTV interview
From around 14-20 secs when shes walking, 24secs when she turns to the side, 28-30 when she walks to sit down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hsAxjsl ... EXXH92uyc=

WOF
At 1:46-1:55 as she is posing with her dad
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gOsIUtJ ... ure=relmfu
If you watch some of the other videos with the speeches it can be seen then and you can see the she keeps tuggging on her dress trying to pull it down so the part of the dress that ties up covers her lower stomach, but it just keeps sliding up.

Do other's see this?
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby ThisMadScientist » Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:24 pm

Oh dear God. Please can people not start this ridiculous scrutiny on the woman's body all over again? If she is pregnant, she will let people know when she feels like it. Seeing imaginary bumps won't make it true. She isn't having a baby until she herself says she is.
User avatar
ThisMadScientist
Swami
 
Posts: 1035
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 12:14 am
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:42 pm

...and about the rest of the crap he worte martyr that is, it is pointless. Brad and Angie can do whatever they want . We fans want to see clebration so are normal other people who love to see a union celebration.
Marragie is conistituion. I believe it is what god made it to soldify a union infront of him. Though Brad and Angie doing everything do back wards, there is not reason they should mis the oppurtunity for this. If you gonna do everything then why not the engament? may be a chance to get to suprpise angie, a chance to give her something meaningful. May be a chance to sit in one knee ask her to marry him do the traditional thing Why not???? why having kids and being together should stop you from enjoying?? it is not a bad thing just because you have kids it doesn't mean you should mis the whole tradition and celebriation.
People would have known in one way or another if they are engaged if she just wore the engament ring and said nothing and that would lead to the question and then eventually she would admit. It so admiting first and done with it is fine way to go.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:43 pm

to blind and incoherent LOON

Image


:shh:

go be happy for brad and angie and leave us alone
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Justllly » Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:46 pm

Guest wrote:...and about the rest of the crap he worte martyr that is, it is pointless. Brad and Angie can do whatever they want . We fans want to see clebration so are normal other people who love to see a union celebration.
Marragie is conistituion. I believe it is what god made it to soldify a union infront of him. Though Brad and Angie doing everything do back wards, there is not reason they should mis the oppurtunity for this. If you gonna do everything then why not the engament? may be a chance to get to suprpise angie, a chance to give her something meaningful. May be a chance to sit in one knee ask her to marry him do the traditional thing Why not???? why having kids and being together should stop you from enjoying?? it is not a bad thing just because you have kids it doesn't mean you should mis the whole tradition and celebriation.
People would have known in one way or another if they are engaged if she just wore the engament ring and said nothing and that would lead to the question and then eventually she would admit. It so admiting first dand done with it is fine way to go.



So what are you doing in here go and celebrate their engagment. Who is holding here. We are here celebrating true love of Jen and Justin
Justllly
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:46 pm

I think it is a shocking invasion of privacy and the tabs should be fined for giving out names of doctors of celebs or anyone for that matter. Sounds like stalking. :evil:
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby ThisMadScientist » Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:50 pm

Guest wrote:I think it is a shocking invasion of privacy and the tabs should be fined for giving out names of doctors of celebs or anyone for that matter. Sounds like stalking. :evil:


Im also positive that there is some kind of law that ensures confidentiality between doctors and patients. Regardless of if Jennifer is this doctors patient or not, someone needs to sue. That way they know that some things are completely off limits. They shouldn't be allowed to get away with stuff like this. Its illegal to obtain patient information without consent.
User avatar
ThisMadScientist
Swami
 
Posts: 1035
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 12:14 am
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Maryt » Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:55 pm

I agree with everything you have said MaryT. If it truly was for them and their children, then just go and get married. There is no reason for an announcement. The only purpose that serves is to create speculation surrounding not only them and their family but also Jennifer as well.

As for the pregnancy story from life and style. Its hard to know when they are making this stuff up, but if Jen did not drink and only ate vegetarian sushi then its definitely a possibility. If you look back at the pics and video we had through out Feb (especially the WOF ceremony), Jen had a small bump, but it was there in the priemere photos, it was reall noticeable during some of the press interviews (especially the MTV interview when Paul and Jen are walking to their seats and access hollywood interview). Even at a point during the prank on the Ellen show you could see it. So it was not due to clothes or a certain angle, however it just be weight gain, although it did not look like that to me.

She has signed on for projects but some dont have a definitive start date and the swtich movie she has not been confirmed for. I am not sure what's going on with MYA. The director had said he would announce the co star soon but he has not. And he tweeted back to someone asking about working with an "actress" that was inferred to be jen that he "hoped so" but he likes her. This made m think that something has postponed the start of this movie or thrown soemthing up in the air.

Again, I think their is evidence to go both ways. Sightings and pics have been few and far between so I guess we will just have to wait for something more definitive.


Guest I personally am more inclined to think she isn't pregnant now for many reasons (new home renos, film projects, etc.). However, I can acknowledge that what you're saying about some of the picture angles during Wanderlust promotion giving a "hint" of a bump. Besides the ones you mentioned, there was also her Conan appearance and Leno where this was also noticeable too. However, this is why I've always said I find "bump watch" to be so unreliable (for Jennifer or anyone else). Jennifer has always had this slight curve to her lower abdomen and I think this is often what gets misconstrued as a "bump" by people. Depending on the outfit, angle, her stance, etc., it's easy for someone to think she's "bumpy." Until she's very obviously visibly pregnant (large undeniable bump) or announces it, I don't put much stock in "bump watch" where she's concerned. I mean there have been pics of her that have really given that impression before and it's not turned out to be the case, so I think it would have to be a rather large distinct bump for it to get me to believe at this point!

As for the L&S report on her food choice and not drinking - well, they could just as easily be inventing that whole report! Plus we've heard before that she's abstained from drinking - there were a bunch of reports of that last August-November, so as someone mentioned then, it might be that she's given up drinking to help with kicking cigarettes. On the other hand, maybe L&S is right, but that still doesn't have to mean she's pregnant: she could simply like the food options they've reported, and she could be opting for non-alcoholic drinks based on preference or because they are trying. Who knows?!

I did have the same question as you mention about the MYA director's tweet about "hoping" to work with her (assuming he was talking about Jennifer) since this came well after he mentioned she was involved and he had met/talked with her (I thought it an odd remark). And you are right that until one of these projects goes into production, anything is possible. I'm still thinking that the films are a big reason that she wouldn't be pregnant right now, but it's certainly possible that she signed on and then became pregnant or was very early stages pregnant and didn't know when she signed on. The only ones that have (unconfirmed) start dates that have floated around (UELP/Switch=May, and MYA=June), were the ones announced back in early February (meaning she signed on for MYA and was in talks for Switch/UELP earlier than that for the info to get out). She's never confirmed her involvement in Switch/UELP (she actually said it was a possibility during the February MTV interview, that they were "talking about it" but not that it was a fact), but the director recently said she is part of the cast (but without knowing when he gave the interview, it's also possible - though not likely - that he was jumping the gun on including her without it being definite). Either way, signing up to a film doesn't preclude a pregnancy: look at Beyonce whose pregnancy postponed the A Star is Born remake, or Reese Witherspoon whose pregnancy has meant she's had to drop out of a previous project commitment. Plus with MYA, one of the characters is meant to be pregnant, so assuming that's Jennifer role and she is or were to become pregnant in real life, it could possibly still work. Besides, lots of films write-in pregnancies too (or film around them): Catherine Zeta-Jones in Traffic is one example.

In terms of WTM, it's been said that she's had the script and an offer for a few weeks (with everything hinging on her) and hasn't yet signed on - so I won't count that as a definite project of hers until something more concrete comes out. And even if she does sign on, there's no start date yet for production (plus if everything really hinges on her then it sounds like they would postpone shooting it to accommodate her if she is or were to become pregnant). The other recent project announcement is the UJTCP written/directed by Justin. Besides there being no start date, this also sounds like it's still in the earlier stages of pre-production and script development, etc. - not close to going into production. Plus, as producer/star and with her partner as writer/director/producer, obviously this can and would be changed or delayed to accommodate her if a pregnancy was an issue.

Like I said, I tend to think her supposedly soon upcoming filming commitments and news are proof she isn't pregnant, but on the other hand, having those put out in the press does offer a good cover if she were pregnant. Recall when the press was reporting she was taking time off from acting that this was used to indicate a pregnancy. So to is the opposite used as proof against one (despite as I've noted above, that not being a good reason since it happens all the time that women become pregnant and projects have to be altered or delayed). We'll just have to wait and see - new pics or info on the projects might offer an answer!
Maryt
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:20 pm

I hope she is not pregnant with Justin. I saw a picture of him looking just like Charles Manson. Jen wouldn't want a baby with a mass murderer. A crazy one. Justin looks weird.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby ThisMadScientist » Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:34 pm

Guest wrote:I hope she is not pregnant with Justin. I saw a picture of him looking just like Charles Manson. Jen wouldn't want a baby with a mass murderer. A crazy one. Justin looks weird.


Umm you just called Justin a mass murderer. You do know that is slanderous, right?
User avatar
ThisMadScientist
Swami
 
Posts: 1035
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 12:14 am
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Maryt » Sun Apr 15, 2012 9:18 pm

And just as we are talking about Miss You Already and casting and what's on the go with this project, comes these tweets:

Sapphire ‏ @SAPPHIRED_
@SteelMillPaul what really? Oh my gosh, that's terrible. I hope you're okay. I just wanted to ask about Miss You Already casting :)
5h

Paul Andrew Williams ‏ @SteelMillPaul
@SAPPHIRED_ all I'll say right now is no casting news as yet but there will be a ton of announcements. x
4h


Don't know what all that means, but hopefully something concrete will come out on this soon.
Maryt
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sun Apr 15, 2012 9:24 pm

If, and that's a big IF, it turns out that Jen really is pregnant, then the sudden Brangelina engagement (which technicall isn't even an engagement yet) will make more sense.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:11 pm

Didn't she just deny she is not getting married or pregnat? regardless, He talked about getting married last summer if you forgot also said the ring take long to creat. This is the usual dragging her to their thing because he can't make sense in her own to her own fans. too sad.
PS. When they adress Brad and Angie they will call them his fiance and her fiance trust me. Weather you like it or not. Admit it or not
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Guest » Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:19 pm

Guest wrote:to blind and incoherent LOON

Image


:shh:

go be happy for brad and angie and leave us alone



nononon... that is OLD times when she is still without SHAME when using the victimhood relevancy...

NOW the thread name above as you can see or when you google it, it doesn't have her name. That was in the victimhood era she was cosniderd and wanted . She never even then have a thread the thread is created later because they figured she can use the hate support

Now she has A MAN the triangle is no more look above if you blind use google, yahoo, msn or any other search engine and you will see it has name brad and Angie name.

JA shouldn't use the victimhood triangle relevancy of any thing. remember she is moved on. So she need to set a fourm using her name and her man name and gather all her fans , hos there. she is using the triangle vicmtimhood attachment hate thread that is under their name.

The protect is a nobody dickless user. NO man no one will let his girl to be attached for her relevancy in her ex name and having his hos posting his everything here. He must know he is no one and he need the attachment of her. And must no she has no value that she brings for him for him with out her attachment. I feel sorry for him. It must suck to be a man like that. She never have a man who is clean never. all of them users who wants to use her victimhood, triangle attachment fame. huvane is dumb but then again he could be fearing she has no fan base to set up a fourm for her. :oops:
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=J

Postby Just Wonderin' » Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:22 pm

So in the midst of your celebrating the "engagement" you still find Jennifer such a threat.
Just Wonderin'
 
Top

PreviousNext

Post a reply
36960 posts • Page 1365 of 2464 • 1 ... 1362, 1363, 1364, 1365, 1366, 1367, 1368 ... 2464

Return to Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Section

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], icedj, MYGUEST and 51 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Sign up stay updated
Tweets by @FemaleFirst_UK

Like Us On facebook

Save up to 75% in the Lovehoney Sale
web2 - 0.01s