Female First Logo
  • Love & Sex
  • Find out more

    • Dating
    • Relationships
    • Weddings
    • Agony Aunts
  • Community
    • Discussion Board
    • Quick Chat
  • Celebrities
  • Find out more

    • Celebrity Gossip
    • Entertainment Gossip
    • Royal Family
    • Celebrity Interviews
    • Photo Gallery
    • Celebrity Directory
  • Lifestyle
  • Find out more

    • Parenting
    • Motoring
    • Travel
    • Food & Drink
    • Health
    • Home & Garden
    • Money
    • Business
    • Recruitment
    • Women's Issues
  • Entertainment
  • Find out more

    • Entertainment Gossip
    • Music
    • Movies
    • Sport
    • TV & Soaps
    • DVD and Blu-Ray
    • Games
    • Bollywood
    • Book Reviews
    • Bizarre
    • Competitions
    • Horoscopes
    • Big Brother
  • Fashion & Beauty
  • Find out more

    • Style News
    • Celebrity Style
    • Beauty Tips
    • Fashion Trends
    • Style Surgery
    • Shopping
  • Shopping
    • Fashion
    • Lingerie
    • Offers
    • Swimwear
    • DVDs
    • Gaming
    • Books
    • CDs
    • Gifts
  • Blog
    • Fashion Blog
    • Health Blog
    • Movies Blog
    • Music Blog
    • Sport Blog
  • Video
    • Latest Videos
    • Exclusive Videos
    • Celebrity Gossip Videos
    • Movie Trailers
    • Video Interviews
  • Follow us
  • femalefirst facebook
  • femalefirst twitter
  • Follow Me on Pinterest
FemaleFirst.co.uk Discussion Board Quick Chat  

Advanced search
  • Board index ‹ Films and Celebrity ‹ Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Section
  • Change font size
  • E-mail friend
  • Print view
  • FAQ
  • Register
  • Login

ANGIE'S GORGEOUS RING UP CLOSE!!!

All posts on Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston
Post a reply
30 posts • Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: ANGIE'S GORGEOUS RING UP CLOSE!!!

Postby Guest » Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:34 pm

Levan1 wrote:I think it's a beautiful ring. Can't do much wrong with a simple, elegant design. Much better than those people who think "the bigger the rock, the better" as if a big rock means that the man loves you more. I hate show-offs, it's tacky.


100% agree . I don't like show off I dont like destruting blinding rocks for some thing you wear every day ring. It is very beautiful ring modest elegant and with meaning i bet. It looks great on her hand and with the wedding band it will be a great combo and I am glad he did something different not something similar with everyone that is more great. Brad could buy her 10 m ring and huge and too sparkly if he wanted but he didn't I am glad he went something just like them elegant , simple meaningful and rare. Great.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: ANGIE'S GORGEOUS RING UP CLOSE!!!

Postby Just Wonderin' » Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:36 pm

Do you guys ever listen to yourselves? Strutting, showing off and tacky is all that brandgelina is.
Just Wonderin'
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: ANGIE'S GORGEOUS RING UP CLOSE!!!

Postby Levan1 » Mon Apr 16, 2012 12:58 am

Guest wrote:
Levan1 wrote:I think it's a beautiful ring. Can't do much wrong with a simple, elegant design. Much better than those people who think "the bigger the rock, the better" as if a big rock means that the man loves you more. I hate show-offs, it's tacky.


100% agree . I don't like show off I dont like destruting blinding rocks for some thing you wear every day ring. It is very beautiful ring modest elegant and with meaning i bet. It looks great on her hand and with the wedding band it will be a great combo and I am glad he did something different not something similar with everyone that is more great. Brad could buy her 10 m ring and huge and too sparkly if he wanted but he didn't I am glad he went something just like them elegant , simple meaningful and rare. Great.


I like practical jewellery, the ring looks practical and aesthetically appealing. Good combo. It's just a symbol anyway and not even a good one (possession) but I get the tradition so I must concur, it looks nice :) And the children get that meaning probably so good for them.
And true love waits
In haunted attics
And true love lives
On lollipops and crisps
User avatar
Levan1
Magician
 
Posts: 757
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 5:52 pm
Location: Between a rock and a hard place
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: ANGIE'S GORGEOUS RING UP CLOSE!!!

Postby Guest » Mon Apr 16, 2012 1:51 am

The ring is ugly and boring just like Angie. And please - kids don't give a shitt about rings - it's just jewelry to them - nothing more nothing less!! And if the children felt secure in their parents' love for each other they would not be begging for a wedding nor would they know their parents are not married - more bullshitt from these two!!
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: ANGIE'S GORGEOUS RING UP CLOSE!!!

Postby Guest » Mon Apr 16, 2012 1:57 am

Guest wrote:The ring is ugly and boring just like Angie. And please - kids don't give a shitt about rings - it's just jewelry to them - nothing more nothing less!! And if the children felt secure in their parents' love for each other they would not be begging for a wedding nor would they know their parents are not married - more bullshitt from these two!!


who cares what YOU think, all that matters is that Angelina likes the ring
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: ANGIE'S GORGEOUS RING UP CLOSE!!!

Postby Guest » Mon Apr 16, 2012 1:58 am

Guest wrote:Uncut diamonds are way cheaper. Also it looks yellow and muddy.

Diamond class goes by the three c's - cut, clarity and color

Obviously in every aspect, this is a low class diamond. Low class diamond for a low class woman.


Definitely low class everything. Lowest of the low. Happy now? :lol:
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: ANGIE'S GORGEOUS RING UP CLOSE!!!

Postby Guest » Mon Apr 16, 2012 2:05 am

Just Wonderin' wrote:Do you guys ever listen to yourselves? Strutting, showing off and tacky is all that brandgelina is.


Do you, haters, ever listen to yourselves? Talking ugly all the time? Making up 'facts' you can't back up.

You seem to be unable to stop following people you find tacky!
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: ANGIE'S GORGEOUS RING UP CLOSE!!!

Postby Guest » Mon Apr 16, 2012 2:08 am

I'm sorry but I don't agree with anyone who thinks that ring is gorgeous. It's very harsh looking for her hand, too squarish and does nothing to soften those hideously mannish hands of hers. Why didn't he do something with emeralds, it's obvious that is her favorite stone by the number of times she's seen with emerald rings on. He supposedly designed it with his taste in mind, and her taste obviously didn't matter to him. He could care less about what she liked. :roll:
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: ANGIE'S GORGEOUS RING UP CLOSE!!!

Postby Guest » Mon Apr 16, 2012 2:13 am

Guest wrote:I'm sorry but I don't agree with anyone who thinks that ring is gorgeous. It's very harsh looking for her hand, too squarish and does nothing to soften those hideously mannish hands of hers. Why didn't he do something with emeralds, it's obvious that is her favorite stone by the number of times she's seen with emerald rings on. He supposedly designed it with his taste in mind, and her taste obviously didn't matter to him. He could care less about what she liked. :roll:


lol at this stranger who actually thinks she knows what Angelina likes better than Brad..you FFers are getting more pathetic by the moment..considering the fact that Brad worked with Angelina's designer Im pretty sure he knows what his fiancee likes rather than a random obsessed FFer...
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: ANGIE'S GORGEOUS RING UP CLOSE!!!

Postby Guest » Mon Apr 16, 2012 2:20 am

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:Uncut diamonds are way cheaper. Also it looks yellow and muddy.

Diamond class goes by the three c's - cut, clarity and color

Obviously in every aspect, this is a low class diamond. Low class diamond for a low class woman.


Definitely low class everything. Lowest of the low. Happy now? :lol:

Strange, you would think it's a "cheap" diamond ring, considering ALL the diamonds in the rings are flawlwss and perfect, I guess you having NEVER received a diamond, or ring of any kind from a man, wouldn't know about such things.
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: ANGIE'S GORGEOUS RING UP CLOSE!!!

Postby JuJuBee » Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:44 am

Guest wrote:I'm sorry but I don't agree with anyone who thinks that ring is gorgeous. It's very harsh looking for her hand, too squarish and does nothing to soften those hideously mannish hands of hers. Why didn't he do something with emeralds, it's obvious that is her favorite stone by the number of times she's seen with emerald rings on. He supposedly designed it with his taste in mind, and her taste obviously didn't matter to him. He could care less about what she liked. :roll:



The best quality emeralds cost way more than diamonds. He went with the gray diamond because that's all he can afford right now.
JuJuBee
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: ANGIE'S GORGEOUS RING UP CLOSE!!!

Postby Guest » Mon Apr 16, 2012 1:02 pm

Guest wrote:I think the ring is perfect. Angular with sharp edges and no sparkle - just like her.


In a nutshell. :clap: :clap: :clap:
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: ANGIE'S GORGEOUS RING UP CLOSE!!!

Postby Guest » Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:59 am

Jen Loon Helen will be quivering wreck. :clap:
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: ANGIE'S GORGEOUS RING UP CLOSE!!!

Postby Guest » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:01 am

Guest wrote:Jen Loon Helen will be quivering wreck. :clap:

Uhm....obsessed much?
Guest
 
Top

  • Report this post
  • Reply with quote

Re: ANGIE'S GORGEOUS RING UP CLOSE!!!

Postby Guest » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:20 am

Guest wrote:
Guest wrote:Uncut diamonds are way cheaper. Also it looks yellow and muddy.

Diamond class goes by the three c's - cut, clarity and color

Obviously in every aspect, this is a low class diamond. Low class diamond for a low class woman.


4 C's actually. You forgot carat.

The clarity looks to be excellent. The cut design is atrocious, what a waste of a nice diamond! The horrific cut isn't throwing the light back out of the top of the stone which is why it looks so dull, lifeless and grey (the grey is the metal reflection up through the stone). Why, why, why choose a diamond if you don't bother taking into account the properties that make a diamond attractive?


I'm with you on this. Worse, they did it to 16ct worth of diamond (cut), so much for not being tackily large.
Guest
 
Top

Previous

Post a reply
30 posts • Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2

Return to Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Section

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: icedj, Olio, Otter4 and 55 guests

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Sign up stay updated
Tweets by @FemaleFirst_UK

Like Us On facebook

Save up to 75% in the Lovehoney Sale
web2 - 0.01s