JuJuBee wrote:Oh yeah, all of them will get writer's block sooner or later, regardless of how prolific they are. I think non-writers tend to view writing as "easy", like the Ho who claimed to knock out the screenplay in 2 days while she was quarantined in the attic with the flu. What an insult to writers that ridiculous assertion is. I found it odd she specified her location, but now I figure she was stealing the old-fashioned image of the poor writer scribbling in his garret.
When you contrast the ease with which she turned out the screenplay, compared to all her whining about how hard directing was, it makes the writing aspect of her "achievement" even less believable. So whether she wins or loses the suit, she's already outed herself as a lyin' Ho who lies. I just wish the suit was publicized more than it is. So far she's getting a free pass from the media.
friends wrote:REPLY by FilmDistrict, GK Films, Angelina Jolie to response in opposition to motion,, 45 to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and/or improper venue or, in the alternative, transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - March 14, 2012 Transcript of Proceedings before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr.)(Achterhof, Kristin)
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/illino ... 97/263025/
Guest wrote:Well ,we HOPE it will be "big news"...if the hag is still working for the See eye Eh they may order the media to 'downplay' the matter; it's all happening on "Agency' turf (i.e the conteinental USA) after all!
It will be innterressting to see where it goes; I am keeping an eye on what happens with it because it will be a sort of 'window" into what, (if any) "status" Jolie still carries with the See Eye Eh! If "they" have decided to 'cut her loose" then they may simply 'throw her to the wolves". If she was still 'in" with them, then she wouldn't have had to stage this 'distraction"; "they" would simply order the media to "look the other way, or else..." like they were doing there for quite a while, (back when she wasn't looking like as much of a JUNKIE...I guess that's the DOWN SIDE of employing ADDICTS in the illicit drug trade!)
VAJ
Guest wrote:Guest wrote:KrazyDiamond wrote:Guest wrote:Hi everybody. Been lurking here for years. I just wanted to say that my impression is that LegGate wasn't an accident. The way she flashed the leg over and over, it was almost mechanical, why keep doing it? And there was a story about the dress, something last minute about the way it was chosen, alledgedly.
And from looking at one of the videos that was posted on here, it looks like she's saying, when she walks in front of BP "I didn't even want this F****** dress". (I don't know how to post links from other threads yet) Maybe she was being made fun of by the photographers, anyways, she seemed pissed.
My point is: I think it was a signal. No way that was going unnoticed, it was W o r l d N e w s ! Methinks it was a subtle signal, a "go ahead" or something of the sort to one of the state leaders she has been "meeting with" perhaps? In other words, programming.
Cheers for listening
haha, yeah, thanks !
I'm very intrigued by your theory and it seems plausible, too. Can you elaborate as to who you think is programmed? You think it's Jolie?
If you look at it from this point of view, yeah, absolutely. Folowing the line of thought, the diamond, with all its connotations, public and other, could well be the reward / uprising for getting the job done.
How about this: A highly criminal leader from a small (B alkan) country, a perfect match for evil Bleet Jolie, dared her to flash her leg at the Oscar's in return of a favour. We will know what the favour is when we hear it. Maybe. Just an idea.
Return to Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Section