Maryt wrote:What a great clip! Thank you and thanks to all the other guests who chimed in for a very interesting backstory. I did not know anything about this. I think I'm going to buy this book -- it sounds like a great read.
You're welcome! I agree, it sounds like a great read - looking forward to it.
New pics! Jennifer was snapped today in LA, so it isn't looking as good that she will be in NY for the awards tomorrow night. Of course she could have always flown out after these pics were snapped but I'm less confident then I was before, so we'll have to wait and see. Who knows? The pics aren't great - she is going to great lengths to hide in these. Should be up at x17 later. Here's the caption:exclusive <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=Jennifer Aniston' target='_blank'>Jennifer Aniston</A> hides her belly!
Pregnant or not pregnant? <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=Jennifer Aniston' target='_blank'>Jennifer Aniston</A> leaving hair salon in Beverly Hills April 27, 2012 X17online.com EXCLUSIVE Foto, Photo : X17 (VS, USA - Californië, Californie)
http://www.isopix.be/view_main.aspx?MODE=HP&PG=1&INIT=1&SRC=jennifer+aniston&DDLB_CATALOG=1
Guest wrote:How come car doors are totally non-transparent blue? As if it was heavily photoshopped before release.
Rare Visitor wrote:If you go to Isopix and especially look at the picture that ends with -006, you can see she doesn´t wear any tight top. It doesn´t have to meathn anything but it at least doesn´t rule out the possibility she is pregnant.
Guest wrote:Maryt wrote:What a great clip! Thank you and thanks to all the other guests who chimed in for a very interesting backstory. I did not know anything about this. I think I'm going to buy this book -- it sounds like a great read.
You're welcome! I agree, it sounds like a great read - looking forward to it.
New pics! Jennifer was snapped today in LA, so it isn't looking as good that she will be in NY for the awards tomorrow night. Of course she could have always flown out after these pics were snapped but I'm less confident then I was before, so we'll have to wait and see. Who knows? The pics aren't great - she is going to great lengths to hide in these. Should be up at x17 later. Here's the caption:exclusive <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=<A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=Jennifer Aniston' target='_blank'>Jennifer Aniston</A>' target='_blank'><A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=Jennifer Aniston' target='_blank'>Jennifer Aniston</A></A> hides her belly!
Pregnant or not pregnant? <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=<A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=Jennifer Aniston' target='_blank'>Jennifer Aniston</A>' target='_blank'><A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=Jennifer Aniston' target='_blank'>Jennifer Aniston</A></A> leaving hair salon in Beverly Hills April 27, 2012 X17online.com EXCLUSIVE Foto, Photo : X17 (VS, USA - Californië, Californie)
http://www.isopix.be/view_main.aspx?MODE=HP&PG=1&INIT=1&SRC=jennifer+aniston&DDLB_CATALOG=1
More great pix! Thanks, MaryT. I'm going to admit right up front that I am one of those annoying people who sometimes speculates as to whether Jen is pregnant. I first thought she was (since she was with the ex) last summer? Fall? Whenever it was that she was living briefly in New York, anyway. I really thought she was pregnant then. Obviously wrong about that. Having said that, her hair looks like it was just touched up in these pictures. Doubtful that she'd be highlighting her hair if she were pregnant, right? At the same time, I've never seen her go to such lengths to keep the papz from getting full body shots of her. Interesting. Thanks again for the pictures and the great analyses.
Maryt wrote:What a great clip! Thank you and thanks to all the other guests who chimed in for a very interesting backstory. I did not know anything about this. I think I'm going to buy this book -- it sounds like a great read.
You're welcome! I agree, it sounds like a great read - looking forward to it.
New pics! Jennifer was snapped today in LA, so it isn't looking as good that she will be in NY for the awards tomorrow night. Of course she could have always flown out after these pics were snapped but I'm less confident then I was before, so we'll have to wait and see. Who knows? The pics aren't great - she is going to great lengths to hide in these. Should be up at x17 later. Here's the caption:exclusive <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=Jennifer Aniston' target='_blank'>Jennifer Aniston</A> hides her belly!
Pregnant or not pregnant? <A HREF='http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/celebrity/?celeb=Jennifer Aniston' target='_blank'>Jennifer Aniston</A> leaving hair salon in Beverly Hills April 27, 2012 X17online.com EXCLUSIVE Foto, Photo : X17 (VS, USA - Californië, Californie)
http://www.isopix.be/view_main.aspx?MODE=HP&PG=1&INIT=1&SRC=jennifer+aniston&DDLB_CATALOG=1

Jennifer Aniston Makes A Mad Dash Out Of The Hair Salon
Aww, why so shy?
Yesterday Jennifer Aniston was snapped after getting her hair done, and the former Friends star made every effort to hide as she made a beeline from the exit to her car. Sorry Jen, but that jacket isn't an invisibility cloak!
Maybe she's still bummed about ex-husband Brad Pitt's recent engagement to Angelina Jolie? Then again, maybe not! A source recently told Us Weekly, "She hates it being brought up because she doesn't really care."
Do you think Jen's over Brad?
CLAIM: Jennifer Aniston “Crushed” That She’s Not Engaged to Justin Theroux
Truth rating: 1
Rather than admit past mistakes, In Touch just digs itself deeper.
For months, the tabloid has published baseless stories about Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux, wrongly claiming that they’d entered couples therapy, that he was battling Brad Pitt, and that she had instituted a “sex ban.”
Aniston was also either set to adopt a baby or pregnant, depending on what the magazine felt like fabricating in any given week.
None of these reports was true, nor was In Touch’s conviction that Theroux “dumped” Aniston over the holidays or the claim (months later) that she was controlling his meals and hair.
Now the clueless tab is running a big splashy story about Aniston being upset over Pitt’s engagement to Angelina Jolie and devastated that Theroux has not proposed by their one-year anniversary.
“Jen wishes Brad nothing but the best, but she’s still crushed that he’s engaged and she isn’t,” explains a so-called “friend.”
The magazine seems to take delight in Aniston’s perceived misfortune, declaring, “One Year Later… No Ring, No Baby!”
In Touch then outlines Aniston’s alleged “sneaky plan” to get Theroux to commit, which involves their co-habitation, working together on another movie, and Aniston impressing Theroux with her “famous friends.”
Uh-huh.
Look, we understand the easy thing for tabloids to do with the Pitt-Jolie engagement news is to shine a spotlight on Aniston and speculate about how miserable she must be, or to insist that she’s decided to race Jolie to the altar.
But that doesn’t make any of it true.
As Gossip Cop has consistently reported, Aniston and Theroux are happy and doing things at their own pace.
A source close to the actress tells us again that she “moved on” from Pitt years ago and that his nuptials have zero bearing on her own marriage timetable.
Return to Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt Section
Users browsing this forum: icedj and 27 guests