Brangelina do not own Chateau Miraval

[Guest]

signée par son propriétaire = signed by the owner

Yeah of that bottle of WHINE he bought to sign. Where's the deed. And as YOU well know, not all that is printed is truth right honey? They'd be married with 12 children on the way already.

[Guest]

You really should be a little bit more skeptical when you read something somewhere, even if it is something you desperately want to be true. Once again you failed to cite a valid source to prove Pitt owns it. FYI a publicity blurb is not a valid source for confirming the ownership of real estate. Do you understand what a valid source would be? A recorded deed of ownership filed somewhere in France would be the best evidence. It would probably be held in the name of one of his corporations rather than in his own name. Not saying he doesn't own it, just saying you haven't proven he does. After all, it is you who claims he owns it and therefore you who has to prove your claim.

Now tell us why there is absolutely nothing about Pitt's ownership on the website for chateau miraval? Nothing in the wine magazines confirming Pitt owns it. No interviews or statements about this acquisition and his plans for it. The website mentions the history of the property, prior owners, and that the Studio Miraval which was owned by Jacques Loussier. There is nothing about Pitt, nothing at all. Why the secrecy? It is not like self-described zen media guru Pitt to miss an opportunity to promote himself and his wine. Or to connect him to a property where well known musicians recorded. Hence the names of the wines Pink Floyd, etc.

This Miraval wine is marketed in the U.S. Tell us one reason why would Pitt not announce that he bought the property that he had been renting for three years if he did in fact buy it. Wouldn't that be the way to go to boost wine sales instead of having him described as the "new owner" in French in a French publicity notice?

If it was/is being used for ILLICIT purposes, then Pitt sure WOULDN'T want attention drawn to the place; he'd try to be as LOW-PROFILE as he COULD! (which is in fact happening! ) The fact of "wine" being produced there would give a reason for TRUCKS and VEHICLES to move in and out of the place...but if "wine" wasn't the Shat-eau's main export >cough-cough<, then of course there would be NO mention of 'wine' or winemaking anywhere! And I am sure he would WANT people to think HE "owned" it, just like they want people to think than he 'adopted the children'-when in fact there is no real evidence he has done any such thing! (I would wager that if the "true' owner were known, it would be a DRUG CARTEL. Winemaking would be a great "laundry", as would be the "upkeep" of a large property!)

VAJ

[Guest]

Does it matter to anyone outside their family and relatives whether they own Miraval or not? No! So why all the fuss?

Yes, it DOES matter. They, the wannabe humanitarians, could invite 50 - 100 or more refuges too live with them. This is what they ask from the public, take more refugees, so why not be a good example?

But they act differently. They would shoot any person entering their luyury resort, wouldn't they? HYPOCRITES.

You're just like the NOTW. You made that up. People are asked for donations. Governments are asked to resettle refugees.

Governments, yes. But it is Jolie who is asking governments to accept more refugees, so why doesn't she want them on her property and expects the public to pay for everything while she enjoys life in huge protected mansions? BTW, she hardly pays taxes, partly because of her fraudation. And in Europe she doesn't pay taxes at all. SHe's one of the worst hypocrites ever.

Jolie speaks for/represents the UNHCR. It's the UNHCR who asks countries/governments to resettle refugees.
Many countries (Canada the US, countries in Europe, Australia, New Zealand) respond and allow a certain number in every year. Jolie was a GA and now the agency's special envoy. Antonio Guterres, the high commissioner, can do with help.

Many people, richer than Pitt and Jolie, donate. Are you after all those people to house refugees at their property too or only after this couple? Stop criticizing. It makes you sound small!

Other people's tax matters don't interest me. Anyone who evades taxes will eventually land in jail, so why do it?
Avoiding tax/paying less tax by taking advantage of loopholes is completely legal! One would be stupid not to do it!

[Guest]

Non of you biz if they own or not they are working on it so deal with it. it looks beautiful and probably marry there what cause the burnning?????

Miraval does look very nice. Who knows if they own it, but I'd say why would they spend so much money on it, according to the stories and if those stories are true, if they don't own it or are in the process of becoming its owners?

[Guest]

They do own the Chateau Miraval.

Show us the deed. If the Mayor can flash innocent babies' birth certificates, then the two poser can flash the ownership papers. You LIE unless you have a link with proof.

Besides, the owner said he'd NEVER sell, they are only worth about $150 MIL together, I hardly think they'd spend HALF their worth on a place they don't live in full time...not to mention MOST of that $150 Mil is stuPITT's so joLIE would be broke putting up her portion.

Why should they show the deed if they have bought it? I doubt it matters to them what people believe.
So the owner once said he'd never sell. How do you know he hasn't changed his mind? Maybe he was made an offer he couldn't refuse. Who knows.
Where did you get the $150m? Others mention $270m (together). I find it amusing how very interested haters/antis are in this couple's business. It must be so much fun speculating about people you don't even like!

[Bennie]

They do own the Chateau Miraval.

Show us the deed. If the Mayor can flash innocent babies' birth certificates, then the two poser can flash the ownership papers. You LIE unless you have a link with proof.

Besides, the owner said he'd NEVER sell, they are only worth about $150 MIL together, I hardly think they'd spend HALF their worth on a place they don't live in full time...not to mention MOST of that $150 Mil is stuPITT's so joLIE would be broke putting up her portion.

Why should they show the deed if they have bought it? I doubt it matters to them what people believe.
So the owner once said he'd never sell. How do you know he hasn't changed his mind? Maybe he was made an offer he couldn't refuse. Who knows.
Where did you get the $150m? Others mention $270m (together). I find it amusing how very interested haters/antis are in this couple's business. It must be so much fun speculating about people you don't even like!

Mother Superior Loon is NOT amused!

[Guest]

Non of you biz if they own or not they are working on it so deal with it.
it looks beautiful and probably marry there what cause the burnning?????

Untalented stupid people like BP should not own properties like this one because a trailer is the appropriate home for trash like AJ and BP . BTW, they should stfu about refugees because it is none of their business. If they are concerned (but they are NOT), why don't they adopt 100 refugees?

That is a, well, that is not a smart thing to say. Refugees are very much Jolies's business outside Hollywood. It's been her business since 2001! Come on, you're not THAT ignorant! Anybody, who can afford it, can buy any property.

Were you drunk when you posted this?

[Guest]

When will we see the king and the queen again and less of the users of all kind?
waiting patiently

[Guest]

Does it matter to anyone outside their family and relatives whether they own Miraval or not? No! So why all the fuss?

Yes, it DOES matter. They, the wannabe humanitarians, could invite 50 - 100 or more refuges too live with them. This is what they ask from the public, take more refugees, so why not be a good example?

But they act differently. They would shoot any person entering their luyury resort, wouldn't they? HYPOCRITES.

You're just like the NOTW. You made that up. People are asked for donations. Governments are asked to resettle refugees.

Governments, yes. But it is Jolie who is asking governments to accept more refugees, so why doesn't she want them on her property and expects the public to pay for everything while she enjoys life in huge protected mansions? BTW, she hardly pays taxes, partly because of her fraudation. And in Europe she doesn't pay taxes at all. SHe's one of the worst hypocrites ever.

Jolie speaks for/represents the UNHCR. It's the UNHCR who asks countries/governments to resettle refugees.
Many countries (Canada the US, countries in Europe, Australia, New Zealand) respond and allow a certain number in every year. Jolie was a GA and now the agency's special envoy. Antonio Guterres, the high commissioner, can do with help.

Many people, richer than Pitt and Jolie, donate. Are you after all those people to house refugees at their property too or only after this couple? Stop criticizing. It makes you sound small!

Other people's tax matters don't interest me. Anyone who evades taxes will eventually land in jail, so why do it?
Avoiding tax/paying less tax by taking advantage of loopholes is completely legal! One would be stupid not to do it!

Listen, moron, and get this through your thick head. The vast majority of the funding for the UN comes from governments. The US pays for over a fifth of the UN budget. That means the taxpayers i.e. "people" as you call us pay for the UN, and against our will at that. Jolie feels we owe part of our wealth to refugees because she is a spoiled Hollywood bimbo who wants the world to forget about her inexcusable past.

[Guest]

While the nasty and greedy Jolie keeps her millions and makes money with her new image. Evil Jolie is the biggest hypocrite ever.

[Guest]

Jolie does not represent UNHCR in any shape or form. She is nothing but a paid spokesperson. Her "role" at UNHCR is the SAME as her "role" at St Jude or Shiseido.

[Guest]

No PROOF...NO OWNERSHIP!!! END OF!!!

[Guest]

Jolie does not represent UNHCR in any shape or form. She is nothing but a paid spokesperson. Her "role" at UNHCR is the SAME as her "role" at St Jude or Shiseido.

When she goes on a trip for the UNHCR she represents that agency and speaks for that agency, and she does not get paid!
I suppose she was paid by Shiseido for advertising their lipstick.

[Guest]

Jolie does not represent UNHCR in any shape or form. She is nothing but a paid spokesperson. Her "role" at UNHCR is the SAME as her "role" at St Jude or Shiseido.

When she goes on a trip for the UNHCR she represents that agency and speaks for that agency, and she does not get paid!
I suppose she was paid by Shiseido for advertising their lipstick.

Sign of the times. How embarrassing for the UNHCR. Although the UN has an extremely bad reputation, Jolie is still a bad choice.

[Guest]

Jolie does not represent UNHCR in any shape or form. She is nothing but a paid spokesperson. Her "role" at UNHCR is the SAME as her "role" at St Jude or Shiseido.

When she goes on a trip for the UNHCR she represents that agency and speaks for that agency, and she does not get paid!
I suppose she was paid by Shiseido for advertising their lipstick.

Sign of the times. How embarrassing for the UNHCR. Although the UN has an extremely bad reputation, Jolie is still a bad choice.

Why is it embarrassing for the UNHCR? She was their most famous GA and will, I'm sure, do her best as special envoy. The high commissioner wouldn't have made her the agency's special envoy if he doesn't believe she can do it. Wouldn't you agree?