Brangelina do not own Chateau Miraval

[Guest]

While the nasty and greedy Jolie keeps her millions and makes money with her new image. Evil Jolie is the biggest hypocrite ever.

[Guest]

Jolie does not represent UNHCR in any shape or form. She is nothing but a paid spokesperson. Her "role" at UNHCR is the SAME as her "role" at St Jude or Shiseido.

[Guest]

No PROOF...NO OWNERSHIP!!! END OF!!!

[Guest]

Jolie does not represent UNHCR in any shape or form. She is nothing but a paid spokesperson. Her "role" at UNHCR is the SAME as her "role" at St Jude or Shiseido.

When she goes on a trip for the UNHCR she represents that agency and speaks for that agency, and she does not get paid!
I suppose she was paid by Shiseido for advertising their lipstick.

[Guest]

Jolie does not represent UNHCR in any shape or form. She is nothing but a paid spokesperson. Her "role" at UNHCR is the SAME as her "role" at St Jude or Shiseido.

When she goes on a trip for the UNHCR she represents that agency and speaks for that agency, and she does not get paid!
I suppose she was paid by Shiseido for advertising their lipstick.

Sign of the times. How embarrassing for the UNHCR. Although the UN has an extremely bad reputation, Jolie is still a bad choice.

[Guest]

Jolie does not represent UNHCR in any shape or form. She is nothing but a paid spokesperson. Her "role" at UNHCR is the SAME as her "role" at St Jude or Shiseido.

When she goes on a trip for the UNHCR she represents that agency and speaks for that agency, and she does not get paid!
I suppose she was paid by Shiseido for advertising their lipstick.

Sign of the times. How embarrassing for the UNHCR. Although the UN has an extremely bad reputation, Jolie is still a bad choice.

Why is it embarrassing for the UNHCR? She was their most famous GA and will, I'm sure, do her best as special envoy. The high commissioner wouldn't have made her the agency's special envoy if he doesn't believe she can do it. Wouldn't you agree?

[Guest]

Jolie does not represent UNHCR in any shape or form. She is nothing but a paid spokesperson. Her "role" at UNHCR is the SAME as her "role" at St Jude or Shiseido.

When she goes on a trip for the UNHCR she represents that agency and speaks for that agency, and she does not get paid!
I suppose she was paid by Shiseido for advertising their lipstick.

Sign of the times. How embarrassing for the UNHCR. Although the UN has an extremely bad reputation, Jolie is still a bad choice.

Why is it embarrassing for the UNHCR? She was their most famous GA and will, I'm sure, do her best as special envoy. The high commissioner wouldn't have made her the agency's special envoy if he doesn't believe she can do it. Wouldn't you agree?

Because this woman is embarrassing and a fake. Everything about her, her present, her past. Not very convincing in her 'role'.She is inarticulate, uneducated, fame addicted, an outcast with psychological and drug problems (isn't she a diagnosed psychopath). She french kissed her brother on several occasions in public, used her 'humanitarian' trips for sex, claimed in an interview that her people told her to do some humanitarian work to improve her image, she adopted illegally, killed her pets, stalked men (restraining order against her), f*cked her mother's lover, is a homewwrecker, the list goes on. I couldn't think of a worse choice. On top of this, she is a joke and unpopular.

[Guest]

Why is it embarrassing for the UNHCR? She was their most famous GA and will, I'm sure, do her best as special envoy. The high commissioner wouldn't have made her the agency's special envoy if he doesn't believe she can do it. Wouldn't you agree?

Because this woman is embarrassing and a fake. Everything about her, her present, her past. Not very convincing in her 'role'.She is inarticulate, uneducated, fame addicted, an outcast with psychological and drug problems (isn't she a diagnosed psychopath). She french kissed her brother on several occasions in public, used her 'humanitarian' trips for sex, claimed in an interview that her people told her to do some humanitarian work to improve her image, she adopted illegally, killed her pets, stalked men (restraining order against her), f*cked her mother's lover, is a homewwrecker, the list goes on. I couldn't think of a worse choice. On top of this, she is a joke and unpopular.

You're entitled to your opinion, and put your own spin on things. I also think you need help before you get a heart attack! Take a deep breath and tell yourself, several times, "I must live my own life!"

You couldn't think of a worse choice? Well, you don't decide. The UN refugee agency's high commissioner does.

[Guest]

Jolie does nothing for the reputation of the UN. On the contrary. People know it is nothing but PR and also suspect she got her role through sex.

[Guest]

Why is it embarrassing for the UNHCR? She was their most famous GA and will, I'm sure, do her best as special envoy. The high commissioner wouldn't have made her the agency's special envoy if he doesn't believe she can do it. Wouldn't you agree?

Because this woman is embarrassing and a fake. Everything about her, her present, her past. Not very convincing in her 'role'.She is inarticulate, uneducated, fame addicted, an outcast with psychological and drug problems (isn't she a diagnosed psychopath). She french kissed her brother on several occasions in public, used her 'humanitarian' trips for sex, claimed in an interview that her people told her to do some humanitarian work to improve her image, she adopted illegally, killed her pets, stalked men (restraining order against her), f*cked her mother's lover, is a homewwrecker, the list goes on. I couldn't think of a worse choice. On top of this, she is a joke and unpopular.

You're entitled to your opinion, and put your own spin on things. I also think you need help before you get a heart attack! Take a deep breath and tell yourself, several times, "I must live my own life!"

You couldn't think of a worse choice? Well, you don't decide. The UN refugee agency's high commissioner does.

He's the one who made bad choices for Portugal. Very bad choices to be exact. Did he also have sex with Jolie?

[Guest]

You're entitled to your opinion, and put your own spin on things. I also think you need help before you get a heart attack! Take a deep breath and tell yourself, several times, "I must live my own life!"

You couldn't think of a worse choice? Well, you don't decide. The UN refugee agency's high commissioner does.

He's the one who made bad choices for Portugal. Very bad choices to be exact. Did he also have sex with Jolie?

If that is true, so? He is not the PM of Portugal now, but the high commissioner of the UN refugee agency, and why don't you ask him that personal question!

What is wrong with haters/antis? When it was in the news that Jolie would be sitting down with Madeleine Albright to talk about Bosnia, you slammed MA. When it didn't happen, you stopped. When she met Germany's foreign minister, you tried to diminish him by saying he is gay, as if that matters. Then it stopped. Who is next?

What does this all say about you? She seems to make you CRAZY! Why do you allow her to make you so CRAZY?

[Guest]

Why is it embarrassing for the UNHCR? She was their most famous GA and will, I'm sure, do her best as special envoy. The high commissioner wouldn't have made her the agency's special envoy if he doesn't believe she can do it. Wouldn't you agree?

Because this woman is embarrassing and a fake. Everything about her, her present, her past. Not very convincing in her 'role'.She is inarticulate, uneducated, fame addicted, an outcast with psychological and drug problems (isn't she a diagnosed psychopath). She french kissed her brother on several occasions in public, used her 'humanitarian' trips for sex, claimed in an interview that her people told her to do some humanitarian work to improve her image, she adopted illegally, killed her pets, stalked men (restraining order against her), f*cked her mother's lover, is a homewwrecker, the list goes on. I couldn't think of a worse choice. On top of this, she is a joke and unpopular.

You're entitled to your opinion, and put your own spin on things. I also think you need help before you get a heart attack! Take a deep breath and tell yourself, several times, "I must live my own life!"

You couldn't think of a worse choice? Well, you don't decide. The UN refugee agency's high commissioner does.

How very kind of you to admit that a poster on an ANTI site has a right to her opinion. Followed, of course, by an insult, because that's the way you loons roll.

So, let's all stipulate that we all have a right to our opinion. This is a well-known anti site. People who dislike the Brand come here to share their opinions of all their PR stunts. Cause, face it. They're in the papers, the tabs, the internet, every single day. And frequently it's because they've made an "announcement" or a provocative statement, not just because the tabs are running BS stories on them. So we come here to Bleet. Just like you loons used to go to JJ's and JJB's before the loon rapture.

My question to you is this -- why does it bother you so much that a total stranger on the internet dislikes the brand and expresses that dislike? Public figures are fair game for opinions, but you loons are offended that people you don't even know dislike your favorite celebrities. That's just really weird. For example, I like Charlize Theron. I understand that she provokes strong opinions, and a lot of people dislike her quite strenuously. I've never bothered to find out why these people dislike her, because I simply don't care. And I can't even imagine going to a website known internationally as an anti-Theron site to try and "convert" people into liking her, and insulting them when they don't. That makes no sense to me. I've never gone to JJ or JJB for the same reason.

So, please, explain to me why it is that you are so invested in celebrities who have actually insulted their fans (the ho coined the term "loons," sPitt said their fans are "missing something") that you roam the internet, insulting and arguing with ordinary people that don't like them. Why do you care so much about our opinion, when your own idols have done everything they could to distance themselves from you?

[Guest]

You're entitled to your opinion, and put your own spin on things. I also think you need help before you get a heart attack! Take a deep breath and tell yourself, several times, "I must live my own life!"

You couldn't think of a worse choice? Well, you don't decide. The UN refugee agency's high commissioner does.

He's the one who made bad choices for Portugal. Very bad choices to be exact. Did he also have sex with Jolie?

If that is true, so? He is not the PM of Portugal now, but the high commissioner of the UN refugee agency, and why don't you ask him that personal question!

What is wrong with haters/antis? When it was in the news that Jolie would be sitting down with Madeleine Albright to talk about Bosnia, you slammed MA. When it didn't happen, you stopped. When she met Germany's foreign minister, you tried to diminish him by saying he is gay, as if that matters. Then it stopped. Who is next?

What does this all say about you? She seems to make you CRAZY! Why do you allow her to make you so CRAZY?

As usual, you miss the point loon. Jolie associates only with losers and has-beens. Albright is a has-been who was incompetent while in office. Her legacy is embarrassing because she actually made things worse. Germany's foreign minister being gay is relevant because it shows how Jolie's fan base is not heterosexual men, but gay men who love her tranny look and lack of morals. Jolie attracts freeks.

[JuJuBee]

Why is it embarrassing for the UNHCR? She was their most famous GA and will, I'm sure, do her best as special envoy. The high commissioner wouldn't have made her the agency's special envoy if he doesn't believe she can do it. Wouldn't you agree?

Because this woman is embarrassing and a fake. Everything about her, her present, her past. Not very convincing in her 'role'.She is inarticulate, uneducated, fame addicted, an outcast with psychological and drug problems (isn't she a diagnosed psychopath). She french kissed her brother on several occasions in public, used her 'humanitarian' trips for sex, claimed in an interview that her people told her to do some humanitarian work to improve her image, she adopted illegally, killed her pets, stalked men (restraining order against her), f*cked her mother's lover, is a homewwrecker, the list goes on. I couldn't think of a worse choice. On top of this, she is a joke and unpopular.

You're entitled to your opinion, and put your own spin on things. I also think you need help before you get a heart attack! Take a deep breath and tell yourself, several times, "I must live my own life!"

You couldn't think of a worse choice? Well, you don't decide. The UN refugee agency's high commissioner does.

He's the one who made bad choices for Portugal. Very bad choices to be exact. Did he also have sex with Jolie?

It's a given that the Ho offered up her shriveled loins to any/all thugs at the UN who could offer her a little somethin' somethin' in exchange. The UN is filled with men who r@[e children while on "peace-keeping" missions. The disconnect between what the UN says it does, and what it really does, makes it the Ho's kind of place.

[Guest]

Why is it embarrassing for the UNHCR? She was their most famous GA and will, I'm sure, do her best as special envoy. The high commissioner wouldn't have made her the agency's special envoy if he doesn't believe she can do it. Wouldn't you agree?

Because this woman is embarrassing and a fake. Everything about her, her present, her past. Not very convincing in her 'role'.She is inarticulate, uneducated, fame addicted, an outcast with psychological and drug problems (isn't she a diagnosed psychopath). She french kissed her brother on several occasions in public, used her 'humanitarian' trips for sex, claimed in an interview that her people told her to do some humanitarian work to improve her image, she adopted illegally, killed her pets, stalked men (restraining order against her), f*cked her mother's lover, is a homewwrecker, the list goes on. I couldn't think of a worse choice. On top of this, she is a joke and unpopular.

You're entitled to your opinion, and put your own spin on things. I also think you need help before you get a heart attack! Take a deep breath and tell yourself, several times, "I must live my own life!"

You couldn't think of a worse choice? Well, you don't decide. The UN refugee agency's high commissioner does.

How very kind of you to admit that a poster on an ANTI site has a right to her opinion. Followed, of course, by an insult, because that's the way you loons roll.

So, let's all stipulate that we all have a right to our opinion. This is a well-known anti site. People who dislike the Brand come here to share their opinions of all their PR stunts. Cause, face it. They're in the papers, the tabs, the internet, every single day. And frequently it's because they've made an "announcement" or a provocative statement, not just because the tabs are running BS stories on them. So we come here to Bleet. Just like you loons used to go to JJ's and JJB's before the loon rapture.

My question to you is this -- why does it bother you so much that a total stranger on the internet dislikes the brand and expresses that dislike? Public figures are fair game for opinions, but you loons are offended that people you don't even know dislike your favorite celebrities. That's just really weird. For example, I like Charlize Theron. I understand that she provokes strong opinions, and a lot of people dislike her quite strenuously. I've never bothered to find out why these people dislike her, because I simply don't care. And I can't even imagine going to a website known internationally as an anti-Theron site to try and "convert" people into liking her, and insulting them when they don't. That makes no sense to me. I've never gone to JJ or JJB for the same reason.

So, please, explain to me why it is that you are so invested in celebrities who have actually insulted their fans (the ho coined the term "loons," sPitt said their fans are "missing something") that you roam the internet, insulting and arguing with ordinary people that don't like them. Why do you care so much about our opinion, when your own idols have done everything they could to distance themselves from you?

I believe the loons are equally responsible for the massive public brand hate. i think many people were not fans of the two cheaters but then running across the rabid loon love on the internet, insults and hate if you did not think the were the hottest couple to ever walk the earth, and then the media shoving them down the publics throaght, telling us how beautiful they are also not helpful to the brand. sites that would not allow any negative brad or angelina comment...I think it woke people up that did not realize how sick and fake the couple are. But loons have certainly made things much worse for the nasty couple.