Guest wrote:friends wrote:Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Guest wrote:The alleged similarities are all true anecdotes from the war that hundreds of people experienced - maybe thousands of people. They in turn told others. Similarities in retelling historically accurate events is not evidence of plagiarism. There is actually no way around the fact of similarities of the events really happened. You cannot copyright history or true events. All the events you mention such as being raped in front of others, separating women and children - those things didn't just happen one time and in one place but at many times and in many places and to many women. So the idea that only Braddock could know or tell about those events is something I am just not seeing. Thousands of people knew all these things.
This is what seems odd to me. Braddock has insisted his story is a true story. Jolie has said that she was told the germ of her story by a woman refugee. Jolie also said that a number of events in her movie were retellings of other events during the war and how they unfolded told her by some of the actors in her film.
If it makes you feel all warm and fuzzy then keep believing Angie's story---but please do everyone else a big favor and stop posting your same old story over and over and over and over and over again. Tired of reading your same comments on other sites also. You are a one note LOON.
If it makes you feel all smug and superior to be impressed with this idiot Braddock and his igorant arrogance then enjoy yourself. The same old tired attacks on Jolie without even using one brain cell became old many years ago. Nothing changes here. The stupid just multiplies.
Care to explain the points I mentioned? How do you plagiarize true stories experienced by thousands of people, witnessd by untold thousands more and retold to thousands of people. How does Braddock have a copyright claim on these true events and stories that thousands of people were aware of and discussing? You can't explain it can you?
Nothing has been shown yet except both these authors were writing about the same historical events. The plaintiff hasn't even delivered up to the court yet the subject writing.
At this point the parties have to enter into court mandated mediation before anything happens. Even if no one wants to settle, all the parties have to certify to the court that they made a good faith effort to do so before the case can proceed.
I can see this is going to be a field day for those eager to twist the realities of the on-going case into more nonsensical fodder against Jolie.
You're a stupid multiplied! Incredibly stupid, idiot, you could say something like that. Idiot, understand! The book was written, such as a whole, have not one book, the film was not made with the same story, identical? And it appears Jolie stupid, just like you and talk about the thousands of stories? Here is a specific, protected, to authoritative story, with the code, ISDN bar cod, from 2007? Hello! Idiot, I feel sorry. and those next to them are you! An amazing amount of nonsense is yours, just like Jolie? Braddock has a copyright, like any writer of his literary work, thus it is a book published many years ago, and even more so because he was born in Sarajevo, lived, worked, was during the war, while Jolie's drug use? Your stupidity tires, literally, that such happiness as you do not reproduce, because the world would be horrible. moron
Do not lie! Books in Croatian and English was delivered in court. Literally, you're disgusting in his lies! How do you claim that it was not delivered up, even when delivered in December last year, you idiot! Rotten garbage. Such people should be forbidden to go out, it would not be passed on the infection of their stupidity!
Oh, really? Then please tell me what exhibit number these 2 books are on the case docket. They were not submitted as exhibits or as evidence in any form to the court. They are nowhere to be found even now.
Keep up your trash talk. That will go a long way in helping your case. I wonder what Judge Dow thought, and now what Judge Gee and M.J. Kentor thought, when they read the trash talking idiotic emails and other communications sent to Angelina Jolie, attorneys, her manager, and others before this suit was filed. The defendant's attorneys quite properly and smartly made these communications part of the court record. I'll bet the defendants are keeping the best for trial. This is going to be hilarious.
So where are those exhibits you claim were "delivered in court"? Got any proof of that? Like, oh I don't know - in the effing court record? Maybe Braddock wrapped them up and sent them as Christmas presents to the judge.
You want trash talking emails!? Oh boy, the loons have littered the airwaves for 7 solid years... if you want to compare that kinda S***, I think you'll find you have a losing battle. It's all garbage and that can't be blamed on a journalist!
Other than that, stop trying to tease more details from Braddock through this website. they are not going to provide you with advance notice of their evidence so you can buy off witnesses to deny everything.... I am sure they know your game and are not stupid enough to fall for what you thought was a clever subterfuge to find out strategy, points and everything you'll need to provide a contradictory reality for the judge. there are plenty facts not blasted on these blogs, that will have its day in court and which time you can shuffle papers up your asss trying to come up with a quick defense, a liar you paid off or whatever other unsavory, unethical and illegal activities planned behind scenes to win Jolie's case.