What do women think of circumcised guys? Please post

[cosmicB]

Wrong colonel-rectum!.. it's true, peeled dicks do so last longer, giving the Woman much more pleasure than ultra-sensitive natural penies...

Colonel-SA.. Do you know why is it that you are in a thread focused totally upon "C***-sucking"..? Would you kindly relate your intense military experiences in sucking men's penises..? I'm thinking you were gang raped in the military... Would you like to tell us about your sore-ass escapades..?

_________________

It wasn't Colonel Plum in the kitchen with the candle holder!.. It was Colonel Rectum in the basement with a broom handle...

[Guest]

Circumcised are much better. There is not any lack of sensibility and is good either to cure the guys with premature ejaculations. The surgery is done with local anesthesia and very very simple. You can do it and just after go to work, but I give you an advice : do a " low & tight" circumcision, that one that excises all the inner skin ( mucosa ), suturing the external skin near the head. That's the best. Believe me, I know what I'm saying, because I know the before and the after, considering that I made mine about my 19 y.o.

Bill

[cosmicB]

Like in everything on the planet, maybe there are some who shouldn't get circumcised... And given that some labia look like empty scrotum's.. could it be that foreskins is full vulva..? "Vroop!.."

[Tsuba]

Circumcised are much better. There is not any lack of sensibility and is good either to cure the guys with premature ejaculations.

This is rich. On the one hand you claim there is no loss of sensitivity, and then you manage to contradict yourself in the same sentence by saying it's "good to cure guys with premature ejaculations". You do realize that the whole "cure premature ejaculation" argument rests entirely on the loss of sensation, right?

But that is rather moot, as both your points are wrong in any case. Is there loss of sensitivity? You betcha. There is some debate as to how much sensitivity is lost in the glans, but even if there is none, you still have the loss of the nerve endings in the foreskin. I mean, your argument is about the same as, "cutting off a finger will not reduce sensitivity to the hand". And sure, maybe not the hand that remains, but what about the finger that you've cut off? Barring phantom pains, you still have sensitivity in that?

Also, men who are premature ejaculators will not find circumcision to be a magic cure. Premature ejaculation is rooted more deeply in psychology than physical stimuli.

The surgery is done with local anesthesia and very very simple. You can do it and just after go to work, but I give you an advice : do a " low & tight" circumcision, that one that excises all the inner skin ( mucosa ), suturing the external skin near the head. That's the best. Believe me, I know what I'm saying, because I know the before and the after, considering that I made mine about my 19 y.o.

Bill

Did you have all types of circumcision done to you, Bill, as you seem so sure that "low & tight" is the best? What is your basis of comparison?

Also, did you have the circumcision done for medical reasons? If so, then I fully expect you to be satisfied with the results. Speaking for myself, however, as an intact male, I have never had medical issues (or issues of any kind) with my foreskin, and I wouldn't allow myself to be circumcized even if it would bring on world peace. The foreskin gives me tremendous amounts of pleasure when it comes to masturbation, handjobs, blowjobs as well as intercourse.

[Tsuba]

Wrong colonel-rectum!.. it's true, peeled dicks do so last longer, giving the Woman much more pleasure than ultra-sensitive natural penies...

This assumes that intact men are "ultra-sensitive" and cum too fast. Which, of course, is rubbish. It is true that circumcision makes you last longer, in the beginning at least. As soon as one has adjusted to the difference in sensation, however, one's "lasting power" returns to what they were before. One essentially learns to make do with less. All research indicates that premature ejaculation is just as prevalent among circumcized men.

[cosmicB]

Only if the survey included 16 year-olds as "men"...
They probably did...

Should the average 16 year-old American touch his dick to a young hot Greek lass's labia, suddenly he would squirt his load before he got an inch in, circumcised or not... Including teens as "men" fouls the survey with kiddie-stuff...

Sensitivity is lost by rubbing skin on clothing a lot... Uncircumcised dicks have a protective shield around the end o the dick, what maintains them thar nerves sensitive, which generally can make a man cum a lot faster than if his his dick was chopped-up and worn-out...

[The Colonel]

Only if the survey included 16 year-olds as "men"...
They probably did...

Should the average 16 year-old American touch his dick to a young hot Greek lass's labia, suddenly he would squirt his load before he got an inch in, circumcised or not... Including teens as "men" fouls the survey with kiddie-stuff...

Sensitivity is lost by rubbing skin on clothing a lot... Uncircumcised dicks have a protective shield around the end o the dick, what maintains them thar nerves sensitive, which generally can make a man cum a lot faster than if his his dick was chopped-up and worn-out...

Mine might be chopped up, but it certainly isn't worn out.

[Polgara69]

Ah ha! U admitted it!

[The Colonel]

Ah ha! U admitted it!

Admitted what?

[Polgara69]

That u have the snip. Someone asked u that before (cant remember who) and u wouldnt say.

[The Colonel]

I have said so before, although I did deny it at least a few times as well. But I cannot be bothered any more to do so.

However, I had no choice in the matter. The decision was denied to me.

[Polgara69]

True. I have never seen anywhere where u admitted it so I am behind the times there!

[Tsuba]

Only if the survey included 16 year-olds as "men"...
They probably did...

Should the average 16 year-old American touch his dick to a young hot Greek lass's labia, suddenly he would squirt his load before he got an inch in, circumcised or not... Including teens as "men" fouls the survey with kiddie-stuff...

Speak for yourself. I was never a premature ejaculator (always been the opposite, in fact), and indeed whether or not you are is not that relevant to age. At any rate, even if I accepted your flimsy excuse here as fact, that means that the INTACT premature ejaculators include 16-year olds, too. So where does that leave your argument?

Sensitivity is lost by rubbing skin on clothing a lot... Uncircumcised dicks have a protective shield around the end o the dick, what maintains them thar nerves sensitive, which generally can make a man cum a lot faster than if his his dick was chopped-up and worn-out...

Premature ejaculation has precious little to do with sensitivity. The orgasm trigger is in the mind. Try pleasing yourself the best way imaginable physically, while thinking of your grandmother. Will you be able to reach orgasm? I highly doubt it, no matter how pleasurable the physical sensation may be.

Physical stimulation is important, of course it is. And in my case, personally, it is especially important, but not the way you might think. I need a certain kind of stimulation when it comes to handjobs, blowjobs or intercourse. I need the sensation to be familiar. The first time I had intercourse, I was unable to climax. Same thing with my first blowjob. This was because the sensations were unfamiliar to me, not the way I was used to orgasm at all, and so I had to learn to climax with the new sensations. If the sensation is too different from what I'm used to, I won't cum. If there's too little sensation, I won't cum. And, dun dun dun, if there is too much sensation, I won't be able to cum either. It's fun, feels great and all that, but it won't send me over the top. Of course, just as women are different, so are men. But you certainly can't make sweeping statements such as "sensitivity=premature ejaculation".

[The Colonel]

True. I have never seen anywhere where u admitted it so I am behind the times there!

Well now you know! Aren't you lucky!

[The Colonel]

Only if the survey included 16 year-olds as "men"...
They probably did...

Should the average 16 year-old American touch his dick to a young hot Greek lass's labia, suddenly he would squirt his load before he got an inch in, circumcised or not... Including teens as "men" fouls the survey with kiddie-stuff...

Speak for yourself. I was never a premature ejaculator (always been the opposite, in fact), and indeed whether or not you are is not that relevant to age. At any rate, even if I accepted your flimsy excuse here as fact, that means that the INTACT premature ejaculators include 16-year olds, too. So where does that leave your argument?

Sensitivity is lost by rubbing skin on clothing a lot... Uncircumcised dicks have a protective shield around the end o the dick, what maintains them thar nerves sensitive, which generally can make a man cum a lot faster than if his his dick was chopped-up and worn-out...

Premature ejaculation has precious little to do with sensitivity. The orgasm trigger is in the mind. Try pleasing yourself the best way imaginable physically, while thinking of your grandmother. Will you be able to reach orgasm? I highly doubt it, no matter how pleasurable the physical sensation may be.

Physical stimulation is important, of course it is. And in my case, personally, it is especially important, but not the way you might think. I need a certain kind of stimulation when it comes to handjobs, blowjobs or intercourse. I need the sensation to be familiar. The first time I had intercourse, I was unable to climax. Same thing with my first blowjob. This was because the sensations were unfamiliar to me, not the way I was used to orgasm at all, and so I had to learn to climax with the new sensations. If the sensation is too different from what I'm used to, I won't cum. If there's too little sensation, I won't cum. And, dun dun dun, if there is too much sensation, I won't be able to cum either. It's fun, feels great and all that, but it won't send me over the top. Of course, just as women are different, so are men. But you certainly can't make sweeping statements such as "sensitivity=premature ejaculation".

You are correct.