Moderator: Silent One
cosmicB wrote:"Does she like to chew on clean dic or dirdy dic" went about as far as it go.. so some of us pushed it into other related controversial areas, out of its mono-dimensional format... It's an issue that touches every part of the culture, every culture, everywhere, in some way or another... So what if it hasn't "remained in the box"..?
Things that stay "in the box" never even begin to get solved.. they only gets stirred, like "stirring a great plugged toilet, then sniffing it to smell if anything has changed"...
By bringing it "out of the box", flaws are exposed, solutions created, things realized, fears and doubts and guilts and lies are shattered...
Those who cannot grasp anything "out of the box" are generally afraid of new and change... They tend to stifle new and change , because their faith demands it, because their faith fears that massive change means that there won't be a place in the future for them, after the truth about their lies is exposed to their victims and suckers...
I bet after you've grasped that, you won't be able to poop for a whole month...
AussieAdam wrote:So why bothering answering the post Colonel.....If you cant give an answer without waffle then why bother?
The Colonel wrote:franfran wrote:The Circumcision Information and Resource Pages (http://www.cirp.org/) wrote:The Roman Catholic Church and Non-therapeutic Circumcision
The early teaching of the Roman Catholic Church regarding the practice of male circumcision was stated by Eugene IV in a Papal Bull, Bull of Union with the Copts, in 1442 Persons who practice circumcision risk loss of eternal salvation.
The Roman Catholic Church has never issued an official policy specifically regarding non-therapeutic neonatal male circumcision as it has been practiced primarily in the English-speaking nations in the Twentieth Century and now the Twenty-first Century. The Church, however, has a strong moral statement on amputations, mutilations, and sterilizations. Circumcision falls under both amputation and mutilation, so it is clearly covered by this policy. Catholics generally are required to respect bodily integrity. Lack of respect for bodily integrity is viewed as a violation of the Fifth Commandment, Thou shalt not kill.
The new (1994) Catechism of the Catholic Church at paragraph 2297 states in part:
"Except when performed for strictly therapeutic medical reasons, directly intended amputations, mutilations, and sterilizations performed on innocent persons are against the moral law."
The Council on Scientific Affairs of the American Medical Association now defines neonatal circumcision as a "non-therapeutic" surgical procedure. Circumcisions (as commonly performed on newborn boys) are non-therapeutic, because no disease is present and no therapeutic treatment is required. Furthermore, circumcision removes healthy and functional tissue from the body and renders the part less functional. Thus, a circumcision is a non-therapeutic amputation and mutilation. Therefore, for Catholics, non-therapeutic circumcision at any age is immoral according to the teaching of the Church as expressed in the Catechism.
Be that as it maybe. I was still done. My mother being Catholic and my father a convert.
Most Yanks are - in direct violation of the bible as you pointed out. Some believers huh?!
AussieAdam wrote:waffle waffle waffle.... A colonel?.....I think the closest you have ever been to the army is playing with an action man.....oops gone off thread
AussieAdam wrote:waffle waffle waffle.... A colonel?.....I think the closest you have ever been to the army is playing with an action man.....oops gone off thread
Fred75 wrote:The Colonel wrote:franfran wrote:The Circumcision Information and Resource Pages (http://www.cirp.org/) wrote:The Roman Catholic Church and Non-therapeutic Circumcision
The early teaching of the Roman Catholic Church regarding the practice of male circumcision was stated by Eugene IV in a Papal Bull, Bull of Union with the Copts, in 1442 Persons who practice circumcision risk loss of eternal salvation.
The Roman Catholic Church has never issued an official policy specifically regarding non-therapeutic neonatal male circumcision as it has been practiced primarily in the English-speaking nations in the Twentieth Century and now the Twenty-first Century. The Church, however, has a strong moral statement on amputations, mutilations, and sterilizations. Circumcision falls under both amputation and mutilation, so it is clearly covered by this policy. Catholics generally are required to respect bodily integrity. Lack of respect for bodily integrity is viewed as a violation of the Fifth Commandment, Thou shalt not kill.
The new (1994) Catechism of the Catholic Church at paragraph 2297 states in part:
"Except when performed for strictly therapeutic medical reasons, directly intended amputations, mutilations, and sterilizations performed on innocent persons are against the moral law."
The Council on Scientific Affairs of the American Medical Association now defines neonatal circumcision as a "non-therapeutic" surgical procedure. Circumcisions (as commonly performed on newborn boys) are non-therapeutic, because no disease is present and no therapeutic treatment is required. Furthermore, circumcision removes healthy and functional tissue from the body and renders the part less functional. Thus, a circumcision is a non-therapeutic amputation and mutilation. Therefore, for Catholics, non-therapeutic circumcision at any age is immoral according to the teaching of the Church as expressed in the Catechism.
Be that as it maybe. I was still done. My mother being Catholic and my father a convert.
Most Yanks are - in direct violation of the bible as you pointed out. Some believers huh?!
And yet you post about the problems with wrapping Christmas presents!
Fred75 wrote:AussieAdam wrote:waffle waffle waffle.... A colonel?.....I think the closest you have ever been to the army is playing with an action man.....oops gone off thread
No... I think he has every right to be called that!
Being that he's the night manager at a Kentucky Fried Chicken!
AussieAdam wrote:I doubt there are more than two in your user group anyway - You bore the ass off 99.9999 of the people who post here anyway
cosmicB wrote:Me thinks the colonel is truely a military man... He to obviously thinks that the cure to everything is in military procedure... A little like using hammers to repair electronics, and bullets to fix the sick...
Return to Sex (Better Sex) Issues
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests