..................

Discuss your thoughts and get advice on sex issues

Moderator: Silent One

Postby screeby » Fri Apr 25, 2008 3:26 pm

i've just been circumcised on day 4 now and its not really painful its just annoyin, night time erections r the worst feels like ur dick is gonna explode. and its VERY sensitive when it rubs on ur boxers when u walk etc...not sure what my girlfriends gonna make of it either

but i think it looks better, although i was scared at first (didnt have it done through preferance, more an accident in bed
screeby
 

Postby TonyRockyhara » Fri Apr 25, 2008 7:18 pm

screeby wrote:iut i think it looks better, although i was scared at first (didnt have it done through preferance, more an accident in bed


An Accident in bed??? :shock: I hope she didn't bite it off! :shock:
Mmmmm....Beer!
User avatar
TonyRockyhara
Guru
 
Posts: 686
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:05 pm
Location: US of A

Postby screeby » Sat Apr 26, 2008 1:14 am

nah she didnt bite it off haha, she pulled it back so far it ripped the banjo string when we were drunk, like a year back...was worst ever, just had complications and its resulted in this...had a frenuloplasty (cannot spell it) before hand but it was unsuccessful so i'm left with this...i can only hope i will like it after the pain has gone!!
screeby
 

Postby Guest » Sat Apr 26, 2008 2:42 am

. wrote:Circumcised guys are less likely to pass on STDs including HIV, cervical cancer, and are less likely to get penile cancer themselves. Shurely these are benefits enough weighed up against a small operation?


OH MY GOD!!! Are you a complete idiot?!?!
You're obviously the kind of person who still thinks HIV/AIDS can be transferred via toilet seats or from kissing! And in case you hadn't realised cervical cancer isn't an STD!!
And as for all the morons talking about circumcision being 'cleaner'..... have you never heard of a shower?!?! Funnily enough, foreskin DOES move and you can clean under it.... it isn't permanently fixed in place stopping it from being clean!
I can't believe how many ignorant morons there are!!
Guest
 

Postby AussieAdam » Sat Apr 26, 2008 10:42 am

Colonel your going senile ok - You can no longer understand topics therfore nothing you write can be taken seriously.

Far from being the ''Rambo'' of the forums you are in fact the ''Dumbo'' of the forum.

And you call me an idiot ??? - Your shot to bits SIR and I am begining to doubt your credentials as an officer.........

Hmmm on second thoughts I came across enough idiots like you when I did my time in the army....Perhaps Sandhurst just takes the thick kids from the upper classes and turns them out as thick kids that THINK they are cleverer than the rest of us.
Seduction isn’t making someone do what they don’t want to do. Seduction is enticing someone into doing what they secretly want to do already.
----------------------------------------------------
By the way the image on the avatar is not me
User avatar
AussieAdam
Wizard
 
Posts: 1454
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:33 pm
Location: All over the freaking place

Foreskin tastes

Postby Andrew Macduff » Sat Apr 26, 2008 9:50 pm

nonymous wrote:OH MY GOD!!! Are you a complete idiot?!?!
You're obviously the kind of person who still thinks HIV/AIDS can be transferred via toilet seats or from kissing!


No, you moron! HIV/AIDS is transferred by C***. And all the medical authorities agree that the uncircumcised C*** is a most efficient device for transferring HIV/AIDS. There's tons of references up-thread - start by reading a few of them. They explain the disease/foreskin relationship. And that's why women prefer circumcised cocks.
Andrew Macduff
 

Postby G Wizard » Sat Apr 26, 2008 11:36 pm

screeby wrote:i've just been circumcised on day 4 now and its not really painful its just annoyin, night time erections r the worst feels like ur dick is gonna explode. and its VERY sensitive when it rubs on ur boxers when u walk etc...not sure what my girlfriends gonna make of it either

but i think it looks better, although i was scared at first (didnt have it done through preferance, more an accident in bed

This is the first I've heard about your surgery. I don't know if you mentioned on the forum beforehand that you were planning this, as I would have shared my own circumcision experience with you.

I spent a few weeks pre-op with my foreskin pulled back, to get used to the sensations (or more accurately, overstimulation/rubbing/chafing of my underwear) prior to getting the snip. Thing is, my foreskin was only too happy to retract into place, so it took some creativity to get it to stay put.

As for those who complain about an uncircumcised penis being 'dirty', yes it's quite possible to wash it. In fact, this was one of my complaints about my own. That is, I could scrub-a-dub-dub in the morning shower till it was squeaky clean, but by evening the smegma would be back. Quite the drag. If I knew I was going to be intimate with a woman on a spur-of-the-moment basis, I would try to find time to go to a washroom and at least use toilet paper to try and clean things up one last time.

The smegma was merely a nuisance. I was rather partial to the aesthetics of being circumcised.

I was a little disappointed with the results, though. My urologist lopped off too much, and so things tended to be quite tight. In fact, during the post-op healing I would get nocturnal erections which were painful from pulling against the stitches; I would bleed a bit from the one side, they were pulling that much.

So if I were to turn back the hands of time and reconsider, would I still do it? Yes. But knowing what I know now, I would shop around and consult with different urologists. From what I've read on|ine since then, it seems the "high and tight" is the way to go. And quite probably done with a Plastibell, and not "freehand" with a scalpel.

It's a personal choice whether to get it done. I'm very glad my parents (who were both medical professionals at the time) left my bits alone, thus leaving the choice up to me.

As for statistics? Anyone can make statistics say what they want. Just remember there are 3 kinds of lies: Lies, damned lies, and statistics.
~*~ G Wiz ~*~
I'm the one with the wizard's hat and robe.
When did ignorance become a point of view?
User avatar
G Wizard
Mahatma
 
Posts: 1160
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:40 am
Location: near Dallas, Texas, USA, planet Earth

Postby Kami » Sun Apr 27, 2008 10:52 am

If a woman wouldn't go out with a guy for such a petty reason they can go to hell.
Kami
Wet behind the ears
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 2:10 pm

Postby The Colonel » Sun Apr 27, 2008 5:27 pm

AussieAdam wrote:Colonel your going senile ok - You can no longer understand topics therfore nothing you write can be taken seriously.

Far from being the ''Rambo'' of the forums you are in fact the ''Dumbo'' of the forum.

And you call me an idiot ??? - Your shot to bits SIR and I am begining to doubt your credentials as an officer.........

Hmmm on second thoughts I came across enough idiots like you when I did my time in the army....Perhaps Sandhurst just takes the thick kids from the upper classes and turns them out as thick kids that THINK they are cleverer than the rest of us.


I am right and you just can't accept that for some reason.

And stop the stupid slurs - I mean, I could infer your point is worthless too, since your ancestors were criminals shipped out from Britain.

Stupid is it not?
The Colonel
 

Postby G Wizard » Sun Apr 27, 2008 6:26 pm

The Colonel wrote:
And stop the stupid slurs - I mean, I could infer your point is worthless too, since your ancestors were criminals shipped out from Britain.

So if I relocate to Australia, would you also infer that my ancestors were criminals shipped from Britain?

For that matter, why not infer that AussieAdam is aboriginal? Or given the non-trivial number of Filipinos who live in Australia, how about Filipino?

Stupid is it not?

You took the words right out of my mouth.
~*~ G Wiz ~*~
I'm the one with the wizard's hat and robe.
When did ignorance become a point of view?
User avatar
G Wizard
Mahatma
 
Posts: 1160
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:40 am
Location: near Dallas, Texas, USA, planet Earth

Postby Rebman » Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:09 pm

The Colonel wrote:
AussieAdam wrote:Colonel your going senile ok - You can no longer understand topics therfore nothing you write can be taken seriously.

Far from being the ''Rambo'' of the forums you are in fact the ''Dumbo'' of the forum.

And you call me an idiot ??? - Your shot to bits SIR and I am begining to doubt your credentials as an officer.........

Hmmm on second thoughts I came across enough idiots like you when I did my time in the army....Perhaps Sandhurst just takes the thick kids from the upper classes and turns them out as thick kids that THINK they are cleverer than the rest of us.


I am right and you just can't accept that for some reason.


The thread question is what women think of circumcised men, NOT whether men or boys should be circumcised or not. Please stick to the topic.
Rebman
Mahatma
 
Posts: 1150
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 11:57 am

Postby G Wizard » Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:29 pm

Rebman wrote:
The thread question is what women think of circumcised men, NOT whether men or boys should be circumcised or not. Please stick to the topic.

+1

I'll throw in some vaguely relevant material.

My first wife was a virgin when I'd met her (no, that was never a priority with me), and was somewhat naive about sexuality. As such, she was never predisposed one way or the other.

When I told her I wanted to get circumcised, she was still ambivalent, but she was fine with me getting it. That said, she had a girlfriend who was pretty adamant that circumcised was the only way to go.

It was about 5 years later that our son was born. Suddenly she was all gung-ho for circumcision, and pressed that point pretty hard. Since my own parents had been medical professionals and had decided to just let me and my brother remain intact, I was adamant that my son not be given the snip. I figure that when he's old enough, if he's interested, I'll gladly give him any info on the subject that I can.

Let's use tattooing as an analogy. I got a tattoo when I was well into adulthood, but I would never be so presumptuous that I would force my son to get a tattoo days after being born. That said, when he's an adult, I would be only too glad to share with him my knowledge and caveats to make sure that he goes into it as informed as possible, and doesn't do something silly like get a tattoo on his face.

But I digress.

The original point was the question regarding whether my first wife preferred circumcised or not. She had nothing to compare to, other than my 'before' and 'after'.

I think in Canada/USA, my sense is that most women prefer circumcised, although there are of course exceptions. In Europe, my sense is the reverse is true. I say this because I seem to recall reading something along these lines, either on a pro-circumcision or an anti-circumcision site.

I would actually like to see how many women here feel that the circumcised penis is somehow less pleasant to look at than an uncircumcised penis. Once the foreskin is retracted, the two are pretty much indistinguishable, save for perhaps a scar. But with the foreskin in place, I think it looks a bit like a miniature elephant's trunk. ;)
~*~ G Wiz ~*~
I'm the one with the wizard's hat and robe.
When did ignorance become a point of view?
User avatar
G Wizard
Mahatma
 
Posts: 1160
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:40 am
Location: near Dallas, Texas, USA, planet Earth

Survey result

Postby Andrew Macduff » Mon Apr 28, 2008 7:27 am

G Wizard wrote:I would actually like to see how many women here feel that the circumcised penis is somehow less pleasant to look at than an uncircumcised penis.


If you go to the top of this topic, you will see that only 40% of members prefer the uncircumcised dick. It doesn't say why, but the result is still that only 40% prefer the natural dick. That's pretty conclusive; it's even more remarkable considering that these are UK women voting. I suspect the numbers would be even fewer in favour of the natural dick in America.
Andrew Macduff
 

Re: Survey result

Postby Andrew Macduff » Mon Apr 28, 2008 7:30 am

Andrew Macduff wrote:If you go to the top of this topic, you will see that only 40% of members prefer the uncircumcised dick.


Correction: I mis-read: that's only 13% prefer the natural dick!
Andrew Macduff
 

Postby G Wizard » Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:34 pm

Ah. Yes. The poll. Kinda forgot about that.

Interesting.
~*~ G Wiz ~*~
I'm the one with the wizard's hat and robe.
When did ignorance become a point of view?
User avatar
G Wizard
Mahatma
 
Posts: 1160
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:40 am
Location: near Dallas, Texas, USA, planet Earth

PreviousNext

Return to Sex (Better Sex) Issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DarkEve and 33 guests