..................

[Polgara69]

OMG shall I roll up a newspaper. All the men WHO HAD IT DONE AS BABIES OR AS TEENS FOR MEDICAL REASONS do you ladies prefer THESE circumcised cocks. The fact is that some men are (for whatever reason) and some men are not and seeing as the majority of men sleep with women then of course they have a say. Jeez louise.

[Emily B]

Women have no more right to ask a man to alter his C*** than a man has the right to ask a woman to alter her tits. It is offensive and totally disrespectful to them.

Oh, for crying out loud, Colonel! Bong off please! You've had your fun making a mess here, now please move along.

[The Colonel]

Women have no more right to ask a man to alter his C*** than a man has the right to ask a woman to alter her tits. It is offensive and totally disrespectful to them.

Oh, for crying out loud, Colonel! Bong off please! You've had your fun making a mess here, now please move along.

No. I stand up for men's rights.

[G Wizard]

Women have no more right to ask a man to alter his C*** than a man has the right to ask a woman to alter her tits. It is offensive and totally disrespectful to them.

Oh, for crying out loud, Colonel! Bong off please! You've had your fun making a mess here, now please move along.

No. I stand up for men's rights.

Fine. Then start a men's rights thread elsewhere.

This thread is strictly about a woman's preference. You know, like preferring chocolate vs vanilla. Soliciting women's opinions on what they prefer, and not asking whether they feel men's rights in this regard should be revoked.

By way of analogy, some women prefer the super-muscular bodybuilder look, other women prefer a guy of a more average build. It's a preference. By stating a preference, it might be wishful thinking for a single woman to want ALL men to look that way, but that's mere fantasy, and in no way suggests that a law be passed to mandate that all men look the same way.

Next time you see one woman driving a particular car in black, and you see another woman driving the same car in white, just remember: it's a preference.

[Polgara69]

Well said.

[The Colonel]

Women have no more right to ask a man to alter his C*** than a man has the right to ask a woman to alter her tits. It is offensive and totally disrespectful to them.

Oh, for crying out loud, Colonel! Bong off please! You've had your fun making a mess here, now please move along.

No. I stand up for men's rights.

Fine. Then start a men's rights thread elsewhere.

This thread is strictly about a woman's preference. You know, like preferring chocolate vs vanilla. Soliciting women's opinions on what they prefer, and not asking whether they feel men's rights in this regard should be revoked.

By way of analogy, some women prefer the super-muscular bodybuilder look, other women prefer a guy of a more average build. It's a preference. By stating a preference, it might be wishful thinking for a single woman to want ALL men to look that way, but that's mere fantasy, and in no way suggests that a law be passed to mandate that all men look the same way.

Next time you see one woman driving a particular car in black, and you see another woman driving the same car in white, just remember: it's a preference.

Any women who judges a man by his dick is shallow. Therefore, preference should no be an issue either way.

[Bouncy]

I prefer circumsized. It is up to the man to decide whether or not he does as well. My wants aren't forced on anyone.

I prefer my breasts on the large side. It's up to the man to decide whether or not he does as well. His wants aren't forced on me. He's free to walk away from them if he so chooses.

The guy who was pressured into getting circumsized in order to marry the bride of his choice was well within his rights to object and not get it done. The cost of marriage to this woman was his foreskin. He may not have been willing to pay that price, but he did anyway. He chose to be circumsized. He could have walked away intact.

[G Wizard]

Any women who judges a man by his dick is shallow. Therefore, preference should no be an issue either way.

If a man doesn't wash himself down there, and a woman judges him to have poor personal hygiene habits, I'd have to say I'm on her side.

Now if the man in question has a legitimate medical issue which prevents him from properly cleaning himself there, that's a different matter.

Other than that, I'm not sure what sort of judgement you're referring to. Surely not moral character?

[The Colonel]

Any women who judges a man by his dick is shallow. Therefore, preference should no be an issue either way.

If a man doesn't wash himself down there, and a woman judges him to have poor personal hygiene habits, I'd have to say I'm on her side.

Now if the man in question has a legitimate medical issue which prevents him from properly cleaning himself there, that's a different matter.

Other than that, I'm not sure what sort of judgement you're referring to. Surely not moral character?

If a man doesn't wash down there - it won't make any difference if he's circumcised or not. He will be just as dirty either way.

[G Wizard]

Not true.

As someone who was uncut for the first 29 years of my life, one of my prime objectives for getting my circumcision was no longer having to deal with the smegma.

I could wash in the shower with soap and water in the morning, and by early evening it would be back. Bloody annoying.

And now? No longer do I suffer from "head cheese".

[Guest]

I am a 22yr female living in US and married at the age of 20. My husband, 35, was uncut when we started dating five years back. I forced him to circumcize after our marriage. He has a low and tight cut, his inner skin and frenulum is totally removed. Cutting foreskin de-sensitizes the glan. In my husband's case it became dry and partially numb . The major advantage is due to lack of sensitivity on the penis-head he vigorously strokes inside me in order to achive the desired level of pleasure and can last much longer than before. It has become a little rough ride , but that's a kind of sex I was looking for. Many women may not like this.
Secondly it's great for the oral sex. It was impossible to have oral due to odor when he was un-cut.

Liz M

That's because he couldn't take care of himself. He had no idea how to wash an uncut penis.

[Guest]

Not true.

As someone who was uncut for the first 29 years of my life, one of my prime objectives for getting my circumcision was no longer having to deal with the smegma.

I could wash in the shower with soap and water in the morning, and by early evening it would be back. Bloody annoying.

And now? No longer do I suffer from "head cheese".

LMAO well 'G Wizard', I can tell you now, that you had a serious problem.

I wash my bellend every morning, as I should, and it doesn't smell of anything, and it stays that way all throughout the day.

Also, foreskins can be very handy. In me teenage days when I used to smoke hash, sometimes the Police would pull up, and if I caught an early glimps of them before they caught up with me, I could hide the bit of hash I had under my foreskin, just incase they might search me LOL.

[Bouncy]

Hiding hash in your foreskin; something to be proud of.

[Guest]

Hiding hash in your foreskin; something to be proud of.

It had cling film wrapped around it. Still, stopped me from getting in trouble, didn't it?

[Bouncy]

Hiding hash in your foreskin; something to be proud of.

It had cling film wrapped around it. Still, stopped me from getting in trouble, didn't it?

OH!! That's different then! In that case, it makes you look ever so clever.

In any case, I think I'd prefer someone who was "clean" than someone who used their foreskin to cover their crimes.