
The Colonel wrote:
Any women who judges a man by his dick is shallow. Therefore, preference should no be an issue either way.
G Wizard wrote:The Colonel wrote:
Any women who judges a man by his dick is shallow. Therefore, preference should no be an issue either way.
If a man doesn't wash himself down there, and a woman judges him to have poor personal hygiene habits, I'd have to say I'm on her side.
Now if the man in question has a legitimate medical issue which prevents him from properly cleaning himself there, that's a different matter.
Other than that, I'm not sure what sort of judgement you're referring to. Surely not moral character?
lizm wrote:I am a 22yr female living in US and married at the age of 20. My husband, 35, was uncut when we started dating five years back. I forced him to circumcize after our marriage. He has a low and tight cut, his inner skin and frenulum is totally removed. Cutting foreskin de-sensitizes the glan. In my husband's case it became dry and partially numb . The major advantage is due to lack of sensitivity on the penis-head he vigorously strokes inside me in order to achive the desired level of pleasure and can last much longer than before. It has become a little rough ride , but that's a kind of sex I was looking for. Many women may not like this.
Secondly it's great for the oral sex. It was impossible to have oral due to odor when he was un-cut.
Liz M
G Wizard wrote:Not true.
As someone who was uncut for the first 29 years of my life, one of my prime objectives for getting my circumcision was no longer having to deal with the smegma.
I could wash in the shower with soap and water in the morning, and by early evening it would be back. Bloody annoying.
And now? No longer do I suffer from "head cheese".

. wrote:Bouncy wrote:Hiding hash in your foreskin; something to be proud of.
It had cling film wrapped around it. Still, stopped me from getting in trouble, didn't it?

Bouncy wrote:. wrote:Bouncy wrote:Hiding hash in your foreskin; something to be proud of.
It had cling film wrapped around it. Still, stopped me from getting in trouble, didn't it?
OH!! That's different then! In that case, it makes you look ever so clever.
In any case, I think I'd prefer someone who was "clean" than someone who used their foreskin to cover their crimes.

. wrote:
LMAO well 'G Wizard', I can tell you now, that you had a serious problem.
I wash my bellend every morning, as I should, and it doesn't smell of anything, and it stays that way all throughout the day.
Also, foreskins can be very handy.
. wrote:
Well, it was clever, as I could have been arrested otherwise. Sticking it in my anus, now that would have been stupid.
G Wizard wrote:. wrote:
LMAO well 'G Wizard', I can tell you now, that you had a serious problem.
I'm glad my condition was worth a 'LMAO' from you. And I'm glad you thought it was a serious problem. Because it wasn't.
Or, if you think that was serious, you have a strange perception of what 'serious' is.
And mine smelled quite acceptable all day as well. I never said smell was ever an issue.
Go back and read my post again to better understand the words I wrote.
Wait, I'll save you the trouble. Smegma is that natural |ubricant which you're no doubt familiar with. No doubt if left alone for a month without washing, it would probably start to acquire a funky smell.
To recap what I wrote, I didn't say anything about smell, nor did I say I left it alone for a month.
I said that I could wash it clean in the morning, and by evening the smegma would be back. And that, to me, was a nuisance.
Now if in your case you can scrub yourself clean in the morning, and still not have even the slightest hint of smegma in the evening, congratulations, and welcome to the human condition known as "individual variation". Based on that, you could probably go a week without scrubbing. Of course, the bacteria would still start to grow, and hence the smell....

This has got to be the best line I've heard this week.
Penn and Teller would be proud of you.
G Wizard wrote:. wrote:
Well, it was clever, as I could have been arrested otherwise. Sticking it in my anus, now that would have been stupid.
Right. Because a proper rubber-gloved cavity search would somehow overlook your foreskin.
. wrote:
Oh it definitely was worth a LMAO. It was serious enough for you to get the snip, wasn't it?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests