What do women think of circumcised guys? Please post

Discuss your thoughts and get advice on sex issues

Moderator: Silent One

User avatar
The Colonel
Seraphim
 
Posts: 19350
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 12:01 pm

Re: Bong off

Postby The Colonel on Fri May 16, 2008 7:13 pm

G Wizard wrote:
The Colonel wrote:
Emily B wrote:
The Colonel wrote:Women have no more right to ask a man to alter his C*** than a man has the right to ask a woman to alter her tits. It is offensive and totally disrespectful to them.


Oh, for crying out loud, Colonel! Bong off please! You've had your fun making a mess here, now please move along.


No. I stand up for men's rights.

Fine. Then start a men's rights thread elsewhere.

This thread is strictly about a woman's preference. You know, like preferring chocolate vs vanilla. Soliciting women's opinions on what they prefer, and not asking whether they feel men's rights in this regard should be revoked.

By way of analogy, some women prefer the super-muscular bodybuilder look, other women prefer a guy of a more average build. It's a preference. By stating a preference, it might be wishful thinking for a single woman to want ALL men to look that way, but that's mere fantasy, and in no way suggests that a law be passed to mandate that all men look the same way.

Next time you see one woman driving a particular car in black, and you see another woman driving the same car in white, just remember: it's a preference.


Any women who judges a man by his dick is shallow. Therefore, preference should no be an issue either way.
I am the Colonel. The One. The Only. The Best. The Best of the Best. Image

User avatar
Bouncy
Cherubim
 
Posts: 20359
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 10:51 pm
Location: In a Bouncy Castle

Postby Bouncy on Fri May 16, 2008 8:35 pm

I prefer circumsized. It is up to the man to decide whether or not he does as well. My wants aren't forced on anyone.

I prefer my breasts on the large side. It's up to the man to decide whether or not he does as well. His wants aren't forced on me. He's free to walk away from them if he so chooses.

The guy who was pressured into getting circumsized in order to marry the bride of his choice was well within his rights to object and not get it done. The cost of marriage to this woman was his foreskin. He may not have been willing to pay that price, but he did anyway. He chose to be circumsized. He could have walked away intact.
Image

User avatar
G Wizard
Mahatma
 
Posts: 1149
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:40 am
Location: near Dallas, Texas, USA, planet Earth

Re: Bong off

Postby G Wizard on Fri May 16, 2008 8:42 pm

The Colonel wrote:
Any women who judges a man by his dick is shallow. Therefore, preference should no be an issue either way.

If a man doesn't wash himself down there, and a woman judges him to have poor personal hygiene habits, I'd have to say I'm on her side.

Now if the man in question has a legitimate medical issue which prevents him from properly cleaning himself there, that's a different matter.

Other than that, I'm not sure what sort of judgement you're referring to. Surely not moral character?
~*~ G Wiz ~*~
I'm the one with the wizard's hat and robe.
When did ignorance become a point of view?

User avatar
The Colonel
Seraphim
 
Posts: 19350
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 12:01 pm

Re: Bong off

Postby The Colonel on Fri May 16, 2008 10:53 pm

G Wizard wrote:
The Colonel wrote:
Any women who judges a man by his dick is shallow. Therefore, preference should no be an issue either way.

If a man doesn't wash himself down there, and a woman judges him to have poor personal hygiene habits, I'd have to say I'm on her side.

Now if the man in question has a legitimate medical issue which prevents him from properly cleaning himself there, that's a different matter.

Other than that, I'm not sure what sort of judgement you're referring to. Surely not moral character?


If a man doesn't wash down there - it won't make any difference if he's circumcised or not. He will be just as dirty either way.
I am the Colonel. The One. The Only. The Best. The Best of the Best. Image

User avatar
G Wizard
Mahatma
 
Posts: 1149
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:40 am
Location: near Dallas, Texas, USA, planet Earth

Postby G Wizard on Fri May 16, 2008 11:52 pm

Not true.

As someone who was uncut for the first 29 years of my life, one of my prime objectives for getting my circumcision was no longer having to deal with the smegma.

I could wash in the shower with soap and water in the morning, and by early evening it would be back. Bloody annoying.

And now? No longer do I suffer from "head cheese".
~*~ G Wiz ~*~
I'm the one with the wizard's hat and robe.
When did ignorance become a point of view?

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Mon May 19, 2008 8:47 pm

lizm wrote:I am a 22yr female living in US and married at the age of 20. My husband, 35, was uncut when we started dating five years back. I forced him to circumcize after our marriage. He has a low and tight cut, his inner skin and frenulum is totally removed. Cutting foreskin de-sensitizes the glan. In my husband's case it became dry and partially numb . The major advantage is due to lack of sensitivity on the penis-head he vigorously strokes inside me in order to achive the desired level of pleasure and can last much longer than before. It has become a little rough ride , but that's a kind of sex I was looking for. Many women may not like this.
Secondly it's great for the oral sex. It was impossible to have oral due to odor when he was un-cut.

Liz M


That's because he couldn't take care of himself. He had no idea how to wash an uncut penis.

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Mon May 19, 2008 10:02 pm

G Wizard wrote:Not true.

As someone who was uncut for the first 29 years of my life, one of my prime objectives for getting my circumcision was no longer having to deal with the smegma.

I could wash in the shower with soap and water in the morning, and by early evening it would be back. Bloody annoying.

And now? No longer do I suffer from "head cheese".


LMAO well 'G Wizard', I can tell you now, that you had a serious problem.

I wash my bellend every morning, as I should, and it doesn't smell of anything, and it stays that way all throughout the day.

Also, foreskins can be very handy. In me teenage days when I used to smoke hash, sometimes the Police would pull up, and if I caught an early glimps of them before they caught up with me, I could hide the bit of hash I had under my foreskin, just incase they might search me LOL.

User avatar
Bouncy
Cherubim
 
Posts: 20359
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 10:51 pm
Location: In a Bouncy Castle

Postby Bouncy on Mon May 19, 2008 10:46 pm

Hiding hash in your foreskin; something to be proud of. :?
Image

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Mon May 19, 2008 10:48 pm

Bouncy wrote:Hiding hash in your foreskin; something to be proud of. :?


It had cling film wrapped around it. Still, stopped me from getting in trouble, didn't it?

User avatar
Bouncy
Cherubim
 
Posts: 20359
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 10:51 pm
Location: In a Bouncy Castle

Postby Bouncy on Mon May 19, 2008 10:59 pm

. wrote:
Bouncy wrote:Hiding hash in your foreskin; something to be proud of. :?


It had cling film wrapped around it. Still, stopped me from getting in trouble, didn't it?


OH!! That's different then! In that case, it makes you look ever so clever.

In any case, I think I'd prefer someone who was "clean" than someone who used their foreskin to cover their crimes.
Image

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Mon May 19, 2008 11:10 pm

Bouncy wrote:
. wrote:
Bouncy wrote:Hiding hash in your foreskin; something to be proud of. :?


It had cling film wrapped around it. Still, stopped me from getting in trouble, didn't it?


OH!! That's different then! In that case, it makes you look ever so clever.

In any case, I think I'd prefer someone who was "clean" than someone who used their foreskin to cover their crimes.


Well, it was clever, as I could have been arrested otherwise. Sticking it in my anus, now that would have been stupid.

lol you're completely twisting what I had said about using my foreskin to hide the hash I had. Originally I just threw it in as a light hearted comment to show why a foreskin is better :lol:, it was meant in a purely commical sense, although I did do it. But that was about 10 years ago when I was 15 and I am completely THC free now, and have been for about 8 years. Just so you know.

Just because I once hid some hash in my foreskin it doesn't mean I don't have a clean penis, you dozey fool. :rotflmao:

User avatar
G Wizard
Mahatma
 
Posts: 1149
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:40 am
Location: near Dallas, Texas, USA, planet Earth

Postby G Wizard on Mon May 19, 2008 11:17 pm

. wrote:
LMAO well 'G Wizard', I can tell you now, that you had a serious problem.

I'm glad my condition was worth a 'LMAO' from you. And I'm glad you thought it was a serious problem. Because it wasn't.

Or, if you think that was serious, you have a strange perception of what 'serious' is.

I wash my bellend every morning, as I should, and it doesn't smell of anything, and it stays that way all throughout the day.

And mine smelled quite acceptable all day as well. I never said smell was ever an issue.

Go back and read my post again to better understand the words I wrote.

Wait, I'll save you the trouble. Smegma is that natural |ubricant which you're no doubt familiar with. No doubt if left alone for a month without washing, it would probably start to acquire a funky smell.

To recap what I wrote, I didn't say anything about smell, nor did I say I left it alone for a month.

I said that I could wash it clean in the morning, and by evening the smegma would be back. And that, to me, was a nuisance.

Now if in your case you can scrub yourself clean in the morning, and still not have even the slightest hint of smegma in the evening, congratulations, and welcome to the human condition known as "individual variation". Based on that, you could probably go a week without scrubbing. Of course, the bacteria would still start to grow, and hence the smell....

Also, foreskins can be very handy.

This has got to be the best line I've heard this week.

Penn and Teller would be proud of you.
~*~ G Wiz ~*~
I'm the one with the wizard's hat and robe.
When did ignorance become a point of view?

User avatar
G Wizard
Mahatma
 
Posts: 1149
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:40 am
Location: near Dallas, Texas, USA, planet Earth

Postby G Wizard on Mon May 19, 2008 11:19 pm

. wrote:
Well, it was clever, as I could have been arrested otherwise. Sticking it in my anus, now that would have been stupid.

Right. Because a proper rubber-gloved cavity search would somehow overlook your foreskin.
~*~ G Wiz ~*~
I'm the one with the wizard's hat and robe.
When did ignorance become a point of view?

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Mon May 19, 2008 11:51 pm

G Wizard wrote:
. wrote:
LMAO well 'G Wizard', I can tell you now, that you had a serious problem.

I'm glad my condition was worth a 'LMAO' from you. And I'm glad you thought it was a serious problem. Because it wasn't.

Or, if you think that was serious, you have a strange perception of what 'serious' is.


Oh it definitely was worth a LMAO. It was serious enough for you to get the snip, wasn't it?

And mine smelled quite acceptable all day as well. I never said smell was ever an issue.

Go back and read my post again to better understand the words I wrote.

Wait, I'll save you the trouble. Smegma is that natural |ubricant which you're no doubt familiar with. No doubt if left alone for a month without washing, it would probably start to acquire a funky smell.

To recap what I wrote, I didn't say anything about smell, nor did I say I left it alone for a month.

I said that I could wash it clean in the morning, and by evening the smegma would be back. And that, to me, was a nuisance.

Now if in your case you can scrub yourself clean in the morning, and still not have even the slightest hint of smegma in the evening, congratulations, and welcome to the human condition known as "individual variation". Based on that, you could probably go a week without scrubbing. Of course, the bacteria would still start to grow, and hence the smell....


Yes that's right..."natural".
Why would something that didn't smell be a nuisance to you? Don't say it's more hygienic for God sake. If it doesn't smell then girls aren't going to care, as it's the smell that puts them off. I suppose we should just completely remove our finger nails as bacteria can harbor underneath them...? :roll: You should have just used some 'common sense' and wiped your bellend on your boxers every now and then, instead of having your foreskin chopped off. :rotflmao:

This has got to be the best line I've heard this week.

Penn and Teller would be proud of you.


You must live a very boring life then, oh well, we're only in Monday, still all week to go. :?

Guest
 

Postby Guest on Mon May 19, 2008 11:55 pm

G Wizard wrote:
. wrote:
Well, it was clever, as I could have been arrested otherwise. Sticking it in my anus, now that would have been stupid.

Right. Because a proper rubber-gloved cavity search would somehow overlook your foreskin.


No dozey, I'm talking about when they search me on the street. They'd have to arrest me to give me a cavity search, and the point is; me hiding it underneath my foreskin means they can't find it in a basic, run-of-the-mill search that they carry out on the street.

PreviousNext

Return to Sex (Better Sex) Issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: fun*lovin and 1 guest