. wrote:The fundamental starting point of Christian moral thought is the question "What would Jesus do?"
Given that if not Jesus at least his followers whom asked that basic question have been among if not the most powerful forces of history in the West, North Africa, Near East, and Indochina, isn't it trite to compare that question to "What would Cinderella do?"

Phlyguy wrote:
Yes, I may have trivialized the argument a tad bit.
On the other hand, the teachings of Jesus have been distorted, abused, misinterpreted, misapplied, and downright co-opted since the infancy of Christianity. My trivialization doesn't strike me as so great a sin in the grand scheme of things.
. wrote:
Fair enough. The precept of what would Jesus do is murky at best from a historical perspective and has been abused by many.
As far as sins I think it's about as minor as you get, however it is fairly poor as critical thinking.
Phlyguy wrote:. wrote:
Fair enough. The precept of what would Jesus do is murky at best from a historical perspective and has been abused by many.
As far as sins I think it's about as minor as you get, however it is fairly poor as critical thinking.
I was stating an opinion, relevant only to my perspective. It wasn't intended to be a Doctoral dissertation.
Do you make it a point to judge "critical thinking" on internet message boards?
. wrote:Phlyguy wrote:. wrote:
Fair enough. The precept of what would Jesus do is murky at best from a historical perspective and has been abused by many.
As far as sins I think it's about as minor as you get, however it is fairly poor as critical thinking.
I was stating an opinion, relevant only to my perspective. It wasn't intended to be a Doctoral dissertation.
Do you make it a point to judge "critical thinking" on internet message boards?
Yup
elliott20 wrote:Jesus wrestles now? Man, talk about the biggest FACE character in history.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest