Emily B wrote:Excuse me, youthful person, but circumcision is indeed a religious argument to many viewers!
It is not entirely religious. Religion is but one argument that favours circumcision. Another is Medical/health reasons, and the third is just visual preference.
Emily B wrote:It's an African procedure, designed to remove the sex urge from women. Some practitioners may be African Muslims, but it's not a Muslim procedure. Therefore it's not likely a religious matter.
But the Islam religion influences it, or did you not read that article? Or have you read much on Islam's view on female circumcision? Have you read anything else in this topic besides what you post yourself? And no, posting as "Katherine" or Reporter37 and saying "I listened to them!" doesn't count.
Emily B wrote:Male circumcision, on the other hand, IS a religious procedure. And like all religious prescriptions, it's intended to bring good health to the man/woman relationship. And that it does.
Again, if this were the 1400's, where we didn't have sinks or showers, then yes, this would be a valid argument. I would like to welcome you to 2008. It features hygiene and anti-bacterial soaps.
Emily B wrote:Regardless of what the Swedish socialist troglodytes think (and the gay youthful persons here), a clean healthy dick is a marital blessing well into old age.
I couldn't agree with you more. A clean, healthy penis is very nice, which is why uncircumcised males like myself shower every day and do not receive any complaints from any partners.
Emily B wrote:However, if you're not religious, you probably don't give a rat's ass about sweet smelling dicks, nor good health.
This statement shows your incompetence and your ignorance. You don't have to be religious to have good hygiene and shower every day, along with brushing your teeth three times a day. You also don't need to be religious to eat properly, stay healthy and in-shape. You certainly don't need to be religious to have a "sweet smelling dick". That only involves a good wash once a day. Again, you prove that you don't actually listen to anything anyone else has to say. It has been explained to you time and time again, that hygiene is not an issue for males [or at least most of us. If you want your man circumcised because he has bad hygiene, then that's none of my business]. If someone didn't shower at least three times a week [even though you should be doing it daily], then they'd stink all over, in which case being circumcised or not won't make a difference. Everything that has been explained to you doesn't matter, because you don't have the intelligence to comprehend it all. Either that, or you are too stubborn to admit that you are wrong about some of the things you say in this topic. Either way, you're incapable of giving an unbiased argument, and you've only shown yourself to be a woman who doesn't understand much about a man's body, simply because she isn't a man. Again, I would like to welcome you to 2008, where being uncircumcised will never matter because we have lovely things called showers, sinks, and wonderful-smelling body wash and antibacterial soap. Do you even know what these things are or what they do, Emily B?
However, I would like to thank you for at least shifting the topic back on track to what its original intention wanted: women's preferences on a penis. For once, you actually did something right. However, it seems more females here prefer uncircumcised penises over circumcised.
Nicole* wrote:emily b and katherine do not speak for the rest of us women.
Yes, I realize that.
Rosemary wrote:Anyways, dont try to talk any sense to miss emily b whatsoever. everyone on these forums know that shes a selfish old fart from the 10s that cant be reasoned with.
I think I'm starting to understand why all of you keep warning me against talking to Emily B.