My 10 year old nudist daughter

[Rebman]

For those who insist that this does not happen, I recently needed to speak to a neighbour so I rang his doorbell. I was astonished to find his 8/9-year-old daughter opening the front door in the nude. I asked if her dad was in and she went to fetch him. He didn’t bat an eyelid concerning his daughter’s state of undress, and I didn’t mention it. I would certainly not regard this as normal, but it does seem to happen in some families.

[Rebman]

Totally agree with Polly and Captain.

Could be the work of McMum, or Julie H (both trolls).

There is no way that story is true. The perverts we get here is chronic.

The only perverted McMum here is the fake McMum, alias the Colonel (although he is now claiming that the fake McMum posts were written by Thot Gor). The real McMum (a guest) appears to have long gone, and there does not appear to be any reason to believe that she was perverted. Either way, the fake McMum does not exist (being an invention of either the Colonel or Thot Gor), so the Colonel is either mad (likely) or a liar (a proven fact), or both (highly probable).

The Colonel uses his (invented) fake McMum as an excuse to disrupt threads.

[Polgara69]

Proof?

[Rebman]

Proof?

In the “What do women think of circumcised guys?” thread on the 8th May, the Colonel wrote:-

“The person who posts the McMum posts (with Mohammed) which are indeed amusing, are posted by a member called Thot Gor. Everybody knows this.”

If these fake McMum posts are posted by Thot Gor (personally I still believe that they are posted by the Colonel), then by definition the fake McMum is not a real person and does not exist. So why does the Colonel continually refer to her as being a pervert and a troll, and use this non-existent person’s supposed perversion as an excuse to disrupt threads?

[Polgara69]

Mmm good point but you cant prove that Thot Gor is the Colonel either. Just because he made reference to him doesnt mean he is that person. You are saying the Colonel is a troll and you might be Thot Gor for all we know! Or McMum or whoever.

[Rebman]

Mmm good point but you cant prove that Thot Gor is the Colonel either. Just because he made reference to him doesnt mean he is that person. You are saying the Colonel is a troll and you might be Thot Gor for all we know! Or McMum or whoever.

I have never claimed that Thot Gor was the Colonel. I merely stated that it was my belief that the Colonel was the author of the fake McMum posts. My main point was that although the Colonel claims to know that the fake McMum posts were posted by Thot Gor, and not by the real McMum (a guest who has not posted for several months), he still regularly uses the name of an invented person (by his own admission) to disrupt threads.

I agree that you do not know who I am any more than I know who you are, but the Colonel does claim to know that the McMum he refers to so often is an invention, so why does he carry on doing it? This is the behaviour of a troll (not to mention a liar).

[Polgara69]

I give in, Im tired! I dont know either and you are right, he does disrupt threads at times. He amuses tho!

[The Colonel]

Mmm good point but you cant prove that Thot Gor is the Colonel either. Just because he made reference to him doesnt mean he is that person. You are saying the Colonel is a troll and you might be Thot Gor for all we know! Or McMum or whoever.

McMum was here - but now on and off Thot posts funny posts which are clearly not her - but take the piss out of her. They are amusing.

McMum was real and was a pervert and a troll. And I think SHE is here now to in a certain other person (not you Polly).

[The Colonel]

As for Rebman (or should I say McMum) look at HER posts.

Out of 26 to date 24 have been directly attacking me.

It doesn't take a genius to work out:

a) They are not who they say they are,
b) They have an evident problem with me which was why they joined,
c) They are obviously upset about the closure of the nappy thread,
d) They think McMum was saint,
e) They are clearly a troll with 24/26 posts attacking one member.

Thus, this person is either McMum or someone who liked her perversion.

[The Colonel]

I give in, Im tired! I dont know either and you are right, he does disrupt threads at times. He amuses tho!

I only "disrupt" when I feel it is important - and you know what thread I am talking about.

I am not like myron, Fred, or McMum (present alias Rebman).

[Death From Above 1993]

This "Rebman" character could just be an honest or nearly-honest member like me, who has seen your posts as injustice and wants to do something about it, after all that was why I joined, and I don't remember anybody accusing me of being a troll at the time (or since then)

[The Colonel]

This "Rebman" character could just be an honest or nearly-honest member like me, who has seen your posts as injustice and wants to do something about it, after all that was why I joined, and I don't remember anybody accusing me of being a troll at the time (or since then)

But there is no injustice - that all ended last September!

Further, you have posted on many other things, and have not necessarily attacked me on every given occassion (perhaps a few, but quite a few have and we are still perfectly civil).

On another point - when you joined I was completely respectful to you and I asked you not to get involved with a matter that did not concern you directly.

All of this you know to be true.

[Rebman]

As for Rebman (or should I say McMum) look at HER posts.

Just because YOU pretend to be someone you aren’t, it doesn’t mean that others do the same.

Out of 26 to date 24 have been directly attacking me.

Have you taken a good look recently to see how many FF members attack you? Perhaps you should take a step back and ask yourself why.

It doesn't take a genius to work out:

a) They are not who they say they are,

Where is your evidence? I haven’t claimed to be anyone except Rebman, and as you haven’t a clue who Rebman is, how can you say I am not Rebman?

b) They have an evident problem with me which was why they joined,

I joined because I found a load of utter nonsense being spouted here concerning defence matters while browsing on the Internet, and I needed to be a member to respond.

c) They are obviously upset about the closure of the nappy thread,

The attempted closure of any legitimate thread by deceitful means annoys me. It just happened to have been a nappy thread. In fact I had never heard of McMum until you kept mentioning her and telling members that they could check up on your posting record. Unfortunately for you I took you up on your invite and did just that.

d) They think McMum was saint,

Very few people are saints, you especially. As I do not know the real McMum, I cannot comment, but nothing that she posted in the threads she visited leads me to believe that her behaviour warranted closing a thread down. The same cannot be said about your behaviour.

e) They are clearly a troll with 24/26 posts attacking one member.

There must be a lot of ‘trolls’ here judging by the number of members who have repeatedly attacked you, not to mention all of the other attacks there have been. Incidentally, you are not the only one I have criticised or disagreed with. Also, have you forgotten that you topped the poll as the most disliked member, and I didn’t even cast a vote?

Thus, this person is either McMum or someone who liked her perversion.

That is indeed rich, coming from the person who invented the only perverted McMum on these forums, i.e. the fake McMum.

You still haven’t explained why you continue to disrupt threads for reasons associated with the supposed perverted activities of someone who you admit does not exist, and who you invented.

[Death From Above 1993]

This "Rebman" character could just be an honest or nearly-honest member like me, who has seen your posts as injustice and wants to do something about it, after all that was why I joined, and I don't remember anybody accusing me of being a troll at the time (or since then)

But there is no injustice - that all ended last September!

Further, you have posted on many other things, and have not necessarily attacked me on every given occassion (perhaps a few, but quite a few have and we are still perfectly civil).

On another point - when you joined I was completely respectful to you and I asked you not to get involved with a matter that did not concern you directly.

All of this you know to be true.

Yeah - Good point well made.

Saw your "proud father" bit on your signature's changed - are you and Mrs Colonel expecting?

[The Colonel]

This "Rebman" character could just be an honest or nearly-honest member like me, who has seen your posts as injustice and wants to do something about it, after all that was why I joined, and I don't remember anybody accusing me of being a troll at the time (or since then)

But there is no injustice - that all ended last September!

Further, you have posted on many other things, and have not necessarily attacked me on every given occassion (perhaps a few, but quite a few have and we are still perfectly civil).

On another point - when you joined I was completely respectful to you and I asked you not to get involved with a matter that did not concern you directly.

All of this you know to be true.

Yeah - Good point well made.

Saw your "proud father" bit on your signature's changed - are you and Mrs Colonel expecting?

Yes, Mrs Colonel and I are expecting another little one.